Biogenic Conversion Technologies
Scout intake sheet
Challenge description
There is a wide variety of biogenic waste streams in the Netherlands, which contain components that could be valorized. These streams are often quite heterogeneous. The current way of processing these streams results in unnecessary CO~2~ emissions, loss of valuable components, and economic value. BCB is looking for conversion technologies that can be used for biogenic waste valorization. This valorization could be done by direct conversion into specific compounds (fuels, chemicals etc.), or by fractionation into different value-added components (e.g. fibers). This scouting project will identify conversion technologies for biogenic waste streams that result in value-creation. These biogenic waste streams are both sludges and slurry-type streams, but also green wastes. Within these conversion technologies, input streams, output streams, and process conditions (energy use etc.) are important specifications.
Scope
Current known technique(s)
- Hydrofaction
- Pyrolysis (hydro, flash, catalytic etc.)
- Gasification
- Hydrothermal
- Digestion/Fermentation
Ideal outcome
- Hydrofaction
- Pyrolysis (hydro, flash, catalytic etc.)
- Gasification
- Hydrothermal
- Digestion/Fermentation
A simple and affordable solution to convert heterogeneous biogenic waste streams; a solution that is applicable and was not known before.
Minimum viable outcome
An overview of conversion technologies and their specifications.
Objective(s)
- Energy requirement
- Safety
- Input (type of biomass, contaminants, prerequisites)
- Output (products + waste)
- Value-addition
- Sustainability (does not require fossil based resources etc.)
- capacity
- scalability
- Technology readiness level
- Cost
- Low waste (output) treatment
- Complexity
Constraint(s)
- High organic content input
Functions
Action = [convert] OR [valorize] OR [develop]
Object = [biogenic waste] OR [biobased waste stream] OR [process]
Environment =
[process] OR [conversion] OR [biomass]
Terminology
- biogenic waste
- waste stream
- conversion
- valorization
- pyrolysis
- gasification
- hydrofaction
- process
- building block
- value-added
- crop residues
- torrefaction
- fractionation
- extraction
- hydrolysis
Preliminary Results
Published 06/15/2020
Based on the case described above we have executed the first line of queries in IGOR^AI. The goal was to obtain a broad set of Technologies that convert biogenic waste. 6 concepts are distinguished based on the results: 1. Hydrothermal conversions 2. Anaerobic digestion 3. Biochemical 4. Thermal conversion 5. Fractionation 6. Others Every concept comprises multiple Technologies (48 in total). Below the table, short descriptions, research findings and sources per Technologies are listed as well. You can use this information to get a better understanding of the Technologies. During the midway meeting, we would like to discuss the Technologies and concepts, determine their relevance and select the top selection that needs to be deepened in the second phase of the project.
To determine which technologies are relevant to proceed to the next scouting phase you can play the technology selection game by clicking on the button below.
1. Hydrothermal conversions
BackConversions done in an aqueous and thermal environment
1.1 Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC)
Also sometimes called wet torrefaction.
Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) (also referred to as "aqueous carbonization at elevated temperature and pressure") is a chemical process for the conversion of organic compounds to structured carbons. It can be used to make a wide variety of nanostructured carbons, simple production of brown coal substitute, synthesis gas, liquid petroleum precursors and humus from biomass with release of energy. Technically the process imitates, within a few hours, the brown coal formation process. [\[Wiki\]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrothermal_carbonization)
**Highlights:**
* Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) has received much attention in recent years as a process to **convert wet organic waste into carbon-rich hydrochar**. The process also generates an aqueous phase that is still largely considered a burden. The success of HTC is dependent on finding solutions for the aqueous phase. In the present study, we provide the first investigation of recirculation of the aqueous phase from HTC of poultry litter as a means to concentrate nutrients and its subsequent application to agriculture as a fertilizer. [ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96378-2965652869)
* Hydrothermal carbonization is an attractive thermochemical method for upgrading organic waste and biomass. Hydrothermal carbonization's improvement of the upgrading and dewatering of fuel mixed with sewage sludge and low rank coal as peat was evaluated at **temperatures ranging from 200 to 350 °C and at 60 min reaction time**. **The moisture content of mixed fuel (50:50 wt %) of sludge: peat was approximately 80.7%.** **Hydrothermal carbonization can improve sludge with a high moisture content as well as the mixed fuels increasing the latter's calorific value by reducing the hydrogen and oxygen contents of the solid products.** [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96378-2760148100)
* In this document a new biomass conversion process called hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) is presented, which has the potential to convert organic waste into a hydrophobic solid of reduced mass and increased fuel value (hydrochar) to provide at least renewable energy and/or increase soil organic matter. As with every emerging technology, hydrothermal carbonization is currently hardly a competitive stand alone process on the open market. **But if the process can be implemented in an existing infrastructure e.g. compost plant, sewage plant or other businesses which are confronted with large amounts of wet organic waste, HTC is already today a financially feasible process.** Altogether, HTC offers not only a new green and sustainable technology for the treatment of biowaste. It is a promising research and development field leading to new functional materials based on renewable resources. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96378-2806731263)
| 1.1.1 | Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) |
|---|---|
| Biomass Chars: Elaboration, Characterization and Applications | |
| This book contains the successful invited submissions [1–15] to a Special Issue of Energies onthe subject area of “Biomass Chars: Elaboration, Characterization, and Applications”. The invitededitors have decided to focus the Special Issue on the specific topic of biomass transformation and use.In fact, biomass can be converted to energy, biofuels, and bioproducts, via thermochemical conversionprocesses such as combustion, pyrolysis, and gasification. Combustion technology is most widelyapplied on an industrial scale. However, biomass gasification and pyrolysis processes are still in theresearch and development stage. The major products from these processes are syngas, bio-oil, andchar (called also biochar for agronomic applications). Among these products, biomass chars have beenreceiving increasing attention for different applications such as gasification, co-combustion, catalyst oradsorbent precursors, soil amendment, carbon fuel cells, and supercapacitors.This Special Issue provides an overview for biomass chars production methods (pyrolysis,hydrothermal carbonization, etc.), the characterization techniques (scanning electronic microscopy,X-ray fluorescence, nitrogen adsorption, Raman spectroscopy, nuclear magnetic resonancespectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, temperature programmed desorption, massspectrometry, etc.), their properties and their suitable recovery processes.Topics of interest for the call included, but were not limited to the production of biochar for: Biofuel production Soil amendment Carbon sequestration Heterogeneous catalysis Syngas production Pollutant adsorptionResponses to our call had the following statistics: Submissions (25); Publications (15); Rejections (10); Article types: research article (15).The authors’ geographical distribution (published papers) is: China (4) USA (2) Canada (2) | |
| 12/03/2017 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.1.2 | Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) |
| Combustion Behavior of Animal-Manure-Based Hydrochar and Pyrochar | |
| The sustainability of energy production can be increased by combusting waste-derived solid fuels, alone or as blends with coal. This paper investigated whether two thermochemical processes (hydrothermal carbonization and pyrolysis) can be used in sustainable manure management systems to convert surplus manure waste streams into renewable fuels. Hydrochars and pyrochars derived from swine manure and poultry litter at various process conditions were characterized. Their combustion behavior was studied by thermogravimetric analysis, individually and simulated as a blend with fossil coal. The hydrochars underwent two combustion stages, active and char combustion, while the pyrochars and four fossil coals showed only one stage. The substantial differences in characteristic combustion temperatures, kinetic parameters, and ash content between animal-manure-derived chars and coal suggest that fossil coals should not be replaced entirely with char, but used preferably as a blend. Simulation of blends with coal sho... | |
| 12/18/2018 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.1.3 | Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) |
| Hydrothermal Carbonization of Biomass: Design of a Bench- Scale Reactor for Evaluating the Heat of Reaction | |
| HydroThermal Carbonization (HTC) is a thermochemical process capable of converting wet biomass into a carbon-enriched solid, commonly referred to as hydrochar. Hydrochar finds application as bio-fuel, soil improver and for the production of carbon-advanced materials. In recent years, interest in HTC technology has grown significantly, in terms of both scientific research and industrial development. The HTC process consists of several reactions occurring both in series and in parallel: hydrolysis, dehydration, decarboxylation, condensation, aromatization, and others. Some reactions are known to be exothermic, while others are endothermic. Knowing the enthalpy of the “whole” HTC reaction would be beneficial in terms of both process design and energy calculations, in particular to evaluate the process heat duty. Unfortunately, such kind of information is barely available in the literature: some data have been obtained at the “micro-scale” using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), with the limits of using a few milligrams of (usually heterogeneous) biomass per trial, while punctual data at larger scale are actually missing. In order to fill this gap, we designed and constructed in-house a 2 L batch reactor equipped with four thermocouples - placed at different heights inside the reactor - and capable to withstand pressures up to 140 bar and temperatures up to 300 °C. The reactor, controlled in temperature, is heated by four electrical resistances (1 kW each) and thermally insulated. An electric power meter allows monitoring and recording the electrical consumption during HTC trials.Thermal trials were performed with the bench-scale reactor fed with only water to provide a baseline for calculations. HTC trials were then performed using biomasses, namely organic fraction of municipal solid waste and agave pulp. At the different HTC operating conditions investigated (residence time: 3 h; reactor filling degree: 67 %; temperatures: 180, 220, and 250 °C; dry biomass to water ratio: 0.10 and 0.15), our data testify that the “whole” HTC reaction is exothermic, and the heat released by the reaction increases with temperature. The design of such a reactor and the data obtained so far encourage an in-depth analysis of the enthalpy of the HTC reaction for different biomasses and at various operating conditions. | |
| 06/01/2018 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.1.4 | Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) |
| Hydrothermal Carbonization of Municipal Waste Streams | |
| Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) is a novel thermal conversion process that can be used to convert municipal waste streams into sterilized, value-added hydrochar. HTC has been mostly applied and studied on a limited number of feedstocks, ranging from pure substances to slightly more complex biomass such as wood, with an emphasis on nanostructure generation. There has been little work exploring the carbonization of complex waste streams or of utilizing HTC as a sustainable waste management technique. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the environmental implications associated with the carbonization of representative municipal waste streams (including gas and liquid products), to evaluate the physical, chemical, and thermal properties of the produced hydrochar, and to determine carbonization energetics associated with each waste stream. Results from batch carbonization experiments indicate 49–75% of the initially present carbon is retained within the char, while 20–37% and 2–11% of the carbon is ... | |
| 07/01/2011 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.1.5 | Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) |
| Hydrothermal Carbonization of Waste Biomass: Process Design, Modeling, Energy Efficiency and Cost Analysis | |
| In this paper, a hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) process is designed and modeled on the basis of experimental data previously obtained for two representative organic waste materials: off-specification compost and grape marc. The process accounts for all the steps and equipment necessary to convert raw moist biomass into dry and pelletized hydrochar. By means of mass and thermal balances and based on common equations specific to the various equipment, thermal energy and power consumption were calculated at variable process conditions: HTC reactor temperature T: 180, 220, 250 °C; reaction time θ: 1, 3, 8 h. When operating the HTC plant with grape marc (65% moisture content) at optimized process conditions (T = 220 °C; θ = 1 h; dry biomass to water ratio = 0.19), thermal energy and power consumption were equal to 1170 kWh and 160 kWh per ton of hydrochar produced, respectively. Correspondingly, plant efficiency was 78%. In addition, the techno-economical aspects of the HTC process were analyzed in detail, considering both investment and production costs. The production cost of pelletized hydrochar and its break-even point were determined to be 157 €/ton and 200 €/ton, respectively. Such values make the use of hydrochar as a CO 2 neutral biofuel attractive. | |
| 02/13/2017 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.1.6 | Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) |
| Numerical Comparison of a Combined Hydrothermal Carbonization and Anaerobic Digestion System with Direct Combustion of Biomass for Power Production | |
| Two of the methods for converting biomass to fuel are hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) and anaerobic digestion (AD). This study is aimed at designing and analyzing two scenarios for bioenergy production from undervalued biomass (sawdust). In one of the scenarios (direct combustion or DC), raw biomass is burned in a combustor to provide the heat that is required by the Rankine cycle to generate electricity. In the other scenario (HTC-AD), the raw biomass first undergoes HTC treatment. While the solid product (hydrochar) is used to produce power by a Rankine cycle, the liquid by-product undergoes an AD process. This results in fuel gas production and it can be used in a Brayton cycle to generate more power. Energy and mass balance analysis of both scenarios were developed for each unit process by using Engineering Equation Solver (EES). The required data were obtained experimentally or from the literature. The performances of the proposed systems were evaluated, and a sensitivity analysis was presented to help in finding the best operational conditions. | |
| 01/01/2020 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.1.7 | Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) |
| Nutrient Behavior in Hydrothermal Carbonization Aqueous Phase Following Recirculation and Reuse | |
| Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) has received much attention in recent years as a process to convert wet organic waste into carbon-rich hydrochar. The process also generates an aqueous phase that is still largely considered a burden. The success of HTC is dependent on finding solutions for the aqueous phase. In the present study, we provide the first investigation of recirculation of the aqueous phase from HTC of poultry litter as a means to concentrate nutrients and its subsequent application to agriculture as a fertilizer. Aqueous-phase recirculation generally resulted in an increase in nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium concentrations up to cycle 3 with maximum concentrations reaching up to 5400, 397, and 23300 mg L–1 for N, P, and K, respectively. Recirculation did not adversely affect hydrochar composition or calorific value. The recirculated and nonrecirculated aqueous phases were able to support lettuce growth similar to a commercial fertilizer. Results from this study indicate that the combinatio... | |
| 09/03/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.1.8 | Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) |
| Optimization and characterization of hydrochar produced from microwave hydrothermal carbonization of fish waste | |
| Abstract Fish processing results in large amounts of solid and liquid wastes that are unsustainably dumped into oceans and landfills. Alternative sustainable technologies that completely utilize seafood wastes are needed. Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) that converts moisture-rich biomass into hydrochar is mostly employed for pure lignocellulosic biowaste. However, the suitability of HTC for pure non-lignocellulosic waste is unknown. Here, for the first time, a response surface design guided optimization of microwave hydrothermal carbonization (MHTC) process parameters, holding temperature (150–210 °C) and time (90–120 min), showed that a temperature of approximately 200 °C and a time of approximately 119 min yielded maximal hydrochar (∼34%). The atomic carbon and ash content, and calorific value of hydrochar were approximately 25–57%, 20–28%, and 19–24.5 MJ/kg respectively, depending on the MHTC operating conditions. Taken together, these results confirm that MHTC produces hydrochar from fish waste of quality comparable to one produced from certain lignocellulosic, sewage and municipal wastes. Therefore, this strategy presents an exciting alternative technology that can be used either independently or in combination with other valorization techniques to completely utilize fish wastes irrespective of their quality. | |
| 07/01/2017 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.1.9 | Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) |
| Technical and financial feasibility of hydrothermal carbonization | |
| For many decades, Europe has enjoyed growth of wealth and wellbeing, based on intensive use of resources. Today, sources of energy, minerals and metals, as well as water, fertile soil, biomass, biodiversity and others are all under pressure, as is the stability of the climate system. While some people already worry about peak oil and the end of cheap energy, it seems that other resources like fertible soil and potable water are “peaking” even faster. In this document a new biomass conversion process called hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) is presented, which has the potential to convert organic waste into a hydrophobic solid of reduced mass and increased fuel value (hydrochar) to provide at least renewable energy and/or increase soil organic matter. As with every emerging technology, hydrothermal carbonization is currently hardly a competitive stand alone process on the open market. But if the process can be implemented in an existing infrastructure e.g. compost plant, sewage plant or other businesses which are confronted with large amounts of wet organic waste, HTC is already today a financially feasible process. Altogether, HTC offers not only a new green and sustainable technology for the treatment of biowaste. It is a promising research and development field leading to new functional materials based on renewable resources. | |
| 01/01/2013 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.1.10 | Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) |
| Upgrading the fuel properties of sludge and low rank coal mixed fuel through hydrothermal carbonization | |
| Hydrothermal carbonization is an attractive thermochemical method for upgrading organic waste and biomass. Hydrothermal carbonization's improvement of the upgrading and dewatering of fuel mixed with sewage sludge and low rank coal as peat was evaluated at temperatures ranging from 200 to 350 °C and at 60 min reaction time. The moisture content of mixed fuel (50:50 wt %) of sludge: peat was approximately 80.7%. Hydrothermal carbonization can improve sludge with a high moisture content as well as the mixed fuels increasing the latter's calorific value by reducing the hydrogen and oxygen contents of the solid products. Therefore, after the hydrothermal carbonization, the aromatic H/C and O/C ratios decreased due to of the chemical conversion. These results show that the hydrothermal carbonization process can be advantageous for improving the properties of mixed fuel to reusing and upgrading sludge and low rank coal. Upgraded fuel mixed with sewage sludge and peat is characteristically resistant to change in the carbon-functional groups, and their properties as determined via Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, are discussed herein. | |
| 12/01/2017 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.1.11 | Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) |
| Wet torrefaction of biomass for high quality solid fuel production: A review | |
| Abstract Wet torrefaction (WT) is a sustainable subcritical water pretreatment technology to upgrade moist biomass into hydrochar solid fuel with superior fuel properties with the avoidance of energy-intensive conventional thermal drying. In order to obtain a holistic understanding of WT processing system, this review has comprehensively discussed recent advances in WT of biomass to produce high quality solid fuel and its subsequent thermochemical applications. This review has not only summarized distinct advantages of WT over dry torrefaction of biomass with high moisture content but also clarified the similarities and differences between WT and hydrothermal carbonization. According to structures and chemical compositions of components therein, four representative categories of diverse biomass materials were selected to describe the influence of intrinsic nature of biomass on fuel quality of hydrochar derived from WT. Furthermore, this article has attempted to figure out the inherent relationship between WT conditions and fuel properties with respect to operating conditions (e.g. temperature, pressure, and residence time), biomass to water ratio, acids and additives, torrefaction atmosphere, and heating techniques. Three conventional thermochemical applications of wet-torrefied biomass have been extensively reviewed to reveal that WT could benefit energy recovery from wet biomass in terms of improved quality of ultimate energy carriers and obviously reduced pollutants emissions. Nevertheless, critical concerns associated with optimization of operating cost, minimization and controlling of pollutants emissions, re-design of industrially applicable reactor, and system integration with downstream applications have been pointed out in order to make WT technology more environmentally and commercially viable. | |
| 08/01/2018 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
1.2 Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL)
Sometimes called hydrothermal pyrolysis or wet pyrolysis.
Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) is a thermal depolymerization process used to convert wet biomass into crude-like oil -sometimes referred to as bio-oil or biocrude- under moderate temperature and high pressure. The crude-like oil (or bio-oil) has high energy density with a lower heating value of 33.8-36.9 MJ/kg and 5-20 wt% oxygen and renewable chemicals.[\[Wiki\]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrothermal_liquefaction)
**Highlights:**
* Conversion of wet biomass and waste products via hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) has been evolving as an alternative thermochemical technology for the production of liquid biofuels. Processing of biomass slurries with approximately 20 % solids content under high temperature and pressure mimics the natural formation of fossil crude on earth. With reaction times of around 10 to 30 minutes, **temperatures of 350 °C and pressures of around 200 bar**, HTL converts any biomass feedstock to a liquid bio-crude. This raw product roughly resembles petroleum, but exhibits higher oxygen contents (\~10 %) and has a higher viscosity. Therefore, development of the hydrothermal liquefaction technology has concentrated on the upgrading of bio-crude via hydrotreatment to reduce its heteroatom content, viscosity, boiling point and density. Upgraded bio-crude can then be further refined via distillation or other established processes into renewable gasoline, diesel and jet fuel. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96337-2744095134)
* These results suggest that AD is a feasible approach to treat post-hydrothermal-liquefaction wastewater (PHWW), and to improve the energy efficiency of the HTL processes.[ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96337-2210221651)
| 1.2.1 | Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) |
|---|---|
| Algal biorefinery to value-added products by using combined processes based on thermochemical conversion: A review | |
| Abstract Thermochemical processes, including gasification, liquefaction, and pyrolysis, are promising technologies for algal conversion. Gasification is effective to convert algal biomass into fuel gases while liquefaction and pyrolysis are favorable for the production of bio-oil with low molecular weight and biocrude with high energy density, respectively. To understand the role of algal components (proteins, lipids, and carbohydrates) on thermochemical conversion processes, this paper reviews the properties of biofuels from the thermochemical conversion of algal components and their model compounds. The characteristic fingerprints of algal components differ from one another. Consequently, the thermochemical conversion of the total algal biomass results in heterogeneity of the biofuels. The unfavorable nitrogenous compound production also leads to resource and energy losses, which are the critical bottleneck of algal biorefinery. As such, this review tackles some combined processes. The combination of the hydrothermal liquefaction of algal biomass and the hydrothermal gasification of an aqueous fraction shows potential for applications that improve fuel gas production. Lipid extraction combined with thermochemical residue conversion contributes to an increase in total oil yield. Protein extraction combined with thermochemical residue conversion decreases the risk of nitrogenous compound contamination in bio-oil and increases the recovery of value-added protein-derived products. Protein and lipid extraction before thermochemical conversion should be further explored to maximize the exploitation of multiple value-added products from algal biomass. | |
| 05/01/2020 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.2.2 | Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) |
| Anaerobic digestion of post-hydrothermal liquefaction wastewater for improved energy efficiency of hydrothermal bioenergy processes | |
| Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) is a promising process for converting wet biomass and organic wastes into bio-crude oil. It also produces an aqueous product referred to as post-hydrothermal liquefaction wastewater (PHWW) containing up to 40% of the original feedstock carbon, which reduces the overall energy efficiency of the HTL process. This study investigated the feasibility of using anaerobic digestion (AD) to treat PHWW, with the aid of activated carbon. Results showed that successful AD occurred at relatively low concentrations of PHWW (≤ 6.7%), producing a biogas yield of 0.5 ml/mg CODremoved, and ∼53% energy recovery efficiency. Higher concentrations of PHWW (≥13.3%) had an inhibitory effect on the AD process, as indicated by delayed, slower, or no biogas production. Activated carbon was shown to effectively mitigate this inhibitory effect by enhancing biogas production and allowing digestion to proceed at higher PHWW concentrations (up to 33.3%), likely due to sequestering toxic organic compounds. The addition of activated carbon also increased the net energy recovery efficiency of AD with a relatively high concentration of PHWW (33.3%), taking into account the energy for producing activated carbon. These results suggest that AD is a feasible approach to treat PHWW, and to improve the energy efficiency of the HTL processes. | |
| 12/16/2015 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.2.3 | Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) |
| Bio-oil production via subcritical hydrothermal liquefaction of biomass | |
| Biomass based raw materials can be converted into the more valued energy forms using biochemical methods such as ethanol fermentation, methane fermentation and the thermochemical methods such as direct combustion, pyrolysis, gasification, liquefaction. The bio-oil obtained from the biomass has many advantages than traditional use. Firstly, it has features such as high energy density, easy storage and easy transportation. Bio-oil can be used as a fuel in engines, turbines and burning units directly. Besides, it can be converted into products in higher quality and volume via catalytic cracking, hydrodexygenation, emulsification, and steam reforming [1,2]. Many organic solvents such as acetone, ethanol, methanol, isopropanol are used in the supercritical liquefaction processes. When we think about the cost and effects of the organic solvent on nature, it will be understood better that it is necessary to find solvent that are more sensitive against nature. Here, water must have an important place because of i... | |
| 01/01/2017 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.2.4 | Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) |
| Development of innovative processes and catalysts for the valorisation of Bio-Oil | |
| Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) is a process for converting waste biomass to bio-oil by contacting the biomass with water at high temperatures and sufficient pressures in order to keep the water in the liquid state. HTL process is energy efficient and capable of dealing with wet biomass, such as sorted domestic organic waste, sewage sludge, algae, etc. However, HTL oils contain high contents of oxygen and nitrogen because of the initial biomass composition. Therefore, the bio-oil has to be upgraded in order to produce advanced transport fuels. Information regarding the nitrogen compounds present in bio-oil is of major concern of any hydrotreatment, since the low hydrodenitrogenation rate and catalyst poisoning by nitrogen compounds make this process expensive. Therefore, the main goal of the present study is the investigation of the HTL reaction mechanism, focusing the attention on the nitrogen containing species pathways, with the goal to increase the energy yields and reduce the nitrogen content in the produced bio-oil. Due to the complexity of the biomass composition, model compounds that encompass all the biochemical components of biomass, namely proteins, lipid and carbohydrates, are emerged to unravel the main chemical reaction pathways existing between macromolecular components. Moreover, several microbial biomass types, such as oleaginous yeast and liamocins, were also treated via HTL. The whole study helps to better understand the HTL of organic waste biomass and microbial biomass/oils, providing useful insights into the reaction products, pathways, and mechanisms for the production of bio-oils and chemicals. | |
| 02/15/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.2.5 | Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) |
| From waste biomass to chemicals and energy via microwave-assisted processes | |
| Lignocellulosic waste material serves as a considerable renewable feedstock that may be used to replace oil refineries with biorefineries. Indeed, all biomass components can be converted into platform chemicals, bioenergy and materials. However, thermo-chemical and conventional catalytic conversions suffer from a number of drawbacks. Enabling technologies, such as microwaves (MW), can reduce process times and energy consumption, leading to improvements in product quality and yields. The remarkable advantages of MW over conventional heating, which originate from its direct dielectric interaction with biomass, are documented in this comprehensive survey. Moreover, the use of alternative solvents that interact strongly with MW in biphasic systems can circumvent additional upgrading and separation steps. Finally, this review discusses some of the challenges that MW irradiation faces, including the poor dielectric properties of some substrates and issues related to its large-scale application in pyrolysis, hydrothermal conversion and catalytic routes to biofuels, materials and platform chemicals. Waste biomass may well be the benchmark feedstock for the development of a circular bioeconomic approach. | |
| 01/01/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.2.6 | Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) |
| Hydrothermal Conversion in Near-Critical Water – A Sustainable Way of Producing Renewable Fuels | |
| Liquid fuels from biomass will form an essential part of meeting the grand challenges within energy. The need for renewable and sustainable energy sources is triggered by a number of factors; like increase in global energy demand, depletion of conventional resources, climate issues and the desire for national/regional energy independence. Especially in marine, aviation and heavy land transport suitable carbon neutral drop-in fuels from biomass are needed, since electrification of those is rather unlikely. Hydrothermal conversion (HTC) of biomass offers a solution and is a sustainable way of converting biomass feedstocks to valuable bio-crude. HTC is a high pressure and medium temperature thermochemical biomass conversion process and converts aqueous biomasses under sub- or super-critical conditions to a bio-crude similar to fossil crude oil. | |
| 01/01/2014 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.2.7 | Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) |
| Hydrothermal Liquefaction to Convert Biomass into Crude Oil | |
| All fossil fuels found in nature — petroleum, natural gas, and coal, based on biogenic hypothesis — are formed through processes of thermochemical conversion (TCC) from biomass buried beneath the ground and subjected to millions of years of high temperature and pressure. In particular, existing theories attribute that petroleum is from diatoms (algae) and deceased creatures and coal is from deposited plants. TCC is a chemical reforming process of biomass in a heated and usually pressurized, oxygen deprived enclosure, where long - chain organic compounds (solid biomass) break into short - chain hydrocarbons such as syngas or oil. TCC is a broad term that includes gasifi cation, including the Fisher - Tropsch process, direct liquefaction, hydrothermal liquefaction, and pyrolysis. Gasifi cation of biomass produces a mixture of hydrogen and carbon monoxide, commonly called syngas. The syngas is then reformed into liquid oil with the presence of a catalyst. Pyrolysis is a heating process of dried biomass to directly produce syngas and oil. Both gasifi cation and pyrolysis require dried biomass as feedstock, and the processes occur in an environment higher than 600 ° C. The hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) involves direct liquefaction of biomass, with the presence of water and perhaps some catalysts, to directly convert biomass into liquid oil, with a reacting temperature of lower than 400 ° C. This chapter only covers the topic of HTL of biomass. Biomass feedstocks include biowaste (manure and food processing waste), lignocellulose (crop residue), and algae. The chapter is in two parts. The fi rst part covers HTL fundamentals based on the current knowledge, and the second part is a summary of state - of - the - art knowledge of HTL for various feedstocks. The author has attempted to organize this chapter for a variety of readers who are interested in the topic of HTL, including students and professionals. | |
| 07/06/2010 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.2.8 | Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) |
| Hydrothermal Liquefaction: A Promising Pathway Towards Renewable Jet Fuel | |
| Conversion of wet biomass and waste products via hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) has been evolving as an alternative thermochemical technology for the production of liquid biofuels. Processing of biomass slurries with approximately 20 % solids content under high temperature and pressure mimics the natural formation of fossil crude on earth. With reaction times of around 10 to 30 minutes, temperatures of 350 °C and pressures of around 200 bar, HTL converts any biomass feedstock to a liquid bio-crude. This raw product roughly resembles petroleum, but exhibits higher oxygen contents (~10 %) and has a higher viscosity. Therefore, development of the hydrothermal liquefaction technology has concentrated on the upgrading of bio-crude via hydrotreatment to reduce its heteroatom content, viscosity, boiling point and density. Upgraded bio-crude can then be further refined via distillation or other established processes into renewable gasoline, diesel and jet fuel. The upgraded fuel’s chemical composition, with a high concentration of aliphatic hydrocarbons showing carbon numbers in the range of C8 to C18, appears promising for application as renewable jet fuel. The specific composition of the refined fuel products (as well as of the bio-crude) is, however, affected to a significant extent by the type of feedstock applied. For example, using lignocellulosic feedstock results in increased concentrations of aromatic hydrocarbons in the final product. The versatility of the HTL technology in terms of feedstocks and products represents a major advantage over other thermochemical conversion processes. Future developments should address tailoring the process to meet specific fuel requirements, e.g. those of renewable aviation fuels. Recent HTL reactor developments have led to proven continuous operation on a variety of feedstocks, but current reactor capacities of about ~1 bbl/d of bio-crude are still limited. Initial environmental and economic assessments of the hydrothermal liquefaction technology are promising, but in-depth studies covering a representative range of feedstock have not yet been published, rendering estimations of minimum fuel selling prices and greenhouse gas (GHG) balances of HTL derived liquid fuels difficult. To advance the technological maturity of hydrothermal liquefaction towards industrial implementation, development efforts should focus on process integration along the entire production chain encompassing pre-treatment, HTL processing, hydrotreatment, distillation and utilization of process water. | |
| 01/01/2018 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.2.9 | Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) |
| Improved methane production and energy recovery of post-hydrothermal liquefaction waste water via integration of zeolite adsorption and anaerobic digestion | |
| Abstract Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) is a promising technology for converting organic wastes into bio-crude oil, with organic-rich post-hydrothermal liquefaction wastewater (PHWW) as by-product. In this study, zeolite adsorption and anaerobic digestion (AD) were integrated to improve the methane production and energy recovery of PHWW from Chlorella 1067. A statistical design for maximum toxicants removal by zeolite was applied before AD process. Zeolite could mitigate the inhibition associated to compounds such as ammonia, N-heterocyclic compounds, etc. in PHWW and thereby shortening the lag phase and increasing methane production by 32–117% compared with that without zeolite adsorption. Zeolite adsorption also increased energy recovery efficiency (up to 70.5%) for this integrated system. Integration of HTL and AD brought higher energetic return from feedstock via oil and biomethane production, which may offer insight into industrial application of microalgae biomass in the circular economy. In addition, carbon and nitrogen flow for the integrated process was determined. | |
| 02/01/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.2.10 | Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) |
| Microbial electrolysis treatment of post-hydrothermal liquefaction wastewater with hydrogen generation | |
| Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) directly converts wet organic waste into biocrude oil, but it also generates post-HTL wastewater (PHWW) with concentrated nutrients that require further treatment before discharge or reuse. While traditional technologies showed limited success, this study demonstrates that microbial electrolysis cell (MEC) can be an effective approach to treat the swine manure PHWW and recover H2 for onsite HTL biocrude upgrading. The onsite H2 production and utilization makes MEC an ideal wastewater treatment process for HTL operations. Using actual swine manure PHWW, the MEC reactors showed excellent removals of organics (90–98%) and nitrogen (57–93%) under various organic loadings, applied voltages, and flow rates. Increasing organic loadings and applied voltages showed positive influences on system performance, while changes of flow rates showed limited impacts. The highest H2 production rate was 168.01 ± 7.01 mL/L/d with a H2 yield of 5.14 ± 0.22 mmol/kg COD (3000 mg COD/L, 1.0 V), and the highest cathodic H2 recovery and energy efficiency were 74.24 ± 0.11% and 120.56 ± 17.45%, respectively. System configuration and operation can be further optimized to improve system performance. | |
| 02/01/2018 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.2.11 | Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) |
| Prospects for energy recovery during hydrothermal and biological processing of waste biomass. | |
| Abstract Thermochemical and biological processes represent promising technologies for converting wet biomasses, such as animal manure, organic waste, or algae, to energy. To convert biomass to energy and bio-chemicals in an economical manner, internal energy recovery should be maximized to reduce the use of external heat and power. In this study, two conversion pathways that couple hydrothermal liquefaction with anaerobic digestion or catalytic hydrothermal gasification were compared. Each of these platforms is followed by two alternative processes for gas utilization: 1) combined heat and power; and 2) combustion in a boiler. Pinch analysis was applied to integrate thermal streams among unit processes and improve the overall system efficiency. A techno-economic analysis was conducted to compare the feasibility of the four modeled scenarios under different market conditions. Our results show that a systems approach designed to recover internal heat and power can reduce external energy demands and increase the overall process sustainability. | |
| 02/01/2017 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.2.12 | Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) |
| Waste to bioenergy: a review on the recent conversion technologies | |
| Scientific studies have demonstrated that it is possible to generate a wide variety of bioenergy from biomass residues and waste, and however its cost is not competitive with petro-fuels and other renewable energy. On-going efforts are continued extensively to improve conversion technologies in order to reduce production costs. The present review focuses on the conversion technologies for transforming biomass residues and waste to biofuels, specifically their technological concepts, options and prospects for implementation are addressed. The emerging developments in the two primary conversion pathways, namely the thermochemical (i.e. gasification, liquefaction, and pyrolysis) and biochemical (i.e. anaerobic digestion, alcoholic fermentation and photobiological hydrogen production) conversion techniques, are evaluated. Additionally, transesterification, which appears to be the simplest and most economical route to produce biodiesel in large quantity, is discussed. Lastly, the strategies for direct conversion of biomass residues and waste to bioelectricity including the use of combustion and microbial fuel cells are reviewed. | |
| 12/01/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.2.13 | Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) |
| Systems and methods for converting biomass to biocrude via hydrothermal liquefaction | |
|
1. A system for converting biomass to biocrude comprising: a hydrothermal liquefaction system comprising a hydrothermal liquefaction reactor, the hydrothermal liquefaction reactor configured for receiving biomass feedstock and converting the biomass feedstock to biocrude, wherein the hydrothermal liquefaction system receives biogas and combusts the biogas to provide thermal energy to the hydrothermal liquefaction reactor. 2. The system of claim 1 , further comprising at least one anaerobic digester configured for digesting biowaste and producing the biogas. 3. The system of claim 2 , wherein the biomass feedstock received by the hydrothermal liquefaction reactor comprises the biowaste digested by the anaerobic digester, and the system further comprises a concentration mechanism configured for receiving the biosolids biowaste from the anaerobic digester and concentrating the biowaste prior to the biowaste being converted to biocrude by the hydrothermal liquefaction reactor. 4. The system of claim 3 , wherein the system is configured for being installed at least partially within a biosolids treatment facility. 5. The system of claim 2 , wherein the biowaste comprises municipal biosolid waste, grease waste, and/or food waste. 6. The system of claim 1 , wherein the biogas is harvested remotely from the system. 7. The system of claim 1 , wherein the biogas for combusting by the hydrothermal liquefaction system is a first portion of biogas, and the system further comprises a generator configured for receiving thermal energy from combustion of a second portion of biogas, the generator configured for generating electrical energy, wherein the generated electrical energy and any remaining thermal energy from the combustion of the second portion of biogas are provided to the hydrothermal liquefaction reactor for heating the biomass feedstock. 8. The system of claim 1 , wherein the biomass feedstock comprises biowaste. 9. The system of claim 8 , wherein the biowaste comprises municipal biosolid waste, grease waste, and/or food waste. 10. The system of claim 1 , wherein the biomass feedstock comprises algae and/or marine biomass. 11. The system of claim 1 , wherein the biomass feedstock comprises wood waste. 12. The system of claim 1 , wherein the biomass feedstock comprises cellulosic waste. 13. The system of claim 1 , further comprising a pump configured for continuously pumping the biomass feedstock through the hydrothermal liquefaction reactor. 14. The system of claim 13 , wherein the pump is configured for pumping the biomass feedstock at a pressure around 20 MPa. 15. The system of claim 1 , further comprising a quencher disposed adjacent an exit of the hydrothermal liquefaction reactor, the quencher configured for quickly cooling the biocrude. 16. The system of claim 1 , further comprising a heat exchanger downstream of the hydrothermal liquefaction reactor, the heat exchanger configured for harvesting the thermal energy from combustion of the biocrude, biogas, and/or biochar produced by the hydrothermal liquefaction reactor. 17. The system of claim 16 , further comprising a generator configured for generating electrical energy for operating at least one of one or more pumps and one or more electrical components, wherein the thermal energy from the heat exchanger is used for driving the generator. 18. A process of converting biomass feedstock to biocrude comprising: combusting biogas, by a hydrothermal liquefaction system, to produce thermal energy; pumping biomass feedstock through a hydrothermal liquefaction reactor of the hydrothermal liquefaction system; and heating, in the hydrothermal liquefaction reactor, the biomass feedstock using the thermal energy from the combustion of the biogas. 19. The process of claim 18 , wherein the biogas is produced by at least one anaerobic digester of a biosolids treatment facility. 20. The process of claim 18 , further comprising: collecting thermal energy from combustion of natural gas; and heating the biomass feedstock using the collected thermal energy from the combustion of natural gas in the hydrothermal liquefaction reactor. 21. A process of converting biomass to biocrude, comprising: feeding municipal sludge to at least one anaerobic digester, the municipal sludge comprising biowaste; collecting thermal energy from combustion of a first portion of biogas generated from partial digestion of the biowaste; providing the thermal energy from combustion of the first portion of biogas to a generator; providing a second portion of biogas generated from partial digestion of the biowaste to a hydrothermal liquefaction system for combusting, the hydrothermal liquefaction system comprising a hydrothermal liquefaction reactor; providing the thermal energy from combustion of the second portion of the biogas, waste heat generated by the generator, at least a portion of electrical energy generated by the generator, and the partially digested biowaste from the anaerobic digester to the hydrothermal liquefaction reactor; recirculating waste heat generated by the hydrothermal liquefaction system to the anaerobic digesters; and harvesting biocrude from the hydrothermal liquefaction system. 22. The process of claim 21 , further comprising concentrating the partially digested biowaste fed from the anaerobic digester prior to feeding the partially digested biowaste to the hydrothermal liquefaction reactor, and feeding an aqueous phase from the hydrothermal liquefaction reactor and washoff from the concentration of the partially digested biowaste to secondary and tertiary treatment streams of a biosolids treatment plant. 23. The process of claim 21 , further comprising harvesting waste thermal energy from the hydrothermal liquefaction system and providing the waste thermal energy to an electrical generator and/or the at least one anaerobic digester. 24. The system of claim 1 , wherein the biomass feedstock comprises animal waste. |
|
| 10/23/2017 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Patent | |
1.3 Catalytic Hydrothermal Liquefaction
Using catalysts in hydrothermal liquefaction can improve the conversion and also lower temperature and pressure required.
Catalysts that have been used are Nickel-based, Aluminum-based, bentonite, transition metal chlorides, carbonates, hydroxides, iron etc.
Also enzymatic processes have been developed.
**Highlights:**
* Javier Remón et al. reported Microwave-Assisted, Catalytic, Hydrothermal Liquefaction (MAC-HTL) of a mixture of pine and spruce using a Ni–Co/Al–Mg catalysts at moderate temperatures (150–250 °C) using pressurized reactors (50–120 bar). **In their study, the catalyst influenced the product distribution (gas, oil yield) and bio-oil properties**, whereas overall biomass conversion remained the same as non-catalytic HTL. By optimizing reaction conditions, 27% of biomass was converted into phenolic bio-oil with high HHV (20 MJ/kg) at a temperature of 250 °C, a pressure of 80 bar using a ratio of 0.25 g catalyst/g biomass for 1.9 h.
* Arun et al. reported **co-liquefaction of plant wood biomass (*Prosopis juliflora*) with waste polyolefin plastics. In their HTL process activated bentonite clay was used as the catalyst** and experiments were conducted under different catalyst loading (1–5 wt%) and various temperatures 340–440 °C at 50 bar. With a 3:1 feedstock ratio (wood: polyolefin) and 3 wt% catalyst loading, a maximum of 61.2 wt % bio-oil was produced at a temperature of 420 °C. Up to 88.2 wt% of C~8~–C~21~ range hydrocarbons were found in the organic phase whereas low molecular organic acids and polyols were detected in the aqueous phase of the HTL products. The authors mentioned the benefits of having low molecular organic acids in the product as these could be recycled back to the HTL process to further promote the degradation of the lignocellulosic portion of the wood-polyolefin blend. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96405-2976637787)
* One of the novel technologies for conversion of wet biomass and waste streams is hydrothermal liquefaction. The research described in this thesis deals with the CatLiq process; a hydrothermal liquefaction technology developed by the Danish company SCF Technologies A/S, which operates a continuous 20L/h capacity pilot plant in Copenhagen. **This company uses organic matter as for instance DDGS (Dried Distillers Grains with Solubles) as a feedstock to produce bio-oil in the presence of a homogeneous (K2CO3) and a heterogeneous (Zirconia) catalyst at subcritical conditions** (T = 280-350 C, P = 22.5-25.0 MPa). [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96405-2115943201)
* This plant features new continuous and energy-efficient technology developed for pretreatment and liquefaction of lignocellulosicbiomass and has now been operated and optimized for four years with promising results.In the IBUS process, biomass is converted using steam and enzymes only. The process is energy efficient due to very high dry matter content in all process steps and by integration with a power plant. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96405-2132472358)
| 1.3.1 | Catalytic Hydrothermal Liquefaction |
|---|---|
| A review on conversion of biomass to biofuel by nanocatalysts | |
| The world’s increasing demand for energy has led to an increase in fossil fuel consumption. However this source of energy is limited and is accompanied with pollution problems. The availability and wide diversity of biomass resources have made them an attractive and promising source of energy. The conversion of biomass to biofuel has resulted in the production of liquid and gaseous fuels that can be used for different means methods such as thermochemical and biological processes. Thermochemical processes as a major conversion route which include gasification and direct liquefaction are applied to convert biomass to more useful biofuel. Catalytic processes are increasingly applied in biofuel development. Nanocatalysts play an important role in improving product quality and achieving optimal operating conditions. Nanocatalysts with a high specific surface area and high catalytic activity may solve the most common problems of heterogeneous catalysts such as mass transfer resistance, time consumption, fast deactivation and inefficiency. In this regard attempts to develop new types of nanocatalysts have been increased. Among the different biofuels produced from biomass, biodiesel has attained a great deal of attention. Nanocatalytic conversion of biomass to biodiesel has been reported using different edible and nonedible feedstock. In most research studies, the application of nanocatalysts improves yield efficiency at relatively milder operating conditions compared to the bulk catalysts. | |
| 03/01/2014 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.3.2 | Catalytic Hydrothermal Liquefaction |
| Heterogeneous Catalytic Conversion of Biobased Chemicals into Liquid Fuels in the Aqueous Phase | |
| Different biobased chemicals are produced during the conversion of biomass into fuels through various feasible technologies (e.g., hydrolysis, hydrothermal liquefaction, and pyrolysis). The challenge of transforming these biobased chemicals with high hydrophilicity is ascribed to the high water content of the feedstock and the inevitable formation of water. Therefore, aqueous-phase processing is an interesting technology for the heterogeneous catalytic conversion of biobased chemicals. Different reactions, such as dehydration, isomerization, aldol condensation, ketonization, and hydrogenation, are applied for the conversion of sugars, furfural/hydroxymethylfurfural, acids, phenolics, and so on over heterogeneous catalysts. The activity, stability, and reusability of the heterogeneous catalysts in water are summarized, and deactivation processes and several strategies are introduced to improve the stability of heterogeneous catalysts in the aqueous phase. | |
| 06/22/2016 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.3.3 | Catalytic Hydrothermal Liquefaction |
| Modeling and Optimization of CatLiq® Liquid Biofuel Process | |
| Application of biomass and waste, as a renewable and possibly sustainable energy source, has gained an important role in the world’s future energy policy. The Danish government, for instance, has set a target for 2030, which states that 35% of the total energy consumption must be based on renewable sources. The EU has set itself the objective of increasing the proportion of renewable energies in its energy mix by 20% by 2020. In Denmark, biomass currently accounts for approximately 70% of renewable energy consumption, mostly in the form of straw, wood and renewable wastes. An important fraction of the available biomass and waste streams has high moisture content. Wet streams cannot be converted economically by thermal conversion techniques like combustion, pyrolysis and gasification because of the large amount of energy required for evaporation of water. Over the last decades research activities worldwide have been devoted towards the development of new thermochemical processes, which can convert wet biomass efficiently and economically. One of the novel technologies for conversion of wet biomass and waste streams is hydrothermal liquefaction (280<T<370 C, 10<P<25 MPa). Bio-oil with a relatively high heating value, water-soluble substances and gases can be produced by this process that can be controlled by the process conditions and catalysis. The research described in this thesis deals with the CatLiq process; a hydrothermal liquefaction technology developed by the Danish company SCF Technologies A/S, which operates a continuous 20L/h capacity pilot plant in Copenhagen. This company uses organic matter as for instance DDGS (Dried Distillers Grains with Solubles) as a feedstock to produce bio-oil in the presence of a homogeneous (K2CO3) and a heterogeneous (Zirconia) catalyst at subcritical conditions (T = 280-350 C, P = 22.5-25.0 MPa). The experimental work was conducted to analyze the liquid and gaseous product. The thermodynamic work was completed to understand the phase behavior of the system. Prior to the experiments milled DDGS (0.5 mm) was mixed with water to slurries with 25% dry matter. K2CO3 corresponding to 2.5% of the slurry mass was added. The catalytic conversion was carried out in a fixed-bed reactor filled with zirconia-catalyst at process temperature of | |
| 10/01/2010 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.3.4 | Catalytic Hydrothermal Liquefaction |
| Nanocatalyst for Biofuel Production: A Review | |
| The demand for renewable and alternative types of energy has taken a new dimension; the primary reason is traceable to the climate change effects that fossil-based fuels have in the earth atmosphere. Bioenergy is one of the many arrays of renewable forms of energy that have taken centre stage in replacing the conventional fossil-based energy sources. Biofuel is the liquid or gaseous fuel derived from biological processes such as agriculture (biomass) or anaerobic digestion (solid or liquid wastes) or a combination of both, rather than geological processes that are known with the traditional fossil-based counterparts. Biomass energy is readily available and environmentally friendly, because it does not lead to a net increase in carbon dioxide levels and produces low amounts of sulphur. An effective implementation of biomass in the current energy scheme would involve the development of new technologies for the large-scale production of biofuel. The two primary methods for converting biomass to biofuels are thermochemical and biochemical processes. Thermochemical conversion is a major path for producing products such as bioethanol, biodiesel, bio-oil, bio-syngas and biohydrogen. It includes fast pyrolysis, liquefaction, combustion and gasification. Liquefaction of biomass to bio-oils involves two main routes which are hydrothermal and catalytic liquefaction. Catalytic liquefaction is very similar to hydrothermal liquefaction; however, a catalyst is used to reduce the residence time, operating temperature and pressure thereby increasing the quality of liquid products. Thermochemical biofuels are getting much more attention lately as these biofuels offer several technical and strategic advantages, such as highly developed industrial infrastructure and the biofuels can be produced from virtually all sorts of available biomass in a reasonable timeframe without significant modification in the overall process. At lower reaction temperatures, thermal processing of biomass with catalytic methods offers the possibility of selectively yielding a narrow range of products and reducing the energy requirements of the transformations. In terms of catalysts used, for biodiesel production, heterogeneous catalysts in comparison to homogeneous catalysts provide more effective separation steps for products and catalysts, eliminate quenching process, and offer conditions for the continuous production process. The objective of this review is to discuss the trends, recent advances in heterogeneous catalysts and expected contribution to knowledge, specifically in nanocatalysts for biofuel production, such as metal oxide catalysts (e.g. ZnO), metal supported by metal oxide catalysts (e.g. Au–ZnO), Alloy (e.g. Cu–Co), Metal oxide supported by metal oxide (e.g. KF–CaO–Fe3O4). Our focus will be on heterogeneous catalysts. | |
| 01/01/2018 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.3.5 | Catalytic Hydrothermal Liquefaction |
| Recent advances in liquefaction technologies for production of liquid hydrocarbon fuels from biomass and carbonaceous wastes | |
| Abstract The liquefaction of biomass and carbonaceous wastes using hydro-pyrolysis, hydrothermal liquefaction or liquefaction using water and hydrocarbon solvents are promising thermochemical methods for producing renewable fuels and chemicals. New combinations of unit operations and possibly novel reactors will likely be required to economically convert biomass feedstock into partially upgraded bio-crudes. While some techno-economic assessments show that biofuels from fast pyrolysis may be competitive with petroleum fuels in future, conventional pyrolysis produces a poor quality bio-crude and is only suitable for dry, homogenous feedstock such as woody biomass, agricultural waste (corn stoves, wheat stalk, and rice husk). It is desirable to produce high-quality bio-crudes and to be able to process high-moisture feedstock such as algae, organic waste (food residues), bio-solids and bio-sludge into transportation fuels using the liquefaction approaches. Increased awareness of the environmental damage from burning fossil fuels is driving national and international reduction targets for on CO2 emissions. Liquefaction technologies aimed at producing alternatives to fossil-based transportation fuels/hydrocarbons are likely to receive continued support in the future and the most promising ones could be developed to full commercial scale. This review provides a summary of the current state of development of these technologies and also some of the challenges faced to develop commercially viable transportation fuels via liquefaction routes. This review compares liquefaction routes and provides a summary of techno-economic analyses where data is available and discusses the challenges and opportunities associated with commercial scale-up. | |
| 11/01/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.3.6 | Catalytic Hydrothermal Liquefaction |
| The IBUS Process – Lignocellulosic Bioethanol Close to a Commercial Reality | |
| Integrated Biomass Utilization System (IBUS) is a new process for converting lignocellulosic waste biomass to bioethanol. Inbicon A/S has developed the IBUS process in a large-scale process development unit. This plant features new continuous and energy-efficient technology developed for pretreatment and liquefaction of lignocellulosic biomass and has now been operated and optimized for four years with promising results. In the IBUS process, biomass is converted using steam and enzymes only. The process is energy efficient due to very high dry matter content in all process steps and by integration with a power plant. Cellulose is converted to bioethanol and lignin to a high-quality solid biofuel which supply the process energy as well as a surplus of heat and power. Hemicellulose is used as feed molasses but in the future it could also be used for additional ethanol production or other valuable products. Feasibility studies of the IBUS process show that the production price for lignocellulosic bioethanol is close to the world market price for fuel ethanol. There is still room for optimization – and lignocellulosic bioethanol is most likely a commercial alternative to fossil transport fuels before 2012. | |
| 05/01/2008 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
1.4 Supercritcal hydrothermal liquefaction
Liquefaction under supercritical conditions can be beneficial to the yield. There are good opportunities for the use of biomass feedstocks and supercritical technology in the production of liquid fuels for the transportation sector, as well as renewable chemicals for the chemical industry. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96406-2061939403)
**Highlights:**
* Licella is an Australian company developing the Cat-HTR^TM^ process which involves forming a slurry of water and organic matter, heating the slurry to a temperature of between about 350 and 420 °C and pressurising it to greater than 220 bar so that the water phase becomes supercritical. In some embodiments, the hemicellulose of the biomass is first solvated from the cellulose and lignin in sub-critical water at temperatures between about 120 and 190 °C and pressures of about 40 bar, prior to the hydrothermal reaction of the cellulose and lignin at temperatures above 350 °C. However, this pre-treatment step does not seem to be the preferred process line up at large scale, wherein complete processing of the biomass in a single step is more attractive. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96406-2976637787)
| 1.4.1 | Supercritcal hydrothermal liquefaction |
|---|---|
| Recent advances in liquefaction technologies for production of liquid hydrocarbon fuels from biomass and carbonaceous wastes | |
| Abstract The liquefaction of biomass and carbonaceous wastes using hydro-pyrolysis, hydrothermal liquefaction or liquefaction using water and hydrocarbon solvents are promising thermochemical methods for producing renewable fuels and chemicals. New combinations of unit operations and possibly novel reactors will likely be required to economically convert biomass feedstock into partially upgraded bio-crudes. While some techno-economic assessments show that biofuels from fast pyrolysis may be competitive with petroleum fuels in future, conventional pyrolysis produces a poor quality bio-crude and is only suitable for dry, homogenous feedstock such as woody biomass, agricultural waste (corn stoves, wheat stalk, and rice husk). It is desirable to produce high-quality bio-crudes and to be able to process high-moisture feedstock such as algae, organic waste (food residues), bio-solids and bio-sludge into transportation fuels using the liquefaction approaches. Increased awareness of the environmental damage from burning fossil fuels is driving national and international reduction targets for on CO2 emissions. Liquefaction technologies aimed at producing alternatives to fossil-based transportation fuels/hydrocarbons are likely to receive continued support in the future and the most promising ones could be developed to full commercial scale. This review provides a summary of the current state of development of these technologies and also some of the challenges faced to develop commercially viable transportation fuels via liquefaction routes. This review compares liquefaction routes and provides a summary of techno-economic analyses where data is available and discusses the challenges and opportunities associated with commercial scale-up. | |
| 11/01/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.4.2 | Supercritcal hydrothermal liquefaction |
| Recent progress in converting biomass to biofuels and renewable chemicals in sub- or supercritical water | |
| This review covers recent research and development undertaken in converting biomass (lignocelluloses, carbohydrates, waste vegetable oil and algae) to biofuels and renewable chemicals using sub- or supercritical water (SCW) as thermochemical reaction media. Applications of SCW technology in pretreating biomass for bioethanol production by fermentation and in hydrogen/methane production by gasification are not covered in this review. The focus is on research progress in understanding the conversion characteristics of model biomass compounds, such as hemicellulose, cellulose, triglycerides and, to a lesser extent, real heterogeneous biomass in SCW. Specific attention is given to promising reaction pathways and novel process development in SCW conversion of biomass and its model compounds. There are good opportunities for the use of biomass feedstocks and SCW technology in the production of liquid fuels for the transportation sector, as well as renewable chemicals for the chemical industry. However, a broad ... | |
| 01/01/2010 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
1.5 Sub- and Supercritical hydrothermal gasification
Different hydrothermal biomass gasification processes are under development. In contrast to biomass gasification processes without water, biomass with the natural water content (“green biomass”) can be converted completely and energetically efficiently to gases. Depending on the reaction conditions, methane or hydrogen is the burnable gas produced. Some processes use catalysts. In recent years, significant progress was achieved in the development of various hydrothermal biomass gasification processes.[\[Paper\]](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0896844608003501)
**Highlights:**
* **Supercritical water gasification is a promising technology to convert coal/biomass/organic wastes to hydrogen cleanly and efficiently.** Extensive investigations on supercritical water gasification were conducted in China. State Key Laboratory of Multiphase Flow in Power Engineering (SKLMFPE) together with other universities/institutes established experimental device with the reactor type of quartz tube reaction system, tubular reactor and fluidized bed reactor. The fluidized bed reactor system solved the blocking problems to guarantee continuous and stable gasification. [ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96336-2053968199)
* Supercritical water gasification (SCWG) is a process that has been examined in the past years for its potential implementation in waste treatment technologies. SCWG can convert organic waste streams from industrial activities into energy. **A one of a kind vertical continuous apparatus was constructed at UCT Prague for testing this process.** Several experiments with tall soap and black liquor on the hydrothermal gasification apparatus were performed. In this paper, results that permit to compare the influence of different process conditions (residence time, catalyst addition). In addition, practical gasification experiences with real industry waste streams treated in the specific vertical reactor made from stainless steel are presented. All acquired data were obtained from experiments carried at temperature 500 °C and pressure 25 MPa. The reached carbon efficiency when using tall soap and black liquor were 11% and 24%, respectively. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96336-2783804797)
| 1.5.1 | Sub- and Supercritical hydrothermal gasification |
|---|---|
| Assessment of black liquor gasification in supercritical water. | |
| Abstract Supercritical water gasification of black liquor (waste pulping chemicals) has been examined. The aim was to evaluate the feasibility of using this technique to convert such bio-based waste to value added fuel products, as well as recovery of pulping materials. Supercritical gasification may improve overall process efficiency by eliminating the energy intensive evaporation step necessary in conventional process and product gas obtained at high pressure may be ready for utilization without any compression requirement. Appropriate operating parameters, including pressure, temperature, feed concentration, and reaction time, which would yield the highest conversion and energy efficiency were determined. Reaction was performed in a quartz capillary heated in a fluidized bed reactor. Results indicated that pressure between 220 and 400 atm has insignificant influence on the gas products and extent of carbon conversion. Increasing temperature and residence time between 375–650 °C and 5–120 s resulted in greater gas production, overall carbon conversion, and energy efficiency. Maximum conversion to H 2 , CO, CH 4 , and C 2 H X was achieved at the highest temperature and longest residence time tested showing an overall carbon conversion of 84.8%, gas energy content of 9.4 MJ/m 3 and energy conversion ratio of 1.2. Though higher carbon conversion and energy conversion ratio were obtained with more dilute liquor, energy content was lower than for those with higher solid contents. Due to anticipated complex design and high initial investment cost of this operation, further studies on overall feasibility should be carried out in order to identify the optimum operating window for this novel process. | |
| 01/01/2009 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.5.2 | Sub- and Supercritical hydrothermal gasification |
| Catalytic Conversion of High‐Moisture Biomass to Synthetic Natural Gas in Supercritical Water | |
| Methane produced from waste biomass is a renewable and clean biofuel that can be distributed using the existing natural gas infrastructure. It can be used for heat and power generation and as a transportation fuel. High-moisture biomass is a relatively untapped resource with a significant energetic potential and attractive costs. However, new technologies are needed for converting high-moisture biomass efficiently into methane and recovering the nutrients for use as a fertilizer. Gasification of the biomass in a hydrothermal environment is an emerging technology that offers many advantages over gas-phase conversion processes or anaerobic digestion. Heterogeneous catalysis is the key to a successful hydrothermal gasification process for the synthesis of methane. Only a few metals, including Ru, Ni, Rh and Pt, are useful under these conditions. Pd and Co catalysts might also be suitable but conclusive data are lacking. Alloying is another approach that holds promise to yield active and stable catalysts. The choice of hydrothermally stable supports is limited to some insoluble oxides and carbon. Some of these oxides have not yet been tested as catalyst supports (e.g. Nb2O5, Ta2O5 and UO2) and might prove useful. The mechanism for the gasification of the organic compounds to CO and H2 is likely to follow a Mars–van-Krevelen redox cycle with two oxides of the catalytic metal involved. The strongest evidence for such a mechanism was found for RuO2, but specific in situ studies are needed for corroborating this hypothesis and determining the actual oxidation states involved in the mechanism. Deactivation in hydrothermal gasification follows the same modes as in gas-phase and liquid-phase catalysis. Coke deposition is not a primary cause of deactivation due to the high partial pressure of water and the high solubility of coke precursors in near- and supercritical water. Salts play a crucial role in catalyst deactivation. Sulfate was found to be a strong poison for Ru catalysts, but the actual poison might be sulfide, formed by reduction of the sulfate with hydrogen or organic compounds. Based on this knowledge, a continuous catalytic hydrothermal gasification process is under development at PSI featuring continuous on-line salt precipitation and removal before the catalytic reactor. Keywords: biomass; natural gas; methane; catalytic hydrothermal gasification; supercritical water; heterogeneous catalysis | |
| 07/15/2010 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.5.3 | Sub- and Supercritical hydrothermal gasification |
| Hydrogen Production by Supercritical Water Gasification of Biomass with Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Catalyst | |
| Biomass gasification in supercritical water is a clean and efficient way to convert biomass to hydrogen-rich gaseous products. Appropriate catalyst can lower the reaction temperature to guarantee the technological and economic feasibility. This paper selects Ca(OH)2, Na2CO3, K2CO3, NaOH, KOH, LiOH, and ZnCl2 as typical homogeneous catalysts and three kinds of Raney-Ni, dolomite, and olivine as typical heterogeneous catalysts. The catalyst effects are investigated in the process of biomass gasification in supercritical water with the temperature of 400°C, pressure of MPa, and residence time of 20 min. The experimental results show that Raney-Ni has the best hydrogen selectivity and hydrogen yield. The mixture of NaOH with Raney-Ni was investigated in order to research the synergistic effect of different catalysts. The experimental results show that Raney-Ni and NaOH have a synergistic effect in the biomass gasification in supercritical water. | |
| 01/01/2014 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.5.4 | Sub- and Supercritical hydrothermal gasification |
| Study on gasification mechanism of biomass waste in supercritical water based on product distribution | |
| Abstract Supercritical water gasification technology is widely applied to convert organic waste into valuable substances as a clean and efficient method. Biomass gasification in SCW is a complex process and complicated chemical reactions like decomposition and poly-condensation take place, thus, reaction mechanism of real biomass needs to be further investigated. In this paper, experimental study on cornstalk gasification in SCW was conducted at the temperature of 500–800 °C, reaction time of 1–15min and feedstock concentration of 1–9%. The effects of various operating parameters on evolution of gas, liquid and solid products were conducted. It was discovered that pore structure and carbon microspheres appeared successively on the surface of solid residue. Mechanism study showed that the biomass was first depolymerized into monomer and its derivatives, then cracked and poly-condensed into a nuclear to generate carbon microspheres as its concentration reached the critical concentration. As the reaction proceeds, reduction reaction, coke combustion and secondary reaction occurred, thus carbon microspheres decreased. The results indicated that higher reaction temperature, longer reaction time and lower feed concentration were conducive to improving reaction performance of biomass. Finally, it was discovered that carbon gasification efficiency reached 99% at the temperature of 700 °C, reaction time of 15 min and biomass concentration of 3%. | |
| 03/24/2020 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.5.5 | Sub- and Supercritical hydrothermal gasification |
| Supercritical water gasification of biomass: A state-of-the-art review of process parameters, reaction mechanisms and catalysis | |
| The global energy demand has laid emphasis on the exploration of alternate sources of energy. With the application of many thermochemical and biochemical technologies, waste biomass can be converted into green fuels. Gasification is one of the most effective thermochemical (biomass-to-gas) technologies that can transform organic substrates into combustible syngas. Supercritical water gasification is an iteration of conventional gasification that uses water as the reaction medium to efficiently decompose biomass to hydrogen-rich syngas. The yields and composition of products from supercritical water gasification largely depend on the process parameters such as temperature, pressure, residence time, and feed concentration, biomass particle size, reactor configurations as well as reaction pathways and catalysis. These factors also determine the gasification efficiency, carbon conversion and heating value of the gas products. This paper reviews different homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysts involved in supercritical water gasification of biomass. Several reaction mechanisms occurring during gasification of biomass in supercritical water have also been illustrated and discussed, and research gaps for future studies have been identified. Overall, this review is an update to the compiled literature and the aspects involved in supercritical water gasification of different biomass feedstocks. | |
| 01/01/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.5.6 | Sub- and Supercritical hydrothermal gasification |
| Supercritical water gasification of wastes from the paper industry | |
| Abstract Supercritical water gasification (SCWG) is a process that has been examined in the past years for its potential implementation in waste treatment technologies. SCWG can convert organic waste streams from industrial activities into energy. A one of a kind vertical continuous apparatus was constructed at UCT Prague for testing this process. Several experiments with tall soap and black liquor on the hydrothermal gasification apparatus were performed. In this paper, results that permit to compare the influence of different process conditions (residence time, catalyst addition). In addition, practical gasification experiences with real industry waste streams treated in the specific vertical reactor made from stainless steel are presented. All acquired data were obtained from experiments carried at temperature 500 °C and pressure 25 MPa. The reached carbon efficiency when using tall soap and black liquor were 11% and 24%, respectively. | |
| 01/01/2018 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.5.7 | Sub- and Supercritical hydrothermal gasification |
| Supercritical water gasification research and development in China | |
| Abstract Supercritical water gasification is a promising technology to convert coal/biomass/organic wastes to hydrogen cleanly and efficiently. Extensive investigations on supercritical water gasification were conducted in China. State Key Laboratory of Multiphase Flow in Power Engineering (SKLMFPE) together with other universities/institutes established experimental device with the reactor type of quartz tube reaction system, tubular reactor and fluidized bed reactor. The fluidized bed reactor system solved the blocking problems to guarantee continuous and stable gasification. Typically Hongliulin coal as a typical coal in China was completely gasified in supercritical water fluidized bed system and the hydrogen yield was 77.5 mol per kg of coal. A pilot scale demonstration plant for supercritical water gasification driven by solar concentration system was established with a handling capacity of 1 t/h and it proves the feasibility of the system scale up. A novel thermodynamics cycle power generation system based on coal gasification in supercritical water was proposed with the obvious advantages of high coal-electricity efficiency and zero pollutant emission. An Integrated Cooperative Innovation Center with the name of A New Type of High-efficient Coal Gasification Technology and its Large-scale Utilization was founded in order to vigorously enhance the industrialization of the technology. | |
| 01/01/2015 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
1.6 Steam gasification
**In recent years, biomass steam gasification has become an area of growing interest because it produces a synthesis gas with relatively higher hydrogen content.** [\[Paper\]](https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/cr200024w)
**Highlights:**
* The thermochemical conversion processes, such as pyrolysis, gasification, and steam gasification are available for converting the biomass to a more useful energy. The yield from steam gasification increases with increasing water-to-sample ratio. The yields of hydrogen from the pyrolysis and the steam gasification increase with increase of temperature. Hydrogen-powered fuel cells are an important enabling technology for the hydrogen future and more efficient alternatives to the combustion of gasoline and other fossil fuels. Hydrogen has the potential to solve two major energy problems: reducing dependence on petroleum and reducing pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96466-2061451393)
| 1.6.1 | Steam gasification |
|---|---|
| Biohydrogen Generation from Organic Waste | |
| Abstract Hydrogen is not a primary fuel. It must be manufactured from water with either fossil or nonfossil energy sources. Widespread use of hydrogen as an energy source could improve global climate change, energy efficiency, and air quality. The thermochemical conversion processes, such as pyrolysis, gasification, and steam gasification are available for converting the biomass to a more useful energy. The yield from steam gasification increases with increasing water-to-sample ratio. The yields of hydrogen from the pyrolysis and the steam gasification increase with increase of temperature. Hydrogen-powered fuel cells are an important enabling technology for the hydrogen future and more efficient alternatives to the combustion of gasoline and other fossil fuels. Hydrogen has the potential to solve two major energy problems: reducing dependence on petroleum and reducing pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. | |
| 01/24/2008 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.6.2 | Steam gasification |
| METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR STEAM BIOMASS REACTOR | |
| A method and apparatus for a steam biomass reactor converts organic waste placed inside a sealed steam injected reactor to biogas (methane CH 4 and carbon dioxide CO 2 ). The amount of liquid introduced into the reactor can be minimized, increased methane and CO 2 can be produced, and the methane produced can have higher Btu values as compared to methane produced in other reactors. Some embodiments provide a method of injecting steam into a sealed vessel that is loaded with organic waste and collecting the methane produced by accelerated decomposition/biodegradation of the organic component of the waste within the vessel. The steam accelerates the decomposition of the organic refuse, thereby enhancing the production of methane gas and CO 2 . | |
| 12/24/2009 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
1.7 Catalytic hydrothermal gasification
**Highlights:**
* PNNL developed catalytic hydrothermal gasification (CHG) for use with aqueous streams within the pyrolysis biorefinery. These aqueous streams included the aqueous phase separated from the fast pyrolysis bio-oil and the aqueous byproduct streams formed in the hydroprocessing of the bio-oil to finished products. The purpose of this project was to demonstrate a technically and economically viable technology for converting renewable biomass feedstocks to sustainable and fungible transportation fuels.[ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96517-2339007579)
* Gasification of the biomass in a hydrothermal environment is an emerging technology that offers many advantages over gas-phase conversion processes or anaerobic digestion. **Heterogeneous catalysis is the key to a successful hydrothermal gasification process for the synthesis of methane.** Only a few metals, including Ru, Ni, Rh and Pt, are useful under these conditions. Pd and Co catalysts might also be suitable but conclusive data are lacking. Alloying is another approach that holds promise to yield active and stable catalysts. The mechanism for the gasification of the organic compounds to CO and H2 is likely to follow a Mars–van-Krevelen redox cycle with two oxides of the catalytic metal involved. Based on this knowledge, a continuous catalytic hydrothermal gasification process is under development at PSI featuring continuous on-line salt precipitation and removal before the catalytic reactor.[ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96517-1936405539)
| 1.7.1 | Catalytic hydrothermal gasification |
|---|---|
| Algal biorefinery to value-added products by using combined processes based on thermochemical conversion: A review | |
| Abstract Thermochemical processes, including gasification, liquefaction, and pyrolysis, are promising technologies for algal conversion. Gasification is effective to convert algal biomass into fuel gases while liquefaction and pyrolysis are favorable for the production of bio-oil with low molecular weight and biocrude with high energy density, respectively. To understand the role of algal components (proteins, lipids, and carbohydrates) on thermochemical conversion processes, this paper reviews the properties of biofuels from the thermochemical conversion of algal components and their model compounds. The characteristic fingerprints of algal components differ from one another. Consequently, the thermochemical conversion of the total algal biomass results in heterogeneity of the biofuels. The unfavorable nitrogenous compound production also leads to resource and energy losses, which are the critical bottleneck of algal biorefinery. As such, this review tackles some combined processes. The combination of the hydrothermal liquefaction of algal biomass and the hydrothermal gasification of an aqueous fraction shows potential for applications that improve fuel gas production. Lipid extraction combined with thermochemical residue conversion contributes to an increase in total oil yield. Protein extraction combined with thermochemical residue conversion decreases the risk of nitrogenous compound contamination in bio-oil and increases the recovery of value-added protein-derived products. Protein and lipid extraction before thermochemical conversion should be further explored to maximize the exploitation of multiple value-added products from algal biomass. | |
| 05/01/2020 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.7.2 | Catalytic hydrothermal gasification |
| Catalytic Conversion of High‐Moisture Biomass to Synthetic Natural Gas in Supercritical Water | |
| Methane produced from waste biomass is a renewable and clean biofuel that can be distributed using the existing natural gas infrastructure. It can be used for heat and power generation and as a transportation fuel. High-moisture biomass is a relatively untapped resource with a significant energetic potential and attractive costs. However, new technologies are needed for converting high-moisture biomass efficiently into methane and recovering the nutrients for use as a fertilizer. Gasification of the biomass in a hydrothermal environment is an emerging technology that offers many advantages over gas-phase conversion processes or anaerobic digestion. Heterogeneous catalysis is the key to a successful hydrothermal gasification process for the synthesis of methane. Only a few metals, including Ru, Ni, Rh and Pt, are useful under these conditions. Pd and Co catalysts might also be suitable but conclusive data are lacking. Alloying is another approach that holds promise to yield active and stable catalysts. The choice of hydrothermally stable supports is limited to some insoluble oxides and carbon. Some of these oxides have not yet been tested as catalyst supports (e.g. Nb2O5, Ta2O5 and UO2) and might prove useful. The mechanism for the gasification of the organic compounds to CO and H2 is likely to follow a Mars–van-Krevelen redox cycle with two oxides of the catalytic metal involved. The strongest evidence for such a mechanism was found for RuO2, but specific in situ studies are needed for corroborating this hypothesis and determining the actual oxidation states involved in the mechanism. Deactivation in hydrothermal gasification follows the same modes as in gas-phase and liquid-phase catalysis. Coke deposition is not a primary cause of deactivation due to the high partial pressure of water and the high solubility of coke precursors in near- and supercritical water. Salts play a crucial role in catalyst deactivation. Sulfate was found to be a strong poison for Ru catalysts, but the actual poison might be sulfide, formed by reduction of the sulfate with hydrogen or organic compounds. Based on this knowledge, a continuous catalytic hydrothermal gasification process is under development at PSI featuring continuous on-line salt precipitation and removal before the catalytic reactor. Keywords: biomass; natural gas; methane; catalytic hydrothermal gasification; supercritical water; heterogeneous catalysis | |
| 07/15/2010 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.7.3 | Catalytic hydrothermal gasification |
| Pilot-Scale Biorefinery: Sustainable Transport Fuels from Biomass via Integrated Pyrolysis and Catalytic Hydroconversion - Wastewater Cleanup by Catalytic Hydrothermal Gasification | |
| DOE-EE Bioenergy Technologies Office has set forth several goals to increase the use of bioenergy and bioproducts derived from renewable resources. One of these goals is to facilitate the implementation of the biorefinery. The biorefinery will include the production of liquid fuels, power and, in some cases, products. The integrated biorefinery should stand-alone from an economic perspective with fuels and power driving the economy of scale while the economics/profitability of the facility will be dependent on existing market conditions. UOP LLC proposed to demonstrate a fast pyrolysis based integrated biorefinery. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) has expertise in an important technology area of interest to UOP for use in their pyrolysis-based biorefinery. This CRADA project provides the supporting technology development and demonstration to allow incorporation of this technology into the biorefinery. PNNL developed catalytic hydrothermal gasification (CHG) for use with aqueous streams within the pyrolysis biorefinery. These aqueous streams included the aqueous phase separated from the fast pyrolysis bio-oil and the aqueous byproduct streams formed in the hydroprocessing of the bio-oil to finished products. The purpose of this project was to demonstrate a technically and economically viable technology for converting renewable biomass feedstocks to sustainable and fungible transportation fuels. Tomore » demonstrate the technology, UOP constructed and operated a pilot-scale biorefinery that processed one dry ton per day of biomass using fast pyrolysis. Specific objectives of the project were to: The anticipated outcomes of the project were a validated process technology, a range of validated feedstocks, product property and Life Cycle data, and technical and operating data upon which to base the design of a full-scale biorefinery. The anticipated long-term outcomes from successful commercialization of the technology were: (1) the replacement of a significant fraction of petroleum based fuels with advanced biofuels, leading to increased energy security and decreased carbon footprint; and (2) establishment of a new biofuel industry segment, leading to the creation of U.S. engineering, manufacturing, construction, operations and agricultural jobs. PNNL development of CHG progressed at two levels. Initial tests were made in the laboratory in both mini-scale and bench-scale continuous flow reactor systems. Following positive results, the next level of evaluation was in the scaled-up engineering development system, which was operated at PNNL.« less | |
| 06/19/2015 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.7.4 | Catalytic hydrothermal gasification |
| Prospects for energy recovery during hydrothermal and biological processing of waste biomass. | |
| Abstract Thermochemical and biological processes represent promising technologies for converting wet biomasses, such as animal manure, organic waste, or algae, to energy. To convert biomass to energy and bio-chemicals in an economical manner, internal energy recovery should be maximized to reduce the use of external heat and power. In this study, two conversion pathways that couple hydrothermal liquefaction with anaerobic digestion or catalytic hydrothermal gasification were compared. Each of these platforms is followed by two alternative processes for gas utilization: 1) combined heat and power; and 2) combustion in a boiler. Pinch analysis was applied to integrate thermal streams among unit processes and improve the overall system efficiency. A techno-economic analysis was conducted to compare the feasibility of the four modeled scenarios under different market conditions. Our results show that a systems approach designed to recover internal heat and power can reduce external energy demands and increase the overall process sustainability. | |
| 02/01/2017 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
1.8 Hydrothermal oxidation
Wet oxidation is a form of hydrothermal treatment. It is the oxidation of dissolved or suspended components in water using oxygen as the oxidizer. It is referred to as "Wet Air Oxidation" (WAO) when air is used. The oxidation reactions occur in superheated water at a temperature above the normal boiling point of water (100 °C), but below the critical point (374 °C). [\[Wiki\]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wet_oxidation)
**Highlights:**
* A commercial case study on hydrothermal technology (Terax™) revealed that the challenge of sewage sludge management can be addressed successfully using a combination of biological and hydrothermal processes.[ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96387-2886693062)
* The oxidation of harmful organic compounds contained in aqueous waste effluents known as **super critical water oxidation, SCWO**, has been worked out since the 1980s. This highly efficient end of the pipe process operates at pressures and temperatures above 221 bar and 374 °C, the critical point of water. R&D experience and the technological state including economical and regulatory aspects are reviewed and further R&D needs are discussed in this article. Future applications are also seen in coupling supercritical CO2 extraction with oxidation to treat contaminated materials and in supercritical water gasification, SCWG, to convert biomass and organic wastes to hydrogen. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96387-1984630463)
| 1.8.1 | Hydrothermal oxidation |
|---|---|
| Resource recovery from organic solid waste using hydrothermal processing: Opportunities and challenges | |
| Abstract Large amounts of organic solid waste are generated daily throughout the world. Hydrothermal processing has been shown to be a promising solution for dealing with this type of waste. This paper reviews the types of hydrothermal processing currently available, their advantages and disadvantages, and their suitability for converting organic solid wastes to value-added products. This technology can also be used to produce fuels such as bio-char, bio-oil, and biogas, which are more energy-dense than fuels produced after biochemical conversion of waste. Furthermore, hydrothermally produced fuels have similar energy densities to fossil fuels. Hydrothermal technology provides opportunities for resource recovery such as converting waste into value-added products (e.g., organic acids and fertilisers), nutrient recovery and metal removal from organic waste. The challenges associated with developing hydrothermal processing at an industrial scale are examined, and research perspectives and future developments are discussed in this article. Since the hydrothermal process is capable of eliminating and transforming organic waste efficiently, its customer readiness level (CRL) and societal readiness level (SRL) are moderate. However, this technology has a low technology readiness level (TRL) because it operates at high temperatures and pressures. Lack of fundamental thermodynamic data at extreme conditions, limited understanding of reaction kinetics and mass transfer effects on the process are the main challenges of hydrothermal processing. Other important factors of hydrothermal processing are its economic and safety considerations which must be considered before installing a hydrothermal processing unit. A commercial case study on hydrothermal technology (Terax™) revealed that the challenge of sewage sludge management can be addressed successfully using a combination of biological and hydrothermal processes. | |
| 11/01/2018 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.8.2 | Hydrothermal oxidation |
| Supercritical Water Oxidation: State of the Art | |
| Abstract The oxidation of harmful organic compounds contained in aqueous waste effluents known as super critical water oxidation, SCWO, has been worked out since the 1980s. This highly efficient end of the pipe process operates at pressures and temperatures above 221 bar and 374 °C, the critical point of water. R&D experience and the technological state including economical and regulatory aspects are reviewed and further R&D needs are discussed in this article. Future applications are also seen in coupling supercritical CO2 extraction with oxidation to treat contaminated materials and in supercritical water gasification, SCWG, to convert biomass and organic wastes to hydrogen. | |
| 11/01/1999 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.8.3 | Hydrothermal oxidation |
| Method of processing and fractionating biomass and use of fractions thus obtained | |
|
1. A method of fractionation of biomass, in the absence of sulphurous chemicals, comprising the steps of: a) providing a lignocellulosic biomass feedstock containing cellulose, hemicelluloses and lignin; b) dispersing the biomass feedstock in an aqueous phase in the presence of an alkaline agent in an amount of 0.2 to 4.0 mol/kg at a temperature of 120° C. to 180° C. for a period of 1 to 5 hours, whereby in excess of 30% by dry weight of the hemicellulose present in the biomass feedstock is leached into the aqueous phase; c) separating the aqueous phase from the biomass; d) defibering the biomass to provide a modified biomass; e) contacting the modified biomass in an aqueous phase with an oxidizing agent in the presence of an alkaline agent in an amount of 0.5 to 4.0 mol/kg of the modified biomass at an elevated temperature of 100° C. to 180° C. for a period of 1 to 2 hours, whereby in excess of 20% of the lignin is dissolved in the aqueous medium and a cellulose-enriched biomass is obtained; and f) g) recovering the cellulose- enriched biomass thus obtained. 2. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising recovering the hemicelluloses obtained in step c. 3. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising recovering the lignin obtained in step e. 4. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the alkaline agent of step e is selected from the group of alkali metal carbonates, bicarbonates and percarbonates and combinations thereof. 5. The method according to claim 4 , wherein the alkaline agent of step e further contains an alkali metal hydroxide. 6. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the lignocellulosic biomass feedstock is selected from the group of wood, waste or demolition wood, energy crops, pulp, recycled fibres, straw, sugar cane bagasse, agricultural, municipal and industrial wastes and similar compositions which contain carbohydrates, or a mixture thereof. 7. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the lignocellulosic biomass feedstock is wood-based, in particular the biomass is derived from or comprises softwood. 8. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising using in step c an alkaline agent selected from the group of alkali metal carbonates, bicarbonates, hydroxides and percarbonates and combinations thereof. 9. The method according to claim 1 , wherein at least a portion of the alkaline agent in step e is a mixture of sodium carbonate and sodium hydroxide. 10. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising recovering the hemicellulose from the aqueous phase of step c and producing biofuel with the recovered hemicellulose. 11. The method according to claim 10 , wherein the hemicellulose is subjected to hydrolysis, fermentation, oxidation or a combination thereof. 12. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising subjecting the hemicellulose to a further treatment step selected from the group of mechanical treatments, chemical treatments and enzymatic treatments or combinations thereof. 13. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the biomass obtained from step c is mechanically processed in step d by refining to provide a modified biomass. 14. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the modified biomass obtained from step c after an optional mechanical processing is mechanically separated from the aqueous phase. 15. The method according to claim 1 , wherein at least a part of the alkaline agent in the step d is sodium carbonate. 16. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the oxidising agent is selected from oxygen and oxygen containing compounds selected from sodium hypochlorite, calcium hypochlorite and hydrogen peroxide. 17. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the step of contacting the biomass feedstock is carried out in a partial pressure of oxygen of of 4 to 20 bar. 18. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising the step of recovering cellulose and producing biofuel with the recovered cellulose. 19. The method according to claim 18 , further comprising subjecting the cellulose to a further treatment step selected from the group of mechanical treatments, chemical treatments and enzymatic treatments or combinations thereof. 20. The method according to claim 18 , wherein the cellulose is subjected to hydrolysis, fermentation, oxidation or a combination thereof. 21. The method according to claim 18 , wherein ethanol is produced from the cellulose. 22. The method according to claim 18 , wherein the cellulose is fermented. 23. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising subjecting the lignin to a further treatment step selected from the group of mechanical treatments, chemical treatments and enzymatic treatments or combinations thereof. 24. A method of fractionation of biomass, in the absence of sulphurous chemicals, consisting of the steps of: a) providing a lignocellulosic biomass feedstock containing cellulose, hemicelluloses and lignin; b) dispersing the biomass feedstock in an aqueous phase in the presence of an alkaline agent in an amount of 0.5 to 3.0 mol/kg at a temperature of 140° C. to 150° C. for a period of 1.5 to 3 hours, whereby from 50% to 70% by dry weight of the hemicellulose present in the biomass feedstock is leached into the aqueous phase; c) separating the aqueous phase from the biomass; d) defibering the biomass to provide a modified biomass; e) contacting the modified biomass in an aqueous phase with an oxidizing agent in the presence of an alkaline agent in an amount of 0.5 to 3.0 mol/kg of the modified biomass at an elevated temperature of 120° C. to 160° C. for a period of 1 to 2 hours, whereby in excess of 80% of the lignin in the modified biomass is dissolved in the aqueous medium and a cellulose-enriched biomass is obtained; and f) recovering the cellulose-enriched biomass thus obtained. |
|
| 10/19/2015 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Patent | |
2. Thermal conversion
BackConversions done in a thermal environment, usually without water)
2.1 Torrefaction
Torrefaction is a thermochemical pretreatment process at 200–300 °C in an inert condition which transforms biomass into a relatively superior handling, milling, co-firing and clean renewable energy into solid biofuel.
**Highlights:**
* This increases the energy density, water resistance and grindability of biomass and makes it safe from biological degradation which ultimately makes easy and economical on transportation and storing of the torrefied products. Torrefied biomass is considered as improved version than the current wood pellet products and an environmentally friendly future alternative for coal. Torrefaction carries devolatilisation, depolymerization and carbonization of lignocellulose components and generates a brown to black solid biomass as a productive output with water, organics, lipids, alkalis, SiO2, CO2, CO and CH4. During this process, 70 % of the mass is retained as a solid product, and retains 90 % of the initial energy content. The torrefied product is then shaped into pellets or briquettes that pack much more energy density than regular wood pellets.[ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96419-2017865626)
| 2.1.1 | Torrefaction |
|---|---|
| A review on advances of torrefaction technologies for biomass processing | |
| Torrefaction is a thermochemical pretreatment process at 200–300 °C in an inert condition which transforms biomass into a relatively superior handling, milling, co-firing and clean renewable energy into solid biofuel. This increases the energy density, water resistance and grindability of biomass and makes it safe from biological degradation which ultimately makes easy and economical on transportation and storing of the torrefied products. Torrefied biomass is considered as improved version than the current wood pellet products and an environmentally friendly future alternative for coal. Torrefaction carries devolatilisation, depolymerization and carbonization of lignocellulose components and generates a brown to black solid biomass as a productive output with water, organics, lipids, alkalis, SiO2, CO2, CO and CH4. During this process, 70 % of the mass is retained as a solid product, and retains 90 % of the initial energy content. The torrefied product is then shaped into pellets or briquettes that pack much more energy density than regular wood pellets. These properties minimize on the difference in combustion characteristics between biomass and coal that bring a huge possibility of direct firing of biomass in an existing coal-fired plant. Researchers are trying to find a solution to fire/co-fire torrefied biomass instead of coal in an existing coal-fired based boiler with minimum modifications and expenditures. Currently available torrefied technologies are basically designed and tested for woody biomass so further research is required to address on utilization of the agricultural biomass with technically and economically viable. This review covers the torrefaction technologies, its’ applications, current status and future recommendations for further study. | |
| 12/01/2012 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.1.2 | Torrefaction |
| Chemistry and reaction kinetics of biowaste torrefaction | |
| This thesis addresses the question of how the chemistry and reaction kinetics of torrefaction are influenced by reaction conditions and the effects occuring during the reaction. This research question can be specified by questions such as, what controls their kinetics during torrefaction and what does this mean, which products are formed, what are the mass - and energy balances, and what is the endothermal and/or exothermal behaviour. In future energy scenarios an important role in the (renewable) energy supply is given to biomass. The unique position of biomass as the only renewable source for sustainable carbon carrier makes biomass an attractive energy source. Biomass as energy source has some typical characteristics making it a specific, but complicated fuel for the future. Some biomass properties are inconvenient, particularly its high oxygen content, a low calorific value, the hydrophilic nature and there with connected high moisture content. Other disadvantages of biomass are its tenacious and fibrous structure and its inhomogeneous composition. This makes process design and process control complicated. Torrefaction is a technology that can improve biomass properties and therefore offers solutions to the above problems. Torrefaction is a thermal pre-treatment technology to upgrade ligno-cellulosic biomass to a higher quality and more attractive biofuel. The main principle of torrefaction, from a chemical point of view, is the removal of oxygen leading to a final solid product: the torrefied biomass having a lower O/C ratio compared to the original biomass. The heart of the torrefaction technology is the reactor concept. In the development of the torrefaction system knowledge it is important to obtain a good insight into the mechanisms of torrefaction at fundamental level. Torrefaction is a complex process which involves many physical and chemical processes such as heat transfer, moisture evaporation, decomposition kinetics, heat of torrefaction, pressure build up in the solid, changes in material properties all in relation with torrefaction temperature. Further the material is inherently anisotropic. Research at this level can give better information about the quality of the torrefaction. The thesis can be divided into three parts. In the first part a broad literature review about pyrolysis and torrefaction is carried out. The second part gives the experimental section in which the chemistry and reaction kinetics have been studied extensively with the help of different experimental methods. The final part gives an overview on the-state-of-the-art of different commercial torrefaction initiatives to further assist reactor technology. Although pyrolysis and torrefaction operate in a different temperature regime, pyrolysis type research is applied for exploring torrefaction of biowaste resources. The chemical principles and different reaction mechanisms are to get insight into the torrefaction characteristics. Due to the different reaction temperatures differences between pyrolysis and torrefaction are observed in the final product composition and reaction rates. The weight loss kinetics of different biowaste resources and its constituents are determined by thermogravimetric analysis at a milligram scale. The reaction kinetics are modeled based on existing pyrolysis reaction models. On the basis of the mathematical results only, it cannot be stated how the biomass decomposes during torrefaction. Different assumptions on the kinetics lead to identical mathematical formulations. Hence, it is found that biomass torrefaction follows the classical methods of reaction kinetics. During biomass torrefaction two different phases on these categories react independently of each other. The slow reacting phase has high availability and the fast reacting phase has an apparent temperature dependence of the (low) availability. The products formed during torrefaction of different biowaste streams have been determined in a small scale fixed bed reactor (0 – 10 g) and thermogravimetric analysis coupled with mass spectroscopy and Fourier Transformed Infrared. In the fixed bed reactor the torrefied wood, the condensable and non-condensable gases are quantified offline with elemental analysis, gas chromatography/mass spectroscopy and micro gas chromatography. The fast reacting phase with low availability produces small molecular products even as the slow reacting phase with high availability, but this phase also produces higher molecular weight products and aromatic compounds. Finally, the energy balance of the torrefaction of beech wood is determined. The heat of reaction that is found is between 0.7 MJ/kg biomass endothermic and -0.8 MJ/kg biomass exothermic for reaction temperatures between 230 and 280°C. Finally, the influence of torrefaction on large cylindrical wood particles with diameters between 10 and 28 mm for beech and willow wood has been investigated. Fixed bed experiments are carried out at temperatures between 200 - 300°C to determine the product composition and the intra particle temperature profile depending on location, time and temperature. The condensable products are characterized and the exothermal effect is quantified. It is shown that the maximum temperature increase due to this exothermal effect is between 40°C inside a large particle. Also an analytical mathematical model has been developed based on the reaction mechanism found with thermogravimetric analysis and for the kinetic modelling to describe this internal temperature profile. Some modifications are applied to the model found to describe the weight loss kinetics. The model describes the temperature profile in the particle as a function of time, temperature, location and the progress of the reaction. The high number of required numerical parameters limits the numerical validation of the torrefaction model and makes biomass modeling complicated. | |
| 01/01/2011 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
2.2 Supertorrefaction
Shu's improvements to torrefaction involve using higher temperatures and molten salts as the heat transfer fluid. Supertorrefaction (STR) submerges wood chips or other forms of shredded biomass into a bath of molten salts -- NaOAc/KOAc for example -- that is held at an average temperature of 450 ℃.[\[Source\]](https://www.forbes.com/sites/rodadams/2016/09/16/sequestering-carbon-using-mass-quantities-of-small-scale-supertorrefaction-systems/#60044caf4e04)
**Highlights:**
* There are various techniques that can be applied to convert biomass into biofuels but recently the thermochemical conversion of Biomass in a molten salt medium has received a lot of attention. In this work, it will be attempted to carry out the liquefaction of kraft lignin in ZnCl2-KCl-NaCl salt mixture. At ZnCl2:KCl:NaCl= 60:20:20 in mole fraction composition, the salt should exhibit a eutectic temperature of 203°C, which will be advantageous for the liquefaction process.[ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96468-2995696136)
| 2.2.1 | Supertorrefaction |
|---|---|
| Viscosity of Molten Salts for Catalytic Biomass Conversion | |
| Our planet is suffering from climate change and our energy consumption is increasing each year. An effective way of tackling the situation is to simply substitute our consummable resources with renewable energy. Biomass has numerous advantages and is therefore seen as a potential replacement for non renewable energy. There are various techniques that can be applied to convert biomass into biofuels but recently the thermochemical conversion of Biomass in a molten salt medium has received a lot of attention. In this work, it will be attempted to carry out the liquefaction of kraft lignin in ZnCl2-KCl-NaCl salt mixture. At ZnCl2:KCl:NaCl= 60:20:20 in mole fraction composition, the salt should exhibit a eutectic temperature of 203°C, which will be advantageous for the liquefaction process. | |
| 09/30/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.2.2 | Supertorrefaction |
| Batch-process supertorrefaction system and method | |
|
1. A supertorrefaction system comprising: at least one supertorrefying unit defining a receiving space for receiving biomass; a liquid tank in fluid communication with the at least one supertorrefying unit and containing a first heat transfer liquid; a wash tank in fluid communication with the at least one supertorrefying unit and containing a second heat transfer liquid; a first filtration apparatus provided between the at least one supertorrefying unit and the liquid tank; a second filtration apparatus provided between the at least one supertorrefying unit and the wash tank; and an oxidizer comprising carbonate salt and nitrate salt as catalyst; wherein the at least one supertorrefying unit receives the first heat transfer liquid from the liquid tank to supertorrefy and convert the biomass into charcoal, and receives the second heat transfer liquid from the wash tank to rinse and cool the charcoal without moving the biomass and the charcoal during supertorrefaction and cooling processes; wherein the wash tank includes a plurality of basins containing the second heat transfer liquid having different temperatures and salinity, and wherein the first heat transfer liquid is molten salt. 2. The supertorrefaction system according to claim 1 , further comprising a holding member for carrying and moving the biomass to the receiving space and for carrying and moving the charcoal out of the receiving space. 3. The supertorrefaction system according to claim 1 , wherein the second heat transfer liquid is water. 4. The supertorrefaction system according to claim 2 , wherein the holding member includes a meshed basket. 5. The supertorrefaction system according to claim 2 , wherein the first heat transfer liquid is in direct contact with the biomass carried by the holding member and the second heat transfer liquid is in direct contact with the charcoal carried by the holding member, when the holding member is placed in the receiving space and when the first and second heat transfer liquids are supplied to the receiving space of the at least one supertorrefying unit at different time. 6. The supertorrefaction system according to claim 1 , further comprising a filtration apparatus disposed between the at least one supertorrefying unit and at least one of the liquid tank and the wash tank. 7. The supertorrefaction system according to claim 1 , further comprising a volatile organic compound (VOC) unit in fluid communication with the at least one supertorrefying unit for collecting VOCs. 8. The supertorrefaction system according to claim 7 , wherein the VOC unit includes a scrubber containing carbonate salt to remove acetic acid from the VOCs. 9. The supertorrefaction system according to claim 8 , wherein the VOC unit further includes a condenser for separating condensable VOCs as a bioliquor from incondensable gases. 10. The supertorrefaction system according to claim 1 , wherein the first heat transfer liquid includes LiOAc, NaOAc, KOAc in various singlet, binary, or ternary combinations. 11. A method of batch-processing biomass into charcoal, comprising: providing biomass in a receiving space of at least one supertorrefying unit; supplying a first heat transfer liquid to the supertorrefying unit to supertorrefy and converting the biomass into charcoal; sequentially supplying a second heat transfer liquid having different temperatures and different salinity to the at least one supertorrefying unit to cool the charcoal; removing charcoal fines particles from the first heat transfer liquid by a first filtration apparatus; removing charcoal fines particles from the second heat transfer liquid by a second filtration apparatus; and treating the first heat transfer liquid tainted by charcoal fines particles generated during a supertorrefaction process by an oxidizer in the at least one supertorrefying unit; wherein said oxidizer comprises carbonate salt and nitrate salt as catalyst; wherein the biomass is not moved in the at least one supertorrefying unit during supertorrefaction of the biomass and the charcoal is not moved in the at least one supertorrefying unit during cooling of the charcoal; wherein the first heat transfer liquid is molten salt. 12. The method according to claim 11 , further comprising preheating and supertorrefying the biomass in the receiving space of the supertorrefying unit and cooling the charcoal in the same receiving space of the supertorrefying unit. 13. The method according to claim 11 , wherein the second heat transfer liquid is water. 14. The method according to claim 11 , further comprising supplying the first heat transfer liquids to preheat and supertorrefy the biomass in the supertorrefying unit. 15. The method according to claim 11 , further comprising transporting the biomass into the supertorrefying unit before the first heat transfer liquid is supplied to the supertorrefying unit. 16. The method according to claim 15 , further comprising causing the first heat transfer liquid to be in direct contact with the biomass in the supertorrefying unit and causing the second heat transfer liquid to be in direct contact with the charcoal. 17. The method according to claim 16 , further comprising changing at least one of operating temperature, residence time, and pretreatment impregnation of the biomass to generate different types of charcoal. |
|
| 05/07/2015 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Patent | |
| 2.2.3 | Supertorrefaction |
| SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PRODUCTION OF A RENEWABLE LIQUID FUEL | |
|
1 . A method of making a green biofuel based on renewable biomass feedstock, comprising: receiving biomass feedstock; combining the biomass feedstock with a biocarbon colloidal dispersion into a blend; and pumping the blend through a length of first pipe having a first diameter surrounded by second pipe having a second diameter larger than the first diameter, the second pipe being supplied with a continuous flow of heat exchange fluid, the length of the first pipe having an input end for receiving the blend, and an output end for outputting a second blend of torrefied biomass and biocarbon colloidal dispersion generated within the length of the first pipe. 2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the heat exchange fluid is molten salt. 3 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising particulating the second blend to have a particle distribution in the range of 10 micron to 100 nanometers. 4 . The method of claim 3 , wherein the particle distribution has an average particle size of 200 nanometers to 400 nanometers. 5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the torrefied biomass is friable. 6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the biomass feedstock includes waste from a process that produces a combustible liquid from raw biomass. 7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein generating the second blend produces a low moisture biocarbon, a condensable gas and a liquid component. 8 . A system for carbonizing a biomass, comprising: a pump adapted to receive a blended feedstock of noncarbonized biomass and bio fuel, the bio fuel lubricating the bio mass; a reactor configured to continuously receive the blended feedstock and to carbonize the uncarbonized biomass of the blended feedstock, the bio fuel of the blended feedstock also providing for enhanced transfer of heat to the uncarbonized biomass. 9 . The system of claim 8 , wherein heat is provided to the reactor using a recycling molten salt stream, the molten salt having a first temperature. 10 . The system of claim 8 , wherein the reactor outputs a continuous stream of a second blend containing carbonized biomass and bio fuel; and further comprising a pyrolysis reactor configured to continuously receive the second blend and transform the carbonized biomass into a pyrolyzed product. 11 . The system of claim 10 , wherein heat is provide to the pyrolysis reactor using a second recycling molten salt stream, the molten stream having a second temperature. 12 . The system of claim 10 , wherein the pyrolyzed product is a pyro oil. 13 . The system of claim 12 , wherein the pyro oil is added to carbonized biomass and then polymerized to maintain the carbonized biomass in a desired form or shape. 14 . The system of claim 8 , wherein the blended feedstock includes feedstock derived from a plant shell. 15 . A system for carbonizing biomass, comprising: a sealable container configured to receive a blend of uncarbonized biomass and a biofuel, the bio fuel providing enhanced heat transfer to the bio fuel; a lid for sealing the container; a heat source for heating the sealed container. 16 . The system of claim 15 , wherein the heat source is a recycling flow of molten salt. 17 . The system of claim 15 , wherein the heat source is a recycling flow of the bio fuel. 18 . The system of claim 7 , wherein the condensable gas or liquid component may be further processed to form a pyro oil. 19 . The system of claim 18 , wherein the pyro oil is added to the low moisture biocarbon, and the mixture of low moisture biocarbon and pyro oil is further processed to polymerized the mixture in a desired form or shape. 20 . The system of claim 19 , wherein the desired form or shape includes a granule, crumb, small or large cube or ball, a tube or mini-tube, micro-tube, pellet, a briquette, a mini-briquette, or other large or small shape. |
|
| 08/15/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Patent | |
2.3 Pyrolysis
Pyrolysis is the thermal decomposition of materials at elevated temperatures in an inert atmosphere. It involves a change of chemical composition.[\[Wiki\]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyrolysis)
**Highlights:**
* Pyrolysis is a promising technology for the production of marketable energy products from waste mixtures, as it decomposes heterogeneous material into homogenous fuel products. **This research assessed the ability of slow pyrolysis to convert three waste streams, composed of fibre residues contaminated with different plastic mixtures, into char and tarry phase products** at three different temperatures (300, 425 and 550 °C). Significant amounts of hydrocarbon plastics in the feed materials increased the calorific values of the char (up to 32.9 MJ/kg) and tarry phase (up to 42.8 MJ/kg) products, comparable to high volatile bituminous A coal and diesel respectively. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96339-2563570629)
* This paper presents a mobile autothermal pyrolysis system for locally converting biomass feedstock into bio-oil that can be transported easily. The system includes a compact internally interconnected fluidized bed (IIFB) reactor, a biomass pretreatment facility, and a product recovery unit. On the basis of modified chemical kinetic models, the pyrolysis process of common forestry and agricultural residues in this mobile system has been simulated. The pyrolytic product distribution from simulation has good agreements with experimental results. Then, the techno-economic performance of the mobile pyrolysis system in China is evaluated and compared with other liquid biofuel production facilities, i.e., fixed biomass pyrolysis plants and Fischer–Tropsch liquids production via biomass gasification (BG-FT). The results indicate that the biomass feedstock cost of mobile pyrolysis systems can be effectively reduced. Compared with the fixed biofuel production plant, the labor cost is higher for the mobile plant. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96339-2788065379)
* The purpose of this article is to demonstrate how the generated sludge from fermentation can be further converted into useful products such as hydrogen, methane and carbon monoxide, all produced in their maximum possible concentrations. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96339-2026844222)
| 2.3.1 | Pyrolysis |
|---|---|
| Biomass Chars: Elaboration, Characterization and Applications | |
| This book contains the successful invited submissions [1–15] to a Special Issue of Energies onthe subject area of “Biomass Chars: Elaboration, Characterization, and Applications”. The invitededitors have decided to focus the Special Issue on the specific topic of biomass transformation and use.In fact, biomass can be converted to energy, biofuels, and bioproducts, via thermochemical conversionprocesses such as combustion, pyrolysis, and gasification. Combustion technology is most widelyapplied on an industrial scale. However, biomass gasification and pyrolysis processes are still in theresearch and development stage. The major products from these processes are syngas, bio-oil, andchar (called also biochar for agronomic applications). Among these products, biomass chars have beenreceiving increasing attention for different applications such as gasification, co-combustion, catalyst oradsorbent precursors, soil amendment, carbon fuel cells, and supercapacitors.This Special Issue provides an overview for biomass chars production methods (pyrolysis,hydrothermal carbonization, etc.), the characterization techniques (scanning electronic microscopy,X-ray fluorescence, nitrogen adsorption, Raman spectroscopy, nuclear magnetic resonancespectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, temperature programmed desorption, massspectrometry, etc.), their properties and their suitable recovery processes.Topics of interest for the call included, but were not limited to the production of biochar for: Biofuel production Soil amendment Carbon sequestration Heterogeneous catalysis Syngas production Pollutant adsorptionResponses to our call had the following statistics: Submissions (25); Publications (15); Rejections (10); Article types: research article (15).The authors’ geographical distribution (published papers) is: China (4) USA (2) Canada (2) | |
| 12/03/2017 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.3.2 | Pyrolysis |
| Combustion Behavior of Animal-Manure-Based Hydrochar and Pyrochar | |
| The sustainability of energy production can be increased by combusting waste-derived solid fuels, alone or as blends with coal. This paper investigated whether two thermochemical processes (hydrothermal carbonization and pyrolysis) can be used in sustainable manure management systems to convert surplus manure waste streams into renewable fuels. Hydrochars and pyrochars derived from swine manure and poultry litter at various process conditions were characterized. Their combustion behavior was studied by thermogravimetric analysis, individually and simulated as a blend with fossil coal. The hydrochars underwent two combustion stages, active and char combustion, while the pyrochars and four fossil coals showed only one stage. The substantial differences in characteristic combustion temperatures, kinetic parameters, and ash content between animal-manure-derived chars and coal suggest that fossil coals should not be replaced entirely with char, but used preferably as a blend. Simulation of blends with coal sho... | |
| 12/18/2018 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.3.3 | Pyrolysis |
| Copper(II)-mediated thermolysis of alginates: a model kinetic study on the influence of metal ions in the thermochemical processing of macroalgae | |
| Thermochemical processing methods such as pyrolysis are of growing interest as a means of converting biomass into fuels and commodity chemicals in a sustainable manner. Macroalgae, or seaweed, represent a novel class of feedstock for pyrolysis that, owing to the nature of the environments in which they grow coupled with their biochemistry, naturally possess high metal contents. Although the impact of metals upon the pyrolysis of terrestrial biomass is well documented, their influence on the thermochemical conversion of marine-derived feeds is largely unknown. Furthermore, these effects are inherently difficult to study, owing to the heterogeneous character of natural seaweed samples. The work described in this paper uses copper(II) alginate, together with alginic acid and sodium alginate as model compounds for exploring the effects of metals upon macroalgae thermolysis. A thermogravimetric analysis–Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic study revealed that, unusually, Cu2+ ions promote the onset of pyrolysis in the alginate polymer, with copper(II) alginate initiating rapid devolatilization at 143°C, 14°C lower than alginic acid and 61°C below the equivalent point for sodium alginate. Moreover, this effect was mirrored in a sample of wild Laminaria digitata that had been doped with Cu2+ ions prior to pyrolysis, thus validating the use of alginates as model compounds with which to study the thermolysis of macroalgae. These observations indicate the varying impact of different metal species on thermochemical behaviour of seaweeds and offer an insight into the pyrolysis of brown macroalgae used in phytoremediation of metal-containing waste streams. | |
| 12/21/2012 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.3.4 | Pyrolysis |
| Effect of autohydrolysis pretreatment on biomass structure and the resulting bio-oil from a pyrolysis process | |
| Abstract Pyrolysis is a promising method for converting biomass to biofuels. However, some of pyrolysis oil's physiochemical properties still limit its commercial applications. In this study, the autohydrolysis pretreatment at 175 ± 3 °C for 40 min was conducted to improve the resulting pine pyrolysis oil’s properties as a fuel. During autohydrolysis, deacetylation and decomposition of hemicellulose was observed by ion-exchange chromatography and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR). In addition, the cleavage of lignin ether bonds was clearly determined by 13 C cross-polarization/magic angle spinning (CP/MAS) nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). Phosphitylation followed by 31 P NMR analysis of the heavy oils gave detailed structural information of the hydroxyl groups; the results revealed that autohydrolysis pretreatment led to a reduction of carboxyl acids in the heavy oils generated at all three pyrolysis temperatures (400, 500, and 600 °C). The 31 P NMR analysis also revealed that autohydrolysis pretreatment led to a reduction of condensed phenolic hydroxyl groups in the heavy oils produced at 600 °C. 1 H- 13 C heteronuclear single-quantum correlation (HSQC) NMR analysis showed that at a pyrolysis temperature of 600 °C, the pretreated pine produced lower methoxy group constituents. Both 31 P and HSQC NMR results indicated that autohydrolysis pretreatment increased levoglucosan yields in the bio-oils. | |
| 10/01/2017 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.3.5 | Pyrolysis |
| Formation mechanism of levoglucosan and formaldehyde during cellulose pyrolysis | |
| Biomass pyrolysis is an efficient way to transform raw biomass or organic waste materials into useable energy, including liquid, solid, and gaseous materials. Levoglucosan (1,6-anhydro-β-d-glucopyranose) and formaldehyde are two important products in biomass pyrolysis. The formation mechanism of these two products was investigated using the density functional theory (DFT) method based on quantum mechanics. It was found that active anhydroglucose can be obtained from a cellulose homolytic reaction during high-temperature steam gasification of the biomass process. Anhydroglucose undergoes a hydrogen-donor reaction and forms an intermediate, which can transform into the products via three pathways, one (path 1) for the formation of levoglucosan and two (paths 2 and 3) for formaldehyde. A total of six elementary reactions are involved. At a pressure of 1 atm, levoglucosan can be formed at all of the temperatures (450–750 K) considered in this simulation, whereas formaldehyde can be formed only when the temper... | |
| 08/18/2011 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.3.6 | Pyrolysis |
| From waste biomass to chemicals and energy via microwave-assisted processes | |
| Lignocellulosic waste material serves as a considerable renewable feedstock that may be used to replace oil refineries with biorefineries. Indeed, all biomass components can be converted into platform chemicals, bioenergy and materials. However, thermo-chemical and conventional catalytic conversions suffer from a number of drawbacks. Enabling technologies, such as microwaves (MW), can reduce process times and energy consumption, leading to improvements in product quality and yields. The remarkable advantages of MW over conventional heating, which originate from its direct dielectric interaction with biomass, are documented in this comprehensive survey. Moreover, the use of alternative solvents that interact strongly with MW in biphasic systems can circumvent additional upgrading and separation steps. Finally, this review discusses some of the challenges that MW irradiation faces, including the poor dielectric properties of some substrates and issues related to its large-scale application in pyrolysis, hydrothermal conversion and catalytic routes to biofuels, materials and platform chemicals. Waste biomass may well be the benchmark feedstock for the development of a circular bioeconomic approach. | |
| 01/01/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.3.7 | Pyrolysis |
| In-Situ Upgrading of Biomass Pyrolysis Vapor | |
| Processes for thermal conversion of biomass are provided. The processes involve upgrading the pyrolysis vapor from a pyrolysis reactor. The steps include thermally converting a biomass feedstock in a pyrolysis reactor, recovering a pyrolysis vapor from the reactor, passing the pyrolysis vapor in contact with a cracking catalyst, a water-gas shift reaction catalyst, a hydrotreating catalyst, and an acid catalyst, and converting the resulting upgraded pyrolysis vapor into a liquid product. The resulting biooil liquid product is more refined, and the overall processes offer economic and energy efficiency. | |
| 08/21/2014 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.3.8 | Pyrolysis |
| Maximizing the concentrations of hydrogen, carbon monoxide and methane produced from the pyrolysis of a MixAlco process derived sludge | |
| Abstract The MixAlco process converts heterogeneous biomass feedstocks into gasoline, JP-8 and diesel via biochemical and chemical pathways, generating sludge in the effluent stream. The purpose of this article is to demonstrate how the generated sludge can be further converted into useful products such as hydrogen, methane and carbon monoxide, all produced in their maximum possible concentrations. Experiments were performed in a non-catalytic environment at atmospheric pressure conditions, studying synthesis gas and methane concentrations for temperatures in the range of 630/903–770/1043 °C/K and pretreated sludge feed rates in the range of 290–374 g/min. With an auger driven reactor system and the statistical response surface method, the highest possible synthesis gas composition was 43.9 ± 3.36 vol% H 2 /33.3 ± 3.29 vol% CO at 740/1013 °C/K. The methane concentration was 20.3 ± 2.99 vol%. The generated empirical models for both hydrogen and methane concentrations were significant but that for the carbon monoxide concentration behavior was not. As an input factor, temperature was significant but sludge feed rate was not. Mass and energy balances revealed process efficiency decreased with increase in temperature although the process could be self-sustaining even at the lowest process efficiency. | |
| 07/01/2013 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.3.9 | Pyrolysis |
| Mobile Autothermal Pyrolysis System for Local Biomass Conversion: Process Simulation and Techno-Economic Analysis | |
| This paper presents a mobile autothermal pyrolysis system for locally converting biomass feedstock into bio-oil that can be transported easily. The system includes a compact internally interconnected fluidized bed (IIFB) reactor, a biomass pretreatment facility, and a product recovery unit. On the basis of modified chemical kinetic models, the pyrolysis process of common forestry and agricultural residues in this mobile system has been simulated. The pyrolytic product distribution from simulation has good agreements with experimental results. Then, the techno-economic performance of the mobile pyrolysis system in China is evaluated and compared with other liquid biofuel production facilities, i.e., fixed biomass pyrolysis plants and Fischer–Tropsch liquids production via biomass gasification (BG-FT). The results indicate that the biomass feedstock cost of mobile pyrolysis systems can be effectively reduced. Compared with the fixed biofuel production plant, the labor cost is higher for the mobile plant. Th... | |
| 02/20/2018 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.3.10 | Pyrolysis |
| Pyrolysis of fibre residues with plastic contamination from a paper recycling mill: Energy recoveries | |
| Abstract Pyrolysis is a promising technology for the production of marketable energy products from waste mixtures, as it decomposes heterogeneous material into homogenous fuel products. This research assessed the ability of slow pyrolysis to convert three waste streams, composed of fibre residues contaminated with different plastic mixtures, into char and tarry phase products at three different temperatures (300, 425 and 550 °C). The products were characterised in terms of mass yield, higher heating value (HHV) and gross energy conversion (EC). Significant amounts of hydrocarbon plastics in the feed materials increased the calorific values of the char (up to 32.9 MJ/kg) and tarry phase (up to 42.8 MJ/kg) products, comparable to high volatile bituminous A coal and diesel respectively. For all three waste streams converted at 300 °C, the majority of the energy in the feedstock was recovered in the char product (>80%), while deoxygenation of fibre component resulted in char with increased calorific value (up to 31.6 MJ/kg) being produced. Pyrolysis at 425 °C for two of the waste streams containing significant amounts of plastic produced both a valuable char and tarry phase, which resulted in an EC greater than 74%. Full conversion of plastic at 550 °C increased the tarry phase yield but dramatically decreased the char HHV. The influence of temperature on product yield and HHV was discussed based on the pyrolysis mechanisms and in relation to the plastic composition of the waste streams. | |
| 02/01/2017 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.3.11 | Pyrolysis |
| Pyrolytic Fractionation: A Promising Thermochemical Technique for Processing Oleaginous (Algal) Biomass | |
| We report the development of a two-step pyrolytic fractionation approach that is especially applicable to processing oleaginous algae feed stocks. The first step is a low-temperature pyrolysis (T ∼ 300–320 °C) to produce bio-oils from degradation of protein and carbohydrate fractions. Solid residues left behind can subsequently be subjected to a second higher temperature pyrolysis (T ∼ 420–430 °C) to volatilize and/or degrade triglycerides to produce fatty acids, their derivatives, and long chain hydrocarbons. Thus, pyrolytic fractionation can be used to “fractionate” oleaginous biomass and separately recover triglyceride degradation products. Proof-of-concept micropyrolyzer and subsequent lab-scale fixed-bed experiments were performed using oleaginous Chlorella sp. and Scenedesmus sp. to demonstrate the pyrolytic fractionation technique and determine bio-oil yields. As expected, triglyceride-specific bio-oils were rich in hydrocarbons and free fatty acids, were nearly free of water, short-chain organic a... | |
| 01/02/2018 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.3.12 | Pyrolysis |
| Thermal Processes for Biomass to Energy Conversion | |
| Production of energy from biomassis an attractive alternative to conventional fossil fuels. Use of solid organic wastes to produce biofuel is seen as a promising route from the sustainability point of view. Pyrolysis is one of the possible thermochemical methods to convert solid biomasses to valuable liquid and gas products. In this study, the slow pyrolysis process of poultry litter was investigated using different experimental and analytical techniques. A fixed bed reactor was used for the simulation of the slow pyrolysis process up to a constant temperature (400-800°C) under nitrogen flow. Yields of the different product fractions were determined. Several analytic methods were used to characterise the products. On-line FTIR techniques were used to detect the most significant compounds in the evolved gas. GC-MS results allowed the identification of the most important categories of compounds in the liquid condensate. HCNS composition of the products was revealed by elemental analysis and the fate of nitrogen and sulphur, present in relevant amounts in the original substrate, was studied. The energy transfer from the original biomass substrate to the different product fractions was also investigated. However, the bio-oil obtained from pyrolysis can be used as biofuel only after an upgrading step. A suitable method for upgrading bio-oil is catalytic cracking of the pyrolysis products, which converts high molecular weight compounds of the bio-oil into lower-weight molecules. Therefore, in the following step of the present study in-situ catalytic pyrolysis of poultry litter was studied by zeolites (zsm-5) catalyst. In order to study the effect of influential factors (temperature and catalyst to biomass ratio) on the obtained products, experimental design techniques were used. Overall, the results achieved shed some light on the potential use of the slow pyrolysis process for sanitation and waste-to-energy valorization of poultry litter. | |
| 05/18/2016 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.3.13 | Pyrolysis |
| Upgrading pyrolysis bio-oil to biofuel over bifunctional Co-Zn/HZSM-5 catalyst in supercritical methanol | |
| Abstract The role of catalyst is essential in processes of upgrading biomass pyrolysis bio-oil into hydrocarbon biofuel. While the majority of heterogeneous catalytic processes are conducted in the presence of gas (nearly ideal) or liquid phase, a growing number of processes are utilizing supercritical fluids (SCFs) as reaction media. Although hydrodeoxygenation (HDO) is proven a promising process for pyrolysis bio-oil upgrading to hydrocarbon biofuel, catalyst efficiency remains a challenge. Integrating heterogeneous catalysts with SCFs in a bio-oil HDO process was investigated in this study. Bifunctional Co-Zn/HZSM-5 catalysts were firstly used to upgrade bio-oil to biofuel in supercritical methanol. The loading of Co and Zn did not change HZSM-5 crystalline structure. Physicochemical properties of biofuel produced by Co and/or Zn loaded HZSM-5 catalysts such as water content, total acid number, viscosity and higher heating value improved. Bimetallic Co-Zn/HZSM-5 catalysts showed enhanced reactions of decarboxylation and decarbonylation that resulted in higher yields of CO and CO 2 . Bimetallic Co-Zn/HZSM-5 catalysts were more effective for bio-oil HDO than monometallic Co/HZSM-5 or Zn/HZSM-5 catalyst , which was attributed to the synergistic effect of Co and Zn on HZSM-5 support. Bimetallic Co-Zn/HZSM-5 catalysts increased biofuel yields and hydrocarbons contents in biofuels in comparison with monometallic Co/HZSM-5 and Zn/HZSM-5 catalysts. 5%Co15%Zn/HZSM-5 catalyst generated the highest biofuel yield at 22.13 wt.%, and 15%Co5%Zn/HZSM-5 catalyst produced biofuel with the highest hydrocarbons content at 35.33%. Hydrogenation and esterification are two dominant reactions in bio-oil HDO over Co-Zn/HZSM-5 catalysts in supercritical methanol. The energy efficiency of biofuel product was 30.99–58.80% for Co-Zn/HZSM-5 catalysts. Co-Zn/HZSM-5 is a promising catalyst to produce biofuel with high quality in bio-oil HDO. | |
| 09/01/2017 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.3.14 | Pyrolysis |
| Waste to bioenergy: a review on the recent conversion technologies | |
| Scientific studies have demonstrated that it is possible to generate a wide variety of bioenergy from biomass residues and waste, and however its cost is not competitive with petro-fuels and other renewable energy. On-going efforts are continued extensively to improve conversion technologies in order to reduce production costs. The present review focuses on the conversion technologies for transforming biomass residues and waste to biofuels, specifically their technological concepts, options and prospects for implementation are addressed. The emerging developments in the two primary conversion pathways, namely the thermochemical (i.e. gasification, liquefaction, and pyrolysis) and biochemical (i.e. anaerobic digestion, alcoholic fermentation and photobiological hydrogen production) conversion techniques, are evaluated. Additionally, transesterification, which appears to be the simplest and most economical route to produce biodiesel in large quantity, is discussed. Lastly, the strategies for direct conversion of biomass residues and waste to bioelectricity including the use of combustion and microbial fuel cells are reviewed. | |
| 12/01/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.3.15 | Pyrolysis |
| Process for producing high quality bio-oil in high yield | |
|
1. A process for converting a solid biomass material comprising minerals to a high quality bio-oil in high yield, said process comprising: (a) contacting said solid biomass with a solvent so as to dissolve at least part of the minerals present in said solid biomass, wherein said solvent comprises a phosphoric acid; (b) at least partially removing said solvent from said solid biomass via a liquid/solid separation method to form a demineralized biomass; (c) subjecting said demineralized biomass to a pretreatment step, wherein said pretreatment step comprises improving the accessibility of said demineralized biomass by opening the texture of the particles of said demineralized biomass, wherein said improving comprises heating said demineralized biomass to a temperature in the range of from 90 to 300° C. in an oxygen-free atmosphere to form a pretreated solid biomass; and (d) subjecting at least a portion of said pretreated solid biomass to a pyrolysis step in a pyrolysis reactor and in the presence of a regenerated catalyst to produce a bio-oil having a Total Acid Number (TAN) of less than 30 and a used catalyst, wherein said bio-oil has a TAN of y and a yield of x, such that the ratio x/y is greater than 1.5; and (e) regenerating said used catalyst in a regenerator to produce a flue gas and said regenerated catalyst. 2. The process of claim 1 wherein said solid biomass comprises cellulose. 3. The process of claim 2 wherein said solid biomass is a lignocellulosic biomass material. 4. The process of claim 1 wherein said solvent comprises a chelant. 5. The process of claim 1 wherein said temperature is in the range of from 110 to 200° C. 6. The process of claim 1 wherein said temperature is in the range of from 200 to 300° C. 7. The process of claim 1 wherein said regenerated catalyst is water-insoluble. 8. The process of claim 1 wherein said regenerated catalyst comprises an acid. 9. The process of claim 1 wherein said regenerated catalyst comprises a zeolite. 10. The process of claim 9 wherein said regenerated catalyst comprises a Y-zeolite, a ZSM-5 zeolite, or a mixture thereof. 11. The process of claim 1 wherein said regenerated catalyst comprises alumina. 12. The process of claim 11 wherein said alumina comprises gamma-alumina. 13. The process of claim 1 wherein said regenerated catalyst comprises a solid base. 14. The process of claim 13 wherein said regenerated catalyst comprises hydrotalcite; a hydrotalcite-like material; a clay; a layered hydroxy salt; a metal oxide; a metal hydroxide; a mixed metal oxide; or a mixture thereof. 15. The process of claim 1 wherein said bio-oil has a TAN of less than 5. 16. The process of claim 1 wherein said ratio x/y is greater than 2. 17. The process of claim 1 wherein said ratio x/y is greater than 3. 18. The process of claim 1 wherein the pretreatment step is carried out in a mixer, a mill, a grinder, or a kneader. 19. The process of claim 1 wherein the pyrolysis reactor comprises a fluid bed reactor, a moving bed reactor, or a cyclone reactor. 20. The process of claim 1 wherein said pyrolysis step produces gases having a reducing potential, further comprising using said gases in said pyrolysis step to thereby reduce the oxygen content of said bio-oil. 21. The process of claim 1 further comprising recycling the excess heat from said pyrolysis step to said pretreatment step. 22. The process of claim 1 further comprising recycling the flue gas from said regenerator to said pretreatment step. 23. The process of claim 1 wherein said liquid/solid separation method comprises filtering. 24. The process of claim 1 wherein said contacting of step (a) occurs at a temperature in the range of 40 to 95° C. 25. The process of claim 1 further comprising separating said bio-oil into an aqueous phase and an organophilic phase in a skim tank. |
|
| 03/24/2010 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Patent | |
2.4 Fast/flash pyrolysis
Fast pyrolysis is a process in which organic materials are rapidly heated to 450 - 600 °C in the absence of air. Under these conditions, organic vapors, pyrolysis gases and charcoal are produced. The vapors are condensed to bio-oil. Typically, 60-75 wt. % of the feedstock is converted into oil.[\[Source\]](https://www.btgworld.com/en/rtd/technologies/fast-pyrolysis#:\~:text=Fast%20pyrolysis%20is%20a%20process,feedstock%20is%20converted%20into%20oil.)
In flash pyrolysis the heatin rates are even more rapid.
**Highlights:**
* **Fast pyrolysis of biomass is praised as an efficient and feasible process to selectively convert lignocellulosic biomass into bio-fuels and bio-chemicals.** Pith of sugarcane bagasse could be an attractive lignocellulosic waste from depithing process from pulp and paper mill, which can utilize for production of biofuel and added value products. [ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96416-2771828318)
* UOP LLC proposed to demonstrate a fast pyrolysis based integrated biorefinery. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) has expertise in an important technology area of interest to UOP for use in their pyrolysis-based biorefinery. This CRADA project provides the supporting technology development and demonstration to allow incorporation of this technology into the biorefinery. PNNL developed catalytic hydrothermal gasification (CHG) for use with aqueous streams within the pyrolysis biorefinery. These aqueous streams included the aqueous phase separated from the fast pyrolysis bio-oil and the aqueous byproduct streams formed in the hydroprocessing of the bio-oil to finished products. The purpose of this project was to demonstrate a technically and economically viable technology for converting renewable biomass feedstocks to sustainable and fungible transportation fuels. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96416-2339007579)
| 2.4.1 | Fast/flash pyrolysis |
|---|---|
| Catalytic fast pyrolysis of sugarcane bagasse pith with HZSM-5 catalyst using tandem micro-reactor-GC-MS | |
| ABSTRACTFast pyrolysis of biomass is praised as an efficient and feasible process to selectively convert lignocellulosic biomass into bio-fuels and bio-chemicals. Pith of sugarcane bagasse could be an attractive lignocellulosic waste from depithing process from pulp and paper mill, which can utilize for production of biofuel and added value products. In this study, we employed a tandem micro-reactor coupled with gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy to investigate the products distribution from pith of sugarcane bagasse via catalytic fast pyrolysis. In the operating conditions, pyrolysis temperature and HZSM-5 catalyst had significant effect on products and distributions. An increase in the pyrolysis temperature from 400°C to 550°C led to an increase in the yield of phenolic compounds (6.3%, w/w%), followed decrease at higher temperature. The maximum carboxylic acids (10.6%) and furfural (3.5%) were obtained at lower temperature. At presence of HZSM-5 catalyst, the selectivity of aromatics such as benzene,... | |
| 01/02/2018 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.4.2 | Fast/flash pyrolysis |
| Characterization of fast pyrolysis bio-oil properties by near-infrared spectroscopic data | |
| Abstract Pyrolysis transforms bulky and heterogeneous lignocellulosic biomass into more easily-handled oils that can be upgraded into bio-based transportation fuels. Existing systems for monitoring pyrolysis processes and characterizing their products rely on slow and time-consuming wet chemical analyses. On-line near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy could potentially replace such analyses, providing real-time data and reducing costs. To test the usefulness of NIR methods in characterizing pyrolysis oils and processes, biomass from conifers, Salix, and reed canary grass was milled and pyrolyzed at 675, 750, and 775 °C. Two separate pyrolytic fractions (aerosol and condensed) were produced in each experiment, and NIR spectra were collected for each fraction. Multivariate modelling of the resulting data clearly showed that the samples’ NIR spectra could be used to accurately predict important properties of the pyrolysis oils such as their energy values, main organic element (C, H and O) contents, and water content. The spectra also contained predictive information on the samples’ origins, fraction, and temperature treatment, demonstrating the potential of on-line NIR techniques for monitoring pyrolytic production processes and characterizing important properties of pyrolytic oils from lignocellulosic biomass. | |
| 08/01/2018 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.4.3 | Fast/flash pyrolysis |
| Pilot-Scale Biorefinery: Sustainable Transport Fuels from Biomass via Integrated Pyrolysis and Catalytic Hydroconversion - Wastewater Cleanup by Catalytic Hydrothermal Gasification | |
| DOE-EE Bioenergy Technologies Office has set forth several goals to increase the use of bioenergy and bioproducts derived from renewable resources. One of these goals is to facilitate the implementation of the biorefinery. The biorefinery will include the production of liquid fuels, power and, in some cases, products. The integrated biorefinery should stand-alone from an economic perspective with fuels and power driving the economy of scale while the economics/profitability of the facility will be dependent on existing market conditions. UOP LLC proposed to demonstrate a fast pyrolysis based integrated biorefinery. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) has expertise in an important technology area of interest to UOP for use in their pyrolysis-based biorefinery. This CRADA project provides the supporting technology development and demonstration to allow incorporation of this technology into the biorefinery. PNNL developed catalytic hydrothermal gasification (CHG) for use with aqueous streams within the pyrolysis biorefinery. These aqueous streams included the aqueous phase separated from the fast pyrolysis bio-oil and the aqueous byproduct streams formed in the hydroprocessing of the bio-oil to finished products. The purpose of this project was to demonstrate a technically and economically viable technology for converting renewable biomass feedstocks to sustainable and fungible transportation fuels. Tomore » demonstrate the technology, UOP constructed and operated a pilot-scale biorefinery that processed one dry ton per day of biomass using fast pyrolysis. Specific objectives of the project were to: The anticipated outcomes of the project were a validated process technology, a range of validated feedstocks, product property and Life Cycle data, and technical and operating data upon which to base the design of a full-scale biorefinery. The anticipated long-term outcomes from successful commercialization of the technology were: (1) the replacement of a significant fraction of petroleum based fuels with advanced biofuels, leading to increased energy security and decreased carbon footprint; and (2) establishment of a new biofuel industry segment, leading to the creation of U.S. engineering, manufacturing, construction, operations and agricultural jobs. PNNL development of CHG progressed at two levels. Initial tests were made in the laboratory in both mini-scale and bench-scale continuous flow reactor systems. Following positive results, the next level of evaluation was in the scaled-up engineering development system, which was operated at PNNL.« less | |
| 06/19/2015 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.4.4 | Fast/flash pyrolysis |
| The catalyst/biomass integration concept for the direct thermo-catalytic conversion of biomass into either syngas or added-value molecules | |
| A new concept of integrated catalytic biomass thermochemical conversion based on the catalyst/biomass integration is proposed as a strategy to promote process intensification for either (i) the production of syngas from biomass gasification or (ii) the production of bio-oils with targeted composition from biomass flash pyrolysis. This concept is based on the smart and controlled integration of selected transition metal nanoparticles into the biomass feedstock during the pyrolysis step [1]. It relies on the postulate that heterogeneous catalysts, used to convert solid lignocellulosic biomass directly to either syngas or bio-oil, can be made substantially more efficient by improving the catalyst/biomass contact. Specifically, the achievement of such a close contact targets both (i) changes in the mechanisms of the first biomass decomposition stages, leading to high selectivity for specific products and (ii) a substantial improvement in catalyst efficiency for solid fuel conversion, allowing lower temperatures and/or shorter reaction times. This concept, illustrated in figure 1, consists of inserting the catalyst metal precursor into the lignocellulosic biomass feedstock during an impregnation stage with aqueous metal salt solutions, ensuring good precursor dispersion in the lignocellulosic matrix. The catalytic active phases, as metal-based nanoparticles, are then in-situ generated, during thermochemical conversion of the feedstock. As highlighted in figure 1, this concept involves different key reaction steps including i) insertion of catalyst precursor in the solid biomass, ii) catalytic pyrolysis of the as-pretreated biomass, iii) catalytic gasification of the nano-composite char residue and iv) recycling and reuse of the catalyst metal species maintained in the ashes. Each of these reaction steps requires a fundamental understanding in order to further develop new high-efficiency gasification and pyrolysis processes for producing both syngas and added-value molecules from biomass. On the basis of both the cumulated expertise and recent results associated to the application of this concept, this communication will focus on key results obtained using series of selected catalyst precursor for which in situ formation of metal nanoparticles during biomass pyrolysis was demonstrated. Fundamental issues regarding the mechanisms involved during biomass impregnation with metal precursors, formation and evolution of metal-based nanoparticles during pyrolysis [2-4], pyrolysis products selectivities and kinetic data associated to the metal/char nanocomposites gasification, will be addressed to depict the promises of this concept while underlining its associated challenges and prospects. (Texte integral) | |
| 01/01/2015 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
2.5 Hydropyrolysis
In hydropyrolysis, the reducing H~2~ gas generates hydrogen radicals which react with volatiles released by the biomass, usually in the presence of a catalyst, removing oxygen which can be released in the form of water, CO, and CO~2~, and producing hydrocarbons.[\[Paper\]](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0920586116300025)
**Highlights:**
* To increase the stability of pyrolysis bio-oil, pyrolysis can be carried out under a hydrogen environment called hydropyrolysis. In the early days, hydropyrolysis was performed without a catalyst, but the products of hydropyrolysis had similar disadvantages as those derived from conventional pyrolysis. After these studies, several direct routes for the production of gasoline and diesel range hydrocarbons or blending components were developed using catalytic hydropyrolysis, integrated hydropyrolysis and hydroconversion (integrated hydropylrolysis and hydroconversion (IH^2^®)) and a two-step biofuel process (H~2~Bioil).[\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96404-2976637787)
| 2.5.1 | Hydropyrolysis |
|---|---|
| A METHOD FOR HYDROPYROLYZING AN OXYGENATED ORGANIC FEEDSTOCK | |
| This invention relates to a process for thermochemically transforming biomass or other oxygenated feedstocks into high quality liquid hydrocarbon fuels. In particular, a catalytic hydropyrolysis reactor, containing a deep bed of fluidized catalyst particles is utilized to accept particles of biomass or other oxygenated feedstocks that are significantly smaller than the particles of catalyst in the fluidized bed. The reactor features an insert or other structure disposed within the reactor vessel that inhibits slugging of the bed and thereby minimizes attrition of the catalyst. Within the bed, the biomass feedstock is converted into a vapor-phase product, containing hydrocarbon molecules and other process vapors, and an entrained solid char product, which is separated from the vapor stream after the vapor stream has been exhausted from the top of the reactor. When the product vapor stream is cooled to ambient temperatures, a significant proportion of the hydrocarbons in the product vapor stream can be recovered as a liquid stream of hydrophobic hydrocarbons, with properties consistent with those of gasoline, kerosene, and diesel fuel. Separate streams of gasoline, kerosene, and diesel fuel may also be obtained, either via selective condensation of each type of fuel, or via later distillation of the combined hydrocarbon liquid. | |
| 12/17/2018 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.5.2 | Hydropyrolysis |
| Bubbling bed catalytic hydropyrolysis process | |
| The invention relates to a bubbling bed catalytic hydropyrolysis process. This invention relates to a process for thermochemically transforming biomass or other oxygenated feedstocks into high quality liquid hydrocarbon fuels. In particular, a catalytic hydropyrolysis reactor, containing a deep bed of fluidized catalyst particles is utilized to accept particles of biomass or other oxygenated feedstocks that are significantly smaller than the particles of catalyst in the fluidized bed. The reactor features an insert or other structure disposed within the reactor vessel that inhibits slugging of the bed and thereby minimizes attrition of the catalyst. Within the bed, the biomass feedstock is converted into a vapor-phase product, containing hydrocarbon molecules and other process vapors, and an entrained solid char product, which is separated from the vapor stream after the vapor stream has been exhausted from the top of the reactor. When the product vapor stream is cooled to ambient temperatures, a significant proportion of the hydrocarbons in the product vapor stream can be recovered as a liquid stream of hydrophobic hydrocarbons, with properties consistent with those of gasoline, kerosene, and diesel fuel. Separate streams of gasoline, kerosene, and diesel fuel may also be obtained, either via selective condensation of each type of fuel, or via later distillation of the combined hydrocarbon liquid. | |
| 10/28/2015 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.5.3 | Hydropyrolysis |
| Bubbling bed catalytic hydropyrolysis process utilizing larger catalyst particles and smaller biomass particles featuring an anti-slugging reactor | |
| This invention relates to a process for thermochemically transforming biomass or other oxygenated feedstocks into high quality liquid hydrocarbon fuels. In particular, a catalytic hydropyrolysis reactor, containing a deep bed of fluidized catalyst particles is utilized to accept particles of biomass or other oxygenated feedstocks that are significantly smaller than the particles of catalyst in the fluidized bed. The reactor features an insert or other structure disposed within the reactor vessel that inhibits slugging of the bed and thereby minimizes attrition of the catalyst. Within the bed, the biomass feedstock is converted into a vapor-phase product, containing hydrocarbon molecules and other process vapors, and an entrained solid char product, which is separated from the vapor stream after the vapor stream has been exhausted from the top of the reactor. When the product vapor stream is cooled to ambient temperatures, a significant proportion of the hydrocarbons in the product vapor stream can be recovered as a liquid stream of hydrophobic hydrocarbons, with properties consistent with those of gasoline, kerosene, and diesel fuel. Separate streams of gasoline, kerosene, and diesel fuel may also be obtained, either via selective condensation of each type of fuel, or via later distillation of the combined hydrocarbon liquid. | |
| 09/22/2014 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.5.4 | Hydropyrolysis |
| Recent advances in liquefaction technologies for production of liquid hydrocarbon fuels from biomass and carbonaceous wastes | |
| Abstract The liquefaction of biomass and carbonaceous wastes using hydro-pyrolysis, hydrothermal liquefaction or liquefaction using water and hydrocarbon solvents are promising thermochemical methods for producing renewable fuels and chemicals. New combinations of unit operations and possibly novel reactors will likely be required to economically convert biomass feedstock into partially upgraded bio-crudes. While some techno-economic assessments show that biofuels from fast pyrolysis may be competitive with petroleum fuels in future, conventional pyrolysis produces a poor quality bio-crude and is only suitable for dry, homogenous feedstock such as woody biomass, agricultural waste (corn stoves, wheat stalk, and rice husk). It is desirable to produce high-quality bio-crudes and to be able to process high-moisture feedstock such as algae, organic waste (food residues), bio-solids and bio-sludge into transportation fuels using the liquefaction approaches. Increased awareness of the environmental damage from burning fossil fuels is driving national and international reduction targets for on CO2 emissions. Liquefaction technologies aimed at producing alternatives to fossil-based transportation fuels/hydrocarbons are likely to receive continued support in the future and the most promising ones could be developed to full commercial scale. This review provides a summary of the current state of development of these technologies and also some of the challenges faced to develop commercially viable transportation fuels via liquefaction routes. This review compares liquefaction routes and provides a summary of techno-economic analyses where data is available and discusses the challenges and opportunities associated with commercial scale-up. | |
| 11/01/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
2.6 Microwave pyrolysis
Lignocellulosic waste material serves as a considerable renewable feedstock that may be used to replace oil refineries with biorefineries. Indeed, all biomass components can be converted into platform chemicals, bioenergy and materials. However, thermo-chemical and conventional catalytic conversions suffer from a number of drawbacks. Enabling technologies, such as microwaves (MW), can reduce process times and energy consumption, leading to improvements in product quality and yields. The remarkable advantages of MW over conventional heating, which originate from its direct dielectric interaction with biomass, are documented in this comprehensive survey. Moreover, the use of alternative solvents that interact strongly with MW in biphasic systems can circumvent additional upgrading and separation steps. Finally, this review discusses some of the challenges that MW irradiation faces, including the poor dielectric properties of some substrates and issues related to its large-scale application in pyrolysis, hydrothermal conversion and catalytic routes to biofuels, materials and platform chemicals. Waste biomass may well be the benchmark feedstock for the development of a circular bioeconomic approach.[ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96414-2915203621)
| 2.6.1 | Microwave pyrolysis |
|---|---|
| From waste biomass to chemicals and energy via microwave-assisted processes | |
| Lignocellulosic waste material serves as a considerable renewable feedstock that may be used to replace oil refineries with biorefineries. Indeed, all biomass components can be converted into platform chemicals, bioenergy and materials. However, thermo-chemical and conventional catalytic conversions suffer from a number of drawbacks. Enabling technologies, such as microwaves (MW), can reduce process times and energy consumption, leading to improvements in product quality and yields. The remarkable advantages of MW over conventional heating, which originate from its direct dielectric interaction with biomass, are documented in this comprehensive survey. Moreover, the use of alternative solvents that interact strongly with MW in biphasic systems can circumvent additional upgrading and separation steps. Finally, this review discusses some of the challenges that MW irradiation faces, including the poor dielectric properties of some substrates and issues related to its large-scale application in pyrolysis, hydrothermal conversion and catalytic routes to biofuels, materials and platform chemicals. Waste biomass may well be the benchmark feedstock for the development of a circular bioeconomic approach. | |
| 01/01/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.6.2 | Microwave pyrolysis |
| Rheological Characterization of Bio-Oils from Pilot Scale Microwave Assisted Pyrolysis | |
| Renewable energy is gaining importance in satisfying environmental concerns and addressing economical concerns over fossil fuel usage. Lignocellulosic materials are the most abundant renewable resources on earth (Lynd et al., 2005). Energy can be obtained from biomass either biochemically or thermochemically. In the biochemical process, pretreatment of biomass is a necessary and the first step in opening up structure of the biomass cell wall to permit the access of enzymes to cellulose and hemicellulose. Pyrolysis, gasification, and combustion are the three main thermochemical processes to get energy from biomass. Combustion has a maximum efficiency of more than 30% (Yu et al., 2007). Because gasification offers higher efficiency compared to combustion, it has attracted a high level of interest (Bridgwater, 2004). According to Wornat et al (1994), the burning of bio-oils produced through the pyrolysis of biomass is more efficient. Bio-oil also offers advantages in storage and transport and in its versatility as an energy carrier and as a source of chemicals (Bridgwater, 2004). The thermochemical process can convert a low-carbohydrate or non-fermentable biomass to alcohol fuels, thus adding technological robustness to efforts to achieve the 30 x 30 goal. Pyrolysis is an endothermic reaction wherein thermal decomposition occurs in the absence of oxygen. It is always the first step in gasification and combustion, wherein partial or total oxidation of the substrate occurs. Gas is the main product (85%) in gasification, whereas biooil (70-80%) is the main product in most types of pyrolysis. The yield of pyrolysis products such as syngas/ producer gas (mixture of CO and H2), bio-oil, and bio-char (charcoal) would vary depending upon the pyrolysis methods (conventional, fast, vacuum, flash, and ultra), biomass characteristics (feedstock type, moisture content, particle size), and reaction parameters (rate of heating, temperature, and residence time). Bridgwater (2003) listed four essential features to get bio-oil from fast pyrolysis: very high heating rates (1000°C/s), high heat transfer rates (600-1000 W/cm2), short vapor residence times (typically <2 s), and rapid cooling of pyrolysis vapors and aerosols. Because the heart of a fast pyrolysis process is the reactor, during the last two decades several different reactor designs to meet the rapid heattransfer requirements have been explored. Achieving very high heating and heat transfer rates during pyrolysis usually require a finely ground biomass feed. Pyrolysis using microwave irradiation is one of the many ways of converting biomass into high value products and chemicals. Not only does microwave assisted pyrolysis (MAP) not require a high degree of grinding (e.g., large chunk of wood logs can be used) as required in | |
| 01/01/2011 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.6.3 | Microwave pyrolysis |
| Thermochemical Valorization of Paper Deinking Residue through Microwave-Assisted Pyrolysis | |
| Abstract Paper deinking residue (DIR) is a composite waste material generated from paper deinking processes. It is currently underutilized, and its valorization represents both an environmental and economic burden for relative industries. Effective valorization of this low-value waste stream is crucial for paper recycling industries to improve their competitiveness and profitability. Pyrolysis is a promising thermochemical technology to convert biomass/wastes into value-added products. The integration of microwave irradiation as an alternative heating source allows pyrolysis processes to be carried out in a much more efficient and convenient manner. In this chapter, the thermochemical valorization of DIR through pyrolysis and potential applications of its pyrolysis products are demonstrated. Furthermore, the application of microwave-assisted pyrolysis at relatively low temperatures ( | |
| 01/01/2018 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
2.7 Thermo-Catalytic Reforming
A form of catalytic pyrolysis.
**Highlights:**
* The TCR ® process combines intermediate pyrolysis, using an auger reactor to heat the material under moderate temperatures (350–450 °C) and moderate solid residence times (minutes) in the complete absence of Oxygen, with post catalytic reforming in a fixed bed reactor at 700 °C. Pelletised co-form ® rejects were successfully converted into 12 wt% bio-oil, 9 wt% aqueous phase liquid, 8 wt% char and 71 wt% syngas products.[ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96390-2797202079)
* In the operating conditions, pyrolysis temperature and HZSM-5 catalyst had significant effect on products and distributions. An increase in the pyrolysis temperature from 400°C to 550°C led to an increase in the yield of phenolic compounds (6.3%, w/w%), followed decrease at higher temperature. The maximum carboxylic acids (10.6%) and furfural (3.5%) were obtained at lower temperature. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96390-2771828318)
| 2.7.1 | Thermo-Catalytic Reforming |
|---|---|
| Catalytic fast pyrolysis of sugarcane bagasse pith with HZSM-5 catalyst using tandem micro-reactor-GC-MS | |
| ABSTRACTFast pyrolysis of biomass is praised as an efficient and feasible process to selectively convert lignocellulosic biomass into bio-fuels and bio-chemicals. Pith of sugarcane bagasse could be an attractive lignocellulosic waste from depithing process from pulp and paper mill, which can utilize for production of biofuel and added value products. In this study, we employed a tandem micro-reactor coupled with gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy to investigate the products distribution from pith of sugarcane bagasse via catalytic fast pyrolysis. In the operating conditions, pyrolysis temperature and HZSM-5 catalyst had significant effect on products and distributions. An increase in the pyrolysis temperature from 400°C to 550°C led to an increase in the yield of phenolic compounds (6.3%, w/w%), followed decrease at higher temperature. The maximum carboxylic acids (10.6%) and furfural (3.5%) were obtained at lower temperature. At presence of HZSM-5 catalyst, the selectivity of aromatics such as benzene,... | |
| 01/02/2018 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.7.2 | Thermo-Catalytic Reforming |
| Thermo-catalytic reforming of co-form® rejects (waste cleansing wipes) | |
| Abstract Co-form ® products are typically used for personal hygiene care (cleansing wipes), household cleaning (pads and mops) and absorbent applications. Co-form ® is a thermo-bonded multilayer nonwoven composite and Kimberly-Clark patented its process in 2008. Co-form ® rejects are composed of 30% plastic polypropylene and 70% wood pulp fibre. It is difficult to recycle and to-date no research articles explore pyrolytic valorisation for its energy recovery. This paper investigated pyrolytic valorisation of co-form ® rejects into energy vectors. Pelletised co-form ® rejects obtained from a secondary fibre paper mill were processed using a laboratory scale 2 kg/h Thermo-Catalytic Reforming (TCR ® ) reactor. The TCR ® process combines intermediate pyrolysis, using an auger reactor to heat the material under moderate temperatures (350–450 °C) and moderate solid residence times (minutes) in the complete absence of Oxygen, with post catalytic reforming in a fixed bed reactor at 700 °C. Pelletised co-form ® rejects were successfully converted into 12 wt% bio-oil, 9 wt% aqueous phase liquid, 8 wt% char and 71 wt% syngas products. The bio-oil higher heating value was found to be 39.36 MJ/kg, comparable to biodiesel. Naphthalene was found to be the most abundant aromatic compound within the oil, with a relative abundance of 15.22% measured by GC–MS. Oleic acid methyl ester (15.86%) was the most abundant long chain hydrocarbon detected. The higher heating value of produced gas was 11.02 MJ Nm 3 and char 30.79 MJ/kg. TCR ® conversion of co-form ® rejects proved to be a feasible route for the valorisation of this waste stream into sustainable energy vectors. In previous works, gasification processes could not successfully convert organic waste streams with a high plastic content, without implications attributed to agglomeration and melting of plastics. The TCR ® process overcome these issues with no evidence of agglomeration or melting of plastics present within the reactor. The success was believed to be through applying moderate heating rates (°C/min) and temperatures (max 700 °C), as well as the mechanical effect of continuous mixing of material within the reactor via the internal auger screw. Overall, TCR ® is a promising future route for the valorisation of co-form ® rejects to produce energy vectors. | |
| 06/01/2018 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.7.3 | Thermo-Catalytic Reforming |
| Thermo-Catalytic Reforming of municipal solid waste | |
| Abstract Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) refers to a heterogeneous mixture composed of plastics, paper, metal, food and other miscellaneous items. Local authorities commonly dispose of this waste by either landfill or incineration which are both unsustainable practices. Disposing of organic wastes via these routes is also becoming increasingly expensive due to rising landfill taxes and transport costs. The Thermo-Catalytic Reforming (TCR®) process, is a proposed valorisation route to transform organic wastes and residues, such as MSW, into sustainable energy vectors including (H 2 rich synthesis gas, liquid bio-oil and solid char). The aim herein, was to investigate the conversion of the organic fraction of MSW into fuels and chemicals utilising the TCR technology in a 2 kg/h continuous pilot scale reactor. Findings show that MSW was successfully processed with the TCR after carrying out a feedstock pre-treatment step. Approximately, 25 wt.% of the feedstock was converted into phase separated liquids, composed of 19 wt.% aqueous phase and 6 wt.% organic phase bio-oil. The analysis of the bio-oil fraction revealed physical and chemical fuel properties, higher heating value (HHV) of 38 MJ/kg, oxygen content 2 content of 36 vol% and HHV of 17.23 MJ/Nm 3 , and 31 wt.% char with a HHV of 17 MJ/kg. The production of high quantities of H 2 gas and highly de-oxygenated organic liquids makes downstream hydrogen separation and subsequent hydro-deoxygenation of the produced bio-oil a promising upgrading step to achieve drop-in transportation fuels from MSW. | |
| 10/01/2017 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.7.4 | Thermo-Catalytic Reforming |
| Combined anaerobic digester and GTL system and method of use thereof | |
|
1. A system for producing bioproducts, comprising an anaerobic digester that converts biomass to a mixture of gases comprising methane and carbon dioxide, coupled with a syngas generator capable of converting the methane to a mixture of carbon monoxide and hydrogen, and a gas-to-liquid reactor capable of converting the carbon monoxide and hydrogen to hydrocarbon products selected from the group consisting of alcohols, formaldehyde, formalin, low molecular weight (C2-5 ) olefins and paraffins, and C20-50 paraffins, further comprising heat exchangers to transport heat produced in the gas-to-liquid reactor to the anaerobic digester, wherein the syngas generator is an autothermal reformer or a steam reformer. 2. The system of claim 1 , further comprising a steam autoclave unit adapted to receive biomass, autoclave the biomass, and transport the biomass to the anaerobic digester. 3. The system of claim 1 , further comprising a cavitation stirrer adapted to receive biomass, and stir the biomass at extremely high speeds, under cavitation. 4. The system of claim 1 , further comprising a pressure swing absorption unit to remove carbon dioxide from the mixture of gases produced by the anaerobic digester. 5. The system of claim 1 , further comprising a reactor for growing algae or cyanobacteria, wherein the reactor is adapted to receive carbon dioxide from the anaerobic digester and/or the gas-to-liquid reactor. 6. The system of claim 1 , wherein the gas-to-liquid reactor comprises a catalyst suitable for converting a mixture of carbon monoxide and hydrogen to methanol, dimethyl ether, low molecular weight (C2-5 ) olefins and paraffins, or C20-50 paraffins. 7. The system of claim 1 , wherein the product is methanol, and wherein the system further comprises a reactor and catalyst for converting the methanol to formaldehyde. 8. The system of claim 5 , further comprising a reactor for recovering oils from the algae. 9. The system of claim 8 , further comprising a reactor for converting oils produced by algae, or fatty acids produced by cyanobacteria, to biodiesel fuel. 10. A method for producing bio-formaldehyde, comprising the steps of: a) converting biogas to syngas, b) converting the syngas to methanol, and c) converting the methanol to formaldehyde wherein the methanol is formed using the system of claim 1 . 11. The method of claim 10 , wherein the biogas is derived, in whole or in part, from the anaerobic digestion of animal waste. 12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the process for producing methanol is exothermic, further comprising the step of transferring excess heat energy from the exothermic methanol producing step to an anaerobic digester, which anaerobic digester performs the anaerobic digestion of the animal waste. 13. The method of claim 10 , further comprising converting all or part of the bio-formaldehyde to bio-formalin. |
|
| 05/06/2016 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Patent | |
2.8 Gasification
Gasification is a process that converts organic- or fossil fuel-based carbonaceous materials into carbon monoxide, hydrogen and carbon dioxide. This is achieved by reacting the material at high temperatures (>700 °C), without combustion, with a controlled amount of oxygen and/or steam.[\[wiki\]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gasification#:\~:text=Gasification%20is%20a%20process%20that,of%20oxygen%20and%2For%20steam.)
**Highlights:**
* The gasification technique comprises chemical reaction in an environment which is oxygen-deficient. This process involves biomass heating at extreme temperatures (500–1400 °C), from atmospheric pressures up to 33 bar and with low/absent oxygen content to yield combustible gas mixtures. Gasification process transforms carbonaceous constituents into syngas comprising hydrogen, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, methane, higher hydrocarbons, and nitrogen with the presence of a gasification agent and catalyst. By utilizing this syngas, various types of energy/energy carriers are supplied for examples biofuel, hydrogen gas, biomethane gas, heat, power and chemicals.
* **It is reported that gasification process is the most efficient technique in the production of hydrogen gas from biomass.**
* **Gas composition produced from gasification process varies according to type of gasifier, gasification agent, catalyst type and size of particle.** [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96410-2947495040)
* **Co-pyrogasification of plastics and biomass mixtures, as opposed to separately converting these waste streams, offers several advantages including an improvement in syngas quality and composition (H2/CO ratio) in relation to the desired application, and an easier reactor feeding of plastics.** Furthermore, many studies have shown that co-pyrogasification promotes the conversion of waste to gas rather than char and tar. However, in order to achieve the desired product distribution or syngas composition, operating parameters such as the reactor temperature, equivalence ratio (air or oxygen), steam/fuel ratio and catalyst, have to be optimized. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96410-2793895765)
| 2.8.1 | Gasification |
|---|---|
| Co-pyrogasification of Plastics and Biomass, a Review | |
| Over the past few decades, the sharp rise in post-consumer plastic and biomass waste has resulted in an ever growing challenge to treat such waste sustainably. Co-pyrogasification of plastics and biomass mixtures, as opposed to separately converting these waste streams, offers several advantages including an improvement in syngas quality and composition (H2/CO ratio) in relation to the desired application, and an easier reactor feeding of plastics. Furthermore, many studies have shown that co-pyrogasification promotes the conversion of waste to gas rather than char and tar. However, in order to achieve the desired product distribution or syngas composition, operating parameters such as the reactor temperature, equivalence ratio (air or oxygen), steam/fuel ratio and catalyst, have to be optimized. Thus, this paper aims to review literature studies on the co-pyrogasification of plastics and biomass by considering various aspects including the process principle, reactors, influence of feedstock characteristics and operating parameters on the products, as well as the synergies observed during the thermoconversion of plastics and biomass mixtures with some reference to coal mixtures when necessary. | |
| 02/01/2018 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.8.2 | Gasification |
| Hybridization of sugar-carboxylate-syngas platforms for the production of bio-alcohols from lignocellulosic biomass (LCB) – A state-of-the-art review and recommendations | |
| Abstract Lignocellulosic biomass (LCB), the most abundant renewable feedstock for bioenergy generation, is commonly converted to second generation bioalcohols, the main drop-in fuels for petroleum gasoline, through three technologies based on sugar, carboxylic acid and syngas platforms. The hybridization of either any two or three platforms altogether is a novel concept aimed at improvement of yield and quality (high heating value) of bioalcohols. This article reviews the present status of the integration techniques of hybrid platforms with an overall assessment of their advancement with respect to their individual counterpart as well as the challenges involved. It has been indicated that to extract the maximum benefit of hybridization, research studies should be spurred in the fields of kinetic analysis of all thermochemical and biochemical processes, microbial interaction, optimization of process parameters (pH, temperature), performance analysis of engine for the utilization of mixed product bioalcohols, sustainability analysis through the development of mathematical models for lab-scale operations and process simulation models for large scale units along with life cycle assessment. Moreover, pyrolysis of LCB has been identified as a unique central process for the supply of all intermediate compounds, namely, sugar, carboxylic acid and syngas during the hybrid networking of three platform technologies. In this context, the scheme of CONVER-B, a joint research project under the INNO-INDIGO partnership program, aiming at sustainable integration of the platforms to produce bio-alcohols from LCBs leaving zero effluent simultaneously with carbon sequestration potential has been introduced and discussed. | |
| 11/01/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.8.3 | Gasification |
| Waste to bioenergy: a review on the recent conversion technologies | |
| Scientific studies have demonstrated that it is possible to generate a wide variety of bioenergy from biomass residues and waste, and however its cost is not competitive with petro-fuels and other renewable energy. On-going efforts are continued extensively to improve conversion technologies in order to reduce production costs. The present review focuses on the conversion technologies for transforming biomass residues and waste to biofuels, specifically their technological concepts, options and prospects for implementation are addressed. The emerging developments in the two primary conversion pathways, namely the thermochemical (i.e. gasification, liquefaction, and pyrolysis) and biochemical (i.e. anaerobic digestion, alcoholic fermentation and photobiological hydrogen production) conversion techniques, are evaluated. Additionally, transesterification, which appears to be the simplest and most economical route to produce biodiesel in large quantity, is discussed. Lastly, the strategies for direct conversion of biomass residues and waste to bioelectricity including the use of combustion and microbial fuel cells are reviewed. | |
| 12/01/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.8.4 | Gasification |
| System and method for production of ultra-pure hydrogen from biomass | |
|
1. An ultra-pure hydrogen synthesis system which comprises: a gasifier; an oils and tars filtration system; a steam generator; a water gas shift reactor containing a catalyst, comprising oxides of copper, zinc and aluminum, that facilitates one or more chemical reactions between carbon monoxide and water in a temperature range of approximately 200° C. to approximately 250° C.; a heat-exchange two-phase water condenser and separator; a liquid-based, bubbling scrubber wherein a liquid contained within the scrubber includes a methanol suspension of copper (I) chloride particles; a hydrogen separator; one or more fluid conduits, wherein the one or more fluid conduits connect to and establish fluid communication between each of the gasifier, the oils and tars filtration system, the steam generator, the water gas shift reactor, the scrubber, and the hydrogen separator. 2. The ultra-pure hydrogen synthesis system of claim 1 , wherein the gasifier is a down draft gasifier. 3. The ultra-pure hydrogen synthesis system of claim 1 , wherein the catalyst of the water gas shift reactor comprises 32%-33% CuO, 34%-53% ZnO, and 15%-33% Al2 O3 and is configured to minimize thermal sintering and occurrence of side reactions when operating at the temperature range of approximately 200° C. to approximately 250° C. 4. The ultra-pure hydrogen synthesis system of claim 1 , further comprising a hydrogen fuel cell. 5. The ultra-pure hydrogen synthesis system of claim 1 , wherein the hydrogen separator is an electrochemical separator. 6. The ultra-pure hydrogen synthesis system of claim 1 , wherein the hydrogen separator is a swing absorption system. 7. The ultra-pure hydrogen synthesis system of claim 5 , wherein the hydrogen separator is a proton exchange membrane based hydrogen purification system. 8. The ultra-pure hydrogen synthesis system of claim 1 , wherein the-oils and tars filtration system is an activated carbon filter. 9. A method of producing ultra-pure hydrogen from biomass, comprising the steps of: feeding a biomass feedstock into a gasifier and using the gasifier to perform gasification and pyrolysis of the biomass feedstock, which converts the biomass feedstock into a syngas product that includes molecules of nitrogen, carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, and hydrogen; outputting the syngas product from the gasifier into an oils and tars filtration system; filtering any oils and tars from the syngas product using the oils and tars filtration system; outputting the filtered syngas product from the oils and tars filtration system; producing water vapor using a steam generator; mixing the filtered syngas product with the water vapor produced by the steam generator to create a syngas-water vapor mixture; feeding the syngas-water vapor mixture into a water gas shift reactor and using the water gas shift reactor to modify the syngas product to create a modified syngas product by increasing an amount of hydrogen gas and decreasing an amount of carbon monoxide, wherein the water gas shift reactor contains a catalyst comprising 32%-33% CuO, 34%-53% ZnO, and 15%-33% Al2 O3 , wherein the catalyst is configured to facilitate a chemical reaction between the carbon monoxide and water vapor and is also configured to minimize thermal sintering and occurrence of side reactions by operating at a temperature range of approximately 200° C. to approximately 250° C. to convert the syngas-water vapor mixture into a gas mixture that includes molecules of hydrogen and other byproduct gases including nitrogen, carbon dioxide, dihydrogen monoxide, and trace amounts of carbon monoxide; outputting the modified syngas product from the water gas shift reactor; feeding the modified syngas product through a fluid conduit and into a heat-exchange two-phase water separator, wherein the heat-exchange two-phase water separator is configured to: condense water vapor from the modified syngas product into liquid water; transmit the liquid water into the steam generator; and transmit the modified syngas product through the fluid conduit and into a liquid-based bubbling scrubber wherein a liquid contained within the scrubber includes a methanol suspension of copper (I) chloride particles and the scrubber is configured to create a scrubbed gas by removing remaining trace amounts of carbon monoxide from the gas mixture; outputting the scrubbed gas from the scrubber; feeding the scrubbed gas into a hydrogen separator and using the hydrogen separator to isolate hydrogen gas molecules from remaining byproduct gases and create ultra-pure hydrogen gas; and outputting the ultra-pure hydrogen gas from the hydrogen separator. 10. The method of producing ultra-pure hydrogen from biomass of claim 9 , wherein the gasifier is a down draft gasifier. 11. The method of producing ultra-pure hydrogen from biomass of claim 9 , wherein the ultra-pure hydrogen is output from the hydrogen separator into a hydrogen fuel cell. 12. The method of producing ultra-pure hydrogen from biomass of claim 9 wherein the hydrogen separator is an electrochemical separator. 13. The method of producing ultra-pure hydrogen from biomass of claim 9 , wherein the hydrogen separator is a swing absorption system. 14. The method of producing ultra-pure hydrogen from biomass of claim 9 , wherein the oils and tars filtration system is an activated carbon filter. 15. The method of producing ultra-pure hydrogen from biomass of claim 9 , wherein a ratio of water vapor to syngas is a 5:1 ratio. |
|
| 04/30/2016 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Patent | |
2.9 Staged gasification
Staged gasification is an efficient method of converting biomass, producing a gas with a low concentration of tar and with high process efficiency. This is achieved with reasonable simplicity and is cost-effective, making staged gasification ideal for power production at small-to-medium scale. Several staged-gasification systems have been developed based on fixed/moving beds. In the present work, a new staged-gasification system based on a fluidized-bed design is presented and modeled. The process includes three main stages: devolatilization of the fuel, homogeneous gas reforming/oxidation of volatiles, and heterogeneous reforming of gas over in situ generated char. Each thermochemical stage is modeled using kinetics data obtained in dedicated tests in a laboratory-scale fluidized bed or taken from the literature. The fluid-dynamics is characterized using the results from a cold rig constructed to model the gas and solids flows in the new system. The numerical model developed is employed to evaluate the performance of the new system during gasification of dried sewage sludge. The significant improvement achieved in the new staged gasifier compared to a single-stage unit is shown, as well as the potential optimization of the system under different operating conditions.[ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96622-1966625754)
| 2.9.1 | Staged gasification |
|---|---|
| Gasification of biomass and waste in a staged fluidized bed gasifier: Modeling and comparison with one-stage units | |
| Abstract Staged gasification is an efficient method of converting biomass, producing a gas with a low concentration of tar and with high process efficiency. This is achieved with reasonable simplicity and is cost-effective, making staged gasification ideal for power production at small-to-medium scale. Several staged-gasification systems have been developed based on fixed/moving beds. In the present work, a new staged-gasification system based on a fluidized-bed design is presented and modeled. The process includes three main stages: devolatilization of the fuel, homogeneous gas reforming/oxidation of volatiles, and heterogeneous reforming of gas over in situ generated char. Each thermochemical stage is modeled using kinetics data obtained in dedicated tests in a laboratory-scale fluidized bed or taken from the literature. The fluid-dynamics is characterized using the results from a cold rig constructed to model the gas and solids flows in the new system. The numerical model developed is employed to evaluate the performance of the new system during gasification of dried sewage sludge. The significant improvement achieved in the new staged gasifier compared to a single-stage unit is shown, as well as the potential optimization of the system under different operating conditions. | |
| 07/01/2012 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
2.10 Hydrogasification
***Hydrogasification*** is gasification in a hydrogen-rich environment, often used for the production of synthetic natural gas (SNG) from coal or other gasifier feedstocks.[\[Source\]](https://www.netl.doe.gov/research/Coal/energy-systems/gasification/gasifipedia/hydro)
**Highlights:**
* In this paper the integration of the energy production from programmable (biomass, waste) and not programmable (solar, wind) renewable sources is examined as an opportunity for increasing the share of electricity from renewable power plants, in order to overcome the major obstacles to their extensive penetration into the grid. **The integration is performed by using hydrogen from intermittent renewable energy powered-electrolysis as gasification medium in conventional or advanced gasification systems for the waste treatment.** The proposed integrated energy system consists of three main sections: i) the hydrogen production island; ii) the gasification island; iii) the power island. The assessment of the system performance has been conducted by considering two gasification technologies: hydro-gasification and hydro-plasma gasification. The performances comparison has been carried out in terms of syngas composition, energy consumptions and electric efficiency. Results have pointed out that the electric efficiencies of the integrated energy systems are in the range of 40% and 43%.[ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96511-2173720029)
| 2.10.1 | Hydrogasification |
|---|---|
| Hydrogen from intermittent renewable energy sources as gasification medium in integrated waste gasification combined cycle power plants: A performance comparison | |
| In this paper the integration of the energy production from programmable (biomass, waste) and not programmable (solar, wind) renewable sources is examined as an opportunity for increasing the share of electricity from renewable power plants, in order to overcome the major obstacles to their extensive penetration into the grid. The integration is performed by using hydrogen from intermittent renewable energy powered-electrolysis as gasification medium in conventional or advanced gasification systems for the waste treatment. The proposed integrated energy system consists of three main sections: i) the hydrogen production island; ii) the gasification island; iii) the power island. The assessment of the system performance has been conducted by considering two gasification technologies: hydro-gasification and hydro-plasma gasification. The performances comparison has been carried out in terms of syngas composition, energy consumptions and electric efficiency. Results have pointed out that the electric efficiencies of the integrated energy systems are in the range of 40% and 43%. | |
| 01/01/2016 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.10.2 | Hydrogasification |
| Method and system for biomass hydrogasification | |
|
1. A method, comprising: pyrolyzing biomass to produce a pyrolysis gas and char; hydrogasifying the pyrolysis gas in the presence of a catalyst and hydrogen produced by a hydrogen generator powered by a renewable energy source, to produce a gas mixture; separating the gas mixture into a substitute natural gas stream and a residual gas stream. 2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the substitute natural gas stream comprises methane. 3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the residual gas stream comprises water. 4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the residual gas stream comprises a hydrogen rich stream. 5. The method of claim 4 , comprising recycling at least a portion of the hydrogen rich stream to produce a recycled hydrogen stream. 6. The method of claim 4 , comprising hydrogasifying the pyrolysis gas in the presence of a catalyst, the hydrogen, and a portion of the recycled hydrogen stream. 7. The method of claim 5 , comprising at least partially deoxygenating the hydrogen rich stream prior to recycling. 8. The method of claim 7 , wherein at least partially deoxygenating comprises at least partially removing carbon dioxide and water from the hydrogen rich stream. 9. The method of claim 1 , comprising hydrogasifying the pyrolysis gas in the presence the catalyst, the hydrogen, and steam. 10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the hydrogen generator is an electrolytic hydrogen generator. 11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the renewable energy source comprises a wind turbine, a solar photovoltaic or a combination thereof. 12. The method of claim 1 , comprising regenerating the catalyst. 13. The method of claim 12 , wherein the catalyst cycles between methanation and regeneration. 14. The method of claim 13 , wherein the catalyst is: a moving bed with granular catalyst; a fixed bed with granular packing or monolithic catalyst, and rotary or directional valve logic for cyclically switching beds between methanation and regeneration; or a bubbling or circulating fluidized bed. 15. The method of claim 1 , comprising separating at least a portion of the char to form a separated char portion suitable for a carbon sequestration application. 16. The method of claim 13 , wherein the separated char portion is a solid fuel, or a bio-char soil amendment for agriculture or forestry. 17. The method of claim 4 , comprising: recycling at least a portion of the hydrogen rich stream to produce a recycled hydrogen stream; hydrogasifying the pyrolysis gas in the presence of the catalyst, the hydrogen, and a portion of the recycled hydrogen stream; and separating at least a portion of the char to form a separated char portion. 18. A method, comprising: pyrolyzing biomass to produce a pyrolysis gas and char; providing a first portion of hydrogen from an electrolytic hydrogen generator powered by wind power, solar power, or a combination thereof; hydrogasifying the pyrolysis gas in the presence of a catalyst in a methanation zone, hydrogen from an electrolytic hydrogen generator powered by wind power, solar power, or a combination thereof, and a portion of a recycled hydrogen stream, to produce a gas mixture; separating the gas mixture into a hydrogen rich stream and a substitute natural gas stream comprising methane; recycling at least a portion of the hydrogen rich stream to form the recycled hydrogen stream; cycling the catalyst from the methanation zone to a regeneration zone; regenerating the catalyst; and separating at least a portion of the char to form a separated char portion. 19. A system for producing substitute natural gas, comprising: a pyrolysis reactor for producing pyrolysis gas and char; an electrolytic hydrogen generator powered by renewable energy source to produce hydrogen; an independent catalytic reactor for converting the pyrolysis gas and the hydrogen into a gas mixture comprising hydrocarbons over a catalyst; a separator for separating the gas mixture into a substitute natural gas stream and a residual gas stream. 20. The system of claim 19 , wherein the renewable energy source is a wind turbine, solar photovoltaic, or a combination thereof. 21. The system of claim 19 , comprising a regeneration zone for regenerating the catalyst used in the independent catalytic reactor. 22. The system of claim 19 , comprising a char separator. |
|
| 06/24/2016 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Patent | |
2.11 Free radical gasification
**Responsible Energy** has been developing an advanced thermal waste destruction solution that creates a hydrogen rich synthesis gas (syngas) from a vast variety of both liquid and solid wastes. Feedstock examples are MSW, Biomass, Biosolids, Medical Waste, Pet Coke, and environmentally unfriendly waste streams from Commercial and Industrial sources.
The secret of the **FRG™** process is the precisely controlled generation of a >5,000oC (>9,000oF) conversion zone. At this temperature, similar to that of the sun, molecular bonds are broken apart creating two valuable commodities: a clean synthesis gas (syngas) and an inert granular aggregate. [\[Responsible Energy\]](https://www.reinc.co/frg)
| 2.11.1 | Free radical gasification |
|---|---|
| Multi-level control polyradical biomass gasification renewable energy source system | |
| A multi-level control polyradical biomass gasification renewable energy source system can convert wide biomass and carbonaceous raw materials which comprise energy source crop, agriculture and forest by-products, organic waste, industry and dangerous waste, and the like into high-level energy sources. The system is designed into continuous operation, finely controls and integrates all procedure processes of gasification such as pretreatment, thermal dissociation, carbon transformation, dust fusion, tar cracking, synthetic gas reformation, and residual heat utilization in turn for achieving optimization, moisture generated after materials are pretreated is led into a carbon transformation unit for realizing anaerobic thermal dissociation, gasified gas is contacted with a large amount of active free radicals in a polyradical acceleration reaction unit, is purified, and enters downstream application such as power generation, hydrogen production, and biomass carbinol and ethanol production. The system does not need auxiliary fuel, maximizes the gasification efficiency, cracks tar completely, cleans contaminants, and is the upstream technique of biomass renewable energy source application. The energy utilization can satisfy all strict environment protection standards, and the system is also an energy-saving environment-friendly type technique without burning and with innocent treatment. | |
| 11/11/2009 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
2.12 Biodrying
Biodrying has emerged recently as an energy-effective technology for converting organic wastes into solid recovered fuel (SRF). In biodrying, water removal is achieved using metabolic heat produced from microbiological degradation of organics and forced airflow to promote heat and mass transfer. Factors affecting biodrying include moisture content (MC) and free air space (FAS) of the wastes, use of bulking agents, aeration rate, mechanical turning as well as microbial activities. These factors independently or collectively determine water removal capacities of various biodrying processes. In this review article, studies on these factors are surveyed extensively and reviewed. Additionally, details of reactor configurations, operation modes, and modeling studies on biodrying are summarized. Finally, health and environmental risks and their management associated with off-gases and final products of biodrying processes are discussed.[ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96392-2616124719)
| 2.12.1 | Biodrying |
|---|---|
| Advances in biodrying technologies for converting organic wastes into solid fuel | |
| ABSTRACTBiodrying has emerged recently as an energy-effective technology for converting organic wastes into solid recovered fuel (SRF). In biodrying, water removal is achieved using metabolic heat produced from microbiological degradation of organics and forced airflow to promote heat and mass transfer. Factors affecting biodrying include moisture content (MC) and free air space (FAS) of the wastes, use of bulking agents, aeration rate, mechanical turning as well as microbial activities. These factors independently or collectively determine water removal capacities of various biodrying processes. In this review article, studies on these factors are surveyed extensively and reviewed. Additionally, details of reactor configurations, operation modes, and modeling studies on biodrying are summarized. Finally, health and environmental risks and their management associated with off-gases and final products of biodrying processes are discussed. | |
| 12/10/2017 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
2.13 Plasma treatment
Plasma treatments use a plasma conversion zone in either gasification or pyrolysis.
**Highlights:**
* An emerging technology involving thermal plasma gasification for MSW treatment has received increasing attention recently. The advantages are mainly related to improved energy recovery efficiency associated with the fast reaction times, low amount of oxidant, and high heat flux densities. Studies have shown that the high temperature of the plasma arc can reduce the formation of tar and other undesirable products in the syngas \[129\]. The solid residues are produced in the form of a vitrified slag, which can be utilized in construction. One such demonstration plant has been operating in Korea since 2010 \[129\]. An integrated furnace equipped with nontransferred thermal plasma torches was successfully applied for the direct treatment of MSW with a capacity for gasification of MSW at 10 ton/d.[\[Paper\]](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0717345817300040#s0015)
* This paper outlines the principles of thermal plasma pyrolysis processes and discusses recent research activities about organic waste treatment using thermal plasma pyrolysis technology. Different kinds of organic wastes, varying from plastic and used tires to agricultural residue and medical waste, have been subjected to thermal plasma pyrolysis tests in laboratory and pilot scale projects. Plasma pyrolysis of organic waste usually gives two product streams: a combustible gas having a calorific value in the range of 4–9 MJ/Nm^3^ and a carbonaceous residue. Pyrolysis conditions as well as some technical measures such as the quenching process and steam reforming have significant influences on the properties of these pyrolysis products. Research results indicated that thermal plasma pyrolysis may be a useful way of waste management for energy and material recovery.[\[Paper\]](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196890406002512)
2.14 Hydrocracking
**Hydrocracking** is a two-stage process that combines catalytic cracking and hydrogenation. The heavier feedstocks are cracked in the presence of hydrogen to produce more desirable products. The process employs high pressure, high temperature, a catalyst, and hydrogen.[\[Source\]](https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/hydrocracking#:\~:text=Hydrocracking%20is%20a%20two%2Dstage,%2C%20a%20catalyst%2C%20and%20hydrogen.)
**Highlights:**
* The presence of tar content in the product gas is a major problem with the biomass gasification process as it prevents its further utilization. Heterogeneous cracking of tar using catalyst is the most effective way to overcome this problem. **The present study provides specially a method for converting biomass to hydrogen-rich syngas in a two-stage process.** The first stage refers to pyrolysis process and the second stage refers to gasification process. The heterogeneous experiments of rice husk tar cracking were performed in a two-stage gasifier using different catalysts such as char formed from pyrolysis of rice husk in the same reactor, commercial activated carbon, sand silica, and nickel containing stainless steel turnings obtained from mechanical workshop. The products of heterogeneous tar cracking were evaluated for optimizing hydrogen-rich syngas formation considering the effects such as temperature, carrier gas and quantity of catalyst. The mild steel turnings were found to be the best catalyst giving 0.31 vol% tar, 53.60 vol% of hydrogen, 22.73 vol% of carbon monoxide, 0.0 vol% of methane and 23.35 vol% of carbon dioxide in product gas at 900 °C. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96382-2778827371)
| 2.14.1 | Hydrocracking |
|---|---|
| Experimental investigation of catalytic cracking of rice husk tar for hydrogen production | |
| The presence of tar content in the product gas is a major problem with the biomass gasification process as it prevents its further utilization. Heterogeneous cracking of tar using catalyst is the most effective way to overcome this problem. The present study provides specially a method for converting biomass to hydrogen-rich syngas in a two-stage process. The first stage refers to pyrolysis process and the second stage refers to gasification process. The heterogeneous experiments of rice husk tar cracking were performed in a two-stage gasifier using different catalysts such as char formed from pyrolysis of rice husk in the same reactor, commercial activated carbon, sand silica, and nickel containing stainless steel turnings obtained from mechanical workshop. The products of heterogeneous tar cracking were evaluated for optimizing hydrogen-rich syngas formation considering the effects such as temperature, carrier gas and quantity of catalyst. The mild steel turnings were found to be the best catalyst giving 0.31 vol% tar, 53.60 vol% of hydrogen, 22.73 vol% of carbon monoxide, 0.0 vol% of methane and 23.35 vol% of carbon dioxide in product gas at 900 °C. | |
| 04/01/2018 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.14.2 | Hydrocracking |
| Incorporating Agricultural Waste-to-Energy Pathways into Biomass Product and Process Network through Data-Driven Nonlinear Adaptive Robust Optimization | |
| Abstract A biomass product and process network that displays how organic waste and other non-traditional biomass feedstocks may be converted into useful bioproducts and biofuels is a necessary addition to the field of biomass conversion and utilization. We develop a processing network of 216 technologies and 172 materials/compounds that contains conversion pathways of agricultural and organic waste biomass sources, such as food peels, animal manure, and grease. To examine the effectiveness and economic feasibility of these conversion pathways, the biomass product and process network is optimized for return on investment. The resulting problem is a data-driven two-stage adaptive robust mixed-integer nonlinear fractional program, which was effectively solved via a tailored optimization algorithm. The proposed approach is applied to two case studies in which traditional agricultural feedstocks are used alongside biological and agricultural waste feedstocks. The selected feedstocks were used to satisfy and, in some cases, even exceed demand for selected products. The optimal pathways have returns on investment of 26.1% and 6.2%, with utilized conversion technologies ranging from hydrocracking to microwave hydrodiffusion. In both cases, we find that profitable processing pathways are utilized at maximum capacities to increase return on investment. Specifically, in the case study where orange peel wastes are used to produce pectin, we find that this pathway is highly profitable at the given market price. The two cases that are run using the proposed model are then compared to additional cases to display differences that arise when uncertainty is not considered and the objective function of the model is changed. | |
| 05/01/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
3. (An)aerobic digestive technologies
BackTechnologies and advances in anaerobic digestion
3.1 Anaerobic digestion
Anaerobic digestion is a sequence of processes by which microorganisms break down biodegradable material in the absence of oxygen. The process is used for industrial or domestic purposes to manage waste or to produce fuels. [\[Wiki\]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anaerobic_digestion)
**Highlights:**
* Oily-biological sludge (OBS) generated from petroleum refineries has high toxicity. Therefore, it needs an appropriate disposal method to reduce the negative impacts on the environment. The anaerobic co-digestion process is an effective method that manages and converts organic waste to energy. For effective anaerobic digestion, a co-substrate would be required to provide a suitable environment for anaerobic bacteria. In oily-biological sludge, the carbon/nitrogen (C/N) ratio and volatile solids (VS) content are very low. Therefore, it needs to be digested with organic waste that has a high C/N ratio and high VS content. This study investigates the use of sugarcane bagasse (SB) as an effective co-substrate due to its high C/N ratio and high VS content to improve the anaerobic co-digestion process with oily-biological sludge. The sugarcane bagasse also helps to delay the toxicity effect of the methane bacteria. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96338-3010195771)
* Anaerobic Digestion (AD) is a well-developed sustainable technology to convert organic waste streams and energy crops to produce renewable gaseous biofuels, while recycling nutrients and mitigating greenhouse gas emissions. In this study, the environmental and economic impacts of an integrated-state AD technology (i-AD) producing Compressed Natural Gas (noted as BioCNG) were investigated from dairy-manure, food-wastes, and miscanthus biomass feedstocks, and compared with that of stand-alone liquid-state (LS-AD) and solid-state (SS-AD) AD technologies. A coupled life-cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis (LCA‐TEA) approach was used to estimate the Global Warming Potential (GWP) and the Minimum Selling Price (MSP) of BioCNG ‒ a renewable alternative to fossil-CNG. The results illustrated that the Fossil Energy Ratios (FERs) for BioCNG were between 2.3 and 3.3 in the increasing order as LS‐AD [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96338-2972178027)
The dual digestion process consists of an autothermal thermophilic aerobic digestion (ATAD) process ahead of an anaerobic digestion process. [[Art. #ARTNUM]](#article-96338-150671618)
| 3.1.1 | Anaerobic digestion |
|---|---|
| An urban biorefinery for food waste and biological sludge conversion into polyhydroxyalkanoates and biogas | |
| Abstract This study focuses on the application of the concept of circular economy, with the creation of added-value marketable products and energy from organic waste while minimizing environmental impacts. Within this purpose, an urban biorefinery technology chain has been developed at pilot scale in the territorial context of the Treviso municipality (northeast Italy) for the production of biopolymers (polyhydroxyalkanoates, PHAs) and biogas from waste of urban origin. The piloting system (100–380 L) comprised the following units: a) acidogenic fermentation of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW) and biological sludge; b) two solid/liquid separation steps consisting of a coaxial centrifuge and a tubular membrane (0.2 μm porosity); c) a Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR) for aerobic PHA-storing biomass production; d) aerobic fed-batch PHA accumulation reactor and e) Anaerobic co-digestion (ACoD). The thermal pre-treatment (72 °C, 48 h) of the feedstock enhanced the solubilization of the organic matter, which was converted into volatile fatty acids (VFAs) in batch mode under mesophilic fermentation conditions (37 °C). The VFA content increased up to 30 ± 3 g COD/L (overall yield 0.65 ± 0.04 g CODVFA/g VS(0)), with high CODVFA/CODSOL (0.86 ± 0.05). The high CODVFA/CODSOL ratio enhanced the PHA-storing biomass selection in the SBR by limiting the growth of the non-storing microbial population. Under fully aerobic feast-famine regime, the selection reactor was continuously operated for six months at an average organic loading rate (OLR) of 4.4 ± 0.6 g COD/L d and hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 1 day (equal to SRT). The ACoD process (HRT 15 days, OLR 3.0–3.5 kg VS/m3 d) allowed to recover the residual solid-rich overflows generated by the two solid/liquid separation units with the production of biogas (SGP 0.44–0.51 m3/kg VS) and digestate. An overall yield of 7.6% wt PHA/VS(0) has been estimated from the mass balance. In addition, a preliminary insight into potential social acceptance and barriers regarding organic waste-derived products was obtained. | |
| 12/01/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 3.1.2 | Anaerobic digestion |
| Development of sustainable approaches for converting the organic waste to bioenergy. | |
| Abstract Dependence on fossil fuels such as oil, coal and natural gas are on alarming increase, thereby causing such resources to be in a depletion mode and a novel sustainable approach for bioenergy production are in demand. Successful implementation of zero waste discharge policy is one such way to attain a sustainable development of bioenergy. Zero waste discharge can be induced only through the conversion of organic wastes into bioenergy. Waste management is pivotal and considering its importance of minimizing the issue and menace of wastes, conversion strategy of organic waste is effectively recommended. Present review is concentrated on providing a keen view on the potential organic waste sources and the way in which the bioenergy is produced through efficient conversion processes. Biogas, bioethanol, biocoal, biohydrogen and biodiesel are the principal renewable energy sources. Different types of organic wastes used for bioenergy generation and its sources, anaerobic digestion-biogas production and its related process affecting parameters including fermentation, photosynthetic process and novel nano-inspired techniques are discussed. Bioenergy production from organic waste is associated with mitigation of lump waste generation and its dumping into land, specifically reducing all hazards and negativities in all sectors during waste disposal. A sustainable bioenergy sector with upgraded security for fuels, tackles the challenging climatic change problem also. Thus, intensification of organic waste conversion strategies to bioenergy, specially, biogas and biohydrogen production is elaborated and analyzed in the present article. Predominantly, persistent drawbacks of the existing organic waste conversion methods have been noted, providing consideration to economic, environmental and social development. | |
| 03/21/2020 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 3.1.3 | Anaerobic digestion |
| Economic and environmental impacts of an integrated-state anaerobic digestion system to produce compressed natural gas from organic wastes and energy crops | |
| Abstract Anaerobic Digestion (AD) is a well-developed sustainable technology to convert organic waste streams and energy crops to produce renewable gaseous biofuels, while recycling nutrients and mitigating greenhouse gas emissions. In this study, the environmental and economic impacts of an integrated-state AD technology (i-AD) producing Compressed Natural Gas (noted as BioCNG) were investigated from dairy-manure, food-wastes, and miscanthus biomass feedstocks, and compared with that of stand-alone liquid-state (LS-AD) and solid-state (SS-AD) AD technologies. A coupled life-cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis (LCA‐TEA) approach was used to estimate the Global Warming Potential (GWP) and the Minimum Selling Price (MSP) of BioCNG ‒ a renewable alternative to fossil-CNG. The results illustrated that the Fossil Energy Ratios (FERs) for BioCNG were between 2.3 and 3.3 in the increasing order as LS‐AD | |
| 11/01/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 3.1.4 | Anaerobic digestion |
| Efficiency of autothermal thermophilic aerobic digestion under two different oxygen flow rates. | |
| This paper evaluates two dual digestion processes in comparison with conventional digestion. The dual digestion process consists of an autothermal thermophilic aerobic digestion (ATAD) process ahead of an anaerobic digestion process. All the three processes evaluated had the same overall 10 day SRT. The objective of the work is to observe the differences between two different oxygen flow rates (0.105 v/v/h and 0.210 v/v/h) for an ATAD process using blended municipal solids with the help of profile experiments that were conducted for both conditions by sampling every 2 hours for duration of 24 hours. The two processes were compared with the conventional process in terms of VS removal, biogas yield and pathogen destruction. Oxygen utilization per volatile solids removed were found to be 1.20 lb/lb VS removed for the oxygen flow rate of 0.210 v/v/h and 0.83 lb/lb VS removed for 0.105 v/v/h. For the oxygen flow rate 0.210 v/v/h, higher (50% greater) ATAD effluent ammonia concentration was observed compared to the lower airflow rate. Furthermore, for the 0.201 v/v/h flow rate, there was no further increase in ammonia in the subsequent anaerobic step, suggesting that the hydrolytic reactions were complete for this ATAD reactor within the 2.25 day SRT. For the ATAD reactor with oxygen supply of 0.210 v/v/h, higher VS destruction of 23.8% was achieved when compared to 17.8% VS removal for oxygen flow rate of 0.105 v/v/h. However, the two different oxygen flow rates applied to the ATAD reactor did not affect the overall (ATAD + anaerobic digestion) VS removal efficiency, suggesting that the lower oxygen application rates were sufficient to produce a stable digestion process with an excess of 50% overall VS destruction in a relatively short 10 day overall SRT. Thus, there does not appear to be an obvious advantage for completion of the hydrolytic reactions within the ATAD process. The use of the higher oxygen flow rate should be solely considered for producing more heat to maintain thermophilic conditions and not for overall VS removal. Final effluent of both conditions, met the 40CFR Part 503 regulations with undetectable FC levels. The biological heat of oxidations were calculated to be 14,300 J/g VS removed and 15,900 J/g VS removed for the oxygen flow rates of 0.105 v/v/h and 0.210 v/v/h, respectively. | |
| 01/01/2014 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 3.1.5 | Anaerobic digestion |
| Energy recovery from wine sector wastes: A study about the biogas generation potential in a vineyard from Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil | |
| Abstract The constant concern with the environment and the depletion of fossil fuels has attracted interest in renewable energy from bio resources and/or materials wasted incorrectly. The process of anaerobic digestion converts organic waste into valuable energy sources, while reducing the pollution potential of this waste to the environment. The study was designed to analyze the biogas and methane generation potential from organic by-products of wine. Using the methodology described in VDI 4630 and automated biogas quantification based on the displacement of fluids. The results showed the biogas and methane production potential of the wine biomasses, and the ones with greatest potentials are grape must, the mixture of all biomass and bagasse 1.151; 289 and 199 m 3 biogas.tonVS −1 , respectively. Likewise, it was verified that biomass energy recovery for methane production has the capacity to supply approximately 2% of the natural gas demand in Rio Grande do Sul. These results presented specifically the biomass characterization of the wine sector and as potential energy for the production of biogas and methane, verifying the possibility of using this form of clean and sustainable energy on a large scale. | |
| 10/01/2018 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 3.1.6 | Anaerobic digestion |
| Enhanced Anaerobic Digestion of Swine Manure by the Addition of Zero-Valent Iron | |
| Zero-valent iron supplementation and two-stage anaerobic digestion are enhanced ways for CH4 production in anaerobic treatment to convert organic wastes into renewable energy. In this study, different zero-valent iron supplementation modes were applied during acidogenic stage or methanogenic stage in swine manure anaerobic digestion. Adding zero-valent iron in acidogenic stage can increase the pH and improve volatile fatty acids production by 16.5%; zero-valent iron addition on methanogenic stage is more beneficial for CH4 production than acidogenic stage. The results show that adding zero-valent iron at both acidogenic stage and methanogenic stage could achieve CH4 yield an increase of 27.3% than control. The microbial sequencing analysis showed that zero-valent iron supplementation could enrich hydrogenotrophic Methanomassiliicoccus by 39.2-92.0%. Results from this study demonstrated that zero-valent iron could be added to contact directly with methanogens in order to achieve higher energy recovery from... | |
| 11/14/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 3.1.7 | Anaerobic digestion |
| Highly efficient methane generation from untreated microalgae biomass | |
| The fact that microalgae perform very efficiently photosynthetic conversion of sunlight into chemical energy has moved them into the focus of regenerative fuel research. Especially, biogas generation via anaerobic digestion is economically attractive due to the comparably simple apparative process technology and the theoretical possibility of converting the entire algal biomass to biogas/methane. In the last 60 years, intensive research on biogas production from microalgae biomass has revealed the microalgae as a rather challenging substrate for anaerobic digestion due to its high cell wall recalcitrance and unfavorable protein content, which requires additional pretreatment and co-fermentation strategies for sufficient fermentation. However, sustainable fuel generation requires the avoidance of cost/energy intensive biomass pretreatments to achieve positive net-energy process balance. Cultivation of microalgae in replete and limited nitrogen culture media conditions has led to the formation of protein-rich and low protein biomass, respectively, with the last being especially optimal for continuous fermentation. Anaerobic digestion of nitrogen limited biomass (low-N BM) was characterized by a stable process with low levels of inhibitory substances and resulted in extraordinary high biogas, and subsequently methane productivity [750 ± 15 and 462 ± 9 mLN g−1 volatile solids (VS) day−1, respectively], thus corresponding to biomass-to-methane energy conversion efficiency of up to 84%. The microbial community structure within this highly efficient digester revealed a clear predominance of the phyla Bacteroidetes and the family Methanosaetaceae among the Bacteria and Archaea, respectively. The fermentation of replete nitrogen biomass (replete-N BM), on the contrary, was demonstrated to be less productive (131 ± 33 mLN CH4 g−1VS day−1) and failed completely due to acidosis, caused through high ammonia/ammonium concentrations. The organization of the microbial community of the failed (replete-N) digester differed greatly compared to the stable low-N digester, presenting a clear shift to the phyla Firmicutes and Thermotogae, and the archaeal population shifted from acetoclastic to hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis. The present study underlines the importance of cultivation conditions and shows the practicability of microalgae biomass usage as mono-substrate for highly efficient continuous fermentation to methane without any pretreatment with almost maximum practically achievable energy conversion efficiency (biomass to methane). Graphical abstract Growth condition dependence of anaerobic conversion efficiency of microalgae biomass to methane | |
| 12/01/2017 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 3.1.8 | Anaerobic digestion |
| Improved methane production and energy recovery of post-hydrothermal liquefaction waste water via integration of zeolite adsorption and anaerobic digestion | |
| Abstract Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) is a promising technology for converting organic wastes into bio-crude oil, with organic-rich post-hydrothermal liquefaction wastewater (PHWW) as by-product. In this study, zeolite adsorption and anaerobic digestion (AD) were integrated to improve the methane production and energy recovery of PHWW from Chlorella 1067. A statistical design for maximum toxicants removal by zeolite was applied before AD process. Zeolite could mitigate the inhibition associated to compounds such as ammonia, N-heterocyclic compounds, etc. in PHWW and thereby shortening the lag phase and increasing methane production by 32–117% compared with that without zeolite adsorption. Zeolite adsorption also increased energy recovery efficiency (up to 70.5%) for this integrated system. Integration of HTL and AD brought higher energetic return from feedstock via oil and biomethane production, which may offer insight into industrial application of microalgae biomass in the circular economy. In addition, carbon and nitrogen flow for the integrated process was determined. | |
| 02/01/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 3.1.9 | Anaerobic digestion |
| Integrated systems for biopolymers and bioenergy production from organic waste and by-products: a review of microbial processes | |
| Recently, issues concerning the sustainable and harmless disposal of organic solid waste have generated interest in microbial biotechnologies aimed at converting waste materials into bioenergy and biomaterials, thus contributing to a reduction in economic dependence on fossil fuels. To valorize biomass, waste materials derived from agriculture, food processing factories, and municipal organic waste can be used to produce biopolymers, such as biohydrogen and biogas, through different microbial processes. In fact, different bacterial strains can synthesize biopolymers to convert waste materials into valuable intracellular (e.g., polyhydroxyalkanoates) and extracellular (e.g., exopolysaccharides) bioproducts, which are useful for biochemical production. In particular, large numbers of bacteria, including Alcaligenes eutrophus, Alcaligenes latus, Azotobacter vinelandii, Azotobacter chroococcum, Azotobacter beijerincki, methylotrophs, Pseudomonas spp., Bacillus spp., Rhizobium spp., Nocardia spp., and recombinant Escherichia coli, have been successfully used to produce polyhydroxyalkanoates on an industrial scale from different types of organic by-products. Therefore, the development of high-performance microbial strains and the use of by-products and waste as substrates could reasonably make the production costs of biodegradable polymers comparable to those required by petrochemical-derived plastics and promote their use. Many studies have reported use of the same organic substrates as alternative energy sources to produce biogas and biohydrogen through anaerobic digestion as well as dark and photofermentation processes under anaerobic conditions. Therefore, concurrently obtaining bioenergy and biopolymers at a reasonable cost through an integrated system is becoming feasible using by-products and waste as organic carbon sources. An overview of the suitable substrates and microbial strains used in low-cost polyhydroxyalkanoates for biohydrogen and biogas production is given. The possibility of creating a unique integrated system is discussed because it represents a new approach for simultaneously producing energy and biopolymers for the plastic industry using by-products and waste as organic carbon sources. | |
| 12/01/2017 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 3.1.10 | Anaerobic digestion |
| Method of biogas production enhancement using cationic polymer | |
| A method of biogas production enhancement for an anaerobic digestion process is provided. The method of biogas production enhancement uses a cationic polymer to improve the efficiency of converting organic waste into biogas, such as methane containing gas. The cationic polymers typically used are a copolymer of acrylamide / dimethylaminoethyl acrylate methyl chloride. Biochemical methane potential (BMP) assay was carried out with varying amounts of cationic polymer. The results indicated much earlier and higher biogas production rates compared to the control and increasing COD removal efficiency. Further, the low concentration of cationic polymer additive can condition the charges on the surface of the anaerobic microbes and enhance synergy of the microbe community resulting in better kinetics of hydrolysis, acidogenesis and methanogenesis. Further, the low concentration of the cationic polymer can enhance the tolerance of the microbes to the toxicity of the wastewater by conditioning the microbial community. | |
| 09/09/2011 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 3.1.11 | Anaerobic digestion |
| Numerical Comparison of a Combined Hydrothermal Carbonization and Anaerobic Digestion System with Direct Combustion of Biomass for Power Production | |
| Two of the methods for converting biomass to fuel are hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) and anaerobic digestion (AD). This study is aimed at designing and analyzing two scenarios for bioenergy production from undervalued biomass (sawdust). In one of the scenarios (direct combustion or DC), raw biomass is burned in a combustor to provide the heat that is required by the Rankine cycle to generate electricity. In the other scenario (HTC-AD), the raw biomass first undergoes HTC treatment. While the solid product (hydrochar) is used to produce power by a Rankine cycle, the liquid by-product undergoes an AD process. This results in fuel gas production and it can be used in a Brayton cycle to generate more power. Energy and mass balance analysis of both scenarios were developed for each unit process by using Engineering Equation Solver (EES). The required data were obtained experimentally or from the literature. The performances of the proposed systems were evaluated, and a sensitivity analysis was presented to help in finding the best operational conditions. | |
| 01/01/2020 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 3.1.12 | Anaerobic digestion |
| Preliminary Assessment of a Biogas-based Power Plant from Organic Waste in the North Netherlands | |
| Biogas is expected to play a crucial role in achieving the energy targets set by the European Union. Biogas, which mainly comprises methane and carbon dioxide, is produced in an anaerobic reactor, which transforms biomass into biogas. A consortium of anaerobic bacteria and archaea produces biogas during the anaerobic digestion (AD) of various types of feedstocks, such as animal slurries, energy crops, and agricultural residues. A biogas-fed gas turbine-generator and steam generator produce heat and power. In this study, a combined heat and power installation is studied. The biogas-based power plant treating cow manure, grass straw, and sugar beet pulp was examined using the software SuperPro Designer, and the obtained economic reports are evaluated. From the results, subsidy for electricity does not change the feasibility of the plants in case that cow manure or sugar beet pulp are used as feedstocks. The net present value (NPV) of biogas plants treating cow manure and sugar beet pulp was negative and the subsidy is not sufficient to make profitable these cases. The biogas power plant treating straw showed a positive net present value even without subsidy, which means that it is more desirable to invest in a plant that produces electricity and digestate from grass straw. | |
| 10/23/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 3.1.13 | Anaerobic digestion |
| Prospects for energy recovery during hydrothermal and biological processing of waste biomass. | |
| Abstract Thermochemical and biological processes represent promising technologies for converting wet biomasses, such as animal manure, organic waste, or algae, to energy. To convert biomass to energy and bio-chemicals in an economical manner, internal energy recovery should be maximized to reduce the use of external heat and power. In this study, two conversion pathways that couple hydrothermal liquefaction with anaerobic digestion or catalytic hydrothermal gasification were compared. Each of these platforms is followed by two alternative processes for gas utilization: 1) combined heat and power; and 2) combustion in a boiler. Pinch analysis was applied to integrate thermal streams among unit processes and improve the overall system efficiency. A techno-economic analysis was conducted to compare the feasibility of the four modeled scenarios under different market conditions. Our results show that a systems approach designed to recover internal heat and power can reduce external energy demands and increase the overall process sustainability. | |
| 02/01/2017 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 3.1.14 | Anaerobic digestion |
| Regulating Secretion of Extracellular Polymeric Substances through Dosing Magnetite and Zerovalent Iron Nanoparticles To Affect Anaerobic Digestion Mode | |
| Anaerobic digestion technology is a promising method to reduce the usage of fossil fuels by transforming organic waste into biogas. Nano zerovalent iron (nZVI) and nano iron oxide have been reported to affect metabolism modes of anaerobic digestion, i.e., interspecies hydrogen transfer (IHT) and direct interspecies electron transfer (DIET). However, the effects of the nanoparticles on extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) potentially capable of participating in the mass transfer or electron transfer of these two metabolism modes remains unclear. In this study, the addition of nanomagnetite (nFe3O4) significantly enhanced the performance of anaerobic treatment, while adding nZVI led to a decline of the performance. nFe3O4 stimulated the secretion of proteins and humic substances in EPS, which were confirmed electroactive to serve as electron shuttles to enhance the DIET pathway of anaerobic digestion. In contrast, the addition of nZVI increased EPS especially polysaccharide to resist cell disruption caus... | |
| 05/01/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 3.1.15 | Anaerobic digestion |
| Response Surface Methodology to Optimize Methane Production from Mesophilic Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Oily-Biological Sludge and Sugarcane Bagasse | |
| Oily-biological sludge (OBS) generated from petroleum refineries has high toxicity. Therefore, it needs an appropriate disposal method to reduce the negative impacts on the environment. The anaerobic co-digestion process is an effective method that manages and converts organic waste to energy. For effective anaerobic digestion, a co-substrate would be required to provide a suitable environment for anaerobic bacteria. In oily-biological sludge, the carbon/nitrogen (C/N) ratio and volatile solids (VS) content are very low. Therefore, it needs to be digested with organic waste that has a high C/N ratio and high VS content. This study investigates the use of sugarcane bagasse (SB) as an effective co-substrate due to its high C/N ratio and high VS content to improve the anaerobic co-digestion process with oily-biological sludge. The sugarcane bagasse also helps to delay the toxicity effect of the methane bacteria. Batch anaerobic co-digestion of oily-biological sludge was conducted with sugarcane bagasse as a co-substrate in twelve reactors with two-liter capacity, each under mesophilic conditions. The interaction effect of a C/N ratio of 20-30 and a VS co-substrate/VS inoculum ratio of 0.06-0.18 on the methane yield (mL CH4/g VSremoved) was investigated. Before the anaerobic digestion, thermochemical pre-treatment of the inoculum and co-substrate was conducted using sodium hydroxide to balance their acidic nature and provide a suitable pH environment for methane bacteria. Design and optimization for the mixing ratios were carried out by central composite design-response surface methodology (CCD-RSM). The highest predicted methane yield was found to be 63.52 mL CH4/g VSremoved, under optimum conditions (C/N ratio of 30 and co-substrate/inoculum ratio of 0.18). | |
| 03/10/2020 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 3.1.16 | Anaerobic digestion |
| Systems and methods for the co-treatment of solid organic waste and sewage | |
| Solid organic waste is processed into a suitable feedstock that can be mixed with sewage for anaerobic digestion. The processing of the solid organic waste initially transforms the solid organic waste into a uniform biomass. The uniform biomass is then subjected to hydrolysis and volatile acid fermentation to dissolve the soluble compounds leaving a small residual solid component. The liquid in which the soluble compounds are dissolved is then mixed with sewage in an anaerobic digester to produce biogas including methane. The residual solid component can be composted. | |
| 11/27/2007 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 3.1.17 | Anaerobic digestion |
| Waste to bioenergy: a review on the recent conversion technologies | |
| Scientific studies have demonstrated that it is possible to generate a wide variety of bioenergy from biomass residues and waste, and however its cost is not competitive with petro-fuels and other renewable energy. On-going efforts are continued extensively to improve conversion technologies in order to reduce production costs. The present review focuses on the conversion technologies for transforming biomass residues and waste to biofuels, specifically their technological concepts, options and prospects for implementation are addressed. The emerging developments in the two primary conversion pathways, namely the thermochemical (i.e. gasification, liquefaction, and pyrolysis) and biochemical (i.e. anaerobic digestion, alcoholic fermentation and photobiological hydrogen production) conversion techniques, are evaluated. Additionally, transesterification, which appears to be the simplest and most economical route to produce biodiesel in large quantity, is discussed. Lastly, the strategies for direct conversion of biomass residues and waste to bioelectricity including the use of combustion and microbial fuel cells are reviewed. | |
| 12/01/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 3.1.18 | Anaerobic digestion |
| Method and system of treating biomass wastes by biochemistry-thermochemistry multi-point interconnection | |
|
1. A method of treating biomass wastes by biochemistry-thermochemistry multi- point interconnection, comprising: (1) converting dry biomass wastes into pyrolysis gas, biochar, pyrolysis oil and aqueous condensate by a pyrolyzer; (2) feeding the pyrolysis gas and the aqueous condensate into an anaerobic digester to obtain biogas and digestion residues; (3) feeding at least a portion of the biochar into the anaerobic digester wherein the portion of the biochar is discharged with the digestion residues in the anaerobic digester; (4) separating the digestion residues into slurry and fiber digestate by a solid-liquid separator; (5) composting a first portion of the fiber digestate in a composter to form a compost product; (6) employing heat generated from the pyrolysis oil and the biogas to dry a second portion of the fiber digestate, the compost product and other biomass wastes to obtain dried biomass wastes; (7) feeding the dried biomass wastes into the pyrolyzer, wherein step (4) further includes adding at least another portion of the biochar before separating the digestion residues to further increase the solid-liquid separation efficiency. 2. The method of treating biomass wastes by biochemistry-thermochemistry multi-point interconnection of claim 1 , wherein step (5) further includes adding at least another portion of the biochar into the composter to further improve performance of the composting. 3. The method of treating biomass wastes by biochemistry-thermochemistry multi-point interconnection of claim 1 , wherein, in step (2), the pyrolysis gas and the aqueous condensate are converted into the biogas by biochemical actions in the anaerobic digester and trace pollutants contained in the pyrolysis gas are removed, and the biogas contains methane. 4. The method of treating biomass wastes by biochemistry-thermochemistry multi-point interconnection of claim 1 , wherein the compost product in step (5) is used as soil amendment. 5. The method of treating biomass wastes by biochemistry-thermochemistry multi-point interconnection of claim 4 , wherein the compost product in step (5) is mixed with the biochar to be used as soil amendment. |
|
| 05/31/2016 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Patent | |
| 3.1.19 | Anaerobic digestion |
| Systems and methods for converting organic waste materials into useful products | |
|
1. A method for converting organic waste materials, comprising:processing a first portion of the organic waste materials in a biomixer to create a partially hydrolyzed biomass;screening the partially hydrolyzed biomass into that pass through a first screen mesh;hydropulping the unders to remove heavier and lighter materials and to create a slurry of the remainder; andremoving grit from the slurry. 2. The method of claim 1 further comprising screening a second portion of the organic waste materials into unders that pass through a second screen mesh and overs that do not pass through the second screen mesh, wherein the unders from the second portion of the organic waste materials are hydropulped with the unders from the partially hydrolyzed biomass to create the slurry. 3. The method of claim 2 further comprising processing the overs with the first portion of the organic waste materials in the biomixer. 4. The method of claim 2 further comprising grinding the unders from the second portion of the organic waste materials prior to hydropulping. 5. The method of claim 1 further comprising sorting the organic waste materials prior to processing the first portion of the organic waste materials in the biomixer, 6. The method of claim 1 further comprising anaerobically digesting the slurry to produce biogas and a residual solid. 7. The method of claim 6 further comprising dewatering the residual solid and composting the dewatered residual solid. 8. The method of claim 7 further comprising recycling water from dewatering the residual solid back to hydropulping. 9. The method of claim 1 wherein the organic waste materials include source separated organic waste materials. 10. The method of claim 1 wherein the organic waste materials include municipal solid waste. |
|
| 06/25/2007 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Patent | |
3.2 Multi-stage anaerobic digestion
In this two-stage process, high-solid codigestion of food waste and chicken manure was carried out in the first stage and then, transferred and codigested with grass in the second stage.
**Highlights:**
* It was found that high-solid digestion of food waste failed after 3 days because of the accumulation of volatile fatty acids (VFAs). The two-stage process could be optimized by adjusting the mass ratio (based on volatile solids (VS)) among food waste, chicken manure, and grass, and a ratio of 4:5:5 of food waste to chicken manure to grass could lead to the highest biogas yield and efficiency. The biogas yield of the two-stage process 83.25% higher and the duration of digestion was 18 days shorter than those of the codigestion. [\[Paper\]](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0306261917305469)
* Two-stage anaerobic digestion is a substantial breakthrough in the field of renewable and sustainable energy technology that potentially transforms organic wastes into biohythane and simultaneously resolves the threat of energy crisis and waste disposal. Two-stage anaerobic system provides optimal process stability, increased energy efficacy and better control over crucial parameters governing assured performance and energy recovery. This review mainly focuses on the parameters to be monitored and controlled for maximum performance, influence on efficiency and process stability. The current findings and advanced research prospects in the field of two-stage anaerobic digestion of food wastes are analyzed. Increasing interest in utilizing this method for food waste management lies in understanding the influence of process parameters for maximal benefits.[ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96377-2988722300)
* **Zero-valent iron supplementation and two-stage anaerobic digestion are enhanced ways for CH4 production in anaerobic treatment to convert organic wastes into renewable energy.** In this study, different zero-valent iron supplementation modes were applied during acidogenic stage or methanogenic stage in swine manure anaerobic digestion. Adding zero-valent iron in acidogenic stage can increase the pH and improve volatile fatty acids production by 16.5%; zero-valent iron addition on methanogenic stage is more beneficial for CH4 production than acidogenic stage. The results show that adding zero-valent iron at both acidogenic stage and methanogenic stage could achieve CH4 yield an increase of 27.3% than control. The microbial sequencing analysis showed that zero-valent iron supplementation could enrich hydrogenotrophic Methanomassiliicoccus by 39.2-92.0%.[ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96377-2985895162)
| 3.2.1 | Multi-stage anaerobic digestion |
|---|---|
| Critical considerations in two-stage anaerobic digestion of food waste – A review | |
| Abstract Two-stage anaerobic digestion is a substantial breakthrough in the field of renewable and sustainable energy technology that potentially transforms organic wastes into biohythane and simultaneously resolves the threat of energy crisis and waste disposal. Two-stage anaerobic system provides optimal process stability, increased energy efficacy and better control over crucial parameters governing assured performance and energy recovery. This review mainly focuses on the parameters to be monitored and controlled for maximum performance, influence on efficiency and process stability. The current findings and advanced research prospects in the field of two-stage anaerobic digestion of food wastes are analyzed. Increasing interest in utilizing this method for food waste management lies in understanding the influence of process parameters for maximal benefits. | |
| 11/01/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 3.2.2 | Multi-stage anaerobic digestion |
| Enhanced Anaerobic Digestion of Swine Manure by the Addition of Zero-Valent Iron | |
| Zero-valent iron supplementation and two-stage anaerobic digestion are enhanced ways for CH4 production in anaerobic treatment to convert organic wastes into renewable energy. In this study, different zero-valent iron supplementation modes were applied during acidogenic stage or methanogenic stage in swine manure anaerobic digestion. Adding zero-valent iron in acidogenic stage can increase the pH and improve volatile fatty acids production by 16.5%; zero-valent iron addition on methanogenic stage is more beneficial for CH4 production than acidogenic stage. The results show that adding zero-valent iron at both acidogenic stage and methanogenic stage could achieve CH4 yield an increase of 27.3% than control. The microbial sequencing analysis showed that zero-valent iron supplementation could enrich hydrogenotrophic Methanomassiliicoccus by 39.2-92.0%. Results from this study demonstrated that zero-valent iron could be added to contact directly with methanogens in order to achieve higher energy recovery from... | |
| 11/14/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
3.3 bioelectrochemical enhanced anaerobic digestion
Anaerobic digestion (AD) is an important energy strategy for converting organic waste to CH 4 . A major factor limiting the practical applicability of AD is the relatively long hydraulic retention time (HRT) which declines the treatment efficiency of digesters. A coupling process of anaerobic digestion and ‘electromethanogenesis’ was proposed to enhance anaerobic digestion at a short HRT in this study. Microorganisms analysis indicated that the electric-biological reactor enriched hydrogenotrophic methanogens in both cathodic biofilm and suspended sludge, helping achieve the high organic removal (71.0% vs 42.3% \[control reactor\]) and CH 4 production (248.5 mL/h vs 51.3 mL/h), while the additional electric input was only accounted for 25.6% of the energy income from the increased CH 4 production. This study demonstrated that a bioelectrochemical enhanced anaerobic reactor could improve the CH 4 production and organic removal at a short HRT, providing an economically feasible scheme to treat wastewater.[ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96628-2471479672)
| 3.3.1 | bioelectrochemical enhanced anaerobic digestion |
|---|---|
| Enhancement of anaerobic methanogenesis at a short hydraulic retention time via bioelectrochemical enrichment of hydrogenotrophic methanogens | |
| Abstract Anaerobic digestion (AD) is an important energy strategy for converting organic waste to CH 4 . A major factor limiting the practical applicability of AD is the relatively long hydraulic retention time (HRT) which declines the treatment efficiency of digesters. A coupling process of anaerobic digestion and ‘electromethanogenesis’ was proposed to enhance anaerobic digestion at a short HRT in this study. Microorganisms analysis indicated that the electric-biological reactor enriched hydrogenotrophic methanogens in both cathodic biofilm and suspended sludge, helping achieve the high organic removal (71.0% vs 42.3% [control reactor]) and CH 4 production (248.5 mL/h vs 51.3 mL/h), while the additional electric input was only accounted for 25.6% of the energy income from the increased CH 4 production. This study demonstrated that a bioelectrochemical enhanced anaerobic reactor could improve the CH 4 production and organic removal at a short HRT, providing an economically feasible scheme to treat wastewater. | |
| 10/01/2016 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
3.4 Hyperthermophilic anaerobic digestion
**Highlights:**
* At shorter HRTs and upper manure-to-dog food ratio, the thermophilic CSAD marginally outperformed the biomethane production rates and substrate stabilization of the mesophilic CSAD. The increased fiber content relative to lipids at upper manure-to-dog food ratios improved the stability and performance of the thermophilic process by decreasing the concentration of LCFAs in solution, likely adsorbed onto the manure fibers. Overall, results of this study show that stability of the thermophilic co-digestion process is highly dependent on the influent substrate composition, and particularly for this study, on the proportion of manure to lipids in the influent stream.[\[Paper\]](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0043135414000736)
* In this study the anaerobic co-digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste, with thickened waste activated sludge (50:50, w/w based on total volatile solids) was investigated using anaerobic digestion thermophilic and hyper-thermophilic biochemical methane potential (BMP) assays. The hyper-thermophilic BMP assays outperformed the thermophilic BMP assays by providing faster biogas production rates, higher cumulative biogas productions and methane yields. Additionally, 10, 20 and 30% FOG (based on total volatile solids) were added to the co-digestion mixtures in order to boost the biogas production and methane yield in three hyperthermophilic assays. 30% FOG in the co-digestion mixture enhanced the biogas methane content for sample TWAS:OFMSW:30%FOG(H) to 66.4% compared to 60.1% for the control sample TWAS(T), and accordingly improved the methane yield to be 84.4% higher than the methane yield of the control.[ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96395-2755803738)
| 3.4.1 | Hyperthermophilic anaerobic digestion |
|---|---|
| Biogas Recovery from Hyper-Thermophilic Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Thickened Waste Activated Sludge, Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste and Fat, Oil and Grease | |
| The use of organic fraction of municipal solid waste and Fat Oil and Grease (FOG) as co-substrates for thickened waste activated sludge anaerobic digestion has the potential to improve the biodegradation process and significantly enhance biogas production and methane yields. This will not only help convert these potential waste streams from landfills increasing the longevity of existing landfills, but also provide a sustainable waste to energy waste management method. In this study the anaerobic co-digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste, with thickened waste activated sludge (50:50, w/w based on total volatile solids) was investigated using anaerobic digestion thermophilic and hyper-thermophilic biochemical methane potential (BMP) assays. The hyper-thermophilic BMP assays outperformed the thermophilic BMP assays by providing faster biogas production rates, higher cumulative biogas productions and methane yields. Additionally, 10, 20 and 30% FOG (based on total volatile solids) were added to the co-digestion mixtures in order to boost the biogas production and methane yield in three hyperthermophilic assays. 30% FOG in the co-digestion mixture enhanced the biogas methane content for sample TWAS:OFMSW:30%FOG(H) to 66.4% compared to 60.1% for the control sample TWAS(T), and accordingly improved the methane yield to be 84.4% higher than the methane yield of the control. | |
| 01/01/2017 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
3.5 Autogenerative high pressure digestion
**Highlights:**
* Conventional anaerobic digestion is a widely applied technology to produce biogas from organic wastes and residues. The biogas calorific value depends on the CH4 content which generally ranges between 55 and 65%. Biogas upgrading to so-called ‘green gas’, with natural gas quality, generally proceeds with add-on technologies, applicable only for biogas flows >100 m3/h. **In the concept of autogenerative high pressure digestion (AHPD), methanogenic biomass builds up pressure inside the reactor. Since CO2 has a higher solubility than CH4, it will proportion more to the liquid phase at higher pressures. Therefore, AHPD biogas is characterised by a high CH4 content, reaching equilibrium values between 90 and 95% at a pressure of 3–90 bar.** In addition, also H2S and NH3 are theoretically more soluble in the bulk liquid than CO2. Moreover, the water content of the already compressed biogas is calculated to have a dew point <−10 °C. Ideally, high-quality biogas can be directly used for electricity and heat generation, or injected in a local natural gas distribution net. In the present study, using sodium acetate as substrate and anaerobic granular sludge as inoculum, batch-fed reactors showed a pressure increase up to 90 bars, the maximum allowable value for our used reactors. However, the specific methanogenic activity (SMA) of the sludge decreased on average by 30% compared to digestion at ambient pressure (1 bar). Other results show no effect of pressure exposure on the SMA assessed under atmospheric conditions. These first results show that the proposed AHPD process is a highly promising technology for anaerobic digestion and biogas upgrading in a single step reactor system.[ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96631-2002182342)
* The two-stage autogenerative high-pressure digestion technique is a novel and promising approach for the production of gaseous fuels or upgraded biogas. This new technique is described in the patent DE 10 2011 015415 A1 and integrates biogas production, its upgrading and pressure boosting in one process. Anaerobic digestion under elevated pressure conditions leads to decreasing pH-values in the digestate due to the augmented formation of carboxylic acid. Model calculations carried out to evaluate the two-stage design showed that the pH-value in the pressurized anaerobic filter has a major influence on the methane content of the biogas produced. Within this study, the influence of the nitrogen content as one of the most important buffering substances on the performance of the system has been tested. The results show that higher NH 4 contents lead to higher pH-values in the digester and as a consequence to higher methane contents.[ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96631-2022204724)
| 3.5.1 | Autogenerative high pressure digestion |
|---|---|
| Autogenerative high pressure digestion: anaerobic digestion and biogas upgrading in a single step reactor system | |
| Conventional anaerobic digestion is a widely applied technology to produce biogas from organic wastes and residues. The biogas calorific value depends on the CH4 content which generally ranges between 55 and 65%. Biogas upgrading to so-called ‘green gas’, with natural gas quality, generally proceeds with add-on technologies, applicable only for biogas flows >100 m3/h. In the concept of autogenerative high pressure digestion (AHPD), methanogenic biomass builds up pressure inside the reactor. Since CO2 has a higher solubility than CH4, it will proportion more to the liquid phase at higher pressures. Therefore, AHPD biogas is characterised by a high CH4 content, reaching equilibrium values between 90 and 95% at a pressure of 3–90 bar. In addition, also H2S and NH3 are theoretically more soluble in the bulk liquid than CO2. Moreover, the water content of the already compressed biogas is calculated to have a dew point <−10 °C. Ideally, high-quality biogas can be directly used for electricity and heat generation, or injected in a local natural gas distribution net. In the present study, using sodium acetate as substrate and anaerobic granular sludge as inoculum, batch-fed reactors showed a pressure increase up to 90 bars, the maximum allowable value for our used reactors. However, the specific methanogenic activity (SMA) of the sludge decreased on average by 30% compared to digestion at ambient pressure (1 bar). Other results show no effect of pressure exposure on the SMA assessed under atmospheric conditions. These first results show that the proposed AHPD process is a highly promising technology for anaerobic digestion and biogas upgrading in a single step reactor system. | |
| 08/01/2011 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 3.5.2 | Autogenerative high pressure digestion |
| Influence of different substrates on the performance of a two-stage high pressure anaerobic digestion system | |
| Abstract The two-stage autogenerative high-pressure digestion technique is a novel and promising approach for the production of gaseous fuels or upgraded biogas. This new technique is described in the patent DE 10 2011 015415 A1 and integrates biogas production, its upgrading and pressure boosting in one process. Anaerobic digestion under elevated pressure conditions leads to decreasing pH-values in the digestate due to the augmented formation of carboxylic acid. Model calculations carried out to evaluate the two-stage design showed that the pH-value in the pressurized anaerobic filter has a major influence on the methane content of the biogas produced. Within this study, the influence of the nitrogen content as one of the most important buffering substances on the performance of the system has been tested. The results show that higher NH 4 contents lead to higher pH-values in the digester and as a consequence to higher methane contents. | |
| 02/01/2015 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 3.5.3 | Autogenerative high pressure digestion |
| Piezo-tolerant natural gas-producing microbes under accumulating pCO2 | |
| Background It is known that a part of natural gas is produced by biogenic degradation of organic matter, but the microbial pathways resulting in the formation of pressurized gas fields remain unknown. Autogeneration of biogas pressure of up to 20 bar has been shown to improve the quality of biogas to the level of biogenic natural gas as the fraction of CO2 decreased. Still, the pCO2 is higher compared to atmospheric digestion and this may affect the process in several ways. In this work, we investigated the effect of elevated pCO2 of up to 0.5 MPa on Gibbs free energy, microbial community composition and substrate utilization kinetics in autogenerative high-pressure digestion. | |
| 12/01/2016 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
3.6 Microscale AD
Anaerobic digestion is a succession of processes in which biodegradable material is broken down in absence of oxygen, leading to the production of biogas containing methane and of a residue called digestate. Anaerobic digestion represents an interesting treatment process for bio-waste, allowing the production of energy trough the recovery of biogas and the generation of fertilizers from the digestate.
While centralised anaerobic digestion plants are common in Europe to treat municipal bio-waste, the DECISIVE project aims at developing **an eco-designed, micro-scale anaerobic digestion treatment process** with the objective to propose a local, **inexpensive, flexibile and easy-to manage treatment** option for urban bio-waste.
Currently, micro-scale anaerobic digestion plants are widely used in rural areas in China and India, as well as in farms across Europe. To be implemented in European urban reas where winter cold can be challenging for the AD process and to comply with the European environmental and sanitary regulation, several improvements need to be brought to the process.
The micro-AD units designed by the DECISIVE projects will be coupled with **Stirling motors** to maximise their energy recovery and produce a local source of renewable energy.[\[Source\]](https://www.decisive2020.eu/the-project/micro-scale-anaerobic-digestion/)
**Highlights:**
* This paper describes the analysis of an AD plant that is novel in that it is located in an urban environment, built on a micro-scale, fed on food and catering waste, and operates as a purposeful system. The results showed that the plant was capable of stable operation despite large fluctuations in the rate and type of feed. Another innovative aspect of the plant was that it was equipped with a pre-digester tank and automated feeding, which reduced the effect of feedstock variations on the digestion process. Towards the end of the testing period, a rise in the concentration of volatile fatty acids and ammonia was detected in the digestate, indicating biological instability, and this was successfully remedied by adding trace elements. [ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-97034-2587750466)
| 3.6.1 | Microscale AD |
|---|---|
| Assessment of micro-scale anaerobic digestion for management of urban organic waste: A case study in London, UK. | |
| Abstract This paper describes the analysis of an AD plant that is novel in that it is located in an urban environment, built on a micro-scale, fed on food and catering waste, and operates as a purposeful system. The plant was built in 2013 and continues to operate to date, processing urban food waste and generating biogas for use in a community cafe. The plant was monitored for a period of 319 days during 2014, during which the operational parameters, biological stability and energy requirements of the plant were assessed. The plant processed 4574 kg of food waste during this time, producing 1008 m 3 of biogas at average 60.6% methane. The results showed that the plant was capable of stable operation despite large fluctuations in the rate and type of feed. Another innovative aspect of the plant was that it was equipped with a pre-digester tank and automated feeding, which reduced the effect of feedstock variations on the digestion process. Towards the end of the testing period, a rise in the concentration of volatile fatty acids and ammonia was detected in the digestate, indicating biological instability, and this was successfully remedied by adding trace elements. The energy balance and coefficient of performance (COP) of the system were calculated, which concluded that the system used 49% less heat energy by being housed in a greenhouse, achieved a net positive energy balance and potential COP of 3.16 and 5.55 based on electrical and heat energy, respectively. Greenhouse gas emissions analysis concluded that the most important contribution of the plant to the mitigation of greenhouse gases was the avoidance of on-site fossil fuel use, followed by the diversion of food waste from landfill and that the plant could result in carbon reduction of 2.95 kg CO 2eq kW h −1 electricity production or 0.741 kg CO 2eq kg −1 waste treated. | |
| 03/01/2017 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
3.7 Aerobic digestion
Aerobic digestion is a process in sewage treatment designed to reduce the volume of sewage sludge and make it suitable for subsequent use. More recently, technology has been developed that allows the treatment and reduction of other organic waste, such as food, cardboard and horticultural waste.[\[Wiki\]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aerobic_digestion)
Can be used as pretreatment for anaerobic digestion or as a process for the breakdown of biomass, followed by fractionation of components.
**Highlights:**
* Due to the auto thermal thermophilic aerobic digestion the VFA production was enhanced which ultimately increased the biogas production by 39.72%, as compared to the control system.[ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-97348-2324572544)
* Autothermal thermophilic aerobic digestion (ATAD) is an exothermic process where sludge is subjected to temperatures greater than 55 °C for at least 4 hours, over 6–10 days. Organic solids are degraded and the heat released during the microbial degradation is used to bring the process temperature within the thermophilic range.[ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-97348-2046787021)
* A process for the conversion of biomass into a biomass product which is suitable for use as a fuel, wherein the biomass is of plant origin and comprises microorganisms naturally occurring in the biomass, which process comprises - preparing a slurry by dispersing the biomass comprising the naturally occurring microorganisms in an aqueous liquid, - maintaining the slurry at conditions suitable for aerobic digestion by the microorganisms to obtain a slurry comprising the biomass product as a dispersed solid phase, and - recovering the biomass product, which recovering comprises washing using water as a washing liquid and drying the biomass product.[ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-97348-EP2606140B1)
| 3.7.1 | Aerobic digestion |
|---|---|
| An Approach to Enhance Biomethanation by Thermophilic Aerobic Digestion of Combined Vegetable Waste. | |
| In biogas volatile fatty acid are the principle source of energy for methanogens and an increase in their concentration can enhance the process performance of biogas digester. A two phase anaerobic digestion system was used to study the effect of various factors on the net production of volatile fatty acid (VFA). For this purpose thermophilic digester maintained at 55°c (i.e. digester I) and the main digester was kept at ambient temperature (i.e. digester II). Co-digestion of vegetable waste and cow dung was investigated in two phase anaerobic biodigester system. A comparative study was carried out between control and experimental system. The amendment was controlled air supply in predigester (digester I) designed to supply with precise control in the experimental system and no aeration was done in the predigester of control system. The conditions of start up and operation were same in both the systems except controlled supply of air. A conversion of an average of 75% of organic solids fed into digester at total of 15 days hydraulic retention time (HRT) was obtained for both the system. The organic loading rate in phase I digester was 4-4.5 kg VS/m 3 /d. This phase effluent portray a drop in the pH to 4.4-4.7 as high volatile fatty acid produced in the range of 2380-5464 mg/lt with a corresponding gas production of 0.401 m 3 /kg vs. fed in the experimental system, which showed increased biogas yield than the control system. Due to the auto thermal thermophilic aerobic digestion the VFA production was enhanced which ultimately increased the biogas production by 39.72%, as compared to the control system. The NPK value of the digested sludge obtained was having 0.55% of Nitrogen, 0.56% of Phosphorous and 0.61% of Potash. Thus, limited quantity of oxygen can even lead to improved performance of anaerobic digestion reactor, under certain operating conditions. This fact is also supported by the increase in the viable count of bacteria in the experimental system, It was seen that the aeration in predigester (in two phase anaerobic digestion), could assist anaerobic digestion and would prove much beneficial, for treatment strategy for simultaneous waste treatment and energy generation. | |
| 01/01/2014 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 3.7.2 | Aerobic digestion |
| Autothermal thermophilic aerobic digestion (ATAD) — Part II: Review of research and full-scale operating experiences | |
| Autothermal thermophilic aerobic digestion (ATAD) is an exothermic process where sludge is subjected to temperatures greater than 55 °C for at least 4 hours, over 6–10 days. Organic solids are degraded and the heat released during the microbial degradation is used to bring the process temperature within the thermophilic range. It produces a biologically stable product, achieving a reduction in biomass, while using smaller digesters, compared to mesophilic aerobic and anaerobic digestion. There are no regulatory requirements in North America and Europe for the reduction of the volume of total solids in sludge processing. However, a reduction in the volume of material for final disposal has cost benefits. By virtue of the residual mass, volume reductions are easily made through dewatering or dehydrating steps following ATAD. Despite the apparent advantages of ATAD, limited information on the process is available in the literature. Concerns still exist about documented cases of odour issues, problems with sl... | |
| 11/01/2007 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 3.7.3 | Aerobic digestion |
| Solubilization of organic sludge by thermophilic aerobic bacteria as a pretreatment for anaerobic digestion | |
| Solubilization of organic sludge by thermophilic aerobic bacteria as a pretreatment for anaerobic digestion was investigated. The thermophilic bacteria which solubilized organic sludge were isolated from the thermophilic aerobic digestion reactor. The bacterium type SPT2-1 could grow at pH ranging from 5.0 to 8.5 with optimal temperature at 60–70°C. In batch experiments, 25–30% of volatile suspended solids (VSS) in the pre-heated sludge were solubilized on inoculating with the isolated bacteria although little was solubilized without inoculation. The isolated bacteria appeared to secret the extracellular enzymes including proteases and amylases. In continuous flow experiments, sludge solubilization rate (VSS removal) was around 40% under aerobic as well as microaerobic conditions. No accumulation of volatile fatty acids in the treated sludge was observed under aerobic conditions while significant amounts of them were accumulated under microaerobic conditions. Production of biogas on anaerobic digestion of the microaerobically-pretreated sludge was increased by 1.5 when compared with the sludge without pretreatment. | |
| 02/01/2000 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 3.7.4 | Aerobic digestion |
| Techno-economic evaluation of thermal treatment, ozonation and sonication for the reduction of wastewater biomass volume before aerobic or anaerobic digestion. | |
| Abstract Aerobic and anaerobic digestions were compared with different sludge reduction processes such as ultrasonic, ozone, and thermal treatments. Each treatment was tested under the following conditions to improve batch aerobic or anaerobic digestion: ultrasound ( 200,000 kJ kgT S 0 − 1 ) , thermal (40 °C, 60 °C, 90 °C for 90 min, 120 °C 15 min, 1 bar), and ozonation ( 0.1 g O 3 gT S 0 − 1 ) . The different pretreatments induced organic matter solubilisation and intrinsic sludge reduction (total suspended solids): ultrasound (47%), thermal 90 °C (16%), ozone (15%), thermal 60 °C (9%), thermal 40 °C (5%), autoclave (120 °C) (4.2%). TSS (and also VSS) solubilisation were found to be highly correlated to the pretreatment ability to break the flocs rather than to specific energy input. The total values of TSS reduction ranged from 57% to 71% under aerobic conditions and from 66% to 86% under anaerobic conditions. TSS solubilisation after pretreatment can be considered as a predictive parameter of sludge volume reduction enhancement after aerobic or anaerobic digestion while specific energy input did not show anything or negligible impact. In our experimental conditions, ultrasound and ozone led to the best TSS removal improvement after both aerobic (30% and 20%) and anaerobic digestion (20%). Ultrasonic and ozone pretreatments prior to aerobic or anaerobic digestion led to the best reduction of the specific energy required for removing 1 kg of TSS compared to the control. Anaerobic digestion was globally more effective (compare to aerobic digestion) in enhancing sludge production reduction. | |
| 02/01/2010 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 3.7.5 | Aerobic digestion |
| Two-stage anaerobic and post-aerobic mesophilic digestion of sewage sludge: Analysis of process performance and hygienization potential. | |
| Abstract Sequential anaerobic–aerobic digestion has been demonstrated to be effective for enhanced sludge stabilization, in terms of increased solid reduction and improvement of sludge dewaterability. In this study, we propose a modified version of the sequential anaerobic–aerobic digestion process by operating the aerobic step under mesophilic conditions (T = 37 °C), in order to improve the aerobic degradation kinetics of soluble and particulate chemical oxygen demand (COD). Process performance has been assessed in terms of “classical parameters” such as volatile solids (VS) removal, biogas production, COD removal, nitrogen species, and polysaccharide and protein fate. The aerobic step was operated under intermittent aeration to achieve nitrogen removal. Aerobic mesophilic conditions consistently increased VS removal, providing 32% additional removal vs. 20% at 20 °C. Similar results were obtained for nitrogen removal, increasing from 64% up to 99% at the higher temperature. Improved sludge dewaterability was also observed with a capillary suction time decrease of ~ 50% during the mesophilic aerobic step. This finding may be attributable to the decreased protein content in the aerobic digested sludge. The post-aerobic digestion exerted a positive effect on the reduction of microbial indicators while no consistent improvement of hygienization related to the increased temperature was observed. The techno-economic analysis of the proposed digestion layout showed a net cost saving for sludge disposal estimated in the range of 28–35% in comparison to the single–phase anaerobic digestion. | |
| 03/01/2016 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 3.7.6 | Aerobic digestion |
| Two-stage process combines anaerobic and aerobic methods | |
| The organic fraction of the material diverted from landfills has potential to be utilized as a raw material to be recycled, used for the production of compost, converted to energy in waste-to-energy facilities, or used for the production of other end products. Given the uncertainties concerning the future availability, production costs, and market prices for conventional fuels, any potential source of alternate energy and alternative energy technologies deserve serious consideration. Faced with an uncertain energy future, several European countries have already started using biomass and MSW as a source of energy. An innovative high-solids anaerobic digestion/aerobic composting process currently under investigation at the University of California, Davis is as an ideal candidate for processing a large fraction of the organic matter in MSW. The principal advantages of this innovative process which is described and discussed in this paper are: (1) the recovery of biogas that can be used as a fuel for the production of energy, and (2) the production of humus-like material that can be used as a high-quality soil amendment or as boiler fuel. The fact that a liquid waste stream that needs further treatment is not generated in this process is another significant advantage. | |
| 03/01/1991 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 3.7.7 | Aerobic digestion |
| A PROCESS FOR THE CONVERSION OF BIOMASS OF PLANT ORIGIN, AND A COMBUSTION PROCESS | |
|
A process for the conversion of biomass into a biomass product which is suitable for use as a fuel, wherein the biomass is of plant origin and comprises microorganisms naturally occurring in the biomass, which process comprises - preparing a slurry by dispersing the biomass comprising the naturally occurring microorganisms in an aqueous liquid, - maintaining the slurry at conditions suitable for aerobic digestion by the microorganisms to obtain a slurry comprising the biomass product as a dispersed solid phase, and - recovering the biomass product, which recovering comprises washing using water as a washing liquid and drying the biomass product. A process as claimed in claim 1, wherein the process comprises in addition recovering from the slurry a liquid phase, yielding a biomass extract. A process as claimed in claim 1 or 2, wherein the aqueous liquid is water. A process as claimed in claim 3, wherein the pH of the water, as measured at 20 °C, is in the range of from 6.5 to 8.5, and wherein the slurry is maintained at conditions suitable for digestion by the microorganisms for a time in the range of from 100 hours to 500 hours. A process as claimed in claim 1 or 2, wherein the aqueous liquid comprises at least a portion of the biomass extract which was obtained in the process of claim 2. A process as claimed in claim 5, wherein the pH of the aqueous liquid, as measured at 20 °C, is in the range of from 3 to 6, and wherein the slurry is maintained at conditions suitable for digestion by the microorganisms for a time in the range of from 0.5 hours to 150 hours. A process as claimed in any of claims 1-6, wherein the biomass comprises forestry waste or agricultural waste. A process as claimed in any of claims 1-7, wherein the naturally occurring microorganisms comprise microorganisms which are capable of converting saccharides into lactic acid or lactic acid salts under mesophylic or psychrophylic growth conditions. A process as claimed in any of claims 1-8, wherein the weight ratio of the aqueous liquid to the biomass is in the range of from 1:1 to 50:1, and wherein the conditions suitable for digestion by the microorganisms comprise a temperature is in the range of from 5 °C to 40 °C. A process as claimed in any of claims 1-9, wherein recovery of the biomass product from the slurry comprises employing a filter plate or a screen, while exerting a pressure onto the slurry, which pressure is in the range of from 0.0005 MPa to 0.02 MPa. A process as claimed in any of claims 1-10, wherein recovering the biomass product from the slurry comprises a plurality of washing steps in a counter current process, and wherein water is applied as the washing liquid in the last washing step. A process as claimed in any of claims 1-11, wherein the recovering comprises drying to achieve a moisture content of the biomass product of at most 20 % by weight. A combustion process, which combustion process comprises the steps of - preparing a slurry by dispersing a biomass in an aqueous liquid, wherein the biomass is of plant origin and comprises microorganisms naturally occurring in the biomass, - maintaining the slurry at conditions suitable for aerobic digestion by the microorganisms to obtain a slurry comprising a biomass product as a dispersed solid phase, - recovering the biomass product from the slurry, which recovering comprises washing using water as a washing liquid, and - combusting the biomass product. A combustion process as claimed in claim 13, wherein the combustion process comprises drying the biomass product recovered from the slurry by exposing the biomass product to outside weather conditions. A process for the conversion of biomass into a biomass product which is suitable for use as a fuel, wherein the biomass is of plant origin and comprises microorganisms naturally occurring in the biomass, which process comprises - preparing a slurry by dispersing the biomass comprising the naturally occurring microorganisms in an aqueous liquid, - maintaining the slurry at conditions suitable for aerobic digestion by the microorganisms to obtain a slurry comprising the biomass product as a dispersed solid phase, - recovering the biomass product, - recovering from the slurry a liquid phase, yielding a biomass extract, and - separating the biomass extract into an aqueous effluent comprising salts, and an aqueous concentrate comprising neutral organic compounds. A process for making a board material for building purposes, wherein the process comprises - the steps of converting a biomass into a biomass product as claimed in any of claims 1-12, and converting the biomass product into a board material for building purposes. |
|
| 08/11/2011 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Patent | |
4. (Other) Biochemical
BackBiochemical and biotechnological conversions that are not anaerobic digestion
4.1 Fermentation
In this technology fermentation to ethanol, organic acids and other products is reviewed.
Ethanol fermentation, also called alcoholic fermentation, is a biological process which converts sugars such as glucose, fructose, and sucrose into cellular energy, producing ethanol and carbon dioxide as by-products. [\[Wiki\]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethanol_fermentation)
**Highlights:**
* The MixAlco process converts heterogeneous biomass feedstocks into gasoline, JP-8 and diesel via biochemical and chemical pathways, generating sludge in the effluent stream. The MixAlco process ferments a mixture of domestic wastes to chemicals and fuels, generating on a dry basis 8 tons of sludge for every 40 tons of dry feedstock fed into the process. In this process, wastes from paper and pulp and mixed food residues are first fermented to produce carboxylate salts. These salts are thermally converted into ketones and then to a mixture of alcohols by hydrogenation [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96381-2026844222)
* the novel technologies such as the controlled metabolite production, medium chain carboxylic acid production, and high temperature ethanol recovery in thermophilic mixed culture fermentation are also reviewed.[ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96381-2740953923)
* In the present research, R. opacus strains DSM 1069 and PD630 were fed three agro-waste streams: (1) orange pulp, juice, and peel; (2) lemon pulp, juice, and peel; and (3) corn stover effluent, to determine if these low-cost substrates would be suitable for producing a value-added product, SCP for aquafarming or livestock feed. Both strains used agro-waste carbon sources as a growth substrate to produce protein-rich cell biomass[ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96381-2809267533)
* Lignocellulosic biomass (LCB), the most abundant renewable feedstock for bioenergy generation, is commonly converted to second generation bioalcohols, the main drop-in fuels for petroleum gasoline, through three technologies based on sugar, carboxylic acid and syngas platforms. The hybridization of either any two or three platforms altogether is a novel concept aimed at improvement of yield and quality (high heating value) of bioalcohols.[ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96381-2975617920)
* In this context, red clover, clover grass, alfalfa and oilseed radish were studied as possible feedstocks for the development of an organic biorefinery system in Northern Europe. For this purpose, the green crops were processed into a nitrogen-rich protein concentrate, a fiber-rich press cake, and a residual stream of soluble nutrients (brown juice). The process, which involved a novel protein refining technique using lactic acid fermentation, yielded between 6 and 13 kg of dry organic protein product per ton of fresh crop. The protein products of the different crops presented balanced amino acid composition compared to soybeans, which are commonly used in organic farming. Moreover, methionine contents between 7.8 and 9.1 g/kg DM were obtained in the protein products, which is more than the typical concentration found in animal feeds (5.2 g/kg DM in soybeans). This makes the organic protein product produced very promising as a feed ingredient for organic farming of monogastric animals in Europe. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96381-2626692541)
| 4.1.1 | Fermentation |
|---|---|
| Acid Assisted Organosolv Delignification of Beechwood and Pulp Conversion towards High Concentrated Cellulosic Ethanol via High Gravity Enzymatic Hydrolysis and Fermentation | |
| Background: Future biorefineries will focus on converting low value waste streams to chemical products that are derived from petroleum or refined sugars. Feedstock pretreatment in a simple, cost effective, agnostic manner is a major challenge. Methods: In this work, beechwood sawdust was delignified via an organosolv process, assisted by homogeneous inorganic acid catalysis. Mixtures of water and several organic solvents were evaluated for their performance. Specifically, ethanol (EtOH), acetone (AC), and methyl- isobutyl- ketone (MIBK) were tested with or without the use of homogeneous acid catalysis employing sulfuric, phosphoric, and oxalic acids under relatively mild temperature of 175 °C for one hour. Results: Delignification degrees (DD) higher than 90% were achieved, where both AC and EtOH proved to be suitable solvents for this process. Both oxalic and especially phosphoric acid proved to be good alternative catalysts for replacing sulfuric acid. High gravity simultaneous saccharification and fermentation with an enzyme loading of 8.4 mg/gsolids at 20 wt.% initial solids content reached an ethanol yield of 8.0 w/v%. Conclusions: Efficient delignification combining common volatile solvents and mild acid catalysis allowed for the production of ethanol at high concentration in an efficient manner. | |
| 07/05/2018 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 4.1.2 | Fermentation |
| An integrated biohydrogen refinery: Synergy of photofermentation, extractive fermentation and hydrothermal hydrolysis of food wastes | |
| Abstract An Integrated Biohydrogen Refinery (IBHR) and experimental net energy analysis are reported. The IBHR converts biomass to electricity using hydrothermal hydrolysis, extractive biohydrogen fermentation and photobiological hydrogen fermentation for electricity generation in a fuel cell. An extractive fermentation, developed previously, is applied to waste-derived substrates following hydrothermal pre-treatment, achieving 83-99% biowaste destruction. The selective separation of organic acids from waste-fed fermentations provided suitable substrate for photofermentative hydrogen production, which enhanced the gross energy generation up to 11-fold. Therefore, electrodialysis provides the key link in an IBHR for ‘waste to energy’. The IBHR compares favourably to ‘renewables’ (photovoltaics, on-shore wind, crop-derived biofuels) and also emerging biotechnological options (microbial electrolysis) and anaerobic digestion. | |
| 09/01/2012 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 4.1.3 | Fermentation |
| Bioconversion of cheese whey permeate into fungal oil by Mucor circinelloides | |
| Oleaginous fungi are efficient tools to convert agricultural waste streams into valuable components. The filamentous fungus Mucor circinelloides was cultivated in whey permeate, a byproduct from cheese production, to produce an oil-rich fungal biomass. Response surface methodology was used to optimize the fermentation conditions such as pH and temperature for increased biomass yield and lipid accumulation. Quantification and characterization of the fungal biomass oil was conducted. Upstream lactose hydrolysis of the whey permeate increased the biomass yield from 2.4 to 7.8 (g dry biomass/L) compared to that of non-hydrolyzed whey permeate. The combination of low pH (4.5) and pasteurization minimized microbial competition, thus favoring fungal growth. A central composite rotatable design was used to evaluate the effects of temperature (22.4–33.6 °C) and a lower pH range (3.6–4.7) on biomass yield and composition. The highest biomass yield and oil content was observed at high temperature (33.6 °C), while the pH range evaluated had a less pronounced effect. The predictive model was validated at the optimal conditions of 33.6 °C and pH 4.5. The fungal biomass yield plateaued at 9 g dry cell weight per liter, while the oil content and lipid yield reached a maximum of 24% dry biomass and 2.20 g/L, respectively, at 168 h. Triacylglycerides were the major lipid class (92%), which contained predominantly oleic (41%), palmitic (23%), linoleic (11%), and γ-linolenic acid (9%). This study provided an alternative way of valorization of cheese whey permeate by using it as a substrate for the production of value-added compounds by fungal fermentation. The fatty acid profile indicates the suitability of M. circinelloides oil as a potential feedstock for biofuel production and nutraceutical applications. | |
| 12/01/2018 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 4.1.4 | Fermentation |
| Designing Reactor Microbiomes for Chemical Production from Organic Waste | |
| Microorganisms are responsible for biochemical cycles and therefore play essential roles in the environment. By using omics approaches and network analysis to understand the interaction and cooperation within mixed microbial communities, it would be possible to engineer microbiomes in fermentation and digestion reactors to convert organic waste into valuable products. | |
| 01/01/2018 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 4.1.5 | Fermentation |
| Hybridization of sugar-carboxylate-syngas platforms for the production of bio-alcohols from lignocellulosic biomass (LCB) – A state-of-the-art review and recommendations | |
| Abstract Lignocellulosic biomass (LCB), the most abundant renewable feedstock for bioenergy generation, is commonly converted to second generation bioalcohols, the main drop-in fuels for petroleum gasoline, through three technologies based on sugar, carboxylic acid and syngas platforms. The hybridization of either any two or three platforms altogether is a novel concept aimed at improvement of yield and quality (high heating value) of bioalcohols. This article reviews the present status of the integration techniques of hybrid platforms with an overall assessment of their advancement with respect to their individual counterpart as well as the challenges involved. It has been indicated that to extract the maximum benefit of hybridization, research studies should be spurred in the fields of kinetic analysis of all thermochemical and biochemical processes, microbial interaction, optimization of process parameters (pH, temperature), performance analysis of engine for the utilization of mixed product bioalcohols, sustainability analysis through the development of mathematical models for lab-scale operations and process simulation models for large scale units along with life cycle assessment. Moreover, pyrolysis of LCB has been identified as a unique central process for the supply of all intermediate compounds, namely, sugar, carboxylic acid and syngas during the hybrid networking of three platform technologies. In this context, the scheme of CONVER-B, a joint research project under the INNO-INDIGO partnership program, aiming at sustainable integration of the platforms to produce bio-alcohols from LCBs leaving zero effluent simultaneously with carbon sequestration potential has been introduced and discussed. | |
| 11/01/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 4.1.6 | Fermentation |
| Hydrophobic Eutectic Mixtures as Volatile Fatty Acid Extractants | |
| Organic waste streams can be converted into volatile fatty acids (VFAs) via fermentation. VFAs can be used as intermediates in the synthesis of added-value chemicals. In this work, hydrophobic eutectic mixtures were designed for the liquid-liquid extraction of VFAs from dilute aqueous solutions. The eutectic behaviour was screened for over 100 combinations of 16 hydrophobic components that were selected based on a set of predetermined criteria. Mixtures of dihexylthiourea and trioctylphosphine oxide (TOPO) showed the best extraction performance and were stable over a wide pH range. The extraction efficiency increased with increasing hydrophobicity of the VFAs, and only undissociated acids were extracted. Upon increasing the TOPO content of the eutectic mixture, the extraction performance could be improved, confirming the tuneable nature of eutectic solvents. However, the extraction performance was less than that for solutions of TOPO in hydrophobic solvents, even though mole fractions of TOPO were higher in the eutectic mixtures. It was hypothesized that the intermolecular VFA–TOPO interactions required for extraction are suppressed by the inter-component interactions in the eutectic mixture. The inter-component interactions are responsible for the negative deviation from ideality of the melting temperature depressions that extend the liquid window of the mixtures towards the extraction temperature. Hence, the design of novel hydrophobic extractants based on eutectic mixtures was demonstrated. Their performance might be improved by selecting counterparts that interfere less with the interactions required for VFA extraction. | |
| 01/01/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 4.1.7 | Fermentation |
| Lactic acid fermentation for refining proteins from green crops and obtaining a high quality feed product for monogastric animals | |
| Abstract Nowadays, the organic farming sector is growing at a fast pace in Europe while needs to face the lack of organic protein sources and in particular, feeding monogastric animals is becoming more and more urgent. Green biorefinery concepts might become the suitable solution for the production of organic protein-rich feeds from green crops. In this context, red clover, clover grass, alfalfa and oilseed radish were studied as possible feedstocks for the development of an organic biorefinery system in Northern Europe. For this purpose, the green crops were processed into a nitrogen-rich protein concentrate, a fiber-rich press cake, and a residual stream of soluble nutrients (brown juice). The process, which involved a novel protein refining technique using lactic acid fermentation, yielded between 6 and 13 kg of dry organic protein product per ton of fresh crop. The protein products of the different crops presented balanced amino acid composition compared to soybeans, which are commonly used in organic farming. Moreover, methionine contents between 7.8 and 9.1 g/kg DM were obtained in the protein products, which is more than the typical concentration found in animal feeds (5.2 g/kg DM in soybeans). This makes the organic protein product produced very promising as a feed ingredient for organic farming of monogastric animals in Europe. | |
| 09/01/2017 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 4.1.8 | Fermentation |
| Maximizing the concentrations of hydrogen, carbon monoxide and methane produced from the pyrolysis of a MixAlco process derived sludge | |
| Abstract The MixAlco process converts heterogeneous biomass feedstocks into gasoline, JP-8 and diesel via biochemical and chemical pathways, generating sludge in the effluent stream. The purpose of this article is to demonstrate how the generated sludge can be further converted into useful products such as hydrogen, methane and carbon monoxide, all produced in their maximum possible concentrations. Experiments were performed in a non-catalytic environment at atmospheric pressure conditions, studying synthesis gas and methane concentrations for temperatures in the range of 630/903–770/1043 °C/K and pretreated sludge feed rates in the range of 290–374 g/min. With an auger driven reactor system and the statistical response surface method, the highest possible synthesis gas composition was 43.9 ± 3.36 vol% H 2 /33.3 ± 3.29 vol% CO at 740/1013 °C/K. The methane concentration was 20.3 ± 2.99 vol%. The generated empirical models for both hydrogen and methane concentrations were significant but that for the carbon monoxide concentration behavior was not. As an input factor, temperature was significant but sludge feed rate was not. Mass and energy balances revealed process efficiency decreased with increase in temperature although the process could be self-sustaining even at the lowest process efficiency. | |
| 07/01/2013 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 4.1.9 | Fermentation |
| Optimization of urban waste fermentation for volatile fatty acids production | |
| Abstract The problem of waste disposal has recently focused on practices for waste recycling and bio-resources valorization. Organic waste produced in urban context together with biological sludge produced in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) can be used as renewable feedstock for the production of building blocks of different products, from biopolymers to methyl esters. This paper deals with the optimization of the fermentation process in order to transform urban organic waste (a mixture of pre-treated food waste and biological sludge) into added-value volatile fatty acid (VFA) rich stream, useful for biological processes within a biorefinery technology chain. Different temperatures, pH, hydraulic retention times (HRTs) and organic loading rates (OLRs) were tested both in batch and continuous trials. Batch tests showed the best working conditions at 37 °C and pH 9, using the bio-waste feedstock thermally pre-treated (76 h at 72 °C). These conditions were applied in continuous process, where higher HRT (6.0 d) and lower OLR [7.7 kg VS/(m 3 d)] gave the best performances in terms of process yield and maximum VFA level achieved: 0.77 COD VFA /VS (0) and 39 g COD VFA /L. An optimized fermentation process is crucial in a biorefinery perspective since it has to give a final stream of constant composition or tailored products suitable for further applications. | |
| 06/01/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 4.1.10 | Fermentation |
| Production of single cell protein from agro-waste using Rhodococcus opacus | |
| Livestock and fish farming are rapidly growing industries facing the simultaneous pressure of increasing production demands and limited protein required to produce feed. Bacteria that can convert low-value non-food waste streams into singe cell protein (SCP) present an intriguing route for rapid protein production. The oleaginous bacterium Rhodococcus opacus serves as a model organism for understanding microbial lipid production. SCP production has not been explored using an organism from this genus. In the present research, R. opacus strains DSM 1069 and PD630 were fed three agro-waste streams: (1) orange pulp, juice, and peel; (2) lemon pulp, juice, and peel; and (3) corn stover effluent, to determine if these low-cost substrates would be suitable for producing a value-added product, SCP for aquafarming or livestock feed. Both strains used agro-waste carbon sources as a growth substrate to produce protein-rich cell biomass suggesting that that R. opacus can be used to produce SCP using agro-wastes as low-cost substrates. | |
| 09/01/2018 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 4.1.11 | Fermentation |
| Temperature-Phased Conversion of Acid Whey Waste Into Medium-Chain Carboxylic Acids via Lactic Acid: No External e-Donor | |
| Summary Acid whey is a Greek-yogurt waste stream and can be a resource to produce biofuel precursors. Our objective was to convert acid whey into medium-chain carboxylic acid (MCCA) oil with the open-culture carboxylate platform. Here, we developed a temperature-phased bioprocess with different anaerobic reactor microbiomes, performing thermophilic lactic acid production and mesophilic chain elongation, to produce MCCAs (C6–C9) from acid whey via lactic acid as an intermediate. For the lactic acid-producing bioreactor, we achieved a volumetric lactic acid production rate of 1,230 mmol C L −1 day −1 (1.54 g L −1 hr −1 ). For the chain-elongating bioreactor, we achieved a volumetric MCCA production rate of 111 mmol C L −1 day −1 and a volumetric n -caproic acid (C6) production rate of 81 mmol C L −1 day −1 (0.07 g L −1 hr −1 ). We converted a real waste stream into mainly MCCAs without the external addition of an electron donor. | |
| 12/01/2017 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 4.1.12 | Fermentation |
| Valuable biochemical production in mixed culture fermentation: fundamentals and process coupling | |
| The mixed culture fermentation is an important environmental biotechnology that converts biodegradable organic wastes to valuable chemicals such as hydrogen, methane, acetate, ethanol, propionate, and so on. For the multistep process of hydrolysis, acidogenesis, acetogenesis/homoacetogensis, and methanogenesis, the typical metabolic reactions are firstly summarized. And then, since the final metabolites are always a mixture, the separation and purification processes are necessary to couple with anaerobic fermentation. Therefore, several typical coupling technologies including biogas upgrading, two-stage fermentation, gas stripping, membrane technology of pervaporation, membrane distillation, electrodialysis, bipolar membrane electrodialysis, and microbial fuel cells are summarized to separate the metabolites and recover energy. At last, the novel technologies such as the controlled metabolite production, medium chain carboxylic acid production, and high temperature ethanol recovery in thermophilic mixed culture fermentation are also reviewed. However, the novel concepts are still needed to meet the demands of better overall performances and lower total costs. | |
| 09/01/2017 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 4.1.13 | Fermentation |
| Waste to bioenergy: a review on the recent conversion technologies | |
| Scientific studies have demonstrated that it is possible to generate a wide variety of bioenergy from biomass residues and waste, and however its cost is not competitive with petro-fuels and other renewable energy. On-going efforts are continued extensively to improve conversion technologies in order to reduce production costs. The present review focuses on the conversion technologies for transforming biomass residues and waste to biofuels, specifically their technological concepts, options and prospects for implementation are addressed. The emerging developments in the two primary conversion pathways, namely the thermochemical (i.e. gasification, liquefaction, and pyrolysis) and biochemical (i.e. anaerobic digestion, alcoholic fermentation and photobiological hydrogen production) conversion techniques, are evaluated. Additionally, transesterification, which appears to be the simplest and most economical route to produce biodiesel in large quantity, is discussed. Lastly, the strategies for direct conversion of biomass residues and waste to bioelectricity including the use of combustion and microbial fuel cells are reviewed. | |
| 12/01/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 4.1.14 | Fermentation |
| A PROCESS FOR THE CONVERSION OF BIOMASS OF PLANT ORIGIN, AND A COMBUSTION PROCESS | |
|
A process for the conversion of biomass into a biomass product which is suitable for use as a fuel, wherein the biomass is of plant origin and comprises microorganisms naturally occurring in the biomass, which process comprises - preparing a slurry by dispersing the biomass comprising the naturally occurring microorganisms in an aqueous liquid, - maintaining the slurry at conditions suitable for aerobic digestion by the microorganisms to obtain a slurry comprising the biomass product as a dispersed solid phase, and - recovering the biomass product, which recovering comprises washing using water as a washing liquid and drying the biomass product. A process as claimed in claim 1, wherein the process comprises in addition recovering from the slurry a liquid phase, yielding a biomass extract. A process as claimed in claim 1 or 2, wherein the aqueous liquid is water. A process as claimed in claim 3, wherein the pH of the water, as measured at 20 °C, is in the range of from 6.5 to 8.5, and wherein the slurry is maintained at conditions suitable for digestion by the microorganisms for a time in the range of from 100 hours to 500 hours. A process as claimed in claim 1 or 2, wherein the aqueous liquid comprises at least a portion of the biomass extract which was obtained in the process of claim 2. A process as claimed in claim 5, wherein the pH of the aqueous liquid, as measured at 20 °C, is in the range of from 3 to 6, and wherein the slurry is maintained at conditions suitable for digestion by the microorganisms for a time in the range of from 0.5 hours to 150 hours. A process as claimed in any of claims 1-6, wherein the biomass comprises forestry waste or agricultural waste. A process as claimed in any of claims 1-7, wherein the naturally occurring microorganisms comprise microorganisms which are capable of converting saccharides into lactic acid or lactic acid salts under mesophylic or psychrophylic growth conditions. A process as claimed in any of claims 1-8, wherein the weight ratio of the aqueous liquid to the biomass is in the range of from 1:1 to 50:1, and wherein the conditions suitable for digestion by the microorganisms comprise a temperature is in the range of from 5 °C to 40 °C. A process as claimed in any of claims 1-9, wherein recovery of the biomass product from the slurry comprises employing a filter plate or a screen, while exerting a pressure onto the slurry, which pressure is in the range of from 0.0005 MPa to 0.02 MPa. A process as claimed in any of claims 1-10, wherein recovering the biomass product from the slurry comprises a plurality of washing steps in a counter current process, and wherein water is applied as the washing liquid in the last washing step. A process as claimed in any of claims 1-11, wherein the recovering comprises drying to achieve a moisture content of the biomass product of at most 20 % by weight. A combustion process, which combustion process comprises the steps of - preparing a slurry by dispersing a biomass in an aqueous liquid, wherein the biomass is of plant origin and comprises microorganisms naturally occurring in the biomass, - maintaining the slurry at conditions suitable for aerobic digestion by the microorganisms to obtain a slurry comprising a biomass product as a dispersed solid phase, - recovering the biomass product from the slurry, which recovering comprises washing using water as a washing liquid, and - combusting the biomass product. A combustion process as claimed in claim 13, wherein the combustion process comprises drying the biomass product recovered from the slurry by exposing the biomass product to outside weather conditions. A process for the conversion of biomass into a biomass product which is suitable for use as a fuel, wherein the biomass is of plant origin and comprises microorganisms naturally occurring in the biomass, which process comprises - preparing a slurry by dispersing the biomass comprising the naturally occurring microorganisms in an aqueous liquid, - maintaining the slurry at conditions suitable for aerobic digestion by the microorganisms to obtain a slurry comprising the biomass product as a dispersed solid phase, - recovering the biomass product, - recovering from the slurry a liquid phase, yielding a biomass extract, and - separating the biomass extract into an aqueous effluent comprising salts, and an aqueous concentrate comprising neutral organic compounds. A process for making a board material for building purposes, wherein the process comprises - the steps of converting a biomass into a biomass product as claimed in any of claims 1-12, and converting the biomass product into a board material for building purposes. |
|
| 08/11/2011 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Patent | |
| 4.1.15 | Fermentation |
| Bio-conversion of refinery waste streams | |
|
1. A process of converting refinery waste streams comprising spent caustic into nano-sized carbonates, comprising the steps of: (a) mixing the refinery waste stream comprising spent caustic in a stirred reactor containing carbonic anhydrase, which is obtained from the microbe selected from _Enterobacter aerogenes_ (MTCC 25016), _Lysinibacillus_ sp. (MTCC 25029), _Bacillus thermoleovorans_ (MTCC 25023), _Bacillus stearothermophilus_ (MTCC 25030) or _Arthrobacter_ sp. (MTCC 25028); (b) adding a brine solution to the mixture of step (a); (c) sparging a carbon dioxide rich gas to the mixture of step (b); (d) allowing the components introduced in (a)-(c) to react for a sufficient time and at a sufficient concentration to form a nano-sized carbonate precipitate; (e) separating the aqueous/liquid phase to obtain precipitated nano-sized carbonate; (f) treating the aqueous/liquid phase with a microbial consortia selected from a mixture of any one of _Pseudomonas putida_ (MTCC 5869), _Bacillus substilis_ (MTCC 5386), _Pseudomonas aeruginosa_ (MTCC 5389), _Peudomonas aerugiosa_ (MTCC 5388) and _Lysinibacillus_ sp. (MTCC 5666) for a sufficient time and at a sufficient concentration to remove contaminants; and (g) obtaining a aqueous phase free of contaminants. 2. The process as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the carbonic anhydrase is at a concentration in the range of 2-20 units/ml of the reaction mixture and is capable of withstanding: i) a pH above 10, ii) salinity in the range of 0.1-10% and iii) temperatures above 80° C. 3. The process as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the source of carbon dioxide rich gas is selected from flue gas or bio-gas plant exhaust. 4. The process as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the brine solution is obtained from sources selected from crude oil-desalter unit, produced water, reverse osmosis plant reject, or cooling tower blow down. 5. The process as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the ratio of spent caustic in the refinery waste stream and brine solution is in the range of 1:1 to 1:0.10. 6. The process as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the process in steps (a) to (d) are carried out at a temperature in the range of 25-85° C. for 0.5-30 minutes. 7. The process as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the carbonic anhydrase may be immobilized in the immobilization agents selected from carbon nanotubes, metal organic framework, zeolites, Zinc-ferrite, nickel ferrite, Zinc-nickel (Zn-- Ni) ferrite, polyurethane, glass beads or any other suitable matrixes. 8. The process as claimed in claim 1 , wherein step (f) is carried out at a temperature in the range of 20-60° C. and stirring of the reaction is carried in range of 200-600 rpm. 9. The process as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the total dissolved solids in brine solution in the range of 10 ppm to 100000 ppm. 10. The process as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the nano-sized carbonate has a particle size in the range of 50-100 nm. 11. The process as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the treated aqueous/liquid phase or the spent caustic has more than 98% reduction in sulphides, phenols, hydrocarbons, naphthenic acid, thiols, mercaptans or other contaminants. 12. A process of converting refinery waste streams comprising spent caustic into nano-sized carbonates, said process comprising the steps of: (a) mixing the refinery waste in a stirred reactor containing carbonic anhydrase, wherein the carbonic anhydrase is obtained from microbes selected from _Enterobacter aerogenes_ (MTCC 25016), _Lysinibacillus_ sp. (MTCC 25029), _Bacillus thermoleovorans_ (MTCC 25023), _Bacillus stearothermophilus_ (MTCC 25030) or _Arthrobacter_ sp. (MTCC 25028); (b) adding a brine solution to the mixture of step (a); (c) sparging a carbon dioxide rich gas to the mixture of step (b); (d) allowing the components introduced in (a)-(c) to react for a sufficient time and at a sufficient concentration to form a nano-sized carbonate precipitate; and (e) recovering precipitated nano-sized carbonates. 13. The process as claimed in claim 12 , wherein the carbonic anhydrase is at a concentration in the range of 2-20 units/ml of the reaction mixture and is capable of withstanding: i) a pH above 10, ii) salinity in the range of 0.1-10% and iii) temperatures above 80° C. 14. The process as claimed in claim 12 , wherein the source of carbon dioxide rich gas is selected from flue gas or bio-gas plant exhaust. 15. The process as claimed in claim 12 , wherein the brine solution is obtained from sources selected from crude oil-desalter unit, produced water, reverse osmosis plant reject or cooling tower blow down. 16. The process as claimed in claim 12 , wherein the ratio of spent caustic in the refinery waste stream and brine solution is in the range of 1:1 to 1:0.10. 17. The process as claimed in claim 12 , wherein the process in steps (a)-(d) are carried out at a temperature in the range of 25-85° C. for 0.5-30 minutes. 18. The process as claimed in claim 12 , wherein the biocatalyst in steps (a)-(d) may be immobilized in the immobilization agents selected from carbon nanotubes, metal organic framework, zeolites, Zinc-ferrite, nickel ferrite, Zinc-nickel (Zn--Ni) ferrite, polyurethane, glass beads or any other suitable matrixes. |
|
| 03/31/2016 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Patent | |
4.2 Transesterification
Transesterification is the reaction where fats and oils are converted to form esters and glycerol in the presence of catalysts. The physical characteristics of the fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) produced would then be comparable with the commercial petroleum fuel and the by-product glycerol also has commercial value.
**Highlights:**
* Generally, there are three groups of catalysts exploited for biodiesel production, namely acid, base and enzymes. Base-catalyzed transesterification is frequently applied for commercial production as it gives higher FAME yield rapidly with mild reaction conditions contrasting to acid-catalyzed transesterification. On the other hand, enzyme catalysts are more environmental friendly and can produce high quality products, but its slow reaction rate and high cost needs further development to make it more feasible.
The fabrication of nanocomposites, containing both acid and base sites, higher surface to volume ratio and larger pore distribution, can also contribute to the commercialization of biodiesel production. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-97048-2947495040)
* Preparation of biodiesel using in situ transesterification has been extensively conducted for agricultural, microbial and algal biomass, while few works have been performed using aquatic animal tissue. In this work, fish processing wastes were collected to perform in situ transesterification using grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idellus) biomass as a representative with which to optimize the reaction conditions.[ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-97048-3014328127)
* The high lipid-containing municipal sewage sludge (MSS) can be considered as a potential feedstock owing to its low cost and abundant availability. The lipids are transformed to biodiesel via transesterification[ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-97048-2978992766)
| 4.2.1 | Transesterification |
|---|---|
| Production of Biodiesel and High-Protein Feed from Fish Processing Wastes Using In Situ Transesterification. | |
| Preparation of biodiesel using in situ transesterification has been extensively conducted for agricultural, microbial and algal biomass, while few works have been performed using aquatic animal tissue. In this work, fish processing wastes were collected to perform in situ transesterification using grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idellus) biomass as a representative with which to optimize the reaction conditions. Under the optimum condition, the highest biodiesel purity reached up to 100% for sea bass wastes, which is higher than the 96.5% specified in the EN 14214-2008. The in situ method proposed here has the potential to save significant costs in biodiesel production compared to conventional methods, which usually require high-cost pretreatment of the raw materials. Additionally, the waste residue byproduct produced has a high protein content, and therefore the potential to be used for high-protein feed. This study is expected to inspire new strategies to prepare biodiesel and high-protein feed simultaneously from aquatic animal biomass using the novel in situ transesterification. | |
| 04/03/2020 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 4.2.2 | Transesterification |
| Sewage sludge to bio-fuel: A review on the sustainable approach of transforming sewage waste to alternative fuel | |
| Abstract Bio-fuels are gaining worldwide attention as an alternative fuel option replacing the usage of the mineral diesel derived from conventional fossil sources. However, the high cost attributed by the feedstock made it less competitive with the commercial diesel. A widespread research is going on worldwide for the production of fuels from renewable biomass replacing the currently used traditional sources. The high lipid-containing municipal sewage sludge (MSS) can be considered as a potential feedstock owing to its low cost and abundant availability. The lipids are transformed to biodiesel via transesterification or to bio-oil by pyrolysis. In this review paper, a comprehensive discussion on the various aspects of bio-fuel production from sludge derived lipids along with the key parameters affecting the process and its economics are presented. This review also emphasizes that future studies should focus on the usage of modern process intensification techniques for more efficient production of bio-fuel from renewable biomass. | |
| 01/01/2020 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 4.2.3 | Transesterification |
| Waste to bioenergy: a review on the recent conversion technologies | |
| Scientific studies have demonstrated that it is possible to generate a wide variety of bioenergy from biomass residues and waste, and however its cost is not competitive with petro-fuels and other renewable energy. On-going efforts are continued extensively to improve conversion technologies in order to reduce production costs. The present review focuses on the conversion technologies for transforming biomass residues and waste to biofuels, specifically their technological concepts, options and prospects for implementation are addressed. The emerging developments in the two primary conversion pathways, namely the thermochemical (i.e. gasification, liquefaction, and pyrolysis) and biochemical (i.e. anaerobic digestion, alcoholic fermentation and photobiological hydrogen production) conversion techniques, are evaluated. Additionally, transesterification, which appears to be the simplest and most economical route to produce biodiesel in large quantity, is discussed. Lastly, the strategies for direct conversion of biomass residues and waste to bioelectricity including the use of combustion and microbial fuel cells are reviewed. | |
| 12/01/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
4.3 Chain elongation
Chain elongation is an anaerobic open-culture biotechnological process that converts volatile fatty acids (VFAs) and an electron donor into more valuable medium chain fatty acids (MCFAs). The conversion of VFAs into MCFAs with ethanol as electron donor is done by chain elongating micro-organisms (e.g., *Clostridium kluyveri*) that use the reverse β-oxidation pathway. In this pathway, 1 additional mole of ethanol is oxidized into acetate for every 5 chain elongation reactions (Equation 1).
Reverse β−oxidation pathway:
5CxH(2x−1)O2− +6C2H6O → 5C(x+2)H(2x+3)O2− + C2H3O2− + 4H2O+ H+ +2H2
[\[Paper\]](https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2018.00050/full)
\
**Highlights:**
* In chain elongation, short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs; saturated fatty acids containing less than six carbons) and ethanol are converted by microorganisms into medium-chain fatty acids (MCFAs; saturated fatty acids containing six to 12 carbons). It was found that chain elongation can be performed under a nonsterile condition and in a continuous production mode. Moreover, the use of SCFAs, like acetate and butyrate, in chain elongation yields caproate as the most dominant end-product with a high production rate and specificity. Both acetate and butyrate are the main intermediates from anaerobic degradation of mixed organic waste like OFMSW. Ethanol addition during the anaerobic degradation of OFMSW has been shown to stimulate chain elongation of these SCFAs and the added ethanol to caproate as the main end-product. The highest caproate production rate via this process was 26 g/L/day with a concentration up to 12.6 g/L, which approximates the solubility of caproic acid in water and is advantageous to the downstream processes.[\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96394-2615639733)
* Chain elongation from AFW and ethanol is more effective at long HRT than at short HRT not only because it results in a higher concentration of MCFAs but also because it leads to a more efficient use of ethanol and base. The HRT did not influence the n-caproate production rate. The obtained n-caproate concentration is more than twice as high as the maximum solubility of n-caproic acid in water which is beneficial for its separation from the fermentation broth. This study does not only set the record on the highest n-caproate concentration observed in a chain elongation process to date, it notably demonstrates that such high concentrations can be obtained from AFW under practical circumstances in a continuous process.[\[Paper\]](https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2018.00050/full)
| 4.3.1 | Chain elongation |
|---|---|
| Biological formation of caproate and caprylate from acetate: fuel and chemical production from low grade biomass | |
| This research introduces an alternative mixed culture fermentation technology for anaerobic digestion to recover valuable products from low grade biomass. In this mixed culture fermentation, organic waste streams are converted to caproate and caprylate as precursors for biodiesel or chemicals. It was found that acetate, as the main intermediate of anaerobic digestion, can be elongated to medium chain fatty acids with six and eight carbon atoms. Mixed microbial communities were able to produce 8.17 g l−1 caproate and 0.32 g l−1 caprylate under methanogenesis-suppressed conditions in a stable batch reactor run. The highest production rate was 25.6 mM C caproate per day with a product yield of 0.6 mol C per mol C. This elongation process occurred with both ethanol and hydrogen as electron donors, demonstrating the flexibility of the process. Microbial characterization revealed that the microbial populations were stable and dominated by relatives of Clostridium kluyveri. | |
| 01/01/2011 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 4.3.2 | Chain elongation |
| Liquid biofuel production from volatile fatty acids. | |
| The production of renewable fuels and chemicals reduces the dependency on fossil fuels and limits the increase of CO2 concentration in the atmosphere only if a sustainable feedstock and an energy efficient process are used. The thesis assesses the possibility to use municipal and industrial waste as biomass feedstock to have little of no competition with food production, and to save greenhouse gasses emissions. Waste is a complex substrate with a diverse composition and high water content. It can be homogenized without losing its initial energy value by anaerobic conversion to volatile fatty acids. Using VFA gives the opportunity to process cheap and abundantly present biomass residues to a fuel and chemical instead of sugar containing crops or vegetable oil. This thesis describes the feasibility to convert VFA to compounds with a higher energy content using mixed culture fermentations by eliminating of oxygen and/or increasing the carbon and hydrogen content. At high hydrogen pressure, protons and electrons release via the reduction of organic products such as VFA becomes thermodynamically more attractive. Three VFA reduction reactions were studied: hydrogenation to an alcohol with 1) hydrogen and 2) an electrode as electron donor, and 3) by chain elongation with hydrogen and ethanol. Based on concentration, production rate and efficiency, elongation of acetate with hydrogen and/or ethanol was the best technique to convert VFA into a fuel. In a continuous flow CSTR, 10.5 g L-1 caproic acid and 0.48 g L-1 caprylic acid were produced with ethanol and/or hydrogen at a specific MCFA production activity of 2.9 g caproate and 0.09 g caprylate per gram VSS d-1. The products were selectively removed by calcium precipitation and solvent extraction with ethyl hexanoate and petroleum ether. Microbial characterization revealed that the microbial populations were stable and dominated by relatives of Clostridium kluyveri. VFA could also be reduced to alcohols. Acetic, propionic and butyric acids were biohydrogenated with hydrogen and acetic acid also with an electrode. Observed alcohol concentrations were 0.62 g L-1 ethanol, 0.49 g L-1 propanol and 0.27 g L-1 n-butanol. Methanogenesis was successfully inhibited after thermal pre-treatment incubated at pH 6, while acetate reduction was enhanced. In the second study, ethanol (0.084 g L-1) was produced at the cathodic compartment of a bioelectrochemical system, in which the electron transport was mediated by methyl viologen. The ethanol production activity at the cathode was only of very short term, since the mediator irreversibly reacted at the surface of the cathode. Of the two VFA conversion processes, biohydrogenation and chain elongation, chain elongation was a more dominant process that consumes ethanol with acetate to medium chain fatty acids. With this technology, wet organic waste can be converted to biofuels carbon and energy efficient. The technology is promising due to the good fuel and separation properties of medium chain fatty acids, and the possibility to produce them at high concentrations and specific production rates comparable to other anaerobic conversions. | |
| 01/01/2010 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 4.3.3 | Chain elongation |
| Production of Caproic Acid from Mixed Organic Waste: An Environmental Life Cycle Perspective | |
| Caproic acid is an emerging platform chemical with diverse applications. Recently, a novel biorefinery process, that is, chain elongation, was developed to convert mixed organic waste and ethanol into renewable caproic acids. In the coming years, this process may become commercialized, and continuing to improve on the basis of numerous ongoing technological and microbiological studies. This study aims to analyze the environmental performance of caproic acid production from mixed organic waste via chain elongation at this current, early stage of technological development. To this end, a life cycle assessment (LCA) was performed to evaluate the environmental impact of producing 1 kg caproic acid from organic waste via chain elongation, in both a lab-scale and a pilot-scale system. Two mixed organic waste were used as substrates: the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW) and supermarket food waste (SFW). Ethanol use was found to be the dominant cause of environmental impact over the life cycle. E... | |
| 06/20/2017 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 4.3.4 | Chain elongation |
| Waste Conversion into n-Caprylate and n-Caproate: Resource Recovery from Wine Lees Using Anaerobic Reactor Microbiomes and In-line Extraction | |
| To convert wastes into sustainable liquid fuels and chemicals, new resource recovery technologies are required. Chain elongation is a carboxylate-platform bioprocess that converts short-chain carboxylates (SCCs) (e.g., acetate [C2] and n-butyrate [C4]) into medium-chain carboxylates (MCCs) (e.g., n-caprylate [C8] and n-caproate [C6]) with hydrogen gas as a side product. Ethanol or another electron donor (e.g., lactate, carbohydrate) is required. Competitive MCC productivities, yields (product vs. substrate fed), and specificities (product vs. all products) were only achieved previously from an organic waste material when exogenous ethanol had been added. Here, we converted a real organic waste, which inherently comprised of ethanol, into MCCs with n-caprylate as the target product. We used wine lees, which consisted primarily of settled yeast cells and ethanol from wine fermentation, and produced MCCs with a reactor microbiome. We operated the bioreactor at a pH of 5.2 and with continuous in-line extraction and achieved a MCC productivity of 3.9 g COD/L-d at an organic loading rate of 5.8 g COD/L-d, resulting in a promising MCC yield of 67% and specificities of 36% for each n-caprylate and n-caproate (72% for both). Compared to all other studies that used complex organic substrates, we achieved the highest n-caprylate-to-n-caproate product ratio of 1.0 (COD basis), because we used increased broth-recycle rates through the forward membrane contactor, which improved in-line extraction rates. Increased recycle rates also allowed us to achieve the highest reported MCC production flux per membrane surface area thus far (20.1 g COD/m2-d). Through microbial community analyses, we determined that an operational taxonomic unit (OTU) for Bacteroides spp. was dominant and was positively correlated with increased MCC productivities. Our data also suggested that the microbiome may have been shaped for improved MCC production by the high broth-recycle rates. Comparable abiotic studies suggest that further increases in the broth-recycle rates could improve the overall mass transfer coefficient and its corresponding MCC production flux by almost 30 times beyond the maximum that we achieved. With improved in-line extraction, the chain-elongation biotechnology production platform offers new opportunities for resource recovery and sustainable production of liquid fuels and chemicals. | |
| 11/24/2016 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
4.4 Dark fermentation (DF)
Dark fermentation is the fermentative conversion of organic substrate to biohydrogen. It is a complex process manifested by diverse groups of bacteria, involving a series of biochemical reactions using three steps similar to anaerobic conversion. Dark fermentation differs from photofermentation in that it proceeds without the presence of light.
Fermentative/hydrolytic microorganisms hydrolyze complex organic polymers to monomers which are further converted to a mixture of lower-molecular-weight organic acids and alcohols by obligatory producing acidogenic bacteria.[\[Wiki\]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_fermentation)
**Highlights:**
* In recent years, coupling bacterial dark fermentation (DF) and heterotrophic cultivation of microalgae (HCM) has been pointed out as a promising sustainable approach for producing both gaseous and liquid biofuels. **Complex organic waste and effluents that are not susceptible to be directly degraded by microalgae are first converted into volatile fatty acids (VFAs) and hydrogen by DF**.[ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96400-2333824632)
* Low biohydrogen (H2) yields and use of process by-products from dark fermentation (DF) of waste biomass is limiting its scaled-up application. This study aims to investigate the effects of culture pH, combination of substrate concentration and culture pH, pre-treatment of substrate and inoculum adaptation in H2 yields during the DF of three different wastes biomass. The study showed that the biodegradability of the substrates is important for the selection and application of optimum operational parameters aimed at enhancing H2 production. **Moreover, long-term operational feasibility and stability of dark fermentative H2 production was demostrated using food waste and cheese whey in two semi-continuous thermophilic DF reactors.** [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96400-2559195065)
| 4.4.1 | Dark fermentation (DF) |
|---|---|
| Biological processes for hydrogen production | |
| Methane is produced usually from organic waste in a straightforward anaerobic digestion process. However, hydrogen production is technically more challenging as more stages are needed to convert all biomass to hydrogen because of thermodynamic constraints. Nevertheless, the benefit of hydrogen is that it can be produced, both biologically and thermochemically, in more than one way from either organic compounds or water. Research in biological hydrogen production is booming, as reflected by the myriad of recently published reviews on the topic. This overview is written from the perspective of how to transfer as much energy as possible from the feedstock into the gaseous products hydrogen, and to a lesser extent, methane. The status and remaining challenges of all the biological processes are concisely discussed. | |
| 01/01/2016 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 4.4.2 | Dark fermentation (DF) |
| Dark fermentative biohydrogen production from organic waste and application of by-products in a biorefinery concept | |
| Low biohydrogen (H2) yields and use of process by-products from dark fermentation (DF) of waste biomass is limiting its scaled-up application. This study aims to investigate the effects of culture pH, combination of substrate concentration and culture pH, pre-treatment of substrate and inoculum adaptation in H2 yields during the DF of three different wastes biomass. The study showed that the biodegradability of the substrates is important for the selection and application of optimum operational parameters aimed at enhancing H2 production. Moreover, long-term operational feasibility and stability of dark fermentative H2 production was demostrated using food waste and cheese whey in two semi-continuous thermophilic DF reactors. The effect of organic loading rates (OLRs), hydraulic retention times (HRTs) and co-substrates (buffalo manure) addition as a source of alkalinity on culture pH and H2 production stability was discussed. The study showed that combination of OLR, HRT and co-substrate addition could play an important role in the culture pH and stability of H2 production. Furthermore, the by-products of DF process was utilized for H2 production via photo fermentation (PF), while the waste stream generated from coupling of DF and PF processes was converted to methane in anaerobic digestion (AD). The three-step conversion of food waste in a biorefinery concept increased the total energy yields. Moreover, PF also showed a good potential for concomitant production of H2 and polyhydroxybutyrate (biopolymer). Likewise, dry fermentation could be promising to a biorefinery concept based on waste biomass for the production of bioenergy and biochemicals (organic acids and alcohols) | |
| 12/17/2015 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 4.4.3 | Dark fermentation (DF) |
| Integrated systems for biopolymers and bioenergy production from organic waste and by-products: a review of microbial processes | |
| Recently, issues concerning the sustainable and harmless disposal of organic solid waste have generated interest in microbial biotechnologies aimed at converting waste materials into bioenergy and biomaterials, thus contributing to a reduction in economic dependence on fossil fuels. To valorize biomass, waste materials derived from agriculture, food processing factories, and municipal organic waste can be used to produce biopolymers, such as biohydrogen and biogas, through different microbial processes. In fact, different bacterial strains can synthesize biopolymers to convert waste materials into valuable intracellular (e.g., polyhydroxyalkanoates) and extracellular (e.g., exopolysaccharides) bioproducts, which are useful for biochemical production. In particular, large numbers of bacteria, including Alcaligenes eutrophus, Alcaligenes latus, Azotobacter vinelandii, Azotobacter chroococcum, Azotobacter beijerincki, methylotrophs, Pseudomonas spp., Bacillus spp., Rhizobium spp., Nocardia spp., and recombinant Escherichia coli, have been successfully used to produce polyhydroxyalkanoates on an industrial scale from different types of organic by-products. Therefore, the development of high-performance microbial strains and the use of by-products and waste as substrates could reasonably make the production costs of biodegradable polymers comparable to those required by petrochemical-derived plastics and promote their use. Many studies have reported use of the same organic substrates as alternative energy sources to produce biogas and biohydrogen through anaerobic digestion as well as dark and photofermentation processes under anaerobic conditions. Therefore, concurrently obtaining bioenergy and biopolymers at a reasonable cost through an integrated system is becoming feasible using by-products and waste as organic carbon sources. An overview of the suitable substrates and microbial strains used in low-cost polyhydroxyalkanoates for biohydrogen and biogas production is given. The possibility of creating a unique integrated system is discussed because it represents a new approach for simultaneously producing energy and biopolymers for the plastic industry using by-products and waste as organic carbon sources. | |
| 12/01/2017 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 4.4.4 | Dark fermentation (DF) |
| Potentialities of dark fermentation effluents as substrates for microalgae growth: A review | |
| Abstract In recent years, coupling bacterial dark fermentation (DF) and heterotrophic cultivation of microalgae (HCM) has been pointed out as a promising sustainable approach for producing both gaseous and liquid biofuels. Complex organic waste and effluents that are not susceptible to be directly degraded by microalgae are first converted into volatile fatty acids (VFAs) and hydrogen by DF. In this work, the feasibility of using DF effluents to sustain HCM has been thoroughly reviewed and evaluated. Promising perspectives in terms of microalgae biomass and lipids production are proposed and can be extended as guidelines to promote HCM whatever the organic waste used. Abiotic and biotic factors from DF effluents that promote or inhibit microalgae growth are discussed as well as the use of unsterile DF effluents. Overall, the microalgae growth is favored on effluents containing high acetate concentration (>3 g L −1 ), with a high acetate:butyrate ratio (>2.5), and when pH is strictly controlled. At a low acetate:butyrate ratio ( 10 g L −1 ), a low substrate:microalgae ratio and the presence of light appear to enhance microalgae growth. Butyrate content appears to be a key factor when coupling DF/HCM since high butyrate concentration inhibits the microalgae growth. | |
| 11/01/2016 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 4.4.5 | Dark fermentation (DF) |
| Proof of concept for biorefinery approach aiming at two bioenergy production compartments, hydrogen and biodiesel, coupled by an external membrane | |
| ABSTRACTA biorefinery is a facility that integrates biomass conversion processes and equipment to produce fuels, power and chemicals from biomass. This concept is applied here to hydrogen production by anaerobic fermentation. Its biological production is increasingly perceived as a potential pathway for developing renewable sources of energy, due to hydrogen's high energy content (142 kJ g−1) and the absence of harmful emissions during utilization in a hydrogen fuel cell. The main secondary metabolites produced during dark fermentation (volatile fatty acids, VFAs) are building blocks and can also serve as an alternate carbon source for lipid production from oleaginous yeast strains for biodiesel production.The concept proposed here is the coupling of two main compartments. In the first one, lignocellulosic biomass is transformed by dark fermentation into hydrogen and VFAs. The medium used in the first compartment is transferred via an immersed membrane bioreactor to the second compartment where the produc... | |
| 03/04/2018 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
4.5 Photofermentation
Photofermentation is the fermentative conversion of organic substrate to biohydrogen manifested by a diverse group of photosynthetic bacteria by a series of biochemical reactions involving three steps similar to anaerobic conversion. Photofermentation differs from dark fermentation because it only proceeds in the presence of light. [\[Wiki\]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photofermentation)
**Highlights:**
* We used NIR light sources and optically resonant gold–silica core–shell nanoparticles to increase the light utilization of the bacteria to convert waste organic acids such as acetic and maleic acids to hydrogen. The batch growth studies for the small cultures (40 mL) of Rhodopseudomonas palustris demonstrated >2.5-fold increase in hydrogen production when grown under an NIR source (167 ± 18 μmol H2) compared to that for a broad-band light source (60 ± 6 μmol H2) at equal light intensity (130 W m−2). The addition of the mPEG-coated optically resonant gold–silica core–shell nanoparticles in the solution further improved the hydrogen production from 167 ± 18 to 398 ± 108 μmol H2 at 130 W m−2. The average hydrogen production rate with the nanoparticles was 127 ± 35 μmol L−1 h−1 at 130 W m−2. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96372-2996198659)
* Some biomass such as microalgae have the natural ability to produce H~2~ gas in the presence of light. In photosynthesis, microalgae transform water molecules into O~2~ and H^+^. Hydrogenase enzymes then reduce the H^+^ into H~2~ gas under anaerobic conditions. The O~2~ released during photosynthesis rapidly inhibits the hydrogenase enzymes and interrupts the release of H~2~ gas. This implies that anaerobic condition is necessary for the culturing microalgae for the H~2~ gas production. There are two key methods to extract photosynthetic H~2~ using microalgae. First approach is the simultaneous production of O~2~ and H~2~ gas in the presence of light. The electrons generated from oxidation of water molecules are used by hydrogenase enzymes to yield H~2~ gas. Theoretically, this method has higher yields than the second approach, but the H~2~ production is rapidly inhibited by the O~2~ production. The second approach is to utilize a two-phase system, where the first phase is culturing microalgae under normal conditions and the second phase is promoting continuous H~2~ generation under anaerobic and sulfur-deprived conditions. Sulfur deprivation engages the microalgae in a survival state where the energy required by the cells are obtained through the release of H~2~. In the two-phase system, the H~2~ production would begin to decline after 60 h of operation, and the theoretical maximum H~2~ yield could reach 198 kg H~2~ ha^− 1^ day^− 1^. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96372-2947495040)
| 4.5.1 | Photofermentation |
|---|---|
| An integrated biohydrogen refinery: Synergy of photofermentation, extractive fermentation and hydrothermal hydrolysis of food wastes | |
| Abstract An Integrated Biohydrogen Refinery (IBHR) and experimental net energy analysis are reported. The IBHR converts biomass to electricity using hydrothermal hydrolysis, extractive biohydrogen fermentation and photobiological hydrogen fermentation for electricity generation in a fuel cell. An extractive fermentation, developed previously, is applied to waste-derived substrates following hydrothermal pre-treatment, achieving 83-99% biowaste destruction. The selective separation of organic acids from waste-fed fermentations provided suitable substrate for photofermentative hydrogen production, which enhanced the gross energy generation up to 11-fold. Therefore, electrodialysis provides the key link in an IBHR for ‘waste to energy’. The IBHR compares favourably to ‘renewables’ (photovoltaics, on-shore wind, crop-derived biofuels) and also emerging biotechnological options (microbial electrolysis) and anaerobic digestion. | |
| 09/01/2012 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 4.5.2 | Photofermentation |
| Biological processes for hydrogen production | |
| Methane is produced usually from organic waste in a straightforward anaerobic digestion process. However, hydrogen production is technically more challenging as more stages are needed to convert all biomass to hydrogen because of thermodynamic constraints. Nevertheless, the benefit of hydrogen is that it can be produced, both biologically and thermochemically, in more than one way from either organic compounds or water. Research in biological hydrogen production is booming, as reflected by the myriad of recently published reviews on the topic. This overview is written from the perspective of how to transfer as much energy as possible from the feedstock into the gaseous products hydrogen, and to a lesser extent, methane. The status and remaining challenges of all the biological processes are concisely discussed. | |
| 01/01/2016 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 4.5.3 | Photofermentation |
| Development of sustainable approaches for converting the organic waste to bioenergy. | |
| Abstract Dependence on fossil fuels such as oil, coal and natural gas are on alarming increase, thereby causing such resources to be in a depletion mode and a novel sustainable approach for bioenergy production are in demand. Successful implementation of zero waste discharge policy is one such way to attain a sustainable development of bioenergy. Zero waste discharge can be induced only through the conversion of organic wastes into bioenergy. Waste management is pivotal and considering its importance of minimizing the issue and menace of wastes, conversion strategy of organic waste is effectively recommended. Present review is concentrated on providing a keen view on the potential organic waste sources and the way in which the bioenergy is produced through efficient conversion processes. Biogas, bioethanol, biocoal, biohydrogen and biodiesel are the principal renewable energy sources. Different types of organic wastes used for bioenergy generation and its sources, anaerobic digestion-biogas production and its related process affecting parameters including fermentation, photosynthetic process and novel nano-inspired techniques are discussed. Bioenergy production from organic waste is associated with mitigation of lump waste generation and its dumping into land, specifically reducing all hazards and negativities in all sectors during waste disposal. A sustainable bioenergy sector with upgraded security for fuels, tackles the challenging climatic change problem also. Thus, intensification of organic waste conversion strategies to bioenergy, specially, biogas and biohydrogen production is elaborated and analyzed in the present article. Predominantly, persistent drawbacks of the existing organic waste conversion methods have been noted, providing consideration to economic, environmental and social development. | |
| 03/21/2020 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 4.5.4 | Photofermentation |
| Integrated systems for biopolymers and bioenergy production from organic waste and by-products: a review of microbial processes | |
| Recently, issues concerning the sustainable and harmless disposal of organic solid waste have generated interest in microbial biotechnologies aimed at converting waste materials into bioenergy and biomaterials, thus contributing to a reduction in economic dependence on fossil fuels. To valorize biomass, waste materials derived from agriculture, food processing factories, and municipal organic waste can be used to produce biopolymers, such as biohydrogen and biogas, through different microbial processes. In fact, different bacterial strains can synthesize biopolymers to convert waste materials into valuable intracellular (e.g., polyhydroxyalkanoates) and extracellular (e.g., exopolysaccharides) bioproducts, which are useful for biochemical production. In particular, large numbers of bacteria, including Alcaligenes eutrophus, Alcaligenes latus, Azotobacter vinelandii, Azotobacter chroococcum, Azotobacter beijerincki, methylotrophs, Pseudomonas spp., Bacillus spp., Rhizobium spp., Nocardia spp., and recombinant Escherichia coli, have been successfully used to produce polyhydroxyalkanoates on an industrial scale from different types of organic by-products. Therefore, the development of high-performance microbial strains and the use of by-products and waste as substrates could reasonably make the production costs of biodegradable polymers comparable to those required by petrochemical-derived plastics and promote their use. Many studies have reported use of the same organic substrates as alternative energy sources to produce biogas and biohydrogen through anaerobic digestion as well as dark and photofermentation processes under anaerobic conditions. Therefore, concurrently obtaining bioenergy and biopolymers at a reasonable cost through an integrated system is becoming feasible using by-products and waste as organic carbon sources. An overview of the suitable substrates and microbial strains used in low-cost polyhydroxyalkanoates for biohydrogen and biogas production is given. The possibility of creating a unique integrated system is discussed because it represents a new approach for simultaneously producing energy and biopolymers for the plastic industry using by-products and waste as organic carbon sources. | |
| 12/01/2017 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 4.5.5 | Photofermentation |
| Rhodopseudomonas palustris-based conversion of organic acids to hydrogen using plasmonic nanoparticles and near-infrared light | |
| The simultaneous elimination of organic waste and the production of clean fuels will have an immense impact on both the society and the industrial manufacturing sector. The enhanced understanding of the interface between nanoparticles and photo-responsive bacteria will further advance the knowledge of their interactions with biological systems. Although literature shows the production of gases by photobacteria, herein, we demonstrated the integration of photonics, biology, and nanostructured plasmonic materials for hydrogen production with a lower greenhouse CO2 gas content at quantified light energy intensity and wavelength. Phototrophic purple non-sulfur bacteria were able to generate hydrogen as a byproduct of nitrogen fixation using the energy absorbed from visible and near-IR (NIR) light. This type of biological hydrogen production has suffered from low efficiency of converting light energy into hydrogen in part due to light sources that do not exploit the organisms' capacity for NIR absorption. We used NIR light sources and optically resonant gold–silica core–shell nanoparticles to increase the light utilization of the bacteria to convert waste organic acids such as acetic and maleic acids to hydrogen. The batch growth studies for the small cultures (40 mL) of Rhodopseudomonas palustris demonstrated >2.5-fold increase in hydrogen production when grown under an NIR source (167 ± 18 μmol H2) compared to that for a broad-band light source (60 ± 6 μmol H2) at equal light intensity (130 W m−2). The addition of the mPEG-coated optically resonant gold–silica core–shell nanoparticles in the solution further improved the hydrogen production from 167 ± 18 to 398 ± 108 μmol H2 at 130 W m−2. The average hydrogen production rate with the nanoparticles was 127 ± 35 μmol L−1 h−1 at 130 W m−2. | |
| 12/09/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 4.5.6 | Photofermentation |
| Waste to bioenergy: a review on the recent conversion technologies | |
| Scientific studies have demonstrated that it is possible to generate a wide variety of bioenergy from biomass residues and waste, and however its cost is not competitive with petro-fuels and other renewable energy. On-going efforts are continued extensively to improve conversion technologies in order to reduce production costs. The present review focuses on the conversion technologies for transforming biomass residues and waste to biofuels, specifically their technological concepts, options and prospects for implementation are addressed. The emerging developments in the two primary conversion pathways, namely the thermochemical (i.e. gasification, liquefaction, and pyrolysis) and biochemical (i.e. anaerobic digestion, alcoholic fermentation and photobiological hydrogen production) conversion techniques, are evaluated. Additionally, transesterification, which appears to be the simplest and most economical route to produce biodiesel in large quantity, is discussed. Lastly, the strategies for direct conversion of biomass residues and waste to bioelectricity including the use of combustion and microbial fuel cells are reviewed. | |
| 12/01/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
4.6 Gas fermentation
Gas fermentation is a technology that uses biocatalysts to convert gaseous feedstocks such as carbon monoxide (CO), carbon dioxide (CO2), syngas, methane (CH4), or biogas, into platform chemicals, fuels, polymers, etc.[\[Source\]](https://vito.be/en/product/gas-fermentation#:\~:text=Gas%20fermentation%20is%20a%20technology,%2C%20fuels%2C%20polymers%2C%20etc.)
**Highlights:**
* Increasing demand for renewable feedstock-based biofuels is driving the interest and rapid development of processes to produce fuels and chemicals from biomass-generated syngas. Biomass is gasified to produce syngas that can be converted via thermochemical routes to fuels and chemicals such as alcohols, olefins, and fuel grade hydrocarbons. An alternate route to produce liquid products from syngas is through gas fermentation, a hybrid thermochemical/ biochemical process. Biomass gasification, thermochemical syngas conversion routes, and gas fermentation are described including a comparison for converting biomass to ethanol via thecurrent thermochemical route versus gas fermentation.[ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96463-2059176864)
* Fermentation of syngas is a means through which unutilized organic waste streams can be converted biologically into biofuels and commodity chemicals. Despite recent advances, several issues remain which limit implementation of industrial-scale syngas fermentation processes. At the cellular level, the energy conservation mechanism of syngas fermenting microorganisms has not yet been entirely elucidated. Furthermore, there was a lack of genetic tools to study and ultimately enhance their metabolic capabilities. Recently, substantial progress has been made in understanding the intricate energy conservation mechanisms of these microorganisms. Given the complex relationship between energy conservation and metabolism, strain design greatly benefits from systems-level approaches. Numerous genetic manipulation tools have also been developed, paving the way for the use of metabolic engineering and systems biology approaches. Rational strain designs can now be deployed resulting in desirable phenotypic traits for large-scale production.[ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96463-2126579076)
| 4.6.1 | Gas fermentation |
|---|---|
| Fuel and chemical products from biomass syngas: A comparison of gas fermentation to thermochemical conversion routes | |
| Increasing demand for renewable feedstock-based biofuels is driving the interest and rapid development of processes to produce fuels and chemicals from biomass-generated syngas. Biomass is gasified to produce syngas that can be converted via thermochemical routes to fuels and chemicals such as alcohols, olefins, and fuel grade hydrocarbons. An alternate route to produce liquid products from syngas is through gas fermentation, a hybrid thermochemical/ biochemical process. Biomass gasification, thermochemical syngas conversion routes, and gas fermentation are described including a comparison for converting biomass to ethanol via thecurrent thermochemical route versus gas fermentation. © 2012 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Environ Prog, 2012 | |
| 07/01/2012 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 4.6.2 | Gas fermentation |
| Pyrolysis gas as a carbon source for biogas production via anaerobic digestion | |
| Carbon is an important resource for anaerobes to enhance biogas production. In this study, the possibility of using simulated pyrolysis gas (SPG) as a carbon source for biogas production was investigated. The effects of stirring speed (SS), gas holding time (GHT), and H2 addition on biomethanation of SPG were evaluated. The diversity and structure of microbial communities were also analyzed under an illumina MiSeq platform. Results indicated that at a GHT of 14 h and an SS at 400 rpm, SPG with up to 64.7% CH4 could be bio-upgraded to biogas. Gas–liquid mass transfer is the limitation for SPG biomethanation. For the first time, it has been noticed that the addition of H2 can bioupgrade SPG to high quality biogas (with 91.1% CH4). Methanobacterium was considered as a key factor in all reactors. This study provides an idea and alternative way to convert lignocellulosic biomass and solid organic waste into energy (e.g., pyrolysis was used as a pretreatment to produce pyrolysis gas from biomass, and then, pyrolysis gas was bioupgraded to higher quality biogas via anaerobic digestion). | |
| 01/01/2017 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 4.6.3 | Gas fermentation |
| Trash to treasure: production of biofuels and commodity chemicals via syngas fermenting microorganisms | |
| Fermentation of syngas is a means through which unutilized organic waste streams can be converted biologically into biofuels and commodity chemicals. Despite recent advances, several issues remain which limit implementation of industrial-scale syngas fermentation processes. At the cellular level, the energy conservation mechanism of syngas fermenting microorganisms has not yet been entirely elucidated. Furthermore, there was a lack of genetic tools to study and ultimately enhance their metabolic capabilities. Recently, substantial progress has been made in understanding the intricate energy conservation mechanisms of these microorganisms. Given the complex relationship between energy conservation and metabolism, strain design greatly benefits from systems-level approaches. Numerous genetic manipulation tools have also been developed, paving the way for the use of metabolic engineering and systems biology approaches. Rational strain designs can now be deployed resulting in desirable phenotypic traits for large-scale production. | |
| 06/01/2014 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
4.7 Membrane bioreactors
Membrane bioreactor is the combination of a membrane process like microfiltration or ultrafiltration with a biological wastewater treatment process, the activated sludge process. It is now widely used for municipal and industrial wastewater treatment. [\[Wiki\]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Membrane_bioreactor)
**Highlights:**
* The concept proposed here is the coupling of two main compartments. In the first one, lignocellulosic biomass is transformed by dark fermentation into hydrogen and VFAs. The medium used in the first compartment is transferred via an immersed membrane bioreactor to the second compartment where the production of single-cell oil with oleaginous yeast occurs using VFAs as carbon source. This study aims at presenting the feasibility of this bioprocess, through hydrogen production from glucose followed by lipid production by the oleaginous yeast *Cryptococcus curvatus* grown on the VFA-enriched supernatant resulting from the dark fermentation step.[\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96389-2566232385)
* Light energy is one of the major costs for phototrophic systems. This study evaluated the photoreactor efficiency of purple phototropic bacteria anaerobic membrane bioreactor (PAnMBR) at low irradiance for the treatment of municipal wastewater. Infrared irradiance levels of 3.0 and 1.4 W/m2 produced by an infrared (IR) lamp emitting in the 800–900 nm wavelength range were investigated, with the ultimate goal of optimizing the irradiance energy demand. Experimental and modeling results demonstrated the ability of PPB to grow and treat raw municipal wastewater at the applied low irradiances, with effluent quality below target limits of TCOD˂50 mg/L, TN˂10 mg/L, and TP˂1 mg/L.[ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96389-3003638816)
* **MBR enhancement:** Chemical enhancers (e.g., electroassisted membranes, ozonation) induce high nitrogen and organic removal, biogas production, and energy recovery. Biocarrier enhancers (e.g., powdered activated carbon, zeolite) improve removal of various types of pollutants and energy recovery. Microbial enhancers (e.g., entrapped biomass technology, functional bacterium) accomplish effective removal of pollutants, realize high methane production, and encourage enrichment of functional microbial communities and presence of new emerging bacteria to resist extreme conditions. Membrane fouling control enhancers (e.g., electric field, quorum quenching technology) change sludge properties and inhibit the deposition of sludge flocs on membrane surface. Development of new flocculants, new carriers, and novel electrically conductive membranes, and application of quorum quenching technology in hybrid AnMBR systems are suggested to be future research direction.[ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96389-3005465132)
| 4.7.1 | Membrane bioreactors |
|---|---|
| Advanced anaerobic membrane bioreactors: Performance enhancers and their hybrid systems | |
| Abstract This chapter overviews current studies on development and application of four types of enhancers in anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) as hybrid AnMBR system during wastewater treatment. Chemical enhancers (e.g., electroassisted membranes, ozonation) induce high nitrogen and organic removal, biogas production, and energy recovery. Biocarrier enhancers (e.g., powdered activated carbon, zeolite) improve removal of various types of pollutants and energy recovery. Microbial enhancers (e.g., entrapped biomass technology, functional bacterium) accomplish effective removal of pollutants, realize high methane production, and encourage enrichment of functional microbial communities and presence of new emerging bacteria to resist extreme conditions. Membrane fouling control enhancers (e.g., electric field, quorum quenching technology) change sludge properties and inhibit the deposition of sludge flocs on membrane surface. Development of new flocculants, new carriers, and novel electrically conductive membranes, and application of quorum quenching technology in hybrid AnMBR systems are suggested to be future research direction. | |
| 01/01/2020 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 4.7.2 | Membrane bioreactors |
| Composting leachate: characterization, treatment, and future perspectives. | |
| The increasing production of waste has led to one of the major environmental challenges of today: waste management. A solution to this problem is the composting of organic wastes. While the composting process transforms organic wastes into biologically stable compost, large amounts of highly contaminated leachates that present a direct risk to the environment are also produced. First off, this review discusses the origin and nature of contaminants found in composting leachates. In a general perspective, composting leachates are characterized by the presence of high concentrations of moderately biodegradable organic matter and nutrients and contain toxic pollutants such as heavy metals and plasticizers. Treatment technologies that have been studied are subsequently reported and discussed (treatment efficiencies and operating costs). This review highlights the lack of available solutions to efficiently remove all contaminants found in these leachates, which is a major concern considering the increasing number of composting facilities. While both, membrane bioreactors and reverse osmosis, show promising results with NH₄, COD and TSS removals of > 70, > 85 and > 99.9%, respectively, the resulting effluent remains hazardous for the environment. Further studies are required to assess the use of a combination of biological and advanced oxidation process for the production of a safely disposable effluent. | |
| 06/01/2018 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 4.7.3 | Membrane bioreactors |
| Membrane technology in bioconversion of lignocellulose to motor fuel components | |
| The use of lignocellulosic biomass is one of the promising technologies for the production of energy carriers (bioalcohols, biosyngas) and valuable chemicals. Lignocellulosic biofuels may be thought of as a material capable of substantially replacing oil to provide an efficient consumption of natural energy resources and an improvement of the environment. In the “bioreactor–membrane separator–catalytic reactor (converter)" circuit, all stages are considered to be key: (1) the pretreatment of lignocellulose and the development of fermentation, particularly the cultivation of novel strains of bacteria; (2) the design of energyefficient vapor/gas-phase membrane systems for (a) concentrating bioalcohols and (b) controlling the biosyngas composition; and (3) the development of catalyst systems for the conversion of bioalcohols to motor fuel components. The following sequential tasks are discussed in this brief review: (i) basic approaches to the pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass aimed at preparing it for fermentation and enzymatic processing of lignocellulose, particularly the cultivation of novel strains of bacteria and their communities, to produce bioalcohols— ethanol and butanol—and thermochemical methods of lignocellulose conversion to products in the form of complex mixtures; (ii) the development of energy-efficient membrane concentrating of bioalcohols using hydrophilic and/or organophilic polymer membranes and the control of the composition of synthesis gas in the form of a multicomponent gas mixture using commercial gas-separation membranes; and (iii) the development of catalyst systems exhibiting high selectivity in the ethanol conversion to alkane and aromatic hydrocarbons (high-quality additives to motor fuels) and valuable olefins, particularly ethylene, propylene, and linear alpha-olefins up to C10. | |
| 09/01/2017 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 4.7.4 | Membrane bioreactors |
| Municipal wastewater treatment by purple phototropic bacteria at low infrared irradiances using a photo-anaerobic membrane bioreactor | |
| Abstract Light energy is one of the major costs for phototrophic systems. This study evaluated the photoreactor efficiency of purple phototropic bacteria anaerobic membrane bioreactor (PAnMBR) at low irradiance for the treatment of municipal wastewater. Infrared irradiance levels of 3.0 and 1.4 W/m2 produced by an infrared (IR) lamp emitting in the 800–900 nm wavelength range were investigated, with the ultimate goal of optimizing the irradiance energy demand. Experimental and modeling results demonstrated the ability of PPB to grow and treat raw municipal wastewater at the applied low irradiances, with effluent quality below target limits of TCOD˂50 mg/L, TN˂10 mg/L, and TP˂1 mg/L. While Monod kinetic parameters, km and Y, were determined to be lower than previous high-energy studies (1.9 mgCOD/mgVSS-d and 0.38 mgVSS/mgCOD, respectively), the photobioreactor performance were consistently maintained, indicating that energy cost associated with IR illumination can be reduced by up to 97%. To determine whether the treatment process could approach energy neutrality, subsequent anaerobic digestion experiments of the residual PPB biomass proved a potential for biogas recovery of up to 240 NmLCH4/gVSSadded, and a moderate biomass biodegradability of 41%. As a result, the net energy consumption of the process was estimated at 0.5 kWh/m3 of treated municipal wastewater, considering an energy demand for illumination of 0.67 kWh/m3 and an energy recovery attributed to the anaerobic digestion of 0.17 kWh/m3 from the excess PPB biomass wasted from PAnMBR. | |
| 04/01/2020 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 4.7.5 | Membrane bioreactors |
| Proof of concept for biorefinery approach aiming at two bioenergy production compartments, hydrogen and biodiesel, coupled by an external membrane | |
| ABSTRACTA biorefinery is a facility that integrates biomass conversion processes and equipment to produce fuels, power and chemicals from biomass. This concept is applied here to hydrogen production by anaerobic fermentation. Its biological production is increasingly perceived as a potential pathway for developing renewable sources of energy, due to hydrogen's high energy content (142 kJ g−1) and the absence of harmful emissions during utilization in a hydrogen fuel cell. The main secondary metabolites produced during dark fermentation (volatile fatty acids, VFAs) are building blocks and can also serve as an alternate carbon source for lipid production from oleaginous yeast strains for biodiesel production.The concept proposed here is the coupling of two main compartments. In the first one, lignocellulosic biomass is transformed by dark fermentation into hydrogen and VFAs. The medium used in the first compartment is transferred via an immersed membrane bioreactor to the second compartment where the produc... | |
| 03/04/2018 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
4.8 Irradiation and fermentation
Besides food preservation, γ-irradiation is taking place for novel applications, especially involving the enhancement of food fermentation processes, by directly irradiating the medium, or generating performant genetically modified strains.[\[Paper\]](https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-42457-6_7)
**Highlights:**
* The present invention relates to a method comprising irradiating a biomass feedstock to change a molecular and/or a supramolecular structure of the biomass feedstock; cooling the irradiated biomass feedstock; and then re- irradiating the biomass feedstock with a second dose of ionizing radiation. A method comprising: irradiating a biomass feedstock to change a molecular and/or a supramolecular structure of the biomass feedstock; cooling the irradiated biomass feedstock; and then re-irradiating the biomass feedstock with a second dose of ionizing radiation. The method of claim 1, further comprising processing the re-irradiated biomass feedstock to produce a fuel. The method of claim 2, wherein processing comprises converting the re-irradiated biomass feedstock utilizing a microorganism having the ability to convert at least about 1 percent by weight of the biomass to the fuel.[ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96465-EP3546587A1)
Suppliers
| 4.8.1 | Irradiation and fermentation |
|---|---|
| PROCESSING BIOMASS | |
|
The present invention relates to a method comprising irradiating a biomass feedstock to change a molecular and/or a supramolecular structure of the biomass feedstock; cooling the irradiated biomass feedstock; and then re- irradiating the biomass feedstock with a second dose of ionizing radiation.
A method comprising: irradiating a biomass feedstock to change a molecular and/or a supramolecular structure of the biomass feedstock; cooling the irradiated biomass feedstock; and then re-irradiating the biomass feedstock with a second dose of ionizing radiation. The method of claim 1, further comprising processing the re-irradiated biomass feedstock to produce a fuel. The method of claim 2, wherein processing comprises converting the re-irradiated biomass feedstock utilizing a microorganism having the ability to convert at least about 1 percent by weight of the biomass to the fuel. The method of any one of claims 1 through 3, further comprising preparing the biomass feedstock by reducing one or more dimensions of individual pieces of the biomass feedstock, e.g., by shearing, grinding, cutting or a combination of these methods. The method of any one of claims 1 through 4, further comprising treating the biomass feedstock with one or more other treatment methods, wherein the other pretreatment methods are selected from sonication, pyrolysis, and oxidation. The method of any one of claims 1 through 5, wherein the cooling of the biomass comprises contacting the biomass with a fluid at a temperature below the temperature of the biomass immediately prior to irradiation. The method of any one of claims 1 through 6 wherein the biomass feedstock has internal fibers, and wherein the biomass feedstock has been sheared to an extent that its internal fibers are substantially exposed. The method of any one of claims 1 through 7, wherein the biomass feedstock has a bulk density of less than about 0.25 g/cm 3 . The method of any one of claims 1 through 8, wherein the biomass feedstock is selected from the group consisting of a low molecular weight sugar, a starch, paper, paper products, paper waste, wood, particle board, sawdust, agricultural waste, sewage, silage, grasses, rice hulls, bagasse, cotton, jute, hemp, flax, bamboo, sisal, abaca, straw, corn cobs, corn stover, switchgrass, alfalfa, hay, rice hulls, coconut hair, cotton, synthetic celluloses, seaweed, algae, and mixtures thereof. A product produced by any one of the above methods. |
|
| 04/28/2009 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Patent | |
4.9 Bioelectrochemical synthesis systems (BESs)
Bioelectrochemical systems (BESs) are unique systems capable of converting the chemical energy of organic waste including low-strength wastewaters and lignocellulosic biomass into electricity or hydrogen/chemical products in microbial fuel cells (MFCs) or microbial electrolysis cells (MECs) respectively, or other products formed at the cathode by an electrochemical reduction process. [\[Paper\]](https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2012/ra/c1ra00839k#!divAbstract)
**Highlights:**
* As compared to conventional fuel cells, BESs operate under relatively mild conditions, use a wide variety of organic substrates and mostly do not use expensive precious metals as catalysts. The recently discovered use of BES for product synthesis *via* microbial electrosynthesis have greatly expanded the horizon for these systems. Newer concepts in application as well as development of alternative materials for electrodes, separators, and catalysts, along with innovative designs have made BESs very promising technologies. [\[Paper\]](https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2012/ra/c1ra00839k#!divAbstract)
* Bioelectrochemical synthesis systems (BESs) are based on the primary principle of transforming organic waste into added-value products using microorganisms to catalyse chemical reactions. **This technology is at the core of a research project called BIORARE (BIoelectrosynthesis for ORganic wAste bioREfinery), an interdisciplinary project that aims to use anaerobic digestion as a supply chain to feed a BES and produce target biomolecules.** This technology needs to be driven by environmental strategies. The comparison of the BIORARE concept with conventional fermentation processes and a water-fed BES technology demonstrated the environmental benefit resulting from the use of both the BES technology and a waste-based substrate as input thus supporting the BIORARE concept. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96340-2899430523)
* An Integrated Biohydrogen Refinery (IBHR) and experimental net energy analysis are reported. **The IBHR converts biomass to electricity using hydrothermal hydrolysis, extractive biohydrogen fermentation and photobiological hydrogen fermentation for electricity generation in a fuel cell.** An extractive fermentation, developed previously, is applied to waste-derived substrates following hydrothermal pre-treatment, achieving 83-99% biowaste destruction. The selective separation of organic acids from waste-fed fermentations provided suitable substrate for photofermentative hydrogen production, which enhanced the gross energy generation up to 11-fold. Therefore, electrodialysis provides the key link in an IBHR for ‘waste to energy’. The IBHR compares favourably to ‘renewables’ (photovoltaics, on-shore wind, crop-derived biofuels) and also emerging biotechnological options (microbial electrolysis) and anaerobic digestion. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96340-2002469587)
| 4.9.1 | Bioelectrochemical synthesis systems (BESs) |
|---|---|
| A review of the substrates used in microbial fuel cells (MFCs) for sustainable energy production. | |
| Microbial fuel cells (MFCs) have gained a lot of attention in recent years as a mode of converting organic waste including low-strength wastewaters and lignocellulosic biomass into electricity. Microbial production of electricity may become an important form of bioenergy in future because MFCs offer the possibility of extracting electric current from a wide range of soluble or dissolved complex organic wastes and renewable biomass. A large number of substrates have been explored as feed. The major substrates that have been tried include various kinds of artificial and real wastewaters and lignocellulosic biomass. Though the current and power yields are relatively low at present, it is expected that with improvements in technology and knowledge about these unique systems, the amount of electric current (and electric power) which can be extracted from these systems will increase tremendously providing a sustainable way of directly converting lignocellulosic biomass or wastewaters to useful energy. This article reviews the various substrates that have been explored in MFCs so far, their resulting performance, limitations as well as future potential substrates. | |
| 03/01/2010 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 4.9.2 | Bioelectrochemical synthesis systems (BESs) |
| A Review of the Substrates Used in Microbial Fuel Cells for Sustainable Energy Production | |
| Microbial fuel cells(MFCs) have gained a lot of attention in recent years as a mode of converting organic waste including low-strength wastewaters and lignocellulosic biomass into electricity.Microbial production of electricity may become an important form of bioenergy in future because MFCs offer the possibility of extracting electric current from a wide range of soluble or dissolved complex organic wastes and renewable biomass.A large number of substrates have been explored as feed.The major substrates that have been tried include various kinds of artificial and real wastewaters and lignocellulosic biomass.Though the current and power yields are relatively low at present,it is expected that with improvements in technology and knowledge about these unique systems,the amount of electric current(and electric power) which can be extracted from these systems will increase tremendously providing a sustainable way of directly converting lignocellulosic biomass or wastewaters to useful energy.This article reviews the various substrates that have been explored in MFCs so far,their resulting performance,limitations as well as future potential substrates. | |
| 01/01/2010 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 4.9.3 | Bioelectrochemical synthesis systems (BESs) |
| An integrated biohydrogen refinery: Synergy of photofermentation, extractive fermentation and hydrothermal hydrolysis of food wastes | |
| Abstract An Integrated Biohydrogen Refinery (IBHR) and experimental net energy analysis are reported. The IBHR converts biomass to electricity using hydrothermal hydrolysis, extractive biohydrogen fermentation and photobiological hydrogen fermentation for electricity generation in a fuel cell. An extractive fermentation, developed previously, is applied to waste-derived substrates following hydrothermal pre-treatment, achieving 83-99% biowaste destruction. The selective separation of organic acids from waste-fed fermentations provided suitable substrate for photofermentative hydrogen production, which enhanced the gross energy generation up to 11-fold. Therefore, electrodialysis provides the key link in an IBHR for ‘waste to energy’. The IBHR compares favourably to ‘renewables’ (photovoltaics, on-shore wind, crop-derived biofuels) and also emerging biotechnological options (microbial electrolysis) and anaerobic digestion. | |
| 09/01/2012 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 4.9.4 | Bioelectrochemical synthesis systems (BESs) |
| An overview on emerging bioelectrochemical systems (BESs): Technology for sustainable electricity, waste remediation, resource recovery, chemical production and beyond | |
| Bioelectrochemical systems (BESs) are unique systems capable of converting chemical energy into electrical energy (and vice-versa) while employing microbes as catalysts. Such organic wastes including low-strength wastewaters and lignocellulosic biomass were converted into electricity with microbial fuel cells (MFCs). Likewise, electrical energy was used to produce hydrogen in microbial electrolysis cells (MECs) or other products including caustic and peroxide. BES were also designed to recover nutrients, metals or removal of recalcitrant compounds. Moreover, photosynthetic micro-organisms as well as higher plants were implemented to use solar energy for electricity generation. The diversity on microbial and enzymatic catalysts offered by nature allows a plurality of potential applications. As compared to conventional fuel cells, BESs operate under relatively mild conditions and do not use expensive precious metals as catalysts. The recently discovered microbial electrosynthesis (MES) of high-value chemicals has greatly expanded the horizon for BES. Newer concepts in application as well as development of alternative materials for electrodes, separators, catalysts along with innovative designs have made BES very promising technology. This article discusses the recent developments that have been made in BESs so far, with the emphasis on their various applications beyond electricity generation and resulting performances as well as existing limitations. | |
| 12/01/2016 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 4.9.5 | Bioelectrochemical synthesis systems (BESs) |
| Biological processes for hydrogen production | |
| Methane is produced usually from organic waste in a straightforward anaerobic digestion process. However, hydrogen production is technically more challenging as more stages are needed to convert all biomass to hydrogen because of thermodynamic constraints. Nevertheless, the benefit of hydrogen is that it can be produced, both biologically and thermochemically, in more than one way from either organic compounds or water. Research in biological hydrogen production is booming, as reflected by the myriad of recently published reviews on the topic. This overview is written from the perspective of how to transfer as much energy as possible from the feedstock into the gaseous products hydrogen, and to a lesser extent, methane. The status and remaining challenges of all the biological processes are concisely discussed. | |
| 01/01/2016 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 4.9.6 | Bioelectrochemical synthesis systems (BESs) |
| Electricity and disinfectant production from wastewater: Microbial Fuel Cell as a self-powered electrolyser. | |
| This study presents a simple and sustainable Microbial Fuel Cell as a standalone, self-powered reactor for in situ wastewater electrolysis, recovering nitrogen from wastewater. A process is proposed whereby the MFC electrical performance drives the electrolysis of wastewater towards the self-generation of catholyte within the same reactor. The MFCs were designed to harvest the generated catholyte in the internal chamber, which showed that liquid production rates are largely proportional to electrical current generation. The catholyte demonstrated bactericidal properties, compared to the control (open-circuit) diffusate, and reduced observable biofilm formation on the cathode electrode. Killing effects were confirmed using bacterial kill curves constructed by exposing a bioluminescent Escherichia coli target, as a surrogate coliform, to catholyte where a rapid kill rate was observed. Therefore, MFCs could serve as a water recovery system, a disinfectant/cleaner generator that limits undesired biofilm formation and as a washing agent in waterless urinals to improve sanitation. This simple and ready to implement MFC system can convert organic waste directly into electricity and self-driven nitrogen along with water recovery. This could lead to the development of energy positive bioprocesses for sustainable wastewater treatment. | |
| 07/01/2016 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 4.9.7 | Bioelectrochemical synthesis systems (BESs) |
| Enhancing oxygen reduction reaction by using metal-free nitrogen-doped carbon black as cathode catalysts in microbial fuel cells treating wastewater | |
| Abstract: Microbial fuel cells (MFCs) is promising to combat environmental pollution by converting organic waste to electricity. One critical problem for practical application of MFCs treating wastewater is sluggish oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) on cathode. This study focused on developing novel metal-free cost-effective cathodic catalysts to enhance power generation of MFCs. Specifically, carbon powder (Vulcan XC-72R) was modified with acid treatment and pyrazinamide (as nitrogen precursor), and subsequent pyrolyzed at different temperatures. For CN-X (X = 700–1000 °C) materials, chemical compositions (the doping contents of nitrogen species, oxygen-containing groups, and sulfur-containing groups) were altered with pyrolysis temperature. Linear sweep voltammetry showed that CN-800 exhibited the highest ORR activity, with an onset potential of 0.215 V and a half-wave potential of −0.096 V (vs. Ag/AgCl). Electrochemical measurements clearly presented an enhancement of ORR activity by treating carbon powder with sulfuric acid and nitrogen doping, which was well correlated with voltage output in single chamber MFCs (SCMFCs). On the other hand, for the nitrogen-doped cathode catalysts, the best performance in SCMFCs was directly related with the amount of pyridinic nitrogen species and total nitrogen amount. The MFC operated with CN-800 exhibited a maximum power density of 371 ± 3 mW/m2 with the chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal of 77.2 ± 1.5% and coulombic efficiency (CE) of 8.6 ± 0.3%. Furthermore, the MFC with CN-800 exhibited an excellent stability over longer than 550 h of operation with 1.5% voltage reduction. CN-800 possessed comparable COD removal efficiency to conventional costly Pt/C, and exhibited distinct cost-effectiveness for MFC practical applications in wastewater treatment. | |
| 12/01/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 4.9.8 | Bioelectrochemical synthesis systems (BESs) |
| Integration of Microbial Electrolysis Cells (MECs) in the Biorefinery for Production of Ethanol, H2 and Phenolics | |
| In a biorefinery, biomass is converted into a variety of chemicals, materials and energy. A typical example is the lignocellulosic ethanol biorefinery process, in which substrates such as wheat straw are used as a feedstock for production of ethanol. In this work, an integrated biorefinery procedure is proposed in which the ethanol biorefinery is coupled with a microbial electrolysis cell (MEC), with the aim to further process and valorize the waste stream of bioethanol production. A MEC is an electrochemical system capable of oxidizing reducing equivalents, which results in hydrogen production. The mass and energy balances as well as the economical evaluations, show that this strategy may be useful for additional generation of hydrogen and lignin, thereby increasing the final yield of this biorefinery. From one ton of straw, the yield of ethanol upon yeast fermentation is estimated at 177–190 kg, with a hydrogen yield corresponding to 19–23 kg H2. The remaining solid residue of 147–160 kg comprises primarily lignin. The estimated value of these products approximates the double of that of straw. Integrating a MEC in the biorefinery concept may also be useful for other applications such as polyphenol purification and targeted modification of fruit based phenolics. Examples of such high-value plant polyphenols include equol and resveratrol, which can be produced from soy and grape, respectively. | |
| 03/01/2010 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 4.9.9 | Bioelectrochemical synthesis systems (BESs) |
| Life cycle assessment of a bioelectrochemical system as a new technological platform for biosuccinic acid production from waste | |
| Waste management is a key environmental and socio-economic issue. Environmental concerns are encouraging the use of alternative resources and lower emissions to air, water and soil. Innovative technologies to deal with waste recovery that produce marketable bioproducts are emerging. Bioelectrochemical synthesis systems (BESs) are based on the primary principle of transforming organic waste into added-value products using microorganisms to catalyse chemical reactions. This technology is at the core of a research project called BIORARE (BIoelectrosynthesis for ORganic wAste bioREfinery), an interdisciplinary project that aims to use anaerobic digestion as a supply chain to feed a BES and produce target biomolecules. This technology needs to be driven by environmental strategies. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was used to evaluate the BIORARE concept based on expert opinion and prior experiments for the production of biosuccinic acid and waste management. A multidisciplinary approach based on biochemistry and process engineering expertise was used to collect the inventory data. The BES design and the two-step anaerobic digestion process have many potential impacts on air pollution or ecotoxicity-related categories. The comparison of the BIORARE concept with conventional fermentation processes and a water-fed BES technology demonstrated the environmental benefit resulting from the use of both the BES technology and a waste-based substrate as input thus supporting the BIORARE concept. Some trade-offs among the impact categories were identified but led to options to improve the concept. BES design and synergy management may improve the environmental performance of the BIORARE concept. | |
| 12/01/2018 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 4.9.10 | Bioelectrochemical synthesis systems (BESs) |
| Microbial electrolysis treatment of post-hydrothermal liquefaction wastewater with hydrogen generation | |
| Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) directly converts wet organic waste into biocrude oil, but it also generates post-HTL wastewater (PHWW) with concentrated nutrients that require further treatment before discharge or reuse. While traditional technologies showed limited success, this study demonstrates that microbial electrolysis cell (MEC) can be an effective approach to treat the swine manure PHWW and recover H2 for onsite HTL biocrude upgrading. The onsite H2 production and utilization makes MEC an ideal wastewater treatment process for HTL operations. Using actual swine manure PHWW, the MEC reactors showed excellent removals of organics (90–98%) and nitrogen (57–93%) under various organic loadings, applied voltages, and flow rates. Increasing organic loadings and applied voltages showed positive influences on system performance, while changes of flow rates showed limited impacts. The highest H2 production rate was 168.01 ± 7.01 mL/L/d with a H2 yield of 5.14 ± 0.22 mmol/kg COD (3000 mg COD/L, 1.0 V), and the highest cathodic H2 recovery and energy efficiency were 74.24 ± 0.11% and 120.56 ± 17.45%, respectively. System configuration and operation can be further optimized to improve system performance. | |
| 02/01/2018 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 4.9.11 | Bioelectrochemical synthesis systems (BESs) |
| Microbial Fuel Cell for Biomass Energy Conversion | |
| The vision of producing sustainable and renewable bioenergy is to contribute reducing the current global warming impact. It is well known that microorganisms can produce fuels, such as ethanol, butanol, methane, and hydrogen. Alternatively, microbes can produce electricity by means of microbial fuel cell (MFC). The recent development in energy biology has demonstrated the potential of MFC for commercial applications in converting renewable biomass and organic waste into electricity. The biomass sources are highly desirable because they are “carbon-neutral.” Electrical energy can be extracted from organic waste matter and renewable biomass by microbial degradation. The major challenge of using microbial fuel cell is to increase power density for most of the envisaged applications, such as power monitoring electronic devices, light source of battery charger in off-grid areas. A wide scope lies ahead in the scaling up of MFC for large-scale conversion of organic waste and biomass into electricity for powering vehicles, mobile electronic devices or buildings. The use of waste organic from biomass is environment-friendly and regarded as a renewable energy source. This article gives an overview of microbial fuel cell that covers the bioelectrochemical mechanisms, system and components, characterization, performance, and applications. Keywords: microbial fuel cell; organic waste; biomass energy; microorganisms; glucose | |
| 07/16/2015 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 4.9.12 | Bioelectrochemical synthesis systems (BESs) |
| Microbial fuel cells: From fundamentals to applications. A review | |
| In the past 10–15 years, the microbial fuel cell (MFC) technology has captured the attention of the scientific community for the possibility of transforming organic waste directly into electricity through microbially catalyzed anodic, and microbial/enzymatic/abiotic cathodic electrochemical reactions. In this review, several aspects of the technology are considered. Firstly, a brief history of abiotic to biological fuel cells and subsequently, microbial fuel cells is presented. Secondly, the development of the concept of microbial fuel cell into a wider range of derivative technologies, called bioelectrochemical systems, is described introducing briefly microbial electrolysis cells, microbial desalination cells and microbial electrosynthesis cells. The focus is then shifted to electroactive biofilms and electron transfer mechanisms involved with solid electrodes. Carbonaceous and metallic anode materials are then introduced, followed by an explanation of the electro catalysis of the oxygen reduction reaction and its behavior in neutral media, from recent studies. Cathode catalysts based on carbonaceous, platinum-group metal and platinum-group-metal-free materials are presented, along with membrane materials with a view to future directions. Finally, microbial fuel cell practical implementation, through the utilization of energy output for practical applications, is described. | |
| 07/01/2017 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 4.9.13 | Bioelectrochemical synthesis systems (BESs) |
| Processes and electron flow in a microbial electrolysis cell bioanode fed with furanic and phenolic compounds | |
| Furanic and phenolic compounds are problematic compounds resulting from the pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for biofuel production. Microbial electrolysis cell (MEC) is a promising technology to convert furanic and phenolic compounds to renewable H2. The objective of the research presented here was to elucidate the processes and electron equivalents flow during the conversion of two furanic (furfural, FF; 5-hydroxymethyl furfural, HMF) and three phenolic (syringic acid, SA; vanillic acid, VA; 4-hydroxybenzoic acid, HBA) compounds in the MEC bioanode. Cyclic voltammograms of the bioanode demonstrated that purely electrochemical reactions in the biofilm attached to the electrode were negligible. Instead, microbial reactions related to the biotransformation of the five parent compounds (i.e., fermentation followed by exoelectrogenesis) were the primary processes resulting in the electron equivalents flow in the MEC bioanode. A mass-based framework of substrate utilization and electron flow was developed to quantify the distribution of the electron equivalents among the bioanode processes, including biomass growth for each of the five parent compounds. Using input parameters of anode efficiency and biomass observed yield coefficients, it was estimated that more than 50% of the SA, FF, and HMF electron equivalents were converted to current. In contrast, only 12 and 9% of VA and HBA electron equivalents, respectively, resulted in current production, while 76 and 79% remained as fermentation end products not further utilized in exoelectrogenesis. For all five compounds, it was estimated that 10% of the initially added electron equivalents were used for fermentative biomass synthesis, while 2 to 13% were used for exoelectrogenic biomass synthesis. The proposed mass-based framework provides a foundation for the simulation of bioanode processes to guide the optimization of MECs converting biomass-derived waste streams to renewable H2. | |
| 12/01/2018 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 4.9.14 | Bioelectrochemical synthesis systems (BESs) |
| The electrochemical perspective of bioelectrocatalytic activities in microbial electrolysis and microbial fuel cells | |
| Abstract Transforming organic waste directly into electricity or indirectly into sources of hydrogen fuel is credible through exoelectrogen microorganisms grown on the anode or cathode that catalyze electrochemical reactions. In this review, we discuss the origin of the electrochemical kinetic in both microbial fuel cells (MFCs) and microbial electrolysis cells (MECs) that are utilized to produce energy from waste through either directly by producing electric energy, or indirectly through hydrogen gas production, respectively. The concept of utilizing electrochemical techniques of cyclic voltammetry, chronoamperometric and derivative cyclic voltammetry to study the interfacial kinetics of exoelectrogenic bacteria and characterize biofilms are described. Additionally, we discuss the influence of various parts of electrochemical cells on bioelectrocatalytic processes, i.e, system design, electrolyte properties, anode and cathode materials. Thus, the necessity of optimizing parameters impacting the efficiency, rate, bacteria enrichment, and system implementations for improved biofilm performance are briefly discussed along with the figures of merit. | |
| 11/01/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 4.9.15 | Bioelectrochemical synthesis systems (BESs) |
| The Use of Bioelectrochemical System (BES) to Upgrade Biogas into Biomethane under Thermophilic Conditions | |
| Anaerobic digestion (AD) is used increasingly worldwide to convert organic waste materials into the renewable energy of methane gas. However, the produced biogas consists of a mixture of typically 50% methane CO2, respectively. The presence of CO2 in biogas affects engine performance; therefore, removing CO2 content will significantly improve the usability of biogas. Recently, integrating bioelectrochemical systems (BESs) with AD processes have been considered as a way to increase methane content. The principle of the BES in enriching biogas in methane content is thought to be in the transfer of electrons from an active cathode either directly to methanogens or via reduction of protons to H2 and subsequent H2 transfer to hydrogenotrophic methanogens that reduce CO2 to CH4. Two different types of BES have been described in this thesis: one is membrane-free single-chamber reactor which contains both anode and cathode; the other reactor consists of two-chambers separated by an ion-exchange membrane in order to avoid interference of the anodic reaction with the cathode. This study combined BES with AD (thermophilic anaerobic sludge used as an inoculum) and investigated the capability of upgrading biogas to methane under thermophilic conditions. For the first time, we showed a direct comparison between single and two-chamber systems. Based on the results, the following observations were made: 1. The application of the BES to a glucose fed AD resulted in an immediate increase in biogas production (approximately from 1 L/L/d to 1.5 L/L/d) and methane content (approximately from 50% to about 65%). This applied for both reactor configurations (single- and two-chamber for the first 4 days. However, after one week the methane content of the single chamber decreased to that of the control AD without BES, while the two-chamber reactor increased its methane level to > 90%. The reason for the diminished longer term performance of the single chamber reactor is presumably the production of oxygen by the anode as indicated by increased redox potential. 2. pH adjustment was needed during the operation of the two-chamber reactor as its cathodic chamber tended to be alkaline (>9); while the pH of the single-chamber reactor was in the range of 6-7. 3. After 3 weeks experiment, both single- and two-chamber reactor showed signs of failure by an accumulation of VFA and diminished methane production. The build-up of VFA was attributed to the H2 produced by the BES inside the AD which was known to result in VFA accumulation. To avoid the volatile fatty acids (VFAs) accumulation, the BES was removed from the AD and placed in-line with the AD, receiving the biogas by functioning as a biogas-filter. This novel concept of using a BES as a biogas-filter was evaluated as an alternative way of upgrading biogas to methane. And the microbial community of a mixed-culture methane producing biocathode was investigated to illuminate the possible role of microbial in methane production. Results revealed that: 1. When applying a WE potential at -1.1 V vs. Ag/AgCl the biofilter increased the methane content of inflowing biogas from 50% to 85%. 2. The microbial community at the start of the experiment was dominated by two phylotypes of Archea- Methanosarcina and Methanobacteria. However, at the end of experiment hydrogenotrophic Methanothermobacter was the majority population of Archea (95.4%). 3. Based on the analysis of energy efficiency, it was showed that final energy output as extra methane was 57.1 kJ and the overall energy efficiency was 56%. 4. The use of BES as an inline biofilter to remove CO2 from biogas represents an alternative, not yet published approach that is not likely to cause digester failure as observed by BES imbedded in the AD but showing similar performance. Overall, this thesis showed the capacity of BES on biogas upgrading and the selection of electromethanogens on the biocathode during the BES operation in the two-chamber reactor. Thus, further studies on the optimisation of BES process and the mechanisms of catalysis of biocathode will provide essential knowledge for improving BES performance for the practical application. | |
| 01/01/2017 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 4.9.16 | Bioelectrochemical synthesis systems (BESs) |
| Waste to bioenergy: a review on the recent conversion technologies | |
| Scientific studies have demonstrated that it is possible to generate a wide variety of bioenergy from biomass residues and waste, and however its cost is not competitive with petro-fuels and other renewable energy. On-going efforts are continued extensively to improve conversion technologies in order to reduce production costs. The present review focuses on the conversion technologies for transforming biomass residues and waste to biofuels, specifically their technological concepts, options and prospects for implementation are addressed. The emerging developments in the two primary conversion pathways, namely the thermochemical (i.e. gasification, liquefaction, and pyrolysis) and biochemical (i.e. anaerobic digestion, alcoholic fermentation and photobiological hydrogen production) conversion techniques, are evaluated. Additionally, transesterification, which appears to be the simplest and most economical route to produce biodiesel in large quantity, is discussed. Lastly, the strategies for direct conversion of biomass residues and waste to bioelectricity including the use of combustion and microbial fuel cells are reviewed. | |
| 12/01/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
4.10 Fermentation for material production
**Example:**
**Mycelium composites comprise of networks of filamentous hyphae, utilising biological growth rather than expensive energy intensive manufacturing processes to convert low-cost organic wastes into economically viable and environmentally friendly materials.** Although generally characterised as polymer grade foams and used primarily for limited packaging and construction applications, the mechanical performance of these materials varies significantly and is governed by hyphal architecture, cell wall composition, composite constituents and growth kinetics which are in turn influenced by inherent and exogenous factors. A range of potential applications have been proposed including acoustic dampers, super absorbents, paper, textiles, structural and electronic parts.[ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96393-2745793211)
| 4.10.1 | Fermentation for material production |
|---|---|
| Mycelium Composites: A Review of Engineering Characteristics and Growth Kinetics | |
| Mycelium composites comprise of networks of filamentous hyphae, utilising biological growth rather than expensive energy intensive manufacturing processes to convert low-cost organic wastes into economically viable and environmentally friendly materials. Although generally characterised as polymer grade foams and used primarily for limited packaging and construction applications, the mechanical performance of these materials varies significantly and is governed by hyphal architecture, cell wall composition, composite constituents and growth kinetics which are in turn influenced by inherent and exogenous factors. A range of potential applications have been proposed including acoustic dampers, super absorbents, paper, textiles, structural and electronic parts. Limited research, inconclusive data and the proposed applications and feasibility suggest that further investigation is warranted. | |
| 08/01/2017 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
5. Fractionation
BackValorisation brought about by fractionation processes
5.1 microwave hydrodiffusion
Microwave hydrodiffusion and gravity (MHG) is a combination of microwaves for hydrodiffusion of essential oils from the inside to the exterior of biological material and earth gravity to collect and separate.[\[Paper\]](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0021967308004032)
**Highlights:**
* Components like essential oils, phenolic compounds and pectin can be extracted from plant biomass using this technique.[\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96383-2946440646)
| 5.1.1 | microwave hydrodiffusion |
|---|---|
| Incorporating Agricultural Waste-to-Energy Pathways into Biomass Product and Process Network through Data-Driven Nonlinear Adaptive Robust Optimization | |
| Abstract A biomass product and process network that displays how organic waste and other non-traditional biomass feedstocks may be converted into useful bioproducts and biofuels is a necessary addition to the field of biomass conversion and utilization. We develop a processing network of 216 technologies and 172 materials/compounds that contains conversion pathways of agricultural and organic waste biomass sources, such as food peels, animal manure, and grease. To examine the effectiveness and economic feasibility of these conversion pathways, the biomass product and process network is optimized for return on investment. The resulting problem is a data-driven two-stage adaptive robust mixed-integer nonlinear fractional program, which was effectively solved via a tailored optimization algorithm. The proposed approach is applied to two case studies in which traditional agricultural feedstocks are used alongside biological and agricultural waste feedstocks. The selected feedstocks were used to satisfy and, in some cases, even exceed demand for selected products. The optimal pathways have returns on investment of 26.1% and 6.2%, with utilized conversion technologies ranging from hydrocracking to microwave hydrodiffusion. In both cases, we find that profitable processing pathways are utilized at maximum capacities to increase return on investment. Specifically, in the case study where orange peel wastes are used to produce pectin, we find that this pathway is highly profitable at the given market price. The two cases that are run using the proposed model are then compared to additional cases to display differences that arise when uncertainty is not considered and the objective function of the model is changed. | |
| 05/01/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
5.2 Acidolysis/hydrolysis
A chemical reaction involving the decomposition of a molecule, with the addition of the elements of an acid to the molecule; the reaction is comparable to hydrolysis or alcoholysis, in which water or alcohol, respectively, is used in place of the acid.[\[Source\]](https://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/acidolysis#:\~:text=acidolysis,in%20place%20of%20the%20acid.)
**Highlights:**
* Here, we present the successful scale-up demonstration of the **acid-assisted IL deconstruction on feedstock blends of municipal solid wastes and agricultural residues** (corn stover) by 30-fold, relative to the bench scale (6 vs 0.2 L), at 10% solid loading. By integrating IL pretreatment and acid hydrolysis with subsequent centrifugation and extraction, the sugar and lignin products can be further recovered efficiently. This scale-up development at Advanced Biofuels/Bioproducts Process Demonstration Unit (ABPDU) will leverage the opportunity and synergistic efforts toward developing a cost-effective IL-based deconstruction technology by drastically eliminating enzyme, reducing water usage, and simplifying the downstream sugar/lignin recovery and IL recycling.[\[Paper\]](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13068-016-0694-8)
* In this paper, three types of lignocellulosic biomass (softwood, hardwood and herbaceous biomass) were processed by **microwave-assisted acidolysis to produce high quality lignin.** The lignin from the softwood was isolated largely intact in the solid residue after acidolysis. For example, a 10 min microwave-assisted acidolysis treatment produced lignin with a purity of 93% and in a yield of 82%, which is superior to other conventional separation methods reported. To assess the suitability of this methodology as part of a biorefinery system, the aqueous phase, produced after acidolysis of the softwood, was characterised and assessed for its suitability for fermentation. The broth contained some mono- and di-saccharides but mainly contained organic acids, oligosaccharides and furans. **This preliminary work demonstrates new protocols of microwave-assisted acidolysis and therefore offers an effective approach to produce high purity lignin and fermentable chemicals, which is a key step towards developing a zero-waste lignocellulosic biorefinery.**[\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-97022-2601982806)
| 5.2.1 | Acidolysis/hydrolysis |
|---|---|
| Fast microwave-assisted acidolysis, a new biorefinery approach for a zero-waste utilisation of lignocellulosic biomass to produce high quality lignin and fermentable saccharides | |
| Generally biorefineries convert lignocellulosic biomass into a range of biofuels and further value added chemicals. However, conventional biorefinery processes focus mainly on the cellulose and hemicellulose fractions and therefore produce only low quality lignin, which is commonly burnt to provide process heat. To make full use of the biomass, more attention needs to be focussed on novel separation techniques, where the lignin can be isolated in a high quality suitable for further valorisation into aromatic chemicals and fuel components. In this paper, three types of lignocellulosic biomass (softwood, hardwood and herbaceous biomass) were processed by microwave-assisted acidolysis, to produce high quality lignin. The lignin from the softwood was isolated largely intact in the solid residue after acidolysis. For example, a 10 min treatment, microwave-assisted acidolysis produced a lignin with a purity of 93% and yield of 82%, superior to other conventional separation methods reported. Furthermore, the py-GC/MS analysis proved that the isolated lignin retained the original structure as native lignin in the feedstock without severe chemical modification. This is a large advantage, and the purified lignin is suitable for further chemical processing. To assess the suitability of this methodology as part of a biorefinery system, the aqueous phase, produced after acidolysis of the softwood, was characterised and assessed for its suitability for fermentation. The broth contained some mono- and disaccharides but mainly organic acids, oligosaccharides and furans. While this is unsuitable for S. cerevisiae and other common ethanol producing yeasts, two oleaginous yeasts with known inhibitor tolerances were selected; Cryptococcus curvatus and Metschnikowia pulcherrima. Both yeasts could grow on the broth, demonstrating suitable catabolism of the oligosaccharides and inhibitors over 7 days. In addition, both yeasts were shown to be able to produce an oil with a similar composition to palm oil. This preliminary work demonstrates new protocols of microwave-assisted acidolysis and therefore offers an effective approach to produce high purity lignin and fermentable chemicals, a key step towards a zero-waste lignocellulosic biorefinery. | |
| 01/01/2017 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 5.2.2 | Acidolysis/hydrolysis |
| Low Temperature and Efficient Fractionation of Lignocellulosic Biomass Using Recyclable Organic Solid Acids | |
|
Methods of fractionating lignocellulosic biomass using hydrotropic solid organic acids are provided. Also provided are methods of forming lignin particles, furans, sugars, and/or lignocellulosic micro- and nanofibrils from the liquid and solid fractions produced by fractionation process. The fractionation can be carried out at low temperatures with short reaction times.
**1**. A method for treating lignocellulosic biomass, the method comprising: dispersing a lignocellulosic biomass in an aqueous solution comprising a hydrotropic solid organic acid, wherein the concentration of the hydrotropic solid organic acid in the solution is higher than its minimal hydrotrope concentration; maintaining the solution at a temperature and for a time sufficient to dissolve at least 10 wt. % of the lignin in the lignocellulosic biomass; and separating the solution and the dispersed lignocellulosic biomass into a spent acid solution comprising dissolved lignin and a water- insoluble cellulose-rich solids fraction comprising water-insoluble lignocellulosic solid residues. <br/>**2**. The method of claim 1 , wherein the temperature is no greater than 100° C. and the time is no greater than 300 minutes. <br/>**3**. The method of claim 1 , wherein the lignocellulosic biomass comprises wood chips, milled wood, commercial technical lignin, or a combination thereof. <br/>**4**. The method of claim 1 , wherein the lignocellulosic biomass is a hardwood and at least 10 wt. % of the lignin in the hardwood is dissolved. <br/>**5**. The method of claim 1 , wherein the lignocellulosic biomass is softwood and at least 10 wt. % of the lignin in the softwood is dissolved. <br/>**6**. The method of claim 1 , wherein the lignocellulosic biomass is commercial technical lignin and the amount of the technical lignin dissolved is at least 2 g/100 g solution. <br/>**7**. The method of claim 1 , further comprising fibrillating the lignocellulosic biomass prior to dispersing the lignocellulosic biomass in the aqueous solution comprising the hydrotropic solid organic acid. <br/>**8**. The method of claim 1 , further comprising precipitating lignin nanoparticles from the spent acid solution. <br/>**9**. The method of claim 1 , further comprising converting sugars dissolved in the spent acid solution into furans and separating the furans from the spent acid solution. <br/>**10**. The method of claim 1 , further comprising mechanically fibrillating the lignocellulosic solid residues to form lignocellulosic microfibrils, lignocellulosic nanofibrils, or a combination thereof. <br/>**11**. The method of claim 10 , wherein the water-insoluble cellulose-rich solids fraction comprises lignocellulosic solid residues and lignocellulosic nanocrystals. <br/>**12**. The method of claim 10 , further comprising separating the lignocellulosic solid residues from the lignocellulosic nanocrystals. <br/>**13**. The method of claim 1 , further comprising converting the water- insoluble lignocellulosic solid residues into sugars via hydrolysis using enzymes or chemicals. <br/>**14**. The method of claim 1 , further comprising recycling the hydrotropic solid organic acid in the spent acid solution back into the aqueous solution comprising the dispersed lignocellulosic biomass. |
|
| 03/18/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Patent | |
5.3 Supercritical extraction/reaction
Supercritical fluid extraction is the process of separating one component from another using supercritical fluids as the extracting solvent. Extraction is usually from a solid matrix, but can also be from liquids.[\[Wiki\]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supercritical_fluid_extraction)
**Highlights:**
* SFE has been used to **extract lipids** from various biomass which includes spent coffee grounds using SC-CO~2~, soybean using SC-CO~2~, linseed using supercritical-ethanol, residual corn material using SC-CO~2~, organosolv lignin using supercritical-ethanol, shrimp waste using SC-CO~2~, and white pinewood. Apart from that, SFE has been extensively studied for the extraction of lipid from third generation feedstock as well. Lipid from milk was also extracted using a supercritical anti-solvent fractionation technology (SAFT). The SAFT is a versatile process which consists of a water-miscible organic solvent and water. The resulting solution from the process undergoes extraction using a supercritical solvent. High lipid yields was obtained by SAFT using dimethyl ether and the lipid contents were found to be around 70% neutral and 30% phospholipids.
* **Supercritical transesterification is a simplified biofuel production process that requires no catalyst.** This technique was developed to overcome certain drawbacks associated with catalysed transesterification, such as long reaction time, catalyst poisoning, catalyst regeneration, high operation cost, saponification and biodiesel washing. Supercritical fluid has been used in commercial production of biodiesel, which indicates its scalability potential and its readiness to be deployed as a feasible technology. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-97049-2947495040)
| 5.3.1 | Supercritical extraction/reaction |
|---|---|
| Waste to bioenergy: a review on the recent conversion technologies | |
| Scientific studies have demonstrated that it is possible to generate a wide variety of bioenergy from biomass residues and waste, and however its cost is not competitive with petro-fuels and other renewable energy. On-going efforts are continued extensively to improve conversion technologies in order to reduce production costs. The present review focuses on the conversion technologies for transforming biomass residues and waste to biofuels, specifically their technological concepts, options and prospects for implementation are addressed. The emerging developments in the two primary conversion pathways, namely the thermochemical (i.e. gasification, liquefaction, and pyrolysis) and biochemical (i.e. anaerobic digestion, alcoholic fermentation and photobiological hydrogen production) conversion techniques, are evaluated. Additionally, transesterification, which appears to be the simplest and most economical route to produce biodiesel in large quantity, is discussed. Lastly, the strategies for direct conversion of biomass residues and waste to bioelectricity including the use of combustion and microbial fuel cells are reviewed. | |
| 12/01/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
5.4 Biphasic systems
Solutions can separate into distinc layer, which can be used for fractionation and reaction purposes.
**Highlights:**
* Lignocellulosic biomass, such as corn stover, pulp and paper mill waste, and switchgrass, is a readily available feedstock for the production of monomeric sugars and platform chemicals that can then be transformed into valuable organic molecules. However, efficiently fractionating lignocellulosic biomass is difficult due to the recalcitrance of lignin at mild reaction conditions and the reactive sugars/platform chemicals at more severe conditions. **Biphasic systems present a possible solution to creating an economically viable biomass upgrading process since sugars prefer the aqueous phase while the lignin and furans partition to the organic phase.** [ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-97054-2890619490)
* **The fractionation of lignocellulose in its three main components, hemicellulose, lignin and cellulose pulp can be achieved in a biphasic system comprising water and bio-based 2-methyltetrahydrofuran (2-MeTHF) as solvents and oxalic acid as catalyst at mild temperatures (up to 140 °C). This so-called OrganoCat concept relies on selective hemicellulose depolymerization to form an aqueous stream of the corresponding carbohydrates, whereas solid cellulose pulp remains suspended and the disentangled lignin is to a large extent extracted in situ with the organic phase.** Economic analysis of the process reveals that the improved biomass loading significantly reduces capital and energy costs in the solvent recycle, indicating the importance of process integration for potential implementation. The procedure was successfully scaled-up from the screening on bench scale to 3 L reactor. The feedstock flexibility was assessed for biomasses containing moderate-to-high hemicellulose content.[ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-97054-1991412117)
| 5.4.1 | Biphasic systems |
|---|---|
| Fractionation of lignocellulosic biomass using the OrganoCat process | |
| The fractionation of lignocellulose in its three main components, hemicellulose, lignin and cellulose pulp can be achieved in a biphasic system comprising water and bio-based 2-methyltetrahydrofuran (2-MeTHF) as solvents and oxalic acid as catalyst at mild temperatures (up to 140 °C). This so-called OrganoCat concept relies on selective hemicellulose depolymerization to form an aqueous stream of the corresponding carbohydrates, whereas solid cellulose pulp remains suspended and the disentangled lignin is to a large extent extracted in situ with the organic phase. In the present paper, it is demonstrated that biomass loadings of 100 g L−1 can be efficiently fractionated within 3 h whereby the mild conditions assure that no significant amounts of by-products (e.g. furans) are formed. Removing the solid pulp by filtration allows to re-use the water and organic phase without product separation in repetitive batch mode. In this way, (at least) 400 g L−1 biomass can be processed in 4 cycles, leading to greatly improved biomass-to-catalyst and biomass-to-solvent ratios. Economic analysis of the process reveals that the improved biomass loading significantly reduces capital and energy costs in the solvent recycle, indicating the importance of process integration for potential implementation. The procedure was successfully scaled-up from the screening on bench scale to 3 L reactor. The feedstock flexibility was assessed for biomasses containing moderate-to-high hemicellulose content. | |
| 01/01/2015 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 5.4.2 | Biphasic systems |
| Liquid phase conversion of lignocellulosic biomass using biphasic systems | |
| Abstract Lignocellulosic biomass, such as corn stover, pulp and paper mill waste, and switchgrass, is a readily available feedstock for the production of monomeric sugars and platform chemicals that can then be transformed into valuable organic molecules. However, efficiently fractionating lignocellulosic biomass is difficult due to the recalcitrance of lignin at mild reaction conditions and the reactive sugars/platform chemicals at more severe conditions. Biphasic systems present a possible solution to creating an economically viable biomass upgrading process since sugars prefer the aqueous phase while the lignin and furans partition to the organic phase. This review focuses on recent work to fractionate biomass using biphasic reactions as well as monophasic reactions that use biphasic systems to separate products. The use of different biphasic media, heterogeneous and homogeneous catalysts, and reaction conditions are reviewed and trends in isolating the fractions found in biomass are discussed. | |
| 11/01/2018 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
6. Others
BackOther conversion technologies
6.1 Black soldier fly larvae
Black soldier fly larvae (Hermetia illucens; BSFL) can convert organic wastes into a nutrient-rich biomass suitable in animal feed, which could be a way to achieve more sustainable production of food.
**Highlights:**
* In this study, BSFL were fed 11 diets based on four different organic waste sources (mussels, bread, fish and food waste). Fatty acid and proximate composition (dry matter, crude fat, crude protein and ash) were analysed in the diets, in two-week-old larvae and substrate residues. Larval weight, survival and feed conversion were also recorded. The diet was found to affect all parameters investigated. Irrespective of diet, the larval fat consisted mainly of lauric acid and other saturated fatty acids and these were found to be synthesised by the larvae. However, both the fatty acid composition of the substrate, and the larval weight were found to affect the fatty acid profile of the larvae. In general, larvae with a higher weight contained a higher percentage of saturated fatty acids and a lower percentage of unsaturated fatty acids, such as eicosapentaenoic (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). It was concluded that the possibilities to tailor the fatty acid composition of the BSFL through the diet are limited; thus, the BSFL fat may not be suitable to replace fish oil, but has potential of inclusion in other food, feed and fuel products.[ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96374-2981556263)
* An innovative solution is to use insects for the management of organic waste. Here, we used black soldier fly to convert organic waste into animal feed protein, as fly larvae, and plant fertilizer, as compost residue. A continuous fly reactor was monitored for 9 weeks. We analyzed physicochemical and microbial parameters, and we evaluated the sanitary risk. Results show 55.1 % of material degradation and 11.8 % of biomass conversion based upon total solids. We observed higher levels of N and P in the treatment residue than in the inflow material. Results also show a lower concentration of Salmonella spp. and viruses. Compost treatment with black soldier fly is therefore an efficient system for nutrient recycling.[ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96374-1990613273)
| 6.1.1 | Black soldier fly larvae |
|---|---|
| Fatty acid composition of black soldier fly larvae (Hermetia illucens) – Possibilities and limitations for modification through diet | |
| Abstract Black soldier fly larvae (Hermetia illucens; BSFL) can convert organic wastes into a nutrient-rich biomass suitable in animal feed, which could be a way to achieve more sustainable production of food. However, little is known about how the diet fed to BSFL affects their nutritional value, especially their fatty acid composition. In this study, BSFL were fed 11 diets based on four different organic waste sources (mussels, bread, fish and food waste). Fatty acid and proximate composition (dry matter, crude fat, crude protein and ash) were analysed in the diets, in two-week-old larvae and substrate residues. Larval weight, survival and feed conversion were also recorded. The diet was found to affect all parameters investigated. Irrespective of diet, the larval fat consisted mainly of lauric acid and other saturated fatty acids and these were found to be synthesised by the larvae. However, both the fatty acid composition of the substrate, and the larval weight were found to affect the fatty acid profile of the larvae. In general, larvae with a higher weight contained a higher percentage of saturated fatty acids and a lower percentage of unsaturated fatty acids, such as eicosapentaenoic (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). It was concluded that the possibilities to tailor the fatty acid composition of the BSFL through the diet are limited; thus, the BSFL fat may not be suitable to replace fish oil, but has potential of inclusion in other food, feed and fuel products. | |
| 02/01/2020 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 6.1.2 | Black soldier fly larvae |
| High waste-to-biomass conversion and efficient Salmonella spp. reduction using black soldier fly for waste recycling | |
| The recycling of organic waste worldwide is not effective, which leads to water pollution and loss of potential crop fertilizers. Available resources have to be used more efficiently as the world population increases. An innovative solution is to use insects for the management of organic waste. Here, we used black soldier fly to convert organic waste into animal feed protein, as fly larvae, and plant fertilizer, as compost residue. A continuous fly reactor was monitored for 9 weeks. We analyzed physicochemical and microbial parameters, and we evaluated the sanitary risk. Results show 55.1 % of material degradation and 11.8 % of biomass conversion based upon total solids. We observed higher levels of N and P in the treatment residue than in the inflow material. Results also show a lower concentration of Salmonella spp. and viruses. Compost treatment with black soldier fly is therefore an efficient system for nutrient recycling. | |
| 01/01/2015 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 6.1.3 | Black soldier fly larvae |
| Influence of Lactobacillus buchneri on soybean curd residue co-conversion by black soldier fly larvae (Hermetia illucens) for food and feedstock production | |
| Abstract Black soldier fly larvae (BSFL), Hermetia illucens (Diptera: Stratiomyidae) can reduce environmental pollution and convert organic wastes into biomass that is rich in protein and fat. The influence of the nutritional characteristics of organic waste on BSFL characteristics relevant for food and feed safety remains poorly understood. To evaluate the conversion of soybean curd residues (SCR) into high-quality animal-derived proteins and fats for human and livestock consumption, this study assessed the co-conversion efficacy, nutrient composition, safety, and anti-nutritional factor concentrations in BSFL after the development on SCR with Lactobacillus buchneri (L3-9) . SCR was pretreated with L. buchneri (10 8 cfu/ml), and then BSFL was employed for conversion. BSFL fed with SCR and L. buchneri had a significantly higher dry mass reduction (55.7 ± 0.9%), bioconversion rate (6.9 ± 0.3%), crude protein content (55.3 ± 0.6%), and fat content (30.0 ± 0.6%) than SCR (49.0 ± 0.7%, 5.0 ± 0.3%, 52.8 ± 0.3%, and 26.1 ± 0.8%, respectively) and artificial feed (43.9 ± 0.8%, 3.9 ± 0.1%, 50.3 ± 0.4%, and 24.3 ± 0.4%, respectively). However, the feed conversion ratio (8.0 ± 0.3), of BSFL fed with SCR and L. buchneri was lower than that of the BSFL fed with SCR (9.8 ± 0.1) and artificial feed (11.1 ± 0.5). In addition, BSFL had satisfactory concentrations of all essential amino acids and fatty acids required for human consumption as recommended by WHO/FAO/UNU. The heavy metals and anti-nutritional factor concentrations were within the safety intake levels for food and feedstock. Therefore, the addition of L. buchneri with BSFL on SCR did not only increase co-conversion performance but also enhanced the nutritional value of BSFL. | |
| 03/01/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 6.1.4 | Black soldier fly larvae |
| Reproductive Potential and Nutritional Composition of Hermetia illucens (Diptera: Stratiomyidae) Prepupae Reared on Different Organic Wastes | |
| Hermetia illucens L. (the black soldier fly) has received increased attention because of its great potential in converting organic waste into a renewable resource. The prepupae have high proportions of proteins and fats and can serve as feedstuff for livestock and as feedstock for biodiesel production. With the goal to upgrade the conversion of low-value organic wastes into high-value proteins and fat on a large scale, the effects of the feedstuffs food waste, pig manure, chicken manure, and cow dung on the reproductive potential and nutrient composition of H. illucens were evaluated. The intrinsic rate of increase of H. illucens fed food waste (0.1249 d-1) was significantly greater than the rate of those fed pig manure (0.1167 d-1), chicken manure (0.1154 d-1), and cow dung (0.1049 d-1). The ash content of H. illucens fed food waste (30.8 g.kg-1 lyophilized prepupa matter (LPM)) was significantly lower than that of those fed chicken manure (37.6 g.kg-1 LPM) and cow dung (49.5 g.kg-1 LPM). The contents of crude fat, 372.4 g.kg-1 LPM, and protein, 436.9 g.kg-1 LPM, in prepupae fed food waste were the highest among the four treatments. The reproductive performance and prepupal nutrient composition indicated that food waste was the most suitable feed for H. illucens. The results from this study further demonstrate that the prepupae of H. illucens have great potential for use as a protein and fat source in animal feeds and as biodiesel material. | |
| 11/26/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 6.1.5 | Black soldier fly larvae |
| Sequential Extraction and Characterisation of Lipids, Proteins, and Chitin from Black Soldier Fly ( Hermetia illucens ) Larvae, Prepupae, and Pupae | |
| Over the past years, several insect species have gained increased attention as feedstock for food, feed, and industrial applications. One such species is Hermetia illucens, whose larvae can convert low-value organic waste into valuable fat- and protein-rich biomass. Previous research on extracting their lipids, proteins, and chitin has repeatedly focused on one life stage, while in practice different life stages coexist in the same rearing batch. In this study, the feasibility of the sequential extraction of said components from the larval, prepupal, and pupal stage of H. illucens was investigated. Additionally, the chemical composition of the life stages and their extracts was analysed. Following the lipid extraction with petroleum ether, insect proteins were extracted via solubilisation at pH 11.0 and precipitation at pH 4.0. This procedure delivered protein recoveries ranging between 27 and 57% for the three life stages, with the extracts having high protein contents (85–98%). After protein extraction, the residual impure chitin was treated sequentially with HCl and NaOH for further purification. No residual amino acids were detected by UPLC analysis of the purified chitin, which showed acetylation degrees of ± 90%. Overall, it was concluded that the extraction procedure is indeed suitable for all investigated life stages of H. illucens, allowing for the extraction high-value biomolecules for use in industrial applications. | |
| 01/07/2020 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
6.2 composting technologies
Biological decomposition for the production of compost can be done by different composting techniques, such as vermicomposting and hyperthermophilic composting.
**Highlights:**
* The present study aimed to evaluate the behavior of materials such as sewage sludge and green waste during composting, their compatibility in mixtures and the quality of the end product. Also, the study highlighted the technical and operational characteristics of a composting system on a laboratory scale. The main advantage of this laboratory scale experiment is the reduced processing time and the fact that it can be fast adapted to different experimental conditions. The pilot scale experiment allowed to investigate the dynamics of main parameters during the composting process and provide the basis for an efficient design process. The elaborated composting process is a convenient, cost-effective and environmentally friendly process for biodegradable organic waste management, being also a feasible and controllable process. The obtained results show that all composting variants lead to the production of a quality compost that can be used in agriculture.[ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96379-2976627460)
* Here, we demonstrated for the first time that hyperthermophilic composting ( h TC) was able to mitigate nitrogen loss by 40.9% compared to c TC after 44 days of composting in a full-scale plant. Results demonstrate a decrease in NH 3 volatilization (52.4%), together with an inhibitory effect on protease (19.4–87.5%) and urease (9.1–75.2%) enzyme activities and the ammonification rate (5.2–80.1%) for h TC. Additionally, this study found that h TC could accelerate the humification process, thereby enhancing the formation of the recalcitrant nitrogen reservoir (mainly in the form of nitrogenous humic substances) and reducing the substrate for ammonification reactions. These findings suggest that h TC can significantly reduce nitrogen loss and provide insights into the role of humic substances in nitrogen retention in composting systems. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96379-2957144356)
| 6.2.1 | composting technologies |
|---|---|
| Adding worms during composting of organic waste with red mud and fly ash reduces CO2 emissions and increases plant available nutrient contents | |
| Abstract Alkaline industrial wastes such as red mud and fly ash are produced in large quantities. They may be recycled as bulking agent during composting and vermicomposting, converting organic waste into soil amendments or plant growth media. The aim of this study was to assess the microbial parameters, greenhouse gas emissions and nutrient availability during composting and vermicomposting of household waste with red mud and fly ash 15% (dry weight). CO 2 , CH 4 and N 2 O emissions were monitored during 6 months in controlled laboratory conditions and microbial biomass and phospholipid acids, N and P availability were analysed in the end-products. Higher CO 2 emissions were observed during vermicomposting compared to composting. These emissions were decreased by red mud addition, while fly ash had no effect. Nitrate (NO 3 -N) content of the end-products were more affected by worms than by alkaline materials, while higher ammonium (NH 4 -N) contents were recorded for composts than vermicomposts. Red mud vermicompost showed higher soluble P proportion than red mud compost, suggesting that worm presence can counterbalance P adsorption to the inorganic matrix. Final composts produced with red mud showed no harmful heavy metal concentrations. Adding worms during composting thus improved the product nutrient availability and did not increase metal toxicity. From a practical point of view, this study suggests that for carbon stabilisation and end-product quality, the addition of red mud during composting should be accompanied by worm addition to counterbalance negative effects on nutrient availability. | |
| 09/01/2018 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 6.2.2 | composting technologies |
| Aerobic composting of mixing sewage sludge with green waste from lawn grass | |
| Biological decomposition process is an important goal in terms of pollution reduction. By composting, the organic waste can be converted into compost and can be used for agricultural purposes, to improve the soil quality. The present study aimed to evaluate the behavior of materials such as sewage sludge and green waste during composting, their compatibility in mixtures and the quality of the end product. Also, the study highlighted the technical and operational characteristics of a composting system on a laboratory scale. The main advantage of this laboratory scale experiment is the reduced processing time and the fact that it can be fast adapted to different experimental conditions. The pilot scale experiment allowed to investigate the dynamics of main parameters during the composting process and provide the basis for an efficient design process. The elaborated composting process is a convenient, cost-effective and environmentally friendly process for biodegradable organic waste management, being also a feasible and controllable process. The best intervals for physico-chemical parameter values that were obtained at the end of the composting process are: pH in the range of 8.2 8.6; moisture content in the range of 59.9 % 65.8 %; organic matter in the range of 81.9 % 91.6 %; the C/N ratio in the range of 17.5 18.7. The obtained results show that all composting variants lead to the production of a quality compost that can be used in agriculture. | |
| 08/01/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 6.2.3 | composting technologies |
| Hyperthermophilic Composting Accelerates the Removal of Antibiotic Resistance Genes and Mobile Genetic Elements in Sewage Sludge | |
| Composting is an efficient way to convert organic waste into fertilizers. However, waste materials often contain large amounts of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) and mobile genetic elements (MGEs) that can reduce the efficacy of antibiotic treatments when transmitted to humans. Because conventional composting often fails to remove these compounds, we evaluated if hyperthermophilic composting with elevated temperature is more efficient at removing ARGs and MGEs and explored the underlying mechanisms of ARG removal of the two composting methods. We found that hyperthermophilic composting removed ARGs and MGEs more efficiently than conventional composting (89% and 49%, respectively). Furthermore, the half-lives of ARGs and MGEs were lower in hyperthermophilic compositing compared to conventional composting (67% and 58%, respectively). More-efficient removal of ARGs and MGEs was associated with a higher reduction in bacterial abundance and diversity of potential ARG hosts. Partial least-squares path modeli... | |
| 01/02/2018 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 6.2.4 | composting technologies |
| Hyperthermophilic composting reduces nitrogen loss via inhibiting ammonifiers and enhancing nitrogenous humic substance formation | |
| Abstract Composting is an efficient and economic approach used to convert organic waste into organic fertilizers. However, the substantial nitrogen loss during the composting process is one of the major disadvantages of conventional thermophilic composting ( c TC). Here, we demonstrated for the first time that hyperthermophilic composting ( h TC) was able to mitigate nitrogen loss by 40.9% compared to c TC after 44 days of composting in a full-scale plant. Results demonstrate a decrease in NH 3 volatilization (52.4%), together with an inhibitory effect on protease (19.4–87.5%) and urease (9.1–75.2%) enzyme activities and the ammonification rate (5.2–80.1%) for h TC. Additionally, this study found that h TC could accelerate the humification process, thereby enhancing the formation of the recalcitrant nitrogen reservoir (mainly in the form of nitrogenous humic substances) and reducing the substrate for ammonification reactions. These findings suggest that h TC can significantly reduce nitrogen loss and provide insights into the role of humic substances in nitrogen retention in composting systems. | |
| 07/01/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 6.2.5 | composting technologies |
| Vermicomposting in Turkey: Challenges and opportunities in future | |
| Turkey has been undergoing positive agricultural transformations since the 2011. Turkey agricultural sector today is developing with new techniques and products. One of the best examples of this; is the production of vermicompost and its use in agriculture. Turkey is in Asian and European continents (Eurasia) with the population approximately 81 million. Turkey has 24 million hectares of agriculture land (excluding pastures+ meadows, including total arable land and under permanent crops). There is little data available on vermicompost production in Turkey. The production of vermicompost started after 2011. The average solid vermicompost production in the 2017 was about 20000 tonnes produced by 15 plants with official production permit by the Republic of Turkey Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. Apart from this information, it is estimated that there are approximately 4200 unauthorized vermicompost producers in Turkey. The production of liquid vermicompost in Turkey is limited. A few producers also produce worm-tea in the country. On the other hand, livestock activities also increase day by day and a lot of waste comes out. It can be said that the most rational method for evaluation of waste is to produce vermicompost. Vermicomposting is an environment friendly process used to convert organic waste into valuable agricultural product. The interest in the vermicompost is increasing day by day in the whole country. As far as the vermicompost production is concerned, Turkey has a new specific legislation and published by the official newspaper no 30341 dated 23 rd February 2018. There are two big legally authorized associations in the country today. The number of academicians engaged in academic studies a vermicompost is limited and interest in the vermicomposting is increasing. One of the biggest companies producing solid-liquid vermicompost and all related machines is operating in Tekirdag province and this company has the largest production capacity of Turkey. The company operates by consulting with academicians who are experts in vermicomposting. The results of academic studies on vermicompost showed that there are many positive effects on soil quality and plant growth. However, many other benefits of vermicompost on soil-plant systems are not yet fully understood. The use of vermicompost is important for the sustainability of agriculture. The main aim of the paper is to demonstrate and share reasonable causes for the increased interest in vermicompost and earthworms. For the vermicompost sector by 2023 Turkey aims to be among the top three overall producers globally. | |
| 12/24/2018 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 6.2.6 | composting technologies |
| Vermiculture bioreactor system and method of use | |
|
1. A gravity fed vermiculture bioreactor system for converting raw organic waste matter into a stable biofertilizer utilizing thermophilic composting and vermicomposting, the bioreactor comprising: a decomposing chamber for containing the organic waste matter during thermophilic composting and lignin degradation, the decomposing chamber having a sloped base and a door configured to direct thermophilically composted organic waste matter to a removable vermicomposting chamber below the decomposing chamber when the door is in an opened position; a plurality of sensors for monitoring an environmental condition of the organic waste matter in the decomposition chamber and the vermicomposting chamber; and a temperature control system comprising a closed ducting arrangement, a valve, and a pump for refrigerant-type cooling of at least one of the decomposing chamber and the vermicomposting chamber based on the environmental condition, wherein the temperature control system transmits data about the environmental condition remotely for data storage; wherein the vermicomposting chamber is configured to receive the thermophilically composted organic waste matter from the decomposing chamber and is further configured to contain the thermophilically composted organic waste matter during vermicomposting thereof. 2. The bioreactor system of claim 1 , further comprising a forced-air system coupled to the decomposing chamber for directing air into the decomposing chamber and maintaining the contained organic waste matter within a thermophilic temperature range. 3. The bioreactor system of claim 2 , further comprising: a computer-implemented system comprising: a digital processing device comprising: at least one processor; an operating system configured to perform executable instructions; a memory; and a computer program including instructions executable by the digital processing device configured to interface with and control the bioreactor, bioreactor sub-components and the sensors, and communicate with remote monitoring facilities or cloud computing and storage. 4. The bioreactor system of claim 3 , wherein the slope base is configured to promote gravity transfer of the thermophilically composted organic waste matter from the decomposing chamber to the vermicomposting chamber. 5. The bioreactor system of claim 1 , further comprising a locking mechanism capable of opening and then closing the door. 6. The bioreactor system of claim 1 , wherein the vermicomposting chamber is configured to hold a plurality of annelids for consuming the thermophilically composted organic waste matter received from the decomposing chamber. 7. The bioreactor system of claim 6 , wherein the vermicomposting chamber comprises a porous base. 8. The bioreactor system of claim 7 , wherein the vermicomposting chamber further comprises a cutting bar configured to periodically traverse the length of the chamber, near the bottom, to encourage the processed biofertilizer to fall through the porous bottom surface. 9. The bioreactor system of claim 1 , wherein the bioreactor is portable. 10. The bioreactor system of claim 3 , further comprising injectors in the decomposing chamber connected to a second pump and valving configured to add water to the decomposing organic waste matter to maintain a moisture throughout the composting process. 11. The bioreactor system of any one of claim 10 , further comprising a plurality of inoculating pumps and valving configured to inoculate both the decomposing chamber and the vermicomposting chamber with a plurality of microbial inoculum, hormones and nutrients. 12. The bioreactor system of claim 11 , wherein the plurality of microbial inoculumm of the decomposing chamber comprise lignin-degrading fungi and bacteria. 13. The bioreactor system of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of sensors comprise at least one of: a temperature sensor; a relative humidity sensor; a moisture sensor; a chemical sensor; an O2 sensor; a N2 sensor; a CO2 sensor; and a pH sensor; each configured to interface with a computer-implemented system. 14. The bioreactor system of claim 1 , wherein the decomposing chamber is configured to reach a thermophilic temperature greater than at least about 50° C. (122° F.) but less than about 76° C. (169° F.), for a minimum period of time necessary to substantially render any pathogens harmless to humans before further allowing the organic waste matter temperature to drop to an ambient temperature at a natural thermophilic rate. 15. The bioreactor system of claim 1 , wherein an ambient temperature of the organic waste matter in the vermicomposting chamber is between about 10° C. (50° F.) and about 29° C. (84° F.). 16. The bioreactor system of claim 1 , wherein the organic waste matter temperature is prevented from exceeding a maximum thermophilic temperature with the temperature control system. 17. The bioreactor system of claim 1 , wherein the temperature control system further comprises at least one of: a vented ducting arrangement for forced air infusion; a closed ducting arrangement for water cooling; an automated turning system to disrupt the organic waste matter; an infrared system; a closed ducting arrangement for water heating; an electric coiled system for heating; and a gas burner system for heating. 18. The bioreactor system of claim 1 , further comprising a master control system comprising: an artificial intelligence system comprising: an input variable server; a Fog Node; a SCADA interface to provide instantaneous automatic control; Cloud Servers; Graphical Displays; an ability to accommodate and provide Real Time Queries; or software systems providing Deep Learning, Artificial Intelligence programming. |
|
| 12/12/2018 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Patent | |
6.3 photocatalysis
**Photocatalysis** is a type of catalysis that results in the modification of the rate of a photoreaction - a chemical reaction that involves the absorption of light by one or more reacting species - by adding substances (catalysts) that participate in the chemical reaction without being consumed.[\[Source\]](https://www.nature.com/subjects/photocatalysis#:\~:text=Photocatalysis%20is%20a%20type%20of,chemical%20reaction%20without%20being%20consumed.)
**Highlights:**
* **This study explores a novel photocatalytic approach for the conversion of complex biomass into smaller molecular units for their utility in generation of biofuel precursors.** Following hydrothermal method, TiO 2 /Bi 2 WO 6 nanocomposite photocatalyst for different ratio of TiO 2 viz. 15% and 25% by weight have been synthesized. The efficiency of photodegradation of organic molecule is determined. Composite loaded with 25% TiO 2 found to represent maximum photocatalytic efficiency of 99.9%. Using this composite, solar energy is harvested to perform photocatalytic fragmentation of a biopolymer, namely starch, to derive smaller molecule precursors. The results demonstrate photocatalytic pretreatment of starch by nanocomposite of TiO 2 /Bi 2 WO 6 resulted in the formation of organic precursors that are common feedstock for the microbiota of anaerobic methanation and ethanol fermentation. We therefore conclude that photocatalytic pretreatment of biomass can be utilized for hydrolysis and partial acedogenesis of biomass in biofuel conversion processes. Such an approach represent environmentally benign way to convert biomass waste to biofuel.[ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96401-2802720600)
* As previously mentioned, an interesting valorization protocol to develop would be a photocatalytic approach. To accomplish such photocatalytic strategies, TiO~2~, Pt/CdS/TiO~2~ composite materials, TiO~2~/Ni(OH)~2~ clusters may be used depending on the target, samples, and reaction conditions. Photodegradation has been shown to be possible toward many environmental pollutants such as chlorofluorocarbons, CO~2~, and NO, but whether these photoactive composites could degrade the stable polymeric structure of lignin/protein/carbohydrates is yet to be seen and perhaps understood. \[...\] **This study provides proof of concept that band gap engineering of semiconductors can lead to the development of photoactive materials that may be used selectively for waste valorization. A photocatalytic approach will most importantly address one of the major drawbacks of industrial valorization which is on the relatively large amounts of energy needed for processing and purification of products.**[\[Paper\]](https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.9)
| 6.3.1 | photocatalysis |
|---|---|
| Rhodopseudomonas palustris-based conversion of organic acids to hydrogen using plasmonic nanoparticles and near-infrared light | |
| The simultaneous elimination of organic waste and the production of clean fuels will have an immense impact on both the society and the industrial manufacturing sector. The enhanced understanding of the interface between nanoparticles and photo-responsive bacteria will further advance the knowledge of their interactions with biological systems. Although literature shows the production of gases by photobacteria, herein, we demonstrated the integration of photonics, biology, and nanostructured plasmonic materials for hydrogen production with a lower greenhouse CO2 gas content at quantified light energy intensity and wavelength. Phototrophic purple non-sulfur bacteria were able to generate hydrogen as a byproduct of nitrogen fixation using the energy absorbed from visible and near-IR (NIR) light. This type of biological hydrogen production has suffered from low efficiency of converting light energy into hydrogen in part due to light sources that do not exploit the organisms' capacity for NIR absorption. We used NIR light sources and optically resonant gold–silica core–shell nanoparticles to increase the light utilization of the bacteria to convert waste organic acids such as acetic and maleic acids to hydrogen. The batch growth studies for the small cultures (40 mL) of Rhodopseudomonas palustris demonstrated >2.5-fold increase in hydrogen production when grown under an NIR source (167 ± 18 μmol H2) compared to that for a broad-band light source (60 ± 6 μmol H2) at equal light intensity (130 W m−2). The addition of the mPEG-coated optically resonant gold–silica core–shell nanoparticles in the solution further improved the hydrogen production from 167 ± 18 to 398 ± 108 μmol H2 at 130 W m−2. The average hydrogen production rate with the nanoparticles was 127 ± 35 μmol L−1 h−1 at 130 W m−2. | |
| 12/09/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 6.3.2 | photocatalysis |
| Synthesis, characterization and application of TiO 2 –Bi 2 WO 6 nanocomposite photocatalyst for pretreatment of starch biomass and generation of biofuel precursors | |
| Abstract This study explores a novel photocatalytic approach for the conversion of complex biomass into smaller molecular units for their utility in generation of biofuel precursors. Following hydrothermal method, TiO 2 /Bi 2 WO 6 nanocomposite photocatalyst for different ratio of TiO 2 viz. 15% and 25% by weight have been synthesized. The efficiency of photodegradation of organic molecule is determined. Composite loaded with 25% TiO 2 found to represent maximum photocatalytic efficiency of 99.9%. The structural and optical properties of the synthesized photocatalyst nanomaterial were characterized. A band gap of 2.7 eV was observed for 25% TiO 2 composition which displayed an excellent visible light photoactivity, examined by removal of Rhodamine B. We further observe a four-fold higher photocatalytic activity in this composite compared to pristine Bi 2 WO 6 . Using this composite, solar energy is harvested to perform photocatalytic fragmentation of a biopolymer, namely starch, to derive smaller molecule precursors. Colorimetric analysis of reducing sugars from the degraded biomass quantifies the monomarization of starch. The linear chain molecular fragments thus formed were further analyzed by Raman, FTIR and ESI-MS. The results demonstrate photocatalytic pretreatment of starch by nanocomposite of TiO 2 /Bi 2 WO 6 resulted in the formation of organic precursors that are common feedstock for the microbiota of anaerobic methanation and ethanol fermentation. We therefore conclude that photocatalytic pretreatment of biomass can be utilized for hydrolysis and partial acedogenesis of biomass in biofuel conversion processes. Such an approach represent environmentally benign way to convert biomass waste to biofuel. | |
| 04/01/2018 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
6.4 Continuous flow chemistry
Flow chemistry, continuous processing, or continuous flow chemistry, begins with two or more streams of different reactants pumped at specific flow rates into a single chamber, tube, or microreactor. A reaction takes place, and the stream containing the resultant compound is collected at the outlet.[\[Source\]](https://www.mt.com/my/en/home/applications/L1_AutoChem_Applications/continuous.html#:\~:text=Flow%20chemistry%2C%20continuous%20processing%2C%20or,is%20collected%20at%20the%20outlet.)
**Highlights:**
* One among such promising waste valorization strategies is the application of flow chemical technology to process waste to valuable products. A recent review of Ruiz et al. highlighted various **advantages of continuous flow processes particularly for biomass and/or food waste valorization which included reaction control, ease of scale‐up, efficient reaction cycles producing more yield, and no required catalyst separation.** Although flow chemistry has been known to be used in industries for other processing methodologies, it still remains to be used in biomass/waste valorization – a limitation caused by the large energy needed to degrade highly stable biopolymers and recalcitrant compounds (e.g., lignin). These requirements are not simple to satisfy and various techniques (e.g., microwave irradiation) need to be combined to satisfy the prerequisites for a successful transformation of waste. However, the main challenge for this combination is on the scale‐up itself. As conceptualized by Glasnov et al. microwave and flow chemistries may be coupled by attaching back‐pressure regulators to flow devices. **This approach can revolutionize industrial valorization since it will synthesize products fast (due to microwave heating) on one continuous run (flow process).** Although the approach presented is possible, the main challenge of temperature transfer from microwave to flow remains to be solved. A buildup of temperature gradient inside the instrument could lead to various instrument inefficiencies. [\[Paper\]](https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.9)
* Continuous flow chemical processes offer several advantages as compared to batch chemistries. These are particularly relevant in the case of heterogeneously catalyzed transformations of biomass-derived platform molecules into valuable chemicals and fuels. This work is aimed to provide an overview of key continuous flow processes developed to date dealing with a series of transformations of platform chemicals including alcohols, furanics, organic acids and polyols using a wide range of heterogeneous catalysts based on supported metals, solid acids and bifunctional (metal + acidic) materials.[\[Paper\]](https://www.mdpi.com/2078-1547/3/2/114)
6.5 Hydrocarbon Liquefaction
Biomass liquefaction in organic solvents is an alternative to hydrothermal liquefaction.
**Highlights:**
* In specific cases, (supercritical) hydrocarbon solvents have been demonstrated to possess similar physical properties (high density, low dielectric point and radical scavenger) to water and could be considered for the biomass depolymerization at milder critical temperature and pressure conditions. A large variety of supercritical solvents have been used, e.g. alcohols, ketones, hydrocarbons and CO~2~, with the objective of obtaining higher quality and yields of biocrude. Like water, alcohols and hydrocarbons such as ethanol, methanol or isopropanol and tetraline or decaline are considered as hydrogen donor solvents and have been used for research studies on biomass liquefaction. Further information on the effects of hydrogen donors for biomass upgrading is available elsewhere.
* **In the last decade, a small number of start-up companies have begun developing technologies using high boiling point solvents for the liquefaction of lignocellulose or waste to produce diesel**. Examples of these technologies are the BioCRACK process (BDI-Bioenergy international Gmbh), the KDV process (Alphakat Gmbh), the MECC process (Global Ecofuels Solutions), CTC process (RECENSO GmBH) and the READi process (Nexxoil Gmbh). [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96408-2976637787)
* Here, potato peel waste was subjected to direct acid liquefaction at 160 °C in 2-ethylhexanol and diethylene glycol using p-toluene sulfonic acid as catalyst.[ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96408-2599683166)
| 6.5.1 | Hydrocarbon Liquefaction |
|---|---|
| Direct and efficient liquefaction of potato peel into bio-oil | |
| The world has become dependent on petroleum as a feedstock for most products that we use in our daily lives. As an alternative, bio-refineries that transform biomass into biofuels and primary chemicals are emerging. Actually, many wastes are not fully recycled. For instance, potato peel is a cheap residue available from the potato industry. Up to now, potato peel has been used mostly for livestock feeding. Here, potato peel waste was subjected to direct acid liquefaction at 160 °C in 2-ethylhexanol and diethylene glycol using p-toluene sulfonic acid as catalyst. The product was characterized by infrared spectroscopy, chemical analysis, hydroxyl number and acid value. Results show that liquefaction was achieved in yields higher than 80%. The reactional profile shows two time zones, one comprising the process of liquefaction and one corresponding to the process of decomposition. Kinetics indicate that the liquefaction process occurs 1.9 times faster than the decomposition process. Overall, our findings show for the first time that, despite the water content, potato peel waste can be used to produce bio-oil. The products can be further used as fuels or refined chemicals such as levulinic acid, furfural, 5-hydroxyfurfural, dimethyl furfural and sugars in fermentation processes. | |
| 09/01/2017 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 6.5.2 | Hydrocarbon Liquefaction |
| Recent advances in liquefaction technologies for production of liquid hydrocarbon fuels from biomass and carbonaceous wastes | |
| Abstract The liquefaction of biomass and carbonaceous wastes using hydro-pyrolysis, hydrothermal liquefaction or liquefaction using water and hydrocarbon solvents are promising thermochemical methods for producing renewable fuels and chemicals. New combinations of unit operations and possibly novel reactors will likely be required to economically convert biomass feedstock into partially upgraded bio-crudes. While some techno-economic assessments show that biofuels from fast pyrolysis may be competitive with petroleum fuels in future, conventional pyrolysis produces a poor quality bio-crude and is only suitable for dry, homogenous feedstock such as woody biomass, agricultural waste (corn stoves, wheat stalk, and rice husk). It is desirable to produce high-quality bio-crudes and to be able to process high-moisture feedstock such as algae, organic waste (food residues), bio-solids and bio-sludge into transportation fuels using the liquefaction approaches. Increased awareness of the environmental damage from burning fossil fuels is driving national and international reduction targets for on CO2 emissions. Liquefaction technologies aimed at producing alternatives to fossil-based transportation fuels/hydrocarbons are likely to receive continued support in the future and the most promising ones could be developed to full commercial scale. This review provides a summary of the current state of development of these technologies and also some of the challenges faced to develop commercially viable transportation fuels via liquefaction routes. This review compares liquefaction routes and provides a summary of techno-economic analyses where data is available and discusses the challenges and opportunities associated with commercial scale-up. | |
| 11/01/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
Final Results
Published 07/13/2020
After the midway results meeting, 10 biogenic removal technologies have been reviewed and deepened. The results are organised based on the concept and presented per biogenic removal technologies comprising a description, findings, suppliers (if applicable), images, videos, useful links and a reference list. The technology requirements are measured and shown in the [requirements table](#requirements-table). By using the concept links below, you can quickly navigate to the concepts and their biogenic removal technologies descriptions.
Table of concepts:
| Technology | Ranking | Input (type of biomass, contaminants, prerequisites) | Output (products + waste) | Complexity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.1 Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) |
(
)
|
municipal waste streams [[Art. #ARTNUM]](#article-96378-2322376712) ; lignocellulosic biomass [[Art. #ARTNUM]](#article-96378-2029942596) ; food waste (FW) and paper wastes [[Art. #ARTNUM]](#article-96378-2936850710) ; coal and biomass [[Art. #ARTNUM]](#article-96378-2912208674) ; not affected by inhibiting or toxic substances [[Art. #ARTNUM]](#article-96378-2995148668) ; sewage sludge, algae, and municipal solid waste [[Art. #ARTNUM]](#article-96378-2795307901) ; water content of 96 wt.% [[Art. #ARTNUM]](#article-96378-2992799239) | carbon-rich material, carbon spheres or hydrochar [[Art. #ARTNUM]](#article-96378-2976201394); some gas, liquid with a lot of organic compounds: could be valorized | The challenges faced in attempts to improve the process have been identified as lack of valid kinetic and heat transfer models and insufficient data on continuous and large-scale reactors [[Art. #ARTNUM]](#article-96378-2904565408) |
| 1.2 Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) |
(
)
|
lignocellulosic biomass, algae, manure, glycerol, wastewater, organic waste, sewage sludge. Requires small particle sizes | Biocrude (lower oxygen content than conventional pyrolysis), post HTL wastewater. biocrudes can be hydrotreated | Same as carbonization, but higher temperatures. Mainly heat exchangers require high CAPEX (57%) |
| 1.3 Sub- and Supercritical hydrothermal gasification |
(
)
|
Municipal waste, manure, biomass, sewage sludge, (mixed) plastics, tires, petrochemical wastes, ; s [[Art. #ARTNUM]](#article-96336-2985535198) | Syngas, biochar and tar. Some light hydrocarbon gases, which sometimes need to be removed | More complex than other hydrothermal methods, because of higher temperatures and gaseous product clean up. Requires less purification than conventional gasification |
| 2.1 Pyrolysis |
(
)
|
flexible: both organic as inorganic wastes Usually best if single feedstock and dry | Oil: 40% Char: 30% Gas: 30% | Reactions are complex. Reactors fairly simple usually |
| 2.2 Fast/flash pyrolysis |
(
)
|
Similar to pyrolysis, Needs smaller particle sizes, moisture content is more critical | ~60-70% oil, 15% Char, 15% Gas, flash leads to more oil (75%)usually, but lower quality. Levoglucosan can be a recoverable product | additional unit operations for char and metal removal must be conducted [[Art. #ARTNUM]](#article-96416-2906857259) |
| 2.3 Hydropyrolysis |
(
)
|
Same as pyrolysis/fast pyrolysis | hydropyrolysis produces primarily aromatic hydrocarbons, but alkanes and naphthenes can also be produced under appropriate conditions [[Art. #ARTNUM]](#article-96404-2270848004), also metals and minerals can be recovered | Requires hydrogen (production), which can increase CAPEX and OPEX and adds to complexity. |
| 2.4 Gasification |
(
)
|
Waste+biomass. Needs to be dry (max 20% moisture), comminuted | 5% Liquid, 10% Char, 85% Gas | Requires gas conditioning, some reactors are quite complex. Reactions hapenning are very complex. |
| 3.1 Autogenerative high pressure digestion |
(
)
|
Sewage sludge, can tolerate low organic levels, wastewater ; no effect was observed on starch, more complex organic matter like (ligno-)cellulose are expected to work. [[Art. #ARTNUM]](#article-96631-2138790051); research is mainly with synthetic substrates. More NH4 leads to a higher CH4 content | Biogas (>90% methane is possible); sludge | Process becomes more complex to control than anaerobic digestion, however, gas clean up is done in situ, so unit operations are combined. |
| 4.1 Acidolysis/hydrolysis |
(
)
|
lignocellulosic biomass, municipal solid waste, usually with ionic liquids, or acids. food waste | Phenols, Fermentable sugars; (pure)lignin; fuels by further hydrotreatment/fermentation | Simple process, some use emerging technologies (microwave, ultrasound) and emerging solvents: ionic liquids (which require recycling) |
| 4.2 Biphasic systems |
(
)
|
lignocellulosic biomass, starch, often research phase with synthetic media, for organic/aqueous usually max 15% solids, for water/CO2 up to 40% | sugars, furans [[Art. #ARTNUM]](#article-97054-2989762761) [[Art. #ARTNUM]](#article-97054-3006418174) ; Levulinic acid [[Art. #ARTNUM]](#article-97054-2803552213); hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) | More complex reactor design |
1. Hydrothermal conversions
BackConversions done in an aqueous and thermal environment
1.1 Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC)
Also sometimes called wet torrefaction.
Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) (also referred to as "aqueous carbonization at elevated temperature and pressure") is a chemical process for the conversion of organic compounds to structured carbons. It can be used to make a wide variety of nanostructured carbons, simple production of brown coal substitute, synthesis gas, liquid petroleum precursors and humus from biomass with release of energy. Technically the process imitates, within a few hours, the brown coal formation process. [\[Wiki\]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrothermal_carbonization)
**Input:**
* Microalgae, combined with sewage sludge, or grown on pig manure, high ash content input. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96378-3011754594)
* Hydrothermal carbonization was investigated for conversion of the **organic residue from the SS-AD (Solid-state Anaerobic digestion)** of livestock waste to solid fuels.[ \[Art. #ARTNUM\] ; ](#article-96378-2802951745)[\[Art. #ARTNUM\] ; ](#article-96378-2767555249)[\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96378-2994834879)
* In this study, industrial biowastes, including lignocellulosic, non-lignocellulosic and ash-rich types, were selected for HTC experiment under different temperatures. Except for the fuel properties of hydrochar, the evolution in carbonaceous structures was analyzed and compared to that of coals with different ranks (i.e., lignite, bitumite and anthracite)[ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96378-2973215584)
* It is faster compared to the conventional treatments, and **it is not affected by inhibiting or toxic substances.** In this study, olive pomace is analyzed as raw material in HTC.[ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96378-2995148668)
* In particular, the **co-HTC of chlorinated plastic (e.g., PVC) and biomass** can enhance the dechlorination and inorganics removal from hydrochar.[ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96378-3003708970)
* Based on literature study, wet torrefaction could be an appropriate pre-treatment process for mixed MSW because it requires no initial drying and mixed organic-plastic MSW can be processed without initial sorting.[ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96378-2948902035)
* Once removed from the sea, some plastics cannot be recycled or reused. This debris has high calorific value which makes it suitable to use as fuel. For this reason, a mixture of plastic materials was subjected to hydrothermal carbonization using seawater as solvent.[ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96378-2969358874)
* the solid loading (ratio between dry biomass and water) of WT should be higher than 20 wt% to achieve an economic benefit.[\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96378-2179733799)
**Products: hydrochar, gas, liquid**
* Hydrochar is the main product of WT, it accounts for up to 88.3% of the mass and 89.1% of the energy in the raw biomass. The gaseous product contains mostly CO~2~ (90–95%, volume basis), which is produced during the decarboxylation process. The remaining gases (5–10%) are mainly CO, and trace amounts of H~2~ and CH~4~. The water soluble products are various, including sugars, organic acids, furans, furfurals, and phenolic compounds. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96378-2179733799)
* Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) has received much attention in recent years as a process to **convert wet organic waste into carbon-rich hydrochar**. The process also generates an aqueous phase that is still largely considered a burden. **The success of HTC is dependent on finding solutions for the aqueous phase. In the present study, we provide the first investigation of recirculation of the aqueous phase from HTC of poultry litter as a means to concentrate nutrients and its subsequent application to agriculture as a fertilizer.** [ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96378-2965652869)
* Depending on its chemical and physical characteristics, the hydro char can be used for a variety of purposes. **Possible applications of this material include: solid fuel; low cost adsorbent; heavy metal removal; organic pollutant removal and material for soil correction as it has stable carbon and other nutrients.** [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96378-3011754594)
* In this approach, corn residue is first pretreated in hydrothermal carbonization process to produce solid biocarbon. **Hydrothermal process water, a co-product of hydrothermal carbonization process underwent fast anaerobic digestion to produce biomethane and biofertilizer.** All anaerobic digestion digestate are nutrient enriched and useable as liquid fertilizer.[ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96378-2894592113)
* **some available options for appropriate treatment of aqueous products include recycling in consecutive runs, anaerobic fermentation for methane production or disposal via waste water treatment plants.** A good choice of aqueous product conversion can contribute to further improving the economy of the WT process.[\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96378-2179733799)
**Process:**
* Hydrothermal carbonization is an attractive thermochemical method for upgrading organic waste and biomass. Hydrothermal carbonization's improvement of the upgrading and dewatering of fuel mixed with sewage sludge and low rank coal as peat was evaluated at **temperatures ranging from 200 to 350 °C and at 60 min reaction time**. **The moisture content of mixed fuel (50:50 wt %) of sludge: peat was approximately 80.7%.** **Hydrothermal carbonization can improve sludge with a high moisture content as well as the mixed fuels increasing the latter's calorific value by reducing the hydrogen and oxygen contents of the solid products.** [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96378-2760148100)
* As with every emerging technology, hydrothermal carbonization is currently hardly a competitive stand alone process on the open market. **But if the process can be implemented in an existing infrastructure e.g. compost plant, sewage plant or other businesses which are confronted with large amounts of wet organic waste, HTC is already today a financially feasible process.** Altogether, HTC offers not only a new green and sustainable technology for the treatment of biowaste. It is a promising research and development field leading to new functional materials based on renewable resources. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96378-2806731263)
* Effects of operating conditions (process temperature and residence time) on both biocarbon and hydrothermal process water contents were studied. Four selected hydrothermal temperatures of 200 °C, 220 °C, 240 °C and 260 °C and their three corresponding residence times of 10 min, 20 min and 30 min were considered. Among these 12 hydrothermal processes, 240 °C for 30 min process produced hybrid bioenergy of 14.26 MJkg −1 of raw corn residue with an overall energy yield of 78.65%. Biocarbon produced at 240 °C for 30 min and 260 °C for 10–30 min were comparable to pulverized coal used in power plants, which contained high heating values of 23.01 MJkg −1 to 24.70 MJkg −1 . [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96378-2894592113)
**Techno-economic:**
* Co-Hydrothermal Carbonization (Co-HTC) is a thermochemical process, where coal and biomass were treated simultaneously in subcritical water, resulting in bulk-homogenous hydrochar that is carbon-rich and a hydrophobic solid fuel with combustion characteristics like coal. **In this study, technoeconomic analysis of Co-HTC was performed for a scaled-up Co-HTC plant that produces fuel for 110 MWe coal-fired power plant using Clarion coal #4a and miscanthus as starting feedstocks.** The breakeven selling price of Co-HTC hydrochar was $117 per ton for a 110 MWe. Sensitivity analysis indicates that this breakeven selling price could be as low as $106 per ton for a higher capacity plant. Besides plant size, the price of solid fuel is sensitive to the feedstock costs and hydrochar yield.[ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96378-2912208674)
* Our study for two- and four-reactor full-scale configurations displayed this, whereby larger material inputs (per unit of biowaste treated) do not translate into higher environmental impacts due small contribution of material to total impact. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96378-2529128655)
**Pilots and commercial:**
* **Ingelia:** The HTC process was carried out in a continuously operating HTC pilot plant with a daily capacity of 1200–2400 kg of biomass (on dry base, between 8 and 16 h operation time). The reactor shape is a vertical cylinder and wet biomass is fed to the reactor via a preheated tube to enter the reactor at reaction temperature (>200 °C) at the bottom. The carbon outlet is also at the bottom and gases can be released at the top of the reactor. For the data presented mainly garden pruning biomass was processed. A HTC pilot plant working in continuous mode has been designed which permits to convert wet biomass waste feedstocks into HTC carbons. Due to the optimized design the size of the plant can be small and work still in an economically viable fashion. Hence, the HTC plant could serve as a local biorefinery, involving short transport distances from and to the plant, producing a solid biofuel for heat or electricity generation. Plant nutrients washed out during the process such as potassium can be recovered and used for soil fertilization by irrigation with the process water. Phosphorous can be recovered in the ashes and returned to the crop land.[\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96378-2079634789)
* **Suncoal:** The process includes the feeding (1) and washing (2) systems to clean the feedstock before it enters the WT/HTC reactor (3), which is heated by hot compressed water produced from the heat pump (4). The hydrochar product is first mechanically (5) and then thermally (6) dried before storage in the silo (7) for further use. Aqueous product and repellent water from drying are collected, treated and recovered in the water treatment system (8). [\[Figure 1\]](#image-4390)
WT also produces three different products including a solid called hydrochar, a gas mixture and an aqueous solution. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96378-2179733799)
Suppliers
| 1.1.1 | Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) |
|---|---|
| A review of biochemical and thermochemical energy conversion routes of wastewater grown algal biomass | |
| Abstract Microalgae are recognized as a potential source of biomass for obtaining bioenergy. However, the lack of studies towards economic viability and environmental sustainability of the entire production chain limits its large-scale application. The use of wastewaters economizes natural resources used for algal biomass cultivation. However, desirable biomass characteristics for a good fuel may be impaired when wastewaters are used, namely low lipid content and high ash and protein contents. Thus, the choice of wastewaters with more favorable characteristics may be one way of obtaining a more balanced macromolecular composition of the algal biomass and therefore, a more suitable feedstock for the desired energetic route. The exploration of biorefinery concept and the use of wastewaters as culture medium are considered as the main strategic tools in the search of this viability. Considering the economics of overall process, direct utilization of wet biomass using hydrothermal liquefaction or hydrothermal carbonization and anaerobic digestion is recommended. Among the explored routes, anaerobic digestion is the most studied process. However, some main challenges remain as little explored, such as a low energy pretreatment and suitable and large-scale reactors for algal biomass digestion. On the other hand, thermochemical conversion routes offer better valorization of the algal biomass but have higher costs. A biorefinery combining anaerobic digestion, hydrothermal carbonization and hydrothermal liquefaction processes would provide the maximum possible output from the biomass depending on its characteristics. Therefore, the choice must be made in an integrated way, aiming at optimizing the quality of the final product to be obtained. Life cycle assessment studies are critical for scaling up of any algal biomass valorization technique for sustainability. Although there are limitations, suitable integrations of these processes would enable to make an economically feasible process which requires further study. | |
| 03/16/2020 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.1.2 | Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) |
| A Review of the Current Knowledge and Challenges of Hydrothermal Carbonization for Biomass Conversion | |
| Abstract Greenhouse gases emitted from the excessive use of fossil fuels are threatening the environment, and thus alternative resources like biomass are being considered as a replacement. Biomass with high moisture content is better treated by hydrothermal carbonization method than any other process to generate biofuel. Research on this method on a lab scale has progressed recently. However, due to the complex reaction mechanisms and operational barriers, more improvements are required to make it a commercial technology. This paper aims to review the development of hydrothermal carbonization with a focus on the practical aspects of the process. Many references have been reviewed critically to provide a well-structured source for improving this process. After providing information about the biomass structure and general knowledge of hydrothermal carbonization, the challenges faced in attempts to improve the process have been identified as lack of valid kinetic and heat transfer models and insufficient data on continuous and large-scale reactors. Useful and practical suggestions have been presented to tackle all these challenges. | |
| 12/01/2018 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.1.3 | Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) |
| A review of the hydrothermal carbonization of biomass waste for hydrochar formation: Process conditions, fundamentals, and physicochemical properties | |
| Abstract Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) is a thermochemical conversion technique which is attractive due to its ability to transform wet biomass into energy and chemicals without predrying. The solid product, known as hydrochar, has received attention because of its ability to prepare precursors of activated carbon in wastewater pollution remediation, soil remediation applications, solid fuels, and other carbonaceous materials. Besides the generally lignocellulose biomass used as sustainable feedstock, HTC has been applied to a wide range of derived waste, including sewage sludge, algae, and municipal solid waste to solve practical problems and generate desirable carbonaceous products. This review presented the critical hydrothermal parameters of HTC, including temperature, residence time, heating rate, reactant concentration, and aqueous quality. The chemical reaction mechanisms involved in the formation of hydrochar derived from single components and representative feedstock, lignocellulose, and sludge termed as N-free and N-rich biomass, were elucidated and summarized to better understand the hydrochar formation process. Specifically, hydrochar physicochemical characteristics such as surface chemistry and structure were investigated. Current knowledge gaps, and new perspectives with corresponding recommendations were provided to further exploit the great potential of the HTC technique and more practical applications for hydrochar in the future. | |
| 07/01/2018 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.1.4 | Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) |
| A review on hydrothermal carbonization of biomass and plastic wastes to energy products | |
| Abstract Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) as a promising thermochemical process can convert organic solid wastes (e.g., biomass, plastics) into valuable products (i.e., hydrochar) at relatively low temperatures (180–250 °C) and saturated pressures (2–10 MPa). Hydrothermal conversion generally occurs via dehydration, polymerization and finally carbonization reactions. The carbon materials derived from hydrochar have high potential in various applications such as solid fuel, supercapacitor, fuel cell, and sorbent. Although the energy densification of hydrochar was increased at higher temperatures, most of the benefit was achieved at modest temperatures. Chemical structures of hydrochars include crosslinks of aromatic polymer, surface porosity, organic functional groups and ultimate components. All of these characteristics can be changed significantly by HTC, influencing the reactivity and fuel properties of hydrochars. The reaction pathways including negative and positive effects during (co)-HTC of biomass and plastic wastes are thoroughly concluded. In particular, the co-HTC of chlorinated plastic (e.g., PVC) and biomass can enhance the dechlorination and inorganics removal from hydrochar. | |
| 03/01/2020 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.1.5 | Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) |
| A review on the current status of various hydrothermal technologies on biomass feedstock | |
| Hydrothermal processing, a thermochemical approach, is an excellent method of converting energy-rich biomass into useful products. This approach offers the advantage of handling biomass with relatively high moisture content by precluding an energy-intensive pretreatment step. Hydrothermal processing is of world-wide interest in view of depleting fossil-fuel reserves and increased environmental greenhouse gas emissions. There is potential to develop this novel technology at demonstration scale. This paper reviews the three hydrothermal technologies, namely hydrothermal liquefaction, gasification and carbonization, to provide insight into the likelihood of commercialization. The study discusses the role of different process parameters that have key impacts on the quality and yield of the desired products. This study also identifies the gaps in the literature including the need to establish a baseline to develop key process models and to perform a techno-economic assessment to get a better sense of the viability of the technology in future. | |
| 01/01/2018 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.1.6 | Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) |
| Biocarbon, biomethane and biofertilizer from corn residue: A hybrid thermo-chemical and biochemical approach | |
| Abstract In this research a hybrid thermochemical and biochemical approach is proposed to produce biocarbon, biomethane and biofertilizer from corn residue using the concept of resource recovery from biowaste. In this approach, corn residue is first pretreated in hydrothermal carbonization process to produce solid biocarbon. Hydrothermal process water, a co-product of hydrothermal carbonization process underwent fast anaerobic digestion to produce biomethane and biofertilizer. Effects of operating conditions (process temperature and residence time) on both biocarbon and hydrothermal process water contents were studied. Four selected hydrothermal temperatures of 200 °C, 220 °C, 240 °C and 260 °C and their three corresponding residence times of 10 min, 20 min and 30 min were considered. Among these 12 hydrothermal processes, 240 °C for 30 min process produced hybrid bioenergy of 14.26 MJkg −1 of raw corn residue with an overall energy yield of 78.65%. Biocarbon produced at 240 °C for 30 min and 260 °C for 10–30 min were comparable to pulverized coal used in power plants, which contained high heating values of 23.01 MJkg −1 to 24.70 MJkg −1 . All anaerobic digestion digestate are nutrient enriched and useable as liquid fertilizer. | |
| 12/01/2018 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.1.7 | Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) |
| Biomass Chars: Elaboration, Characterization and Applications | |
| This book contains the successful invited submissions [1–15] to a Special Issue of Energies onthe subject area of “Biomass Chars: Elaboration, Characterization, and Applications”. The invitededitors have decided to focus the Special Issue on the specific topic of biomass transformation and use.In fact, biomass can be converted to energy, biofuels, and bioproducts, via thermochemical conversionprocesses such as combustion, pyrolysis, and gasification. Combustion technology is most widelyapplied on an industrial scale. However, biomass gasification and pyrolysis processes are still in theresearch and development stage. The major products from these processes are syngas, bio-oil, andchar (called also biochar for agronomic applications). Among these products, biomass chars have beenreceiving increasing attention for different applications such as gasification, co-combustion, catalyst oradsorbent precursors, soil amendment, carbon fuel cells, and supercapacitors.This Special Issue provides an overview for biomass chars production methods (pyrolysis,hydrothermal carbonization, etc.), the characterization techniques (scanning electronic microscopy,X-ray fluorescence, nitrogen adsorption, Raman spectroscopy, nuclear magnetic resonancespectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, temperature programmed desorption, massspectrometry, etc.), their properties and their suitable recovery processes.Topics of interest for the call included, but were not limited to the production of biochar for: Biofuel production Soil amendment Carbon sequestration Heterogeneous catalysis Syngas production Pollutant adsorptionResponses to our call had the following statistics: Submissions (25); Publications (15); Rejections (10); Article types: research article (15).The authors’ geographical distribution (published papers) is: China (4) USA (2) Canada (2) | |
| 12/03/2017 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.1.8 | Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) |
| Combustion Behavior of Animal-Manure-Based Hydrochar and Pyrochar | |
| The sustainability of energy production can be increased by combusting waste-derived solid fuels, alone or as blends with coal. This paper investigated whether two thermochemical processes (hydrothermal carbonization and pyrolysis) can be used in sustainable manure management systems to convert surplus manure waste streams into renewable fuels. Hydrochars and pyrochars derived from swine manure and poultry litter at various process conditions were characterized. Their combustion behavior was studied by thermogravimetric analysis, individually and simulated as a blend with fossil coal. The hydrochars underwent two combustion stages, active and char combustion, while the pyrochars and four fossil coals showed only one stage. The substantial differences in characteristic combustion temperatures, kinetic parameters, and ash content between animal-manure-derived chars and coal suggest that fossil coals should not be replaced entirely with char, but used preferably as a blend. Simulation of blends with coal sho... | |
| 12/18/2018 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.1.9 | Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) |
| Conversion of organic residue from solid-state anaerobic digestion of livestock waste to produce the solid fuel through hydrothermal carbonization | |
| The solid-state anaerobic digestion (SS-AD) has promoted the development and application for biogas production from biomass which operate a high solid content feedstock, as higher than 15% of total solids. However, the digested byproduct of SS-AD can be used as a fertilizer or as solid fuel, but it has serious problems: high moisture content and poor dewaterability. The organic residue from SS-AD has to be improved to address these problems and to make it a useful alternative energy source. Hydrothermal carbonization was investigated for conversion of the organic residue from the SS-AD of livestock waste to solid fuels. The effects of hydrothermal carbonization were evaluated by varying the reaction temperatures within the range of 180-240℃. Hydrothermal carbonization increased the calorific value through the reduction of the hydrogen and oxygen contents of the solid fuel, in addition to its drying performance. Therefore, after the hydrothermal carbonization, the H/C and O/C atomic ratios decreased through the chemical conversion. Thermogravimatric analysis provided the changed combustion characteristics due to the improvement of the fuel properties. As a result, the hydrothermal carbonization process can be said to be an advantageous technology in terms of improving the properties of organic waste as a solid-recovered fuel product. | |
| 04/27/2018 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.1.10 | Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) |
| Decentralized biorefinery for lignocellulosic biomass: Integrating anaerobic digestion with thermochemical conversion | |
| Abstract Anaerobic digestion (AD) of lignocellulosic biomass i.e. Napier grass ( Pennisetum purpureum ), was investigated via a series of batch and bench-scale experiments. Two semi-continuous bench-scale horizontal bioreactors were operated in parallel for nearly 300 days, and the reactors were able to handle the organic loading rate (OLR) up to 6 kg volatile solids (VS)/m 3 -d, which was among the highest OLR reported in the literature for lignocellulosic biomass. Hemicellulose was the main structural carbohydrate of lignocellulosic biomass per unit respective mass (dry weight) basis contributing to methane production. The cellulose- and lignin-rich digestate was further examined for its bioenergy potential via torrefaction and hydrothermal carbonization, and was found to have higher mass and energy yield compared with those of raw Napier grass. The produced solid char has energy content similar to bituminous coal with low ash content. Thus, this study provided a successful integration of anaerobic digestion with thermochemical conversion representing a biorefinery concept for lignocellulosic feedstocks. | |
| 02/01/2018 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.1.11 | Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) |
| Downstream augmentation of hydrothermal carbonization with anaerobic digestion for integrated biogas and hydrochar production from the organic fraction of municipal solid waste: A circular economy concept | |
| Abstract Developing a treatment technology which minimizes the production of by-product (waste) is need of an hour. In this study, municipal yard waste (primary raw material) was microwave-pretreated before anaerobic digestion (AD) to improve biogas production. The anaerobically digested, Pretreated Yard Waste (PTY) and the Untreated Yard Waste (UTY) (waste/secondary raw material) was Hydrothermally Carbonized as a downstream treatment technique to produce energy rich hydrochar. The Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) was conducted at a temperature of 180 °C and 200 °C for 6 h to produce carbon-rich hydrochar. Physicochemical, structural and combustion properties of PTY and UTY hydrochar were characterized and compared using a range of techniques to gain detailed insight into individual hydrochar samples. Microwave pretreatment of yard waste enhanced the biogas production from 264 ± 11 mL/g VS to 370 ± 14 mL/g VS. The carbon content and higher heating value of digestate increased considerably from 44 and 44.35% to 53–56% and15–16 MJ/kg to 21–23 MJ/kg, respectively after HTC. Thermal gravimetric analysis of the prepared hydrochar showed that the high-temperature carbonization increased the combustion properties of hydrochar. The hydrochar prepared from PTY showed enhanced physicochemical, structural and combustion properties as compared to hydrochar prepared from UTY. The finding asserted that the pretreatment of yard waste before AD not only improved biogas production but also improved yield with better quality hydrochar when its resulting digestate was hydrothermally carbonized. AD of yard waste yields biogas and HTC of the resulting digestate yields hydrochar; both are biofuel, hence, augmenting HTC as a downstream treatment process along with AD would result in the creation of near-zero loss process. | |
| 03/01/2020 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.1.12 | Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) |
| Effect of hydrothermal carbonization as pretreatment on energy recovery from food and paper wastes | |
| Abstract In this study, food waste (FW) and paper wastes were subjected to hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) with a purpose to improve energy recovery potential. FW is suggested as the suitable feedstock for production of hydrochar (HC) having highest calorific value (29.6 MJ/kg). Carbon content in FW derived HC was increased from 50% to ∼72% whereas energy retention efficiency was found to be 5.74 times of that in FW. Wastewater recovered after HTC of FW was rich in carbohydrates with chemical oxygen demand of ∼56,000 mg/L which may further be subjected to anaerobic treatment for biogas generation. Energy balance calculations showed that the solid and liquid fractions recovered after HTC of FW yielded highest energy output (2950 kJ/kg FW) compared to incineration (2217 kJ/kg FW), anaerobic digestion (2605 kJ/kg) and in-vessel composting. HTC process can be adopted as decentralized facility by institutions where highly moisturized wastes are generated. | |
| 08/01/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.1.13 | Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) |
| Environmental Performance of Hydrothermal Carbonization of Four Wet Biomass Waste Streams at Industry-Relevant Scales | |
| Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) of green waste, food waste, organic fraction of municipal solid waste (MSW), and digestate is assessed using life cycle assessment as a potential technology to treat biowaste. Water content of the biowaste and composition of the resulting hydrochar are important parameters influencing environmental performance. Hydrochar produced from green waste performs best and second best in respectively 2 and 10 out of 15 impact categories, including climate change, mainly due to low transportation needs of the biowaste and optimized pumping efficiency for the feedstock. By contrast, hydrochar produced from the organic fraction of MSW performs best in 6 impact categories, but has high potential impacts on human health and ecosystems caused by emissions of toxic elements through ash disposal. The greatest potential for environmental optimization for the HTC technology is in the use of heat and electricity with increasing plant size, but its overall environmental performance is largely ... | |
| 12/05/2016 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.1.14 | Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) |
| Experimental investigation on high-temperature hydrothermal carbonization of olive pomace in batch reactor | |
| Biomass hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) is the thermochemical conversion of cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin and lipids into organic, homogenized, carbon rich and energy dense solid fuel, called hydrochar. Process occurs under high – temperature and pressure conditions in the presence of subcritical water. The HTC process represents an effective alternative solution to the common treatments for wet biomass, i.e. composting and anaerobic digestion, over which HTC has several advantages. It is faster compared to the conventional treatments, and it is not affected by inhibiting or toxic substances. Moreover, the HTC process generates a solid product exploitable in different fields such as energy production, soil improvement or raw material for high added value applications. In this study, olive pomace is analyzed as raw material in HTC. A batch reactor (Vreactor: 5.0 L; Pdesign: 100 bar; Tdesign: 310 °C) was designed and constructed to investigate the HTC process in terms of mass yield, product composition and High Heating Value of the generated hydrochar. Experiments with temperature in the range of 260 °C to 305 °C (remaining in subcritical conditions) and reaction time from 60 to 180 minutes were carried out to investigate the mass yield of the produced hydrochar, the concentration of carbon in the produced solid and the High Heating Value (HHV). Depending on the test conditions, the obtained char showed a HHv up to 31.14 MJ/kg, with a definitive increase with respect to 22.4 MJ / kg of the initial olive pomace biomass. The effects of the HTC high temperature process on the olive mill waste water were also investigated in terms of residual Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD)5.Biomass hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) is the thermochemical conversion of cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin and lipids into organic, homogenized, carbon rich and energy dense solid fuel, called hydrochar. Process occurs under high – temperature and pressure conditions in the presence of subcritical water. The HTC process represents an effective alternative solution to the common treatments for wet biomass, i.e. composting and anaerobic digestion, over which HTC has several advantages. It is faster compared to the conventional treatments, and it is not affected by inhibiting or toxic substances. Moreover, the HTC process generates a solid product exploitable in different fields such as energy production, soil improvement or raw material for high added value applications. In this study, olive pomace is analyzed as raw material in HTC. A batch reactor (Vreactor: 5.0 L; Pdesign: 100 bar; Tdesign: 310 °C) was designed and constructed to investigate the HTC process in terms of mass yield, product composition ... | |
| 01/01/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.1.15 | Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) |
| Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) of marine plastic debris | |
| Abstract Once removed from the sea, some plastics cannot be recycled or reused. This debris has high calorific value which makes it suitable to use as fuel. For this reason, a mixture of plastic materials was subjected to hydrothermal carbonization using seawater as solvent. We could thus examine the characteristics of the final products obtained and test the feasibility of converting marine plastic debris into fuel. Results showed that raising the temperature of the process reduced the inorganic anions content and increased hydrochar NCV. In addition, thermobalance was used to look for differences in the thermal decomposition of the different solid residues, being hydrochar at 300 °C the most affected material. The content of inorganic compounds in the HTC-liquor increases as the process temperature rose. Amides, alcohols and alkanes were the main organic compounds found in all cases. Gases emissions also increased with temperature. | |
| 12/01/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.1.16 | Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) |
| Hydrothermal carbonization of agricultural residues: A case study of the farm residues -based biogas plants | |
| Abstract Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) of biomass is a promising method to produce carbonaceous materials. The work presented in this article addresses the application of hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) to produce a solid fuel named HTC-Biochar, whose characteristics are comparable to lignite coal. Biogas sludge (SD), maize silage (MS), and barley silage (BS) as a substrates were hydrothermally carbonized in a 1.5 L batch reactor at 200 °C for 6 h. The effect of mixing ratios of different substrates on HTC was investigated. Chemical compositions and combustion characteristics of hydro-chars obtained from mono- and co-carbonization were evaluated. Result showed that HTC increased carbon contents and higher heating values (HHV) by 1.4–14.4% and 13–36%, respectively. The evolution of the H/C and O/C atomic ratios indicated that dehydration and decarboxylation occurred during hydrothermal carbonization for all samples. Furthermore, a significant synergistic enhancement was observed for HHV and carbon content. A mixing ratio of 1:1 for BS and SD showed the best performance for co-HTC. In summary, hydrothermal co-carbonization is a promising strategy to tailor high-performance hydro-char for energy applications. | |
| 04/01/2018 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.1.17 | Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) |
| Hydrothermal carbonization of biomass | |
| The present invention relates to a process and a device for the hydrothermal carbonization of biomass, wherein biomass together with water and at least one catalyst is converted in a pressure vessel by temperature and/or pressure elevation into substances such as coal, oil and/or like substances of related type. In order to improve the hydrothermal carbonization of biomass, in particular with respect to the time period of the conversion process, and also with respect to the type and manner of the process procedure, the present invention proposes that, to a pressure vessel which is constructed essentially as a pipe having at least one controllable inlet orifice and at least one controllable outlet orifice, biomass, water and/or at least one catalyst is fed via the at least one controllable inlet orifice, the temperature and/or pressure conditions in the pressure vessel are controlled in such a manner that the charge material fed to the pressure vessel of biomass, water and catalyst is transported in the pipe, wherein biomass, water and catalyst react with one another and at least one reaction product of the charge material is taken off via the at least one controllable outlet orifice. | |
| 01/16/2008 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.1.18 | Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) |
| Hydrothermal Carbonization of Biomass: Design of a Bench- Scale Reactor for Evaluating the Heat of Reaction | |
| HydroThermal Carbonization (HTC) is a thermochemical process capable of converting wet biomass into a carbon-enriched solid, commonly referred to as hydrochar. Hydrochar finds application as bio-fuel, soil improver and for the production of carbon-advanced materials. In recent years, interest in HTC technology has grown significantly, in terms of both scientific research and industrial development. The HTC process consists of several reactions occurring both in series and in parallel: hydrolysis, dehydration, decarboxylation, condensation, aromatization, and others. Some reactions are known to be exothermic, while others are endothermic. Knowing the enthalpy of the “whole” HTC reaction would be beneficial in terms of both process design and energy calculations, in particular to evaluate the process heat duty. Unfortunately, such kind of information is barely available in the literature: some data have been obtained at the “micro-scale” using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), with the limits of using a few milligrams of (usually heterogeneous) biomass per trial, while punctual data at larger scale are actually missing. In order to fill this gap, we designed and constructed in-house a 2 L batch reactor equipped with four thermocouples - placed at different heights inside the reactor - and capable to withstand pressures up to 140 bar and temperatures up to 300 °C. The reactor, controlled in temperature, is heated by four electrical resistances (1 kW each) and thermally insulated. An electric power meter allows monitoring and recording the electrical consumption during HTC trials.Thermal trials were performed with the bench-scale reactor fed with only water to provide a baseline for calculations. HTC trials were then performed using biomasses, namely organic fraction of municipal solid waste and agave pulp. At the different HTC operating conditions investigated (residence time: 3 h; reactor filling degree: 67 %; temperatures: 180, 220, and 250 °C; dry biomass to water ratio: 0.10 and 0.15), our data testify that the “whole” HTC reaction is exothermic, and the heat released by the reaction increases with temperature. The design of such a reactor and the data obtained so far encourage an in-depth analysis of the enthalpy of the HTC reaction for different biomasses and at various operating conditions. | |
| 06/01/2018 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.1.19 | Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) |
| Hydrothermal carbonization of lignocellulosic biomass | |
| Abstract Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) is a novel thermochemical conversion process to convert lignocellulosic biomass into value-added products. HTC processes were studied using two different biomass feedstocks: corn stalk and Tamarix ramosissima . The treatment brought an increase of the higher heating values up to 29.2 and 28.4 MJ/kg for corn stalk and T. ramosissima , respectively, corresponding to an increase of 66.8% and 58.3% as compared to those for the raw materials. The resulting lignite-like solid products contained mainly lignin with a high degree of aromatization and a large amount of oxygen-containing groups. Liquid products extracted with ethyl acetate were analyzed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. The identified degradation products were phenolic compounds and furan derivatives, which may be desirable feedstocks for biodiesel and chemical production. Based on these results, HTC is considered to be a potential treatment in a lignocellulosic biomass refinery. | |
| 08/01/2012 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.1.20 | Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) |
| Hydrothermal carbonization of lignocellulosic biomass for carbon rich material preparation: A review | |
| Abstract Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) is an active area of research in synthesizing carbon-rich materials because of its ability to transform wet biomass into valuable products. Carbon-rich materials have received a great deal of attention because carbon is a raw material for several industrial products and their production from various biomasses is currently an active area of research. In addition, lignocellulosic biomass has been of great interest as precursors for the preparation of carbon-rich materials because of their low cost and due to environmental concerns. This review exhibits the research on the hydrothermal carbonization of lignocellulosic biomass, production of carbon-rich materials or carbon spheres or hydrochar by the HTC process and the role of water and the proposed mechanism in the HTC process. This research on hydrothermal carbonization mostly focused on lignocellulosic biomass materials and the effect of process parameters including the temperature, pressure residence time, pH, heating rate and substrate concentration are also discussed. The reaction mechanisms of hydrolysis, dehydration or decarboxylation and carbonization are elaborated in detail. Solid carbon-rich materials have a wide range of applications as environmental additives, biofuels, catalysts and energy storage and have been covered in detail. At the end of the review, we deliver an outlook on future research prospects and applications of hydrothermal carbon-rich materials. | |
| 11/01/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.1.21 | Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) |
| Hydrothermal Carbonization of Municipal Waste Streams | |
| Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) is a novel thermal conversion process that can be used to convert municipal waste streams into sterilized, value-added hydrochar. HTC has been mostly applied and studied on a limited number of feedstocks, ranging from pure substances to slightly more complex biomass such as wood, with an emphasis on nanostructure generation. There has been little work exploring the carbonization of complex waste streams or of utilizing HTC as a sustainable waste management technique. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the environmental implications associated with the carbonization of representative municipal waste streams (including gas and liquid products), to evaluate the physical, chemical, and thermal properties of the produced hydrochar, and to determine carbonization energetics associated with each waste stream. Results from batch carbonization experiments indicate 49–75% of the initially present carbon is retained within the char, while 20–37% and 2–11% of the carbon is ... | |
| 07/01/2011 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.1.22 | Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) |
| Hydrothermal carbonization of sewage sludge: A critical analysis of process severity, hydrochar properties and environmental implications | |
| Abstract Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) of sewage sludge reduces the waste volume and can be source of energy and valuable products. Furthermore, HTC offers several advantages over conventional dry-thermal pre-treatments, as no prior drying is requested, and the high quality of the char produced promotes applications as energy production and storage, wastewater remediation, and soil amendment. Relationships between char yields, physicochemical properties and process parameters are here analysed, with the aim to provide insight into the choice of the process severity required to fit the desired application. Moreover, presence and fate of heavy metals and organic contaminants are discussed. The highest reaction temperature is the main parameter affecting the physicochemical characteristics of the char produced, while the heating rate governs the heat mass transfer and the rate of intermediates formation. Depolymerization of the biomass results in a reduction of the oxygen to carbon ratio and, therefore, in augmented high heating values, further increased by deposition of 5-(hydroxymethyl)furfural. Recirculation of process water may enhance dehydration reactions and the deposition of degraded polymers, increasing dewaterability and yield, but field trials are recommended to assess the feasibility of this option. An overuse of chars for energy generation purposes would be deleterious for the environmental life cycle. Further research is encouraged to assess the pollutants abatement and their degradation pathways when incorporated in the carbonaceous product, to promote the application of hydrochars as soil amendment, as well as for environmental remediation purposes. | |
| 06/01/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.1.23 | Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) |
| Hydrothermal Carbonization of Waste Biomass: Process Design, Modeling, Energy Efficiency and Cost Analysis | |
| In this paper, a hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) process is designed and modeled on the basis of experimental data previously obtained for two representative organic waste materials: off-specification compost and grape marc. The process accounts for all the steps and equipment necessary to convert raw moist biomass into dry and pelletized hydrochar. By means of mass and thermal balances and based on common equations specific to the various equipment, thermal energy and power consumption were calculated at variable process conditions: HTC reactor temperature T: 180, 220, 250 °C; reaction time θ: 1, 3, 8 h. When operating the HTC plant with grape marc (65% moisture content) at optimized process conditions (T = 220 °C; θ = 1 h; dry biomass to water ratio = 0.19), thermal energy and power consumption were equal to 1170 kWh and 160 kWh per ton of hydrochar produced, respectively. Correspondingly, plant efficiency was 78%. In addition, the techno-economical aspects of the HTC process were analyzed in detail, considering both investment and production costs. The production cost of pelletized hydrochar and its break-even point were determined to be 157 €/ton and 200 €/ton, respectively. Such values make the use of hydrochar as a CO 2 neutral biofuel attractive. | |
| 02/13/2017 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.1.24 | Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) |
| Hydrothermal Carbonization: Modeling, Final Properties Design and Applications: A Review | |
| Active research on biomass hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) continues to demonstrate its advantages over other thermochemical processes, in particular the interesting benefits that are associated with carbonaceous solid products, called hydrochar (HC). The areas of applications of HC range from biofuel to doped porous material for adsorption, energy storage, and catalysis. At the same time, intensive research has been aimed at better elucidating the process mechanisms and kinetics, and how the experimental variables (temperature, time, biomass load, feedstock composition, as well as their interactions) affect the distribution between phases and their composition. This review provides an analysis of the state of the art on HTC, mainly with regard to the effect of variables on the process, the associated kinetics, and the characteristics of the solid phase (HC), as well as some of the more studied applications so far. The focus is on research made over the last five years on these topics. | |
| 01/16/2018 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.1.25 | Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) |
| Loop bioenergy production and carbon sequestration of polymeric waste by integrating biochemical and thermochemical conversion processes: A conceptual framework and recent advances | |
| Abstract Large volumes of polymeric waste, including natural biomass residues and synthetic waste, motivate the development of a general, robust and flexible process for mining the energy and resources contained in these wastes. By analyzing the positive and negative aspects of current, conventional technologies for the recovery of energy from polymeric waste, an integrated concept of a hybrid technology combining biochemical (anaerobic digestion, gas fermentation, carbon chain elongation) and thermochemical conversion processes (pyrolysis, gasification, hydrothermal carbonization) was proposed. The hybrid technology aims at simultaneously enhancing the efficiency and stability of biochemical conversion, controlling the gaseous and aqueous pollution from thermochemical conversion, and sequestering carbon. This paper presents a detailed review of state-of-the-art research relating to the principles, technical feasibility and practices involved in each technical link between the two conversion processes. | |
| 10/01/2017 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.1.26 | Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) |
| Method for the wet-chemical transformation of biomass by hydrothermal carbonization | |
| A method for converting biomass into higher-energy-density solids, in particular carbon, humus or peat, is described. In the method, organic substances from the biomass are suspended in water to form a suspension and at least a part of the suspension to be converted is heated to a reaction temperature and is converted into higher-energy-density solids by hydrothermal carbonization at elevated pressure. The conversion is carried out in a reaction volume which is located underneath the Earth's surface. Uniformity of the product quality and an increase in the economic efficiency of the process are achieved by the method. | |
| 12/11/2007 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.1.27 | Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) |
| Numerical Comparison of a Combined Hydrothermal Carbonization and Anaerobic Digestion System with Direct Combustion of Biomass for Power Production | |
| Two of the methods for converting biomass to fuel are hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) and anaerobic digestion (AD). This study is aimed at designing and analyzing two scenarios for bioenergy production from undervalued biomass (sawdust). In one of the scenarios (direct combustion or DC), raw biomass is burned in a combustor to provide the heat that is required by the Rankine cycle to generate electricity. In the other scenario (HTC-AD), the raw biomass first undergoes HTC treatment. While the solid product (hydrochar) is used to produce power by a Rankine cycle, the liquid by-product undergoes an AD process. This results in fuel gas production and it can be used in a Brayton cycle to generate more power. Energy and mass balance analysis of both scenarios were developed for each unit process by using Engineering Equation Solver (EES). The required data were obtained experimentally or from the literature. The performances of the proposed systems were evaluated, and a sensitivity analysis was presented to help in finding the best operational conditions. | |
| 01/01/2020 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.1.28 | Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) |
| Nutrient Behavior in Hydrothermal Carbonization Aqueous Phase Following Recirculation and Reuse | |
| Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) has received much attention in recent years as a process to convert wet organic waste into carbon-rich hydrochar. The process also generates an aqueous phase that is still largely considered a burden. The success of HTC is dependent on finding solutions for the aqueous phase. In the present study, we provide the first investigation of recirculation of the aqueous phase from HTC of poultry litter as a means to concentrate nutrients and its subsequent application to agriculture as a fertilizer. Aqueous-phase recirculation generally resulted in an increase in nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium concentrations up to cycle 3 with maximum concentrations reaching up to 5400, 397, and 23300 mg L–1 for N, P, and K, respectively. Recirculation did not adversely affect hydrochar composition or calorific value. The recirculated and nonrecirculated aqueous phases were able to support lettuce growth similar to a commercial fertilizer. Results from this study indicate that the combinatio... | |
| 09/03/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.1.29 | Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) |
| Optimization and characterization of hydrochar produced from microwave hydrothermal carbonization of fish waste | |
| Abstract Fish processing results in large amounts of solid and liquid wastes that are unsustainably dumped into oceans and landfills. Alternative sustainable technologies that completely utilize seafood wastes are needed. Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) that converts moisture-rich biomass into hydrochar is mostly employed for pure lignocellulosic biowaste. However, the suitability of HTC for pure non-lignocellulosic waste is unknown. Here, for the first time, a response surface design guided optimization of microwave hydrothermal carbonization (MHTC) process parameters, holding temperature (150–210 °C) and time (90–120 min), showed that a temperature of approximately 200 °C and a time of approximately 119 min yielded maximal hydrochar (∼34%). The atomic carbon and ash content, and calorific value of hydrochar were approximately 25–57%, 20–28%, and 19–24.5 MJ/kg respectively, depending on the MHTC operating conditions. Taken together, these results confirm that MHTC produces hydrochar from fish waste of quality comparable to one produced from certain lignocellulosic, sewage and municipal wastes. Therefore, this strategy presents an exciting alternative technology that can be used either independently or in combination with other valorization techniques to completely utilize fish wastes irrespective of their quality. | |
| 07/01/2017 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.1.30 | Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) |
| Structure-reactivity relationships of biowaste-derived hydrochar on subsequent pyrolysis and gasification performance | |
| Abstract Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) is emerged as a potential technology to convert wet biowastes into clean solid fuels with significant advantages, which means that the insight into the relationships between HTC pretreatment and subsequent thermochemical utilizations is of important. In this study, industrial biowastes, including lignocellulosic, non-lignocellulosic and ash-rich types, were selected for HTC experiment under different temperatures. Except for the fuel properties of hydrochar, the evolution in carbonaceous structures was analyzed and compared to that of coals with different ranks (i.e., lignite, bitumite and anthracite); furthermore, these changes were used to establish a correlation with the reactivity of pyrolysis and gasification processes. The results found HTC not only upgraded the fuel quality of feedstock but could also develop their aromatic structures, although each biowaste contained different components. Such improvement simulated the development of coals from low to high ranks because the carbonaceous structure in hydrochars was gradually changed to that of bitumite or even anthracite when HTC temperature increased from 120 °C to 300 °C. TG analysis demonstrated that both of the pyrolysis and gasification reactivity of hydrochar were in a generally negative correlation with HTC temperatures, but the extent and the specific relationship differentiated from each other due to the various components in biowaste. These findings are believed to contribute an essential part in bridging the gap from a theoretical potential energy source to the sustainable development of an alternative renewable fuel. | |
| 11/01/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.1.31 | Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) |
| Technical and financial feasibility of hydrothermal carbonization | |
| For many decades, Europe has enjoyed growth of wealth and wellbeing, based on intensive use of resources. Today, sources of energy, minerals and metals, as well as water, fertile soil, biomass, biodiversity and others are all under pressure, as is the stability of the climate system. While some people already worry about peak oil and the end of cheap energy, it seems that other resources like fertible soil and potable water are “peaking” even faster. In this document a new biomass conversion process called hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) is presented, which has the potential to convert organic waste into a hydrophobic solid of reduced mass and increased fuel value (hydrochar) to provide at least renewable energy and/or increase soil organic matter. As with every emerging technology, hydrothermal carbonization is currently hardly a competitive stand alone process on the open market. But if the process can be implemented in an existing infrastructure e.g. compost plant, sewage plant or other businesses which are confronted with large amounts of wet organic waste, HTC is already today a financially feasible process. Altogether, HTC offers not only a new green and sustainable technology for the treatment of biowaste. It is a promising research and development field leading to new functional materials based on renewable resources. | |
| 01/01/2013 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.1.32 | Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) |
| Techno-Economic Assessment of Co-Hydrothermal Carbonization of a Coal-Miscanthus Blend | |
| Co-Hydrothermal Carbonization (Co-HTC) is a thermochemical process, where coal and biomass were treated simultaneously in subcritical water, resulting in bulk-homogenous hydrochar that is carbon-rich and a hydrophobic solid fuel with combustion characteristics like coal. In this study, technoeconomic analysis of Co-HTC was performed for a scaled-up Co-HTC plant that produces fuel for 110 MWe coal-fired power plant using Clarion coal #4a and miscanthus as starting feedstocks. With precise mass and energy balance of the Co-HTC process, sizing of individual equipment was conducted based on various systems equations. Cost of electricity was calculated from estimated capital, manufacturing, and operating and maintenance costs. The breakeven selling price of Co-HTC hydrochar was $117 per ton for a 110 MWe. Sensitivity analysis indicates that this breakeven selling price could be as low as $106 per ton for a higher capacity plant. Besides plant size, the price of solid fuel is sensitive to the feedstock costs and hydrochar yield. | |
| 02/15/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.1.33 | Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) |
| The effect of temperature, residence time, and water-sludge ratio on hydrothermal carbonization of DAF dairy sludge | |
| Abstract Batch hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) experiments were carried out using dissolved air flotation (DAF) dairy sludge in order to investigate the effects of changing temperature, residence time and water-sludge ratio on the yield and quality of the products. The highest solid hydrochar (HC) yield of 84% (dry basis) and highest HC energy yield of 96%, were achieved at a temperature of 250°C, a residence time of 4h and a water content of 96 wt.%. The wt.% of carbon and corresponding energy yield of HC increased with process severity while the oxygen and volatile matter contents decreased. Similarly, HC ash content and ash elemental composition increased and the resulting solid became more stable and hydrophobic. The majority of the compounds detected in the liquid product were acids, with carbon chain ranging between C1 and C10. The total acid-phenol concentrations increased with the severity of the HTC operating conditions, but remained around 2500 ppm. The hydrocarbon content of the gaseous product was low and a high CO2 concentration was observed, while H2S concentration increased significantly with the increase in temperature, residence time and water content. A degradation mechanism for proteins and fats was developed and a full elemental mass balance was performed. | |
| 12/09/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.1.34 | Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) |
| The hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) plant as a decentral biorefinery for wet biomass | |
| Abstract The hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) is a very suitable process to transform wet biomass feedstocks into a peat-like material without drying the biomass input. Therefore, the energetic balance is more favorable than for alternative processes converting biomass as a whole. Further synergies can be achieved when the plant is employed as central hub for a regional biorefinery. Hence, a HTC pilot plant is operated with garden prunings and monitored during two years. It is shown that the elemental composition of HTC carbon is relatively constant. A carbon content of higher than 60% (based on dry, ash-free matter) is achieved. Fixed carbon content and volatile matter show low variation being the volatile content quite high with 61% on average. Dried in a post-process treatment which is less energy-demanding than drying of the raw biomass and pressed into pellets or briquettes the HTC carbon can be used as solid biofuel fulfilling the European standard (EN 14961-6). With a regional thermal valorization of the biofuel the ashes can be returned as phosphorous source to the crop land from which the biomass was harvested. Part of the process water, which involves a high amount of potassium, can be used for crop irrigation. In this way, valuable plant nutrients are recovered for soil remediation. Hence, closing the nutrient cycles a HTC plant can be considered as a sustainable local biorefinery producing a solid biofuel. Thereby, solar energy is exploited which was fixed before by photosynthesis together with the carbon dioxide which is liberated in the combustion of the solid biofuel. Optionally, the process water might serve as an alternative source of energy as it is demonstrated that its carbon content can be exploited for biogas production. | |
| 11/01/2015 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.1.35 | Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) |
| Upgrading biomass fuels via wet torrefaction: A review and comparison with dry torrefaction | |
| Biomass pretreatment is an essential step prior to several thermochemical conversion processes. Wet torrefaction, a biomass pretreatment method in hydrothermal media or hot compressed water at temperatures within 180–260°C, has been receiving a lot of attention because it possesses some advantages over other pretreatment methods. Apart from the undoubted benefits of upgrading biomass fuels to closer to coal properties, wet torrefaction has the capacity to work with wet or even extremely wet biomasses and enhance the ash removal from the biomass. The technology has recently attracted great interest from both academic groups and industrial companies. This review aims at providing a comprehensive overview of recent research and development activities in the field with focus on improvements in the chemical, physical and fuel properties of the solid product after wet torrefaction. Moreover, a brief introduction to dry torrefaction, a more conventional thermal pretreatment of biomass in the absence of oxygen under atmospheric pressure and in a temperature range of 200–300°C, is also given and compared with wet torrefaction. Main differences in the properties of the solid products from the two torrefaction methods are also discussed. | |
| 02/01/2016 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.1.36 | Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) |
| Upgrading the fuel properties of sludge and low rank coal mixed fuel through hydrothermal carbonization | |
| Hydrothermal carbonization is an attractive thermochemical method for upgrading organic waste and biomass. Hydrothermal carbonization's improvement of the upgrading and dewatering of fuel mixed with sewage sludge and low rank coal as peat was evaluated at temperatures ranging from 200 to 350 °C and at 60 min reaction time. The moisture content of mixed fuel (50:50 wt %) of sludge: peat was approximately 80.7%. Hydrothermal carbonization can improve sludge with a high moisture content as well as the mixed fuels increasing the latter's calorific value by reducing the hydrogen and oxygen contents of the solid products. Therefore, after the hydrothermal carbonization, the aromatic H/C and O/C ratios decreased due to of the chemical conversion. These results show that the hydrothermal carbonization process can be advantageous for improving the properties of mixed fuel to reusing and upgrading sludge and low rank coal. Upgraded fuel mixed with sewage sludge and peat is characteristically resistant to change in the carbon-functional groups, and their properties as determined via Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, are discussed herein. | |
| 12/01/2017 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.1.37 | Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) |
| Utilization of mixed organic-plastic municipal solid waste as renewable solid fuel employing wet torrefaction | |
| Abstract The largest obstacles in the utilization of municipal solid waste (MSW) as solid fuel in developing countries such as Indonesia are its high water content, irregular size and shape, and difficulty-to-sort due to the mix of plastic and organic waste. Based on literature study, wet torrefaction could be an appropriate pre-treatment process for mixed MSW because it requires no initial drying and mixed organic-plastic MSW can be processed without initial sorting. In this research, experiments were conducted to investigate the effect of wet torrefaction on increasing the fuel properties of mixed MSW. Based on field survey, the composition of the analyzed sample was: leaf litter (34.67%), food waste (23.33%), vegetable waste (14.33%), fruit waste (11.00%), and non-recycled plastic (16.67%). The experiments were conducted in a 2.5-L stirring reactor temperature variation (150, 175, 200 and 225 °C) with several holding times and solid loads. The result showed that wet torrefaction at a temperature of 200 °C with holding time of 30 min and solid load of 1:2.5 was the optimum condition, producing solid product with uniform physical shape, small particles and homogeneous particle size distribution, HHV of 33.01 MJ/kg and energy yield of 89%. The wet torrefaction process is not only suitable to convert the mixed MSW into renewable high energy density solid fuel, but it can also be used to produce separate organic product that can be used as solid fuel and plastic product that can be prepared for other treatments, such as pyrolysis to produce liquid fuel or recycling. | |
| 07/01/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.1.38 | Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) |
| Wet torrefaction of biomass for high quality solid fuel production: A review | |
| Abstract Wet torrefaction (WT) is a sustainable subcritical water pretreatment technology to upgrade moist biomass into hydrochar solid fuel with superior fuel properties with the avoidance of energy-intensive conventional thermal drying. In order to obtain a holistic understanding of WT processing system, this review has comprehensively discussed recent advances in WT of biomass to produce high quality solid fuel and its subsequent thermochemical applications. This review has not only summarized distinct advantages of WT over dry torrefaction of biomass with high moisture content but also clarified the similarities and differences between WT and hydrothermal carbonization. According to structures and chemical compositions of components therein, four representative categories of diverse biomass materials were selected to describe the influence of intrinsic nature of biomass on fuel quality of hydrochar derived from WT. Furthermore, this article has attempted to figure out the inherent relationship between WT conditions and fuel properties with respect to operating conditions (e.g. temperature, pressure, and residence time), biomass to water ratio, acids and additives, torrefaction atmosphere, and heating techniques. Three conventional thermochemical applications of wet-torrefied biomass have been extensively reviewed to reveal that WT could benefit energy recovery from wet biomass in terms of improved quality of ultimate energy carriers and obviously reduced pollutants emissions. Nevertheless, critical concerns associated with optimization of operating cost, minimization and controlling of pollutants emissions, re-design of industrially applicable reactor, and system integration with downstream applications have been pointed out in order to make WT technology more environmentally and commercially viable. | |
| 08/01/2018 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.1.39 | Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) |
| DEVICE FOR LOCATION-INDEPENDENT TREATMENT OF BIOMASS | |
|
A device for location-independent treatment of biomass, comprising a mobile container (1), which has a pressurized container for accommodating the biomass and which is enclosed by a plurality of wall elements (2-8), which are pivotable from a transportation position about at least one axis of rotation or are movable outward into at least one thrust direction and enclose an enlarged volume in relation to the transportation position in a setup position, which is achievable by pivoting or moving outward, wherein the pressurized container is a reaction container (14) for carrying out a hydrothermal carbonization reaction, wherein a pretreatment tank (15) for homogenizing and sanitizing the biomass, which is arranged in the same mobile container (1) or a separate, further mobile container (10), is associated with the reaction container (14), with a conveyor apparatus interconnected. The device according to Claim 1, **characterized in that** the wall elements (2-8) are embodied as multilayered in the transportation position, wherein a plurality of the wall layers (2-8) lying one on top of another in the transportation position are displaceable in relation to one another or are pivotable in relation to one another about an axis of rotation at the edge. The device according to any one of Claims 1 or 2, **characterized in that** apparatuses accommodated in the container (1) are enclosed by a housing part, which is displaceable from the transportation position into the setup position and forms a part of an outer wall of the mobile container (1) at least in the setup position. The device according to any one of the preceding claims, **characterized in that** first external supply and/or feedthrough fittings for steam and/or current and/or water are associated with the container (1), which are led through to corresponding second external supply and/or feedthrough fittings on another container wall, wherein supply and/or feedthrough lines required inside the mobile container (1) are tapped between the first and the second fittings. The device according to Claim 4, **characterized in that** the supply and/or feedthrough fittings are combined on a common fitting plate (13), wherein different connecting lines to be connected to this fitting plate (13) discharge into a common plug. The device according to any one of the preceding claims, **characterized in that** a shredder (19) and/or supply means (20) for supplying biomass in a raw state are associated with the pretreatment tank (15) in the same or an additional mobile container (1). The device according to any one of the preceding claims, **characterized in that** a cooling container (21) is associated with the pressurized container in the same or an additional mobile container (1). The device according to Claim 7, **characterized in that** the cooling container (21) has a cooling jacket through which media flow. The device according to any one of Claims 7 or 8, **characterized in that** a drying device is connected downstream from the cooling container (21). The device according to Claim 11, **characterized in that** the drying device is a heated or unheated chamber filter press (16). The device according to Claim 12, **characterized in that** it is a heated chamber filter press (16), which is heated using the coolant of the cooling container (21). The device according to any one of the preceding claims, **characterized in that** an air exhaust system for creating a partial vacuum in the mobile container (1) is associated with the mobile container (1). The device according to any one of the preceding claims, **characterized in that** a process water preparation unit (18) is arranged in the same or an additional mobile container (11). The device according to any one of the preceding claims, **characterized in that** a mobile steam generator is arranged in the same or an additional mobile container (1). |
|
| 03/02/2015 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Patent | |
| 1.1.40 | Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) |
| Method for conducting a hydrothermal carbonization reaction | |
|
1. A method for conducting a hydrothermal carbonization reaction comprising: (a) supplying biomass to a reaction tank; (b) creating reaction conditions with regard to pressure and temperature required for allowing a hydrothermal carbonization reaction to take place by introduction of steam and maintaining the reaction conditions for a reaction period; (c) forming a slurry during the reaction period from the steam and the biomass that are introduced; (d) monitoring the slurry with regard to progression of pH value of the slurry; and (e) terminating the hydrothermal carbonization reaction as soon as a determination is made that a maximum of the pH value has been reached. 2. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the progression of the slurry is determined continuously or at discrete time intervals, using at least one measurement probe assigned to the reaction tank, and noted in a database, wherein a process controller compares a current pH value with preceding measurement values from an identical measurement series within the reaction period, and triggers a termination signal when a decrease in pH value that follows an increase phase occurs. 3. The method according to claim 2 , wherein the at least one measurement probe is disposed close to a bottom of the reaction tank. 4. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the progression of the slurry is determined continuously or at discrete time intervals, using at least one measurement probe assigned to a bypass of the reaction tank, and the pH values are noted in a database, wherein a process controller compares a current pH value with preceding measurement values from an identical measurement series within the reaction period, and triggers a termination signal when a decrease in pH value that follows an increase phase occurs. 5. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the slurry is mixed in the reaction tank during the reaction period. 6. The method according to claim 1 , wherein measurement begins when the reaction conditions of hydrothermal carbonization, with regard to pressure and temperature, have been reached and biomass and steam have already been introduced into the reaction container. 7. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the hydrothermal carbonization reaction is terminated by bringing the slurry out of the reaction tank into a cooling tank via pumping or pressure equalization. |
|
| 05/16/2017 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Patent | |
| 1.1.41 | Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) |
| Method for obtaining stabilized lignin having a defined particle-size distribution from a lignin-containing liquid | |
|
A process for recovering carbonized lignin having a defined grain size distribution from a lignin-containing liquid is provided. The lignin-containing liquid is subjected to a hydrothermal carbonization to convert the lignin into a carbonized lignin and the carbonized lignin is separated from the liquid containing the carbonized lignin. The lignin-containing liquid is subjected to a hydrothermal carbonization at temperatures in the range from about 150° C. to about 280° C. and by adapting the H+ ion concentration in the lignin-containing liquid before and/or during the hydrothermal carbonization the grain size distribution of the carbonized lignin is adjusted.
1. A process for recovering carbonized lignin having a defined grain size distribution from a lignin-containing aqueous liquid, wherein the lignin- containing aqueous liquid is subjected to a hydrothermal carbonization to convert the lignin into a carbonized lignin, which proceeds autocatalytically, and the carbonized lignin is separated from the aqueous liquid containing the carbonized lignin, wherein: the lignin-containing aqueous liquid is subjected to a hydrothermal carbonization at temperatures in the range from about 150° C. to about 280° C.; and by adapting the H+ ion concentration in the lignin- containing aqueous liquid before and/or during the hydrothermal carbonization, the grain size distribution of the carbonized lignin is adjusted, wherein the H+ ion concentration in the lignin-containing aqueous liquid is reduced before and/or during the hydrothermal carbonization for reducing the grain size distribution of the carbonized lignin by increasing the pH value, and the H+ ion concentration in the lignin-containing aqueous liquid is increased before and/or during the hydrothermal carbonization for increasing the grain size distribution of the carbonized lignin by lowering the pH value. <br/>2. The process as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the lignin-containing aqueous liquid is subjected to the hydrothermal carbonization at temperatures in the range from 200° C. to 250° C. <br/>3. The process as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the lignin-containing aqueous liquid is subjected to the hydrothermal carbonization for the duration of not less than 1 hour and not more than 6 hours. <br/>4. The process as claimed in claim 1 , wherein: by adapting the H+ ion concentration in the lignin-containing aqueous liquid before and/or during the hydrothermal carbonization, the grain size distribution of the carbonized lignin is adjusted such that a colloidal carbonized lignin is formed; or by adapting the H+ ion concentration in the lignin-containing aqueous liquid before and/or during the hydrothermal carbonization the grain size distribution of the carbonized lignin is adjusted such that a fine sediment of carbonized lignin is formed; or by adapting the H+ ion concentration in the lignin-containing aqueous liquid before and/or during the hydrothermal carbonization, the grain size distribution of the carbonized lignin is adjusted such that a coarse sediment of carbonized lignin is formed. <br/>5. The process as claimed in claim 4 , wherein: for formation of colloidal carbonized lignin the H+ ion concentration is adapted such that the pH of the lignin-containing aqueous liquid before and during the hydrothermal carbonization does not fall below 10, for formation of a fine sediment of carbonized lignin, the H+ ion concentration is adapted such that the pH of the lignin-containing aqueous liquid before and during the hydrothermal carbonization is >7, or for formation of a coarse sediment of carbonized lignin, the H+ ion concentration is adapted such that the pH of the lignin- containing aqueous liquid before and during the hydrothermal carbonization is <9. <br/>6. The process as claimed in claim 5 , wherein: for formation of a fine sediment of carbonized lignin, the H+ ion concentration is adapted such that the pH of the lignin-containing aqueous liquid before the hydrothermal carbonization is >7 and during the hydrothermal carbonization is between 7 and 11, or for formation of a coarse sediment of carbonized lignin, the H+ ion concentration is adapted such that the pH of the lignin-containing aqueous liquid before the hydrothermal carbonization is <9, and during the hydrothermal carbonization is <8. <br/>7. The process as claimed in claim 6 , wherein for formation of a fine sediment of carbonized lignin, the H+ ion concentration is adapted such that the pH of the lignin-containing aqueous liquid before the hydrothermal carbonization is >8 and/or during the hydrothermal carbonization is between 8 and 10. <br/>8. The process as claimed in claim 5 , wherein for formation of a fine sediment of carbonized lignin, the H+ ion concentration is adapted such that the D90 of the fine sediment of carbonized lignin is <100 μm or <100 μm. <br/>9. The process as claimed in claim 8 , wherein for formation of a fine sediment of carbonized lignin, the H+ ion concentration is adapted such that the D90 of the fine sediment of carbonized lignin is ≤50 μm or <50 μm. <br/>10. The process as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the lignin before the hydrothermal carbonization is dissolved in the lignin-containing aqueous liquid to an extent of greater than 50%. <br/>11. The process as claimed in claim 10 , wherein the pH of the lignin- containing aqueous liquid before the hydrothermal carbonization is adjusted such that the lignin before the hydrothermal carbonization is dissolved in the lignin-containing liquid to an extent of greater than 50%. <br/>12. The process as claimed in claim 1 , wherein to increase the H+ ion concentration in the lignin-containing aqueous liquid, an acid which is a reaction participant during the hydrothermal carbonization is employed, or to reduce the H+ ion concentration in the lignin-containing aqueous liquid, a base which binds H+ ions is employed. <br/>13. The process as claimed in claim 1 , wherein CO2 is used for adapting the H+ ion concentration. <br/>14. The process as claimed in claim 1 , wherein H2 S is used for adapting the H+ ion concentration. <br/>15. The process as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the H+ ion concentration is increased by increasing the proportion of biomass, cellulose, hemicellulose and/or decomposition products thereof in the lignin-containing aqueous liquid before and/or during the hydrothermal carbonization. <br/>16. The process as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the grain size distribution of the carbonized lignin is measured continuously or at regular intervals and in the case of a deviation of the grain size distribution in excess of a defined tolerance an adaptation of the H+ ion concentration in the lignin- containing aqueous liquid is effected. <br/>17. The process as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the process is applied to: black liquor from an alkaline fractionation process: or a lignin-containing liquid recovered by dilution of a lignin-containing filtercake, by dilution of a filtercake containing a lignin precipitated from black liquor or by dilution of a filtercake containing the lignin-containing residue from a hydrolysis. <br/>18. The process as claimed in claim 1 , wherein: lignin is precipitated from a first lignin-containing liquid, the precipitated lignin is separated from the first lignin-containing liquid, the precipitated and separated lignin is suspended in a liquid to obtain a second lignin-containing liquid, and the second lignin-containing liquid is subjected to the hydrothermal carbonization. <br/>19. The process as claimed in claim 18 , wherein the precipitated and separated lignin is partly or fully dissolved in the liquid. <br/>20. The process as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the lignin is precipitated from the lignin-containing aqueous liquid upon conversion into carbonized lignin during the hydrothermal carbonization. <br/>21. The process as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the lignin precipitates or is precipitated from the lignin-containing aqueous liquid at least partly upon conversion into carbonized lignin during the hydrothermal carbonization. <br/>22. The process as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the carbonized lignin is separated from the liquid containing the carbonized lignin by a mechanical dewatering. <br/>23. The process as claimed in claim 1 , wherein lignin separated from the liquid containing carbonized lignin is washed. |
|
| 08/04/2015 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Patent | |
| 1.1.42 | Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) |
| Method for the hydrothermal carbonisation of a biomass and associated device | |
|
1. A process for heating a biomass moving along an industrial treatment line comprising an inlet ( **1** ) for the incoming biomass, a heating means ( **4** _b_ ) and a treatment station ( **5** ), the biomass moving along the industrial treatment line from the inlet ( **1** ) to the heating means ( **4** _b_ ) and, heated, into the treatment station ( **5** ), and out an outlet ( **51** ) of the treatment station ( **5** ), a fraction of the biomass heated by the heating means ( **4** _b_ ) being returned along a return branch (R) to a mixing station ( **2** ) upstream of the heating means ( **4** _b_ ) so as to form there, with the incoming biomass incoming into the inlet ( **1** ), a mixture having a temperature above the temperature of the incoming biomass incoming into the inlet ( **1** ), the heated biomass fraction being removed at the outlet ( **51** ) of the treatment station ( **5** ), wherein heat is recovered from the biomass downstream of the treatment station ( **5** ), wherein this recovered heat is transferred to the biomass upstream of the treatment station ( **5** ) by a heat recovery device ( **4** _a_ ) between the biomass leaving the treatment station ( **5** ) and the biomass circulating in the line upstream of the treatment station ( **5** ). 2. The process as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the biomass is a purification sludge and is being treated by hydrothermal carbonization. 3. The process as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the heating means ( **4** _b_ ) is controlled so that the temperature of the biomass reaches a parameterized temperature before it reaches the treatment station ( **5** ), the parameterized temperature being between 165° C. and 205° C. 4. The process of claim 3 , wherein the parameterized temperature is 185° C. 5. The process as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the biomass mixture is pressurized between the mixing station ( **2** ) and the heating means ( **4** _b_ ), and wherein the pressure of the biomass fraction is reduced in the return branch (R). 6. The process as claimed in claim 5 , wherein the flow rate of the heated biomass fraction returned to the mixing station ( **2** ) is adjusted according to the amount of incoming biomass contained in the mixing station ( **2** ). 7. The process as claimed in claim 5 , wherein the pressure of the incoming biomass mixture upstream of the heating means ( **4** _b_ ) is raised to a value which makes it possible to heat the mixture to a temperature of greater than 100° C. without boiling. 8. The process as claimed in claim 7 , wherein the pressure at a pressurizing pump ( **3** , **3** _b_ ) outlet is greater than 3 MPa. 9. The process as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the incoming inlet biomass is pressurized upstream of the mixing station ( **2** ), and wherein the pressure of the heated biomass fraction is raised in the return branch (R). 10. The process as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the line also comprises a cooling station ( **6** ) downstream of the treatment station ( **5** ), and wherein a transfer fluid is heated in its path between the cooling station ( **6** ) and the heating means ( **4** _b_ ). 11. The process as claimed in claim 10 , wherein the transfer fluid is heated to a temperature above that of the biomass at the treatment station ( **5** ). 12. The process as claimed in claim 10 , wherein one and the same external heat source (T **3** ) is used to heat the transfer fluid and a heat-exchange fluid which ensures that the temperature of the biomass at the treatment station ( **5** ) is maintained. 13. The process as claimed in claim 1 , further comprising a step of injecting an additive into the biomass mixture upstream of the heating means ( **4** _b_ ). 14. The process as claimed in claim 1 , wherein a second fraction of the biomass is removed from the treatment station ( **5** ) by means of a recirculation branch (M) and this part is returned to the treatment station ( **5** ) so as to generate movement of the biomass in the treatment station ( **5** ). 15. The process as claimed in claim 14 , wherein the part of biomass is removed with a flow rate of between 5 and 15 times the flow rate of biomass entering the treatment station ( **5** ). 16. A device for implementing a process as claimed in claim 1 , further comprising an industrial treatment line comprising: an inlet ( **1** ) arranged so as to cause incoming biomass to enter the line, a pressurizing pump ( **3** ) arranged so as to move the biomass in the line, a heating means ( **4** _b_ ) capable of heating the biomass, a treatment station ( **5** ) capable of maintaining the biomass substantially at a temperature of entry into the treatment station ( **5** ), the treatment station ( **5** ) being installed downstream of the heating means ( **4** _b_ ), a heat recovery device that exchanges heat between biomass leaving the treatment station ( **5** ) and biomass circulating in the line upstream of the treatment station ( **5** ) and a return branch (R) capable of transferring a biomass fraction from an outlet ( **51** ) of the treatment station ( **5** ) to a mixing station ( **2** ). 17. The device as claimed in claim 16 , wherein the heat recovery device comprises: a transfer circuit (T) in which a transfer fluid circulates so as to heat the biomass in the heating means ( **4** _b_ ) by heat exchange between the transfer fluid and the biomass, and means of circulating (T **1** ) the transfer fluid, capable of circulating the transfer fluid in the transfer circuit (T). 18. The device as claimed in claim 17 , further comprising an external heat source (T **3** ) arranged so as to heat the transfer fluid and a heat- exchange fluid circulating in a jacket ( **52** ) of the treatment station ( **5** ). 19. The device as claimed in claim 16 , the device being arranged such that the biomass enters the treatment station ( **5** ) via a part ( **53** ) that is lower to the ground as compared to a part ( **54** ) from which the biomass leaves the treatment station ( **5** ). 20. The device as claimed in claim 16 , wherein the treatment station ( **5** ) comprises a partition (C **1** , C **2** ) arranged so as to convey a liquid biomass fraction to the return branch (R). |
|
| 10/29/2015 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Patent | |
| 1.1.43 | Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) |
| Method for the production of humus- and nutrient-rich and water-storing soils or soil substrates for sustainable land use and de | |
|
1. A method for producing stable humus and nutrient-rich and water-storing clay-soil substrates having properties of anthropogenic soil forms (Terra Preta), comprising the following steps:(a) mixing pulverized and/or sieved pyrogenic carbon with previously pulverized and homogenized easily decomposable organic biomass,(b) inoculating the mixture by admixing a starter culture made of microorganisms to perform an anaerobic fermentation in the form of a lactic acid fermentation and/or by admixing already produced soil substrates and/or by admixing a biomass which was subjected to the lactic acid fermentation,(c) incubation of the mixture under air exclusion to perform a lactic acid fermentation at a temperature between 30° C. and 40° C. and a pH value in the acid range, controlled soil drainage and degassing being provided during the fermentation process. 2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that the pyrogenic carbon is used in a quantity of at least 5% and the organic biomass is used in a quantity of at least 50%. 3. The method according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the ratio of pyrogenic carbon to organic biomass is 1:4. 4. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that the soil/soil substrate obtained after method step (c) is either packed and stored, or introduced or applied to a soil surface to be treated. 5. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that the method also comprises step (d), in which soil organisms are introduced either into the mixture after the fermentation in a fermenter facility, in special containers and facilities, or directly into the soil to be treated, so that soil organisms naturally present in the soil may cause the conversion and further processing of the soil substrate. 6. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that natural minerals, mineral soils, or other mineral soil substrates, are admixed, introduced, or applied to the mixture, the soil/soil substrate, or the surface to be treated. 7. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that the pyrogenic carbon is introduced in the form of charcoal, sieve residues of charcoal, black earth, wood ash, or other pyrogenic carbon structures, or mixtures thereof. 8. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that the pyrogenic carbon is obtained by pyrolysis or a hydrothermal carbonization process. 9. The method according to claim 8, characterized in that the exhaust heat of the pyrolysis process is conducted to the fermentation process. 10. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that the pyrogenic carbon is admixed with urine and/or urea solution and/or other solutions containing urea before or in step (a). 11. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that green plant residues, organic municipal wastes, organic waste from industry, trade, agriculture and forestry and gardening, biodegradable wastes, kitchen wastes, garden debris, human or animal feces, liquid manure, or fermentation residues from biogas facilities or other organic biomass is used as the easily decomposable organic biomass. 12. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that the fermentation process is performed in containers, silos, boxes, heaps, ground trenches, or in a fermenter facility. 13. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that the lactic acid fermentation is performed as surface fermentation, in which the starting materials, and optionally the admixed mineral soil, are sealed as airtight as possible in order to cause nearly anaerobic milieu conditions. 14. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that the lactic acid fermentation process is performed for a duration of approximately two to six weeks. 15. The method according to claim 5, wherein said soil organisms are selected from the group consisting of earthworms, compost worms, beetles, and mites. 16. The method according to claim 6, wherein (i) said natural mineral is selected from the group consisting of nitrogen, phosphorous, and potassium, (ii) said mineral soil is a fertilizer or limestone, and (iii) said mineral soil substrate is a clay substrate. 17. The method according to claim 13, wherein said starting material is pyrogenic carbon or organic biomass. |
|
| 08/10/2007 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Patent | |
| 1.1.44 | Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) |
| Process for the preparation of hydrothermal hybrid material from biomass, and hydrothermal hybrid material obtainable by the pro | |
|
1. A hydrothermal carbonization process for the preparation of carbonized hydrothermal hybrid material from biomass comprising the step of heating a reaction mixture comprising water, biomass and a copolymerizable compound under hydrothermal conditions to obtain a mixture comprising carbonized hydrothermal hybrid material, characterized in that the copolymerizable compound is added when preparing the reaction mixture. 2. The process of claim 1, wherein the carbonized hydrothermal hybrid material is carbonaceous hybrid material. 3. The process of claim 1, wherein the biomass is raw biomass. 4. The process of claim 1, wherein the copolymerizable compound comprises a binding moiety capable of reacting with the biomass or activated biomass, the activated biomass being products of the disintegration and/or dehydration of the biomass, so as to be incorporated in the structure of the carbonized hydrothermal hybrid material. 5. The process of claim 4, wherein the copolymerizable compound further comprises at least one functional moiety. 6. The process of claim 5, wherein the functional moiety is selected from the group consisting of carboxyl, anhydride, phosphonate, sulfonic acid, sulfonate, imide, cyano, hydroxyl, guanidino, heterocyclic groups, amido, C8-24 alkyl and C8-24 alkylene groups, mono- to pentaethyleneglycol groups, and aromatic groups. 7. The process of claim 4, wherein said binding moiety is selected from the group consisting of an amino group, a carbonyl group, a phenolic hydroxyl group, and a carbon-carbon double bond. 8. The process of claim 1, wherein the copolymerizable compound is a petrochemical compound. 9. The process of claim 8, further comprising the step of separating the carbonized hydrothermal hybrid material from the obtained mixture. 10. A hydrothermal hybrid material obtainable by the process of claim 9. 11. The process of claim 1, wherein the copolymerizable compound is selected from the group consisting of (meth)acrylic acid, maleic anhydride, maleic imide derivatives, acrylamidoalkyl sulfonic acid and salts thereof, vinylphosphonate, glycine, taurine, phenols, acrylonitrile, dicyanamide and salts thereof, histidine, arginine, cationic peptides, vinylimidazole, vinylpyridine, alkanolamine, dialkanolamine, unsaturated fatty acids and fats, C8-24 aldehydes, C8-24 ketones and C8-24 amines, H2N(C2H4O)xH, H(OH4C2)xNH(C2H4O)yH, wherein x and y are independently an integer of 1 to 5. 12. The process of claim 1, wherein the copolymerizable compound comprises a functional moiety, which is a surfactant residue. 13. A mixture obtainable by the process of claim 12, which is an aqueous dispersion of the hydrothermal hybrid material. 14. The process of claim 1, wherein the copolymerizable compound is selected from the group consisting of acrylonitrile, monoalkanol and dialkanol amines, and acrylamidoalkyl sulfonic acid and salts thereof. 15. The process of claim 14, wherein said monoalkanol and dialkanol amines are selected from monoethanolamine, diethanolamine, H2N(C2H4O)xH, and H(OH4C2)xNH(C2H4O)yH, wherein x and y are independently an integer of from 1 to 5. 16. The process of claim 14, wherein said acrylamidoalkyl sulfonic acid is selected from acrylamidopropyl sulfonic acid and salts thereof. 17. The process of claim 1, wherein said carbonized hydrothermal hybrid material is a coal-like hybrid material. 18. A hydrothermal carbonization process for the preparation of carbonized hydrothermal hybrid material from biomass comprising the following steps:(i) heating a reaction mixture comprising water and biomass to convert the biomass to activated biomass; and(ii) adding a polymerization initiator to the reaction mixture obtained in step (i) to copolymerize, under hydrothermal conditions, the activated biomass and a copolymerizable compound that is also present to obtain a mixture comprising carbonized hydrothermal hybrid material, wherein the copolymerizable compound is either included in the reaction mixture of step (i), and/or is included in step (ii). |
|
| 06/22/2009 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Patent | |
| 1.1.45 | Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) |
| Process of hydrothermal carbonization of biomass and installation for carrying out said process. | |
|
This invention relates to a process of hydrothermal carbonization of an aqueous mixture of biomass and catalyst, which comprises at least the following steps: (a) feeding said aqueous mixture of biomass and catalyst to a vertical reverse flow reactor through a riser tube wherein the monomerization of biomass is initiated resulting in a first reaction product; (b) polymerizing said first reaction product to give rise to a second reaction product; (c) accumulating and subsequent evacuating the gases and water vapor through the top of the reactor. It is a further object of the invention an installation for carrying out the process, as well as the product obtained by the process and its use.
Process of hydrothermal carbonization of an aqueous mixture of biomass and catalyst, which comprises at least the following steps: (a) feeding said aqueous mixture of biomass and catalyst to a vertical reverse flow reactor through a riser tube wherein the monomerization of biomass is initiated resulting in a first reaction product; (b) polymerizing said first reaction product to give rise to a second reaction product; (c) accumulating and subsequent evacuating the gases and water vapor through the top of the reactor. Process, according to claim 1, **characterized in that** it further comprises an additional maturation step for the second reaction product, forming a mixture of at least water and carbonized biomass. Process, according to claims 1 or 2, **characterized in that** it further comprises, an initial phase for pretreating the biomass. Process, according to claim 3, **characterized in that** said pretreatment comprises, at least one step for milling and one step for washing the biomass. Process, according to claim 4, **characterized in that** biomass is milled to particle sizes below 30 cm. Process, according to any one of claims 1 to 5, **characterized in that** it further comprises, prior to step (a), a step for pressurizing the aqueous mixture of biomass and catalyst to a pressure of at least 10 bar. Process, according to any one of claims 1 to 5, **characterized in that** it further comprises, prior to step (a), a step for preheating the aqueous mixture of biomass and catalyst to a temperature of at least 170 °C. Process, according to any one of claims 1 to 5, **characterized in that** it further comprises, prior to step (a), a step for pressurizing the aqueous mixture of biomass and catalyst to a pressure of at least 10 bar, followed by a step for preheating the aqueous mixture of biomass and catalyst to a temperature of at least 170 °C. Process, according to claim 2, **characterized in that** it further comprises, after maturation, a step for cooling the mixture of, at least, water and carbonized biomass to a temperature below 100 °C. Process, according to claim 9, **characterized in that** it further comprises, after the cooling step, a step for depressurizing the mixture of, at least, water and carbonized biomass. Process, according to any one of claims 1 to 10, **characterized in that** it takes place in a continuous manner. Process, according to any one of claims 1 a 10, **characterized in that** the carbonization is carried out at a temperature between 180 and 225 °C, a pressure between 10 and 25 bar and a pH from 4.5 to 6.5. Process of hydrothermal carbonization of an aqueous mixture of biomass and catalyst, **characterized in that** it comprises at least the following steps: (a) feeding said aqueous mixture of biomass and catalyst to a vertical reverse flow reactor through a riser tube, in which tube the monomerization of biomass is initiated resulting in a first reaction product; (b) polymerizing said first reaction product to give rise to a second reaction product; (c) maturing the mentioned second reaction product, forming a mixture of, at least, water and carbonized biomass; (d) evacuating the gases and water vapor from inside the reactor through the top thereof; wherein said process is carried out for a period from 2 to 12 hours at a temperature between 180 and 225°C, a pressure between 10 and 25 bar and a pH from 4.5 to 6.5. Installation for carrying out the process defined in claim 1, **characterized in that** it includes at least the following main equipments: (a) pressurization equipment; (b) preheating equipment; (c) a vertical reverse flow reactor, (d) a cooling equipment and (e) a depressurization equipment. Installation, according to claim 14, **characterized in that** the preheating equipment consists of a double-walled pressurized tube. Installation, according to claim 14, **characterized in that** the vertical reverse flow reactor contains a riser tube therein. Installation, according to claim 15, **characterized in that** the riser tube or the vertical reverse flow reactor is occupying between 50% and 80% of the total height of the reactor. Installation, according to claim 14, **characterized in that** the vertical reverse flow reactor is provided at its top with an area for accumulating steam and/or gases. Installation, according to claim 14, **characterized in that** the vertical reverse flow reactor contains a riser tube therein, as well as an area for accumulating steam and/or gases located at the top of said reactor. Installation, according to claim 14, **characterized in that** the reactor further comprises at least one device selected from a group consisting of safety valve, pressure probe, temperature probe, filling level probe, air and gas vent and vacuum breaker. Installation, according to claim 14, **characterized in that** the reactor also includes at least one inlet for injecting steam. Installation, according to claim 14, **characterized in that** the reactor also includes at least one inlet for injecting condensates. Installation, according to claim 14, **characterized in that** the reactor is thermally insulated from outside with rock wool and external finishing of aluminum sheet. Installation, according to claim 14, **characterized in that** the cooling equipment consists of a tubular-type heat exchanger. Installation, according to claim 14, **characterized in that** the depressurization equipment comprises at least two valves located in series. Installation, according to claim 25, **characterized in that** the depressurization equipment further comprises a flash-type tank located between the pressure relief valves. Installation for performing the process according to claim 1, **characterized in that** it includes at least the following main equipments: (a) pressurization equipment; (b) a double-walled pressurized tube; (c) a vertical reverse flow reactor comprising a riser tube therein; (d) a tubular-type heat exchanger; (e) two pressure relief valves and (f) a flash equipment. A reactor for carrying out a hydrothermal carbonization process as defined in claim 1, **characterized in that** it is a vertical reverse flow reactor comprising a riser tube therein and a vapor and/or gas accumulation area located at the top thereof. A reactor according to claim 28, **characterized in that** it further comprises, at least one device selected from a group consisting of safety valve, pressure probe, temperature probe, filling level probe, air and gas vent and vacuum breaker. A reactor according to claim 28, **characterized in that** it further comprises, at least one inlet for injecting steam. A reactor according to claim 28, **characterized in that** it further comprises, at least one inlet for injecting condensates. A reactor according to claim 28, **characterized in that** it is thermally insulated from outside with rock wool and external finishing of aluminum sheet. Product obtained by a hydrothermal carbonization process of an aqueous mixture of biomass and catalyst comprising at least the following steps: (a) feeding an aqueous mixture of biomass and catalyst to a vertical reverse flow reactor through a riser tube, in which tube the monomerization of biomass is initiated resulting in a first reaction product; (b) polymerizing said first reaction product to give rise to a second reaction product; (c) maturing the mentioned second reaction product, forming a mixture of, at least, water and carbonized biomass. Use of the product according to claim 33 as a solid fuel. Use of the product according to claim 33 as feedstock for the production of liquid hydrocarbon fuels. |
|
| 11/16/2009 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Patent | |
1.2 Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL)
Sometimes called hydrothermal pyrolysis or wet pyrolysis.
Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) is a thermal depolymerization process used to convert wet biomass into crude-like oil -sometimes referred to as bio-oil or biocrude- under moderate temperature and high pressure. The crude-like oil (or bio-oil) has high energy density with a lower heating value of 33.8-36.9 MJ/kg and 5-20 wt% oxygen and renewable chemicals.[\[Wiki\]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrothermal_liquefaction)
**Input:**
* Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL), is a very flexible technology utilizing a wide variety of algal feedstock including both freshwater or marine biomass grown under controlled or outdoor conditions using synthetic or waste medium. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96337-3011754594)
* The nature of biomass feedstock affects bio-oil yield due to differing biomass compositions. Hemicellulose and cellulose increase bio-oil yield while lignin goes into the residue fraction. The biomass type also affects the nature of the bio-oil. Loosely packed biomass liquefaction results in bio-oil with high oxygen and moisture content that is undesirable as it lowers the quality and HHV of the fuel. Small particle size improves accessibility and penetration of heat, thereby improving conversion rate and bio-oil efficiency.[\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96337-2623564767)
* Feedstocks: lignocellulosic biomass, algae, manure, glycerol, wastewater, organic waste, sewage sludge [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96337-2623564767)
* In this study, the **co-processing of common plastic waste with pistachio hulls** was assessed to investigate the suitability of the HTL approach. This result represents a highly promising method for waste plastic valorisation.[ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96337-2983905213)
* incorporating HTL into wastewater treatment systems can simultaneously produce valuable bio-crude oil, provide effective removal of BACs and disrupt the natural pathways for antibiotic resistant gene transfer from manure and wastewater biosolids to the environment.[ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96337-2047386126)
**Products: bio-oil, (syn)gas, solids, liquid (water)**
* produce bio-crude (30–60% of dry feedstock) with a relatively high heating value (25–35 MJ/kg), solid residue, a gaseous mixture (N~2~, H~2~, CO~2~, CO, CH~4~) and an aqueous product rich in organics. Detailed investigations of the aqueous phase of HTL have shown the presence of various organic compounds like organic acids, sugars, dipeptides, amino acids and some intermediates of nutraceutical properties which can be valorized using different strategies. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96337-3011754594)
* These results suggest that AD is a feasible approach to treat post-hydrothermal-liquefaction wastewater (PHWW), and to improve the energy efficiency of the HTL processes.[ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96337-2210221651)
* Valorization of the aqueous phase produced by hydrothermal liquefaction of terrestrial feedstocks is a potential strategy to decrease the minimum fuel selling price of biofuels. In this work, three different strategies were developed focused on upgrading the major molecules present in the aqueous phase, carboxylic acids, via 1) catalytic upgrading into chemicals via condensed phase ketonization reaction, 2) catalytic upgrading to H2 via direct steam reforming, and 3) catalytic upgrading to H2 via anaerobic digestion (to CH4) followed by steam reforming.[ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96337-2983555256)
**Process:**
* HTL requires an operating temperature of 300–350 °C at 5–20 MPa for 5–60 min, wherein water is in the liquid phase. The process begins with solvolysis of biomass in micellar forms, the disintegration of biomass fractions (cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin), and thermal depolymerization into smaller fragments. HTL, which mimics the processing of fossil fuels buried deep inside the earth, occurs in minutes or hours. **HTL produces oil with low oxygen content as opposed to other processes like fast pyrolysis.** HTL proves to be very energy efficient as it entails temperatures lower than those reached during pyrolysis.
The process is driven by a complex set of reactions and transformations in subcritical water. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96337-2623564767)
* Liquefaction, also called HTL, is a thermochemical conversion of biomass into liquid fuels by a high-temperature pressurized environment for less than 60 min, which breaks down the polymer structure into liquid components. **The hot compressed water in liquefaction acts as the catalyst of the reactant to make the reaction similar to pyrolysis.** Liquefaction is operated within a temperature range of 250–374 °C, and a pressure range of 4–22 MPa. **Liquefaction improves the quality of bio-oil, such as HHV, bio-oil yield, and oxygen and nitrogen contents. This technology is especially suitable for converting high-moisture biomass, especially for microalgae, and no drying is required. Higher energy efficiency, lower operating temperature, and tar yield are the main advantages of the liquefaction process compared with those of pyrolysis.** [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96337-2958563072)
* Conversion of wet biomass and waste products via hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) has been evolving as an alternative thermochemical technology for the production of liquid biofuels. **Processing of biomass slurries with approximately 20 % solids** content under high temperature and pressure mimics the natural formation of fossil crude on earth. With reaction times of around 10 to 30 minutes, temperatures of 350 °C and pressures of around 200 bar, HTL converts **any biomass feedstock** to a liquid bio-crude. This raw product roughly resembles petroleum, but exhibits higher oxygen contents (\~10 %) and has a higher viscosity. Therefore, **development of the hydrothermal liquefaction technology has concentrated on the upgrading of bio-crude via hydrotreatment to reduce its heteroatom content, viscosity, boiling point and density.** Upgraded bio-crude can then be further refined via distillation or other established processes into renewable gasoline, diesel and jet fuel. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96337-2744095134)
* **Hydrotreatment:** In this work, biocrudes were catalytically hydrotreated with a commercial NiMo/Al2O3 catalyst at different temperatures and pressures. Sewage sludge biocrude was found to be very promising for the production of straight-chain hydrocarbons in the diesel range, with considerable heteroatoms removal even at mild hydrotreating conditions. Similar results were shown by algal biocrude, although complete denitrogenation is challenging. Upgraded biocrudes from lignocellulosic feedstock (miscanthus) showed high yields in the gasoline range, with a remarkable content of aromatics. Operating at a higher H2 pressure was found to be crucial to prevent coking and decarboxylation reactions. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96337-2951244727)
**Comparison AD and HTL:**
* The wastewater grown algal biomass was subjected to anaerobic digestion at 37 °C for 30 days and hydrothermal liquefaction at 27 bars and 230 °C for 20 min to produce biomethane or biocrude, respectively. On performing the biomethane potential assay, a cumulative biomethane production of 346.59 ± 5 mL g−1 VS was observed. The theoretical methane production and stoichiometric methane potential calculated for the biomass was 504 mL g−1 VS and 591 mL g−1 VS, respectively, showing a digestibility of 58.5%. Hydrothermal liquefaction of the wastewater grown biomass gave biocrude yield of 43 ± 2% (dried biomass basis) rich in aldehydes/ketones/fatty acids. Net energy ratios for the two processes were compared. **Net energy ratio for algal cultivation integrated with anaerobic digestion was found to be 0.007 and for that with hydrothermal liquefaction was found to be 0.08, proving it to be a more energy efficient process.** [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96337-2967883758)
**Thermo-economics/ commercial:**
* The economic feasibility and environmental impact is investigated for the conversion of agricultural waste, delactosed whey permeate, through yeast fermentation to a renewable diesel via hydrothermal liquefaction. Process feasibility was demonstrated at laboratory-scale with data leveraged to validate systems models used to perform industrial-scale economic and environmental impact analyses. **Results show a minimum fuel selling price of $4.78 per gallon of renewable diesel, a net energy ratio of 0.81, and greenhouse gas emissions of 30.0 g-CO 2 -eq MJ −1 . High production costs and greenhouse gas emissions can be attributed to operational temperatures and durations of both fermentation and hydrothermal liquefaction.** However, high lipid yields of the yeast counter these operational demands, resulting in a favorable net energy ratio. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96337-1005519156)
* **Steeper Energy is commercializing its proprietary hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) technology as a potential path to sustainable lignocellulosic-derived transport fuels. Hydrofaction™ utilizes high-density, supercritical water chemistry at distinctly higher pressures and temperatures than most literature on HTL.** Steady state operational data from a campaign producing 1 barrel (>150 kg) of oil at a dedicated pilot plant is presented, including closure of mass, energy, and three elemental balances. A detailed oil assay specifying the oil quality as well as mass and energy recoveries from wood to oil of 45.3 wt.% and 85.6%, respectively, reflect that Hydrofaction™ is an energy-efficient technology for sourcing renewable biofuels in tangible volumes. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96337-2589227311)
* CatLiq® process is a catalytic hydrothermal liquefaction process that takes place at water supercritical conditions in the range of 230-250 bar and 350-420°C and the obtained biocrude oil is called as “Altaca oil”. “Altaca Oil” is synthesized from aqueous bio-waste such as lignocelluloses, proteins, fats and carbohydrates and their mixtures. In the development phase of the CatLiq® process, after a pilot scale studies, a demonstration plant was scaled up. The upgraded version of the lab pilot plant is currently operational in Gebze-Kocaeli, Turkey, and a series of tests have been conducted to optimize conversion conditions of bio-gasification and sewage sludge. The demonstration plant mass flow feeding rate is 15 ton/h, while the mass flow feeding rate of pilotplant is 60 kg/h. It is limited for continuous process due to the fact that the pilot plant has some fluid behaviors as fouling, plug, particle flow. It has been forecast that these limitation will be solved at the scale up. The demonstration plant is an energy integrated system with heat recovery of 70%.[ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96337-2524114726)
* **the preliminary cost analysis suggests the CAPEX to be in the ballpark range of 130 M€ per plant, with the HX unit covering more than 57% of the capital investment.** The OPEX was estimated at around 19 M€ per year. Based on the economic analysis, the final biocrude production cost is 321 € per ton. Considering current oil prices, the project payback time foreseen at 7-9 years.[\[Thesis UTwente\]](https://research.utwente.nl/en/publications/hydrothermal-liquefaction-of-woody-biomass-process-plant-design)
**Complexity:**
* Hydrothermal liquefaction processing is attractive in terms of its simplicity and technical performance. The pilot plant results of the Hydrofaction™ process generated carbon efficiencies of \~68–74% from spruce/pine wood and an overall energy efficiency of \~71% to finished products. Other studies on HTL have shown moderately lower results. **However, a practical HTL process requires very small particle sizes and reliable feeding of the slurry at high pressures. The HTL reactor and associated heat exchange equipment are the most expensive components of the plant.** There is still a significant scale-up to be achieved in a commercial demonstration project and the actual costs and performance of HTL reactor systems at commercial scale have a high degree of uncertainty.[\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96337-2976637787)
Suppliers
| 1.2.1 | Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) |
|---|---|
| A review of biochemical and thermochemical energy conversion routes of wastewater grown algal biomass | |
| Abstract Microalgae are recognized as a potential source of biomass for obtaining bioenergy. However, the lack of studies towards economic viability and environmental sustainability of the entire production chain limits its large-scale application. The use of wastewaters economizes natural resources used for algal biomass cultivation. However, desirable biomass characteristics for a good fuel may be impaired when wastewaters are used, namely low lipid content and high ash and protein contents. Thus, the choice of wastewaters with more favorable characteristics may be one way of obtaining a more balanced macromolecular composition of the algal biomass and therefore, a more suitable feedstock for the desired energetic route. The exploration of biorefinery concept and the use of wastewaters as culture medium are considered as the main strategic tools in the search of this viability. Considering the economics of overall process, direct utilization of wet biomass using hydrothermal liquefaction or hydrothermal carbonization and anaerobic digestion is recommended. Among the explored routes, anaerobic digestion is the most studied process. However, some main challenges remain as little explored, such as a low energy pretreatment and suitable and large-scale reactors for algal biomass digestion. On the other hand, thermochemical conversion routes offer better valorization of the algal biomass but have higher costs. A biorefinery combining anaerobic digestion, hydrothermal carbonization and hydrothermal liquefaction processes would provide the maximum possible output from the biomass depending on its characteristics. Therefore, the choice must be made in an integrated way, aiming at optimizing the quality of the final product to be obtained. Life cycle assessment studies are critical for scaling up of any algal biomass valorization technique for sustainability. Although there are limitations, suitable integrations of these processes would enable to make an economically feasible process which requires further study. | |
| 03/16/2020 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.2.2 | Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) |
| A review on the current status of various hydrothermal technologies on biomass feedstock | |
| Hydrothermal processing, a thermochemical approach, is an excellent method of converting energy-rich biomass into useful products. This approach offers the advantage of handling biomass with relatively high moisture content by precluding an energy-intensive pretreatment step. Hydrothermal processing is of world-wide interest in view of depleting fossil-fuel reserves and increased environmental greenhouse gas emissions. There is potential to develop this novel technology at demonstration scale. This paper reviews the three hydrothermal technologies, namely hydrothermal liquefaction, gasification and carbonization, to provide insight into the likelihood of commercialization. The study discusses the role of different process parameters that have key impacts on the quality and yield of the desired products. This study also identifies the gaps in the literature including the need to establish a baseline to develop key process models and to perform a techno-economic assessment to get a better sense of the viability of the technology in future. | |
| 01/01/2018 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.2.3 | Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) |
| Algal biorefinery to value-added products by using combined processes based on thermochemical conversion: A review | |
| Abstract Thermochemical processes, including gasification, liquefaction, and pyrolysis, are promising technologies for algal conversion. Gasification is effective to convert algal biomass into fuel gases while liquefaction and pyrolysis are favorable for the production of bio-oil with low molecular weight and biocrude with high energy density, respectively. To understand the role of algal components (proteins, lipids, and carbohydrates) on thermochemical conversion processes, this paper reviews the properties of biofuels from the thermochemical conversion of algal components and their model compounds. The characteristic fingerprints of algal components differ from one another. Consequently, the thermochemical conversion of the total algal biomass results in heterogeneity of the biofuels. The unfavorable nitrogenous compound production also leads to resource and energy losses, which are the critical bottleneck of algal biorefinery. As such, this review tackles some combined processes. The combination of the hydrothermal liquefaction of algal biomass and the hydrothermal gasification of an aqueous fraction shows potential for applications that improve fuel gas production. Lipid extraction combined with thermochemical residue conversion contributes to an increase in total oil yield. Protein extraction combined with thermochemical residue conversion decreases the risk of nitrogenous compound contamination in bio-oil and increases the recovery of value-added protein-derived products. Protein and lipid extraction before thermochemical conversion should be further explored to maximize the exploitation of multiple value-added products from algal biomass. | |
| 05/01/2020 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.2.4 | Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) |
| Anaerobic digestion of post-hydrothermal liquefaction wastewater for improved energy efficiency of hydrothermal bioenergy processes | |
| Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) is a promising process for converting wet biomass and organic wastes into bio-crude oil. It also produces an aqueous product referred to as post-hydrothermal liquefaction wastewater (PHWW) containing up to 40% of the original feedstock carbon, which reduces the overall energy efficiency of the HTL process. This study investigated the feasibility of using anaerobic digestion (AD) to treat PHWW, with the aid of activated carbon. Results showed that successful AD occurred at relatively low concentrations of PHWW (≤ 6.7%), producing a biogas yield of 0.5 ml/mg CODremoved, and ∼53% energy recovery efficiency. Higher concentrations of PHWW (≥13.3%) had an inhibitory effect on the AD process, as indicated by delayed, slower, or no biogas production. Activated carbon was shown to effectively mitigate this inhibitory effect by enhancing biogas production and allowing digestion to proceed at higher PHWW concentrations (up to 33.3%), likely due to sequestering toxic organic compounds. The addition of activated carbon also increased the net energy recovery efficiency of AD with a relatively high concentration of PHWW (33.3%), taking into account the energy for producing activated carbon. These results suggest that AD is a feasible approach to treat PHWW, and to improve the energy efficiency of the HTL processes. | |
| 12/16/2015 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.2.5 | Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) |
| Bio-oil production via subcritical hydrothermal liquefaction of biomass | |
| Biomass based raw materials can be converted into the more valued energy forms using biochemical methods such as ethanol fermentation, methane fermentation and the thermochemical methods such as direct combustion, pyrolysis, gasification, liquefaction. The bio-oil obtained from the biomass has many advantages than traditional use. Firstly, it has features such as high energy density, easy storage and easy transportation. Bio-oil can be used as a fuel in engines, turbines and burning units directly. Besides, it can be converted into products in higher quality and volume via catalytic cracking, hydrodexygenation, emulsification, and steam reforming [1,2]. Many organic solvents such as acetone, ethanol, methanol, isopropanol are used in the supercritical liquefaction processes. When we think about the cost and effects of the organic solvent on nature, it will be understood better that it is necessary to find solvent that are more sensitive against nature. Here, water must have an important place because of i... | |
| 01/01/2017 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.2.6 | Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) |
| Catalytic thermochemical conversion of biomass for biofuel production: A comprehensive review | |
| Abstract The increasing demand for energy and diminishing sources of fossil fuels have called for the discovery of new energy sources. The effective energy conversion process of biomass is able to fulfill energy needs. Among the advanced biomass conversion technologies, thermochemical processes hold considerable potential approaches and needed for optimization. Thus, this study presents a comprehensive review of the research and development on the effects of catalysts on the thermochemical conversion of biomass to determine the progress of catalytic thermochemical conversion processes. The effects of catalysts on torrefaction, pyrolysis, hydrothermal liquefaction, and gasification are highlighted. Aspects related to reaction conditions, reactor types, and products are discussed comprehensively with the reaction mechanisms involved in the catalytic effects. Hydrogenation and hydrodeoxygenation can occur in the presence of zeolite catalysts during fast pyrolysis while producing highly aromatic bio-oil. A heterogeneous catalyst in liquefaction increases the hydrocarbon content and decreases viscosity, acid value, and oxygenated compounds in the bio-oil. Thus, expanding and enhancing knowledge about catalyst utilization in the thermochemical conversion technologies of biomass will play an important role in the generation of renewable and carbon-neutral fuels. | |
| 10/01/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.2.7 | Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) |
| Catalytic upgrading of hydrothermal liquefaction biocrudes: Different challenges for different feedstocks | |
| Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) followed by catalytic hydrotreating of the produced biocrude is increasingly gaining ground as an effective technology for the conversion of biomass into liquid biofuels. A strong advantage of HTL resides in its great flexibility towards the feedstock, since it is able to treat a large number of different organic substrates, ranging from dry to wet residual biomass. Nevertheless, the characteristics of biocrudes from different typologies of organic materials result in different challenges to be met during the hydrotreating step, leading to differences in heteroatoms removal and in the typology and composition of the targeted products. In this work, biocrudes were catalytically hydrotreated with a commercial NiMo/Al2O3 catalyst at different temperatures and pressures. Sewage sludge biocrude was found to be very promising for the production of straight-chain hydrocarbons in the diesel range, with considerable heteroatoms removal even at mild hydrotreating conditions. Similar results were shown by algal biocrude, although complete denitrogenation is challenging. Upgraded biocrudes from lignocellulosic feedstock (miscanthus) showed high yields in the gasoline range, with a remarkable content of aromatics. Operating at a higher H2 pressure was found to be crucial to prevent coking and decarboxylation reactions. | |
| 04/09/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.2.8 | Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) |
| CatLiq- Catalytic hydrothermal liquefaction process from pilot scale to demo scale | |
| T CatLiq® process is a catalytic hydrothermal liquefaction process that takes place at water supercritical conditions in the range of 230-250 bar and 350-420°C and the obtained biocrude oil is called as “Altaca oil”. “Altaca Oil” is synthesized from aqueous bio-waste such as lignocelluloses, proteins, fats and carbohydrates and their mixtures. In the development phase of the CatLiq® process, after a pilot scale studies, a demonstration plant was scaled up. The upgraded version of the lab pilot plant is currently operational in Gebze-Kocaeli, Turkey, and a series of tests have been conducted to optimize conversion conditions of bio-gasification and sewage sludge. Using delivered data via these tests, the pre-commercial demonstration plant was designed and, the plant is under construction at the Gonen, Balikesir/Turkey. During designing studies, for thermodynamic calculation and process simulation Aspen HYSYS 8.4, and Chemcad 6.1, for heat exchanger designs Aspen HTFS, for piping Bentley, for the stress analysis and materials choise PV Elite, and for fluid dynamic and heat transfer Fluent were used. General requirements were observed for ASME Section 3 Div.2 in the pre-commercial demonstration plant design. The demonstration plant mass flow feeding rate is 15 ton/h, while the mass flow feeding rate of pilot plant is 60 kg/h. It is limited for continuous process due to the fact that the pilot plant has some fluid behaviors as fouling, plug, particle flow. It has been forecast that these limitation will be solved at the scale up. The demonstration plant is an energy integrated system with heat recovery of 70%. Each waste heat stream at the plant was investigated in terms of its waste heat quantity (the approximate energy in the waste heat stream), quality (typical exhaust temperatures). Energy content of waste heat streams was considered as a function of mass flow rate, composition, and temperature, and was evaluated based on process energy consumption, typical temperatures, and mass balances. Ultimately, waste heat of any equipment was used for reaction energy of other equipment. Moreover, the plant was scaled up based on Best Available Technology. The plant is based on transforming the waste into a useful material and minimalizing waste production of the process. | |
| 09/04/2015 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.2.9 | Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) |
| Co-processing of common plastics with pistachio hulls via hydrothermal liquefaction | |
| Abstract Mixed, wet, plastic streams containing food waste residues are being increasingly collected at point of use, but are extremely challenging to recycle and are therefore largely sent to landfill. While a challenging waste problem, this also represents an underutilised feedstock, which could be co-processed with biomass, increasing the scope of products, easing out seasonal variation in biomass production and increasing the production capacity of a traditional biorefinery. One promising method of biomass conversion is hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL), where lignocellulosic residues are broken down in water at high temperatures and pressures to produce a bio-crude oil, a solid residue and an aqueous fertiliser. In this study, the co-processing of common plastic waste with pistachio hulls was assessed to investigate the suitability of the HTL approach. The HTL of pistachio hulls was undertaken at 350 °C over 15 and 60 min, with four commonly used plastics: polyethylene, polypropylene, PET and nylon-6, in blends of up to 20 wt% plastic to biomass. A novel FT-IR method was developed to estimate the conversion of plastics in the system, and the product phases were fully analysed. High yields of up to 35% bio-crude were achieved, and under optimal conditions, nylon-6 and PET were found to break down almost completely in the system. PET generated numerous products that distributed predominantly into the aqueous phase; the major decomposition product of nylon-6 was found to be the monomer ∊-caprolactam, also largely partitioning into the aqueous phase. The polyolefins were less reactive; a limited degree of decomposition formed oxidised products, which distributed into the bio-crude phase. This result represents a highly promising method for waste plastic valorisation. | |
| 02/01/2020 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.2.10 | Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) |
| Conversion of high-ash microalgae through hydrothermal liquefaction | |
| Natural microalgae (NM, Scenedesmus) cultivated by utilization of exhaust gas from a municipal solid waste combustion power plant were used for the biofuel production through hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL). The high-ash NM underwent acid-washing to obtain deashing microalgae (DA). HTL experiments were carried out at different temperatures from 260 °C to 340 °C with NM and DA. Products derived from NM and DA were examined by various techniques in order to identify the influence of the ash on the hydrothermal decomposition behavior. The results show that the ash inhibits the transformation of microalgae. The bio-oil yield including heavy oil and light oil is in the range of 17.59–22.09% for NM and 24.30–31.14% for DA, respectively. Calcium carbonate in the ash promotes deamination, resulting in an increase in the relative content of ketones in the NM-derived light oil. The concentration of NH4+ in the aqueous phase derived from NM is in the range of 1373–1860 mg L−1, and PO43− is undetected due to the precipitation reaction between phosphorus and calcium ions. The HHV values of NM-derived hydrochars are low, ranging from 8.83 MJ kg−1 to 9.88 MJ kg−1, compared with those of DA-derived hydrochars,. For natural microalgae, the deashing pretreatment before HTL is of great significance for improving the biocrude yield and quality, as well as the biomass conversion efficiency, nitrogen utilization and the hydrochar quality. | |
| 03/17/2020 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.2.11 | Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) |
| Development of innovative processes and catalysts for the valorisation of Bio-Oil | |
| Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) is a process for converting waste biomass to bio-oil by contacting the biomass with water at high temperatures and sufficient pressures in order to keep the water in the liquid state. HTL process is energy efficient and capable of dealing with wet biomass, such as sorted domestic organic waste, sewage sludge, algae, etc. However, HTL oils contain high contents of oxygen and nitrogen because of the initial biomass composition. Therefore, the bio-oil has to be upgraded in order to produce advanced transport fuels. Information regarding the nitrogen compounds present in bio-oil is of major concern of any hydrotreatment, since the low hydrodenitrogenation rate and catalyst poisoning by nitrogen compounds make this process expensive. Therefore, the main goal of the present study is the investigation of the HTL reaction mechanism, focusing the attention on the nitrogen containing species pathways, with the goal to increase the energy yields and reduce the nitrogen content in the produced bio-oil. Due to the complexity of the biomass composition, model compounds that encompass all the biochemical components of biomass, namely proteins, lipid and carbohydrates, are emerged to unravel the main chemical reaction pathways existing between macromolecular components. Moreover, several microbial biomass types, such as oleaginous yeast and liamocins, were also treated via HTL. The whole study helps to better understand the HTL of organic waste biomass and microbial biomass/oils, providing useful insights into the reaction products, pathways, and mechanisms for the production of bio-oils and chemicals. | |
| 02/15/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.2.12 | Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) |
| Effects of hydrothermal liquefaction on the fate of bioactive contaminants in manure and algal feedstocks | |
| Abstract This study investigated the effects of hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) on the fate of bioactive compounds (BACs) often present with wet biosolids from wastewater, manure, or algae. Tracking radiolabeled 14 C for two BACs showed that 60–79% of the carbon was transferred to the HTL raw oil product, and most of the rest was found in the aqueous product. In the presence of both swine manure and Spirulina biomass feedstocks, HTL provided essentially complete removal of three BACs when operated at 300 °C for ⩾30 min. Experiments with both natural transformation and high-efficiency transformation showed that HTL provided complete deactivation of antibiotic resistant genes for all tested HTL conditions (250–300 °C, 15–60 min reaction time). Thus, incorporating HTL into wastewater treatment systems can simultaneously produce valuable bio-crude oil, provide effective removal of BACs and disrupt the natural pathways for antibiotic resistant gene transfer from manure and wastewater biosolids to the environment. | |
| 12/01/2013 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.2.13 | Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) |
| From waste biomass to chemicals and energy via microwave-assisted processes | |
| Lignocellulosic waste material serves as a considerable renewable feedstock that may be used to replace oil refineries with biorefineries. Indeed, all biomass components can be converted into platform chemicals, bioenergy and materials. However, thermo-chemical and conventional catalytic conversions suffer from a number of drawbacks. Enabling technologies, such as microwaves (MW), can reduce process times and energy consumption, leading to improvements in product quality and yields. The remarkable advantages of MW over conventional heating, which originate from its direct dielectric interaction with biomass, are documented in this comprehensive survey. Moreover, the use of alternative solvents that interact strongly with MW in biphasic systems can circumvent additional upgrading and separation steps. Finally, this review discusses some of the challenges that MW irradiation faces, including the poor dielectric properties of some substrates and issues related to its large-scale application in pyrolysis, hydrothermal conversion and catalytic routes to biofuels, materials and platform chemicals. Waste biomass may well be the benchmark feedstock for the development of a circular bioeconomic approach. | |
| 01/01/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.2.14 | Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) |
| Fundamentals of Hydrofaction™: Renewable crude oil from woody biomass | |
| As a response to the global requirement for renewable transportation fuels that are economically viable and fungible with existing petroleum infrastructure, Steeper Energy is commercializing its proprietary hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) technology as a potential path to sustainable lignocellulosic-derived transport fuels. Hydrofaction™ utilizes high-density, supercritical water chemistry at distinctly higher pressures and temperatures than most literature on HTL. The paper presents a direct relation between density and the chemical properties that make near-critical water an appealing HTL reaction medium. Further, the fundamentals of Hydrofaction™ and how these are carefully chosen to favor certain chemical reaction paths are explained, including the use of high-density supercritical water, homogenous alkaline metal catalysts at alkaline conditions and recycling of aqueous and oil products. Steady state operational data from a campaign producing 1 barrel (>150 kg) of oil at a dedicated pilot plant is presented, including closure of mass, energy, and three elemental balances. A detailed oil assay specifying the oil quality as well as mass and energy recoveries from wood to oil of 45.3 wt.% and 85.6%, respectively, reflect that Hydrofaction™ is an energy-efficient technology for sourcing renewable biofuels in tangible volumes. | |
| 12/01/2017 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.2.15 | Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) |
| Hydrothermal Conversion in Near-Critical Water – A Sustainable Way of Producing Renewable Fuels | |
| Liquid fuels from biomass will form an essential part of meeting the grand challenges within energy. The need for renewable and sustainable energy sources is triggered by a number of factors; like increase in global energy demand, depletion of conventional resources, climate issues and the desire for national/regional energy independence. Especially in marine, aviation and heavy land transport suitable carbon neutral drop-in fuels from biomass are needed, since electrification of those is rather unlikely. Hydrothermal conversion (HTC) of biomass offers a solution and is a sustainable way of converting biomass feedstocks to valuable bio-crude. HTC is a high pressure and medium temperature thermochemical biomass conversion process and converts aqueous biomasses under sub- or super-critical conditions to a bio-crude similar to fossil crude oil. | |
| 01/01/2014 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.2.16 | Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) |
| Hydrothermal liquefaction of various biomass and waste feedstocks for biocrude production: A state of the art review | |
| The continuing use of fossil fuels accelerated the energy crisis, environmental pollution, and global warming in recent years. These problems are the driving force of the worldwide search for new alternative energy, among which biomass is considered to be one of the most promising candidates due to its renewable, carbon neutral and high productivity characteristics. Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) is an alternative technology of exploiting different types of biomass for fuels production, involving the direct biomass conversion to liquid, in the presence of a solvent and in some times catalyst. HTL has undergone a sudden increase in the number of publications in recent years. The wide variation in different types of feedstock tested, their initial state, the reaction conditions and/or the catalysts applied renders a wide but rather fragmentary spectrum of knowledge generated. This review is a summary of state-of-the-art knowledge of HTL for various feedstocks such as woody biomass, wastes, plastics and microalgae. | |
| 02/01/2017 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.2.17 | Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) |
| Hydrothermal Liquefaction to Convert Biomass into Crude Oil | |
| All fossil fuels found in nature — petroleum, natural gas, and coal, based on biogenic hypothesis — are formed through processes of thermochemical conversion (TCC) from biomass buried beneath the ground and subjected to millions of years of high temperature and pressure. In particular, existing theories attribute that petroleum is from diatoms (algae) and deceased creatures and coal is from deposited plants. TCC is a chemical reforming process of biomass in a heated and usually pressurized, oxygen deprived enclosure, where long - chain organic compounds (solid biomass) break into short - chain hydrocarbons such as syngas or oil. TCC is a broad term that includes gasifi cation, including the Fisher - Tropsch process, direct liquefaction, hydrothermal liquefaction, and pyrolysis. Gasifi cation of biomass produces a mixture of hydrogen and carbon monoxide, commonly called syngas. The syngas is then reformed into liquid oil with the presence of a catalyst. Pyrolysis is a heating process of dried biomass to directly produce syngas and oil. Both gasifi cation and pyrolysis require dried biomass as feedstock, and the processes occur in an environment higher than 600 ° C. The hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) involves direct liquefaction of biomass, with the presence of water and perhaps some catalysts, to directly convert biomass into liquid oil, with a reacting temperature of lower than 400 ° C. This chapter only covers the topic of HTL of biomass. Biomass feedstocks include biowaste (manure and food processing waste), lignocellulose (crop residue), and algae. The chapter is in two parts. The fi rst part covers HTL fundamentals based on the current knowledge, and the second part is a summary of state - of - the - art knowledge of HTL for various feedstocks. The author has attempted to organize this chapter for a variety of readers who are interested in the topic of HTL, including students and professionals. | |
| 07/06/2010 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.2.18 | Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) |
| Hydrothermal Liquefaction: A Promising Pathway Towards Renewable Jet Fuel | |
| Conversion of wet biomass and waste products via hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) has been evolving as an alternative thermochemical technology for the production of liquid biofuels. Processing of biomass slurries with approximately 20 % solids content under high temperature and pressure mimics the natural formation of fossil crude on earth. With reaction times of around 10 to 30 minutes, temperatures of 350 °C and pressures of around 200 bar, HTL converts any biomass feedstock to a liquid bio-crude. This raw product roughly resembles petroleum, but exhibits higher oxygen contents (~10 %) and has a higher viscosity. Therefore, development of the hydrothermal liquefaction technology has concentrated on the upgrading of bio-crude via hydrotreatment to reduce its heteroatom content, viscosity, boiling point and density. Upgraded bio-crude can then be further refined via distillation or other established processes into renewable gasoline, diesel and jet fuel. The upgraded fuel’s chemical composition, with a high concentration of aliphatic hydrocarbons showing carbon numbers in the range of C8 to C18, appears promising for application as renewable jet fuel. The specific composition of the refined fuel products (as well as of the bio-crude) is, however, affected to a significant extent by the type of feedstock applied. For example, using lignocellulosic feedstock results in increased concentrations of aromatic hydrocarbons in the final product. The versatility of the HTL technology in terms of feedstocks and products represents a major advantage over other thermochemical conversion processes. Future developments should address tailoring the process to meet specific fuel requirements, e.g. those of renewable aviation fuels. Recent HTL reactor developments have led to proven continuous operation on a variety of feedstocks, but current reactor capacities of about ~1 bbl/d of bio-crude are still limited. Initial environmental and economic assessments of the hydrothermal liquefaction technology are promising, but in-depth studies covering a representative range of feedstock have not yet been published, rendering estimations of minimum fuel selling prices and greenhouse gas (GHG) balances of HTL derived liquid fuels difficult. To advance the technological maturity of hydrothermal liquefaction towards industrial implementation, development efforts should focus on process integration along the entire production chain encompassing pre-treatment, HTL processing, hydrotreatment, distillation and utilization of process water. | |
| 01/01/2018 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.2.19 | Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) |
| Improved methane production and energy recovery of post-hydrothermal liquefaction waste water via integration of zeolite adsorption and anaerobic digestion | |
| Abstract Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) is a promising technology for converting organic wastes into bio-crude oil, with organic-rich post-hydrothermal liquefaction wastewater (PHWW) as by-product. In this study, zeolite adsorption and anaerobic digestion (AD) were integrated to improve the methane production and energy recovery of PHWW from Chlorella 1067. A statistical design for maximum toxicants removal by zeolite was applied before AD process. Zeolite could mitigate the inhibition associated to compounds such as ammonia, N-heterocyclic compounds, etc. in PHWW and thereby shortening the lag phase and increasing methane production by 32–117% compared with that without zeolite adsorption. Zeolite adsorption also increased energy recovery efficiency (up to 70.5%) for this integrated system. Integration of HTL and AD brought higher energetic return from feedstock via oil and biomethane production, which may offer insight into industrial application of microalgae biomass in the circular economy. In addition, carbon and nitrogen flow for the integrated process was determined. | |
| 02/01/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.2.20 | Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) |
| Investigations on energy efficiency of biomethane/biocrude production from pilot scale wastewater grown algal biomass | |
| Abstract Real-time studies highlighting the actual bottlenecks of microalgae-based biofuels are needed to overcome the limitations of assumption-based approach. In the present study, an algal consortium consisting of Chlorella pyrenoidosa and Phormidium, was cultivated in municipal wastewater under outdoor conditions in a pilot scale (100 L) attached biofilm reactor during January-February 2018. No energy was used to maintain the cultivation conditions (temperature, light intensity/duration). After 6 days of hydraulic retention time, the consortium showed 53–87% reduction in the nutrients’ concentrations of the selected wastewater. Consistent biomass productivity of 3.48 ± 0.44 g m−2 d−1 was observed, and its biochemical composition showed that it was rich in lipids (35.20 ± 0.63% of total solids). The wastewater grown algal biomass was subjected to anaerobic digestion at 37 °C for 30 days and hydrothermal liquefaction at 27 bars and 230 °C for 20 min to produce biomethane or biocrude, respectively. On performing the biomethane potential assay, a cumulative biomethane production of 346.59 ± 5 mL g−1 VS was observed. The theoretical methane production and stoichiometric methane potential calculated for the biomass was 504 mL g−1 VS and 591 mL g−1 VS, respectively, showing a digestibility of 58.5%. Hydrothermal liquefaction of the wastewater grown biomass gave biocrude yield of 43 ± 2% (dried biomass basis) rich in aldehydes/ketones/fatty acids. Net energy ratios for the two processes were compared. Net energy ratio for algal cultivation integrated with anaerobic digestion was found to be 0.007 and for that with hydrothermal liquefaction was found to be 0.08, proving it to be a more energy efficient process. | |
| 11/01/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.2.21 | Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) |
| Microbial electrolysis treatment of post-hydrothermal liquefaction wastewater with hydrogen generation | |
| Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) directly converts wet organic waste into biocrude oil, but it also generates post-HTL wastewater (PHWW) with concentrated nutrients that require further treatment before discharge or reuse. While traditional technologies showed limited success, this study demonstrates that microbial electrolysis cell (MEC) can be an effective approach to treat the swine manure PHWW and recover H2 for onsite HTL biocrude upgrading. The onsite H2 production and utilization makes MEC an ideal wastewater treatment process for HTL operations. Using actual swine manure PHWW, the MEC reactors showed excellent removals of organics (90–98%) and nitrogen (57–93%) under various organic loadings, applied voltages, and flow rates. Increasing organic loadings and applied voltages showed positive influences on system performance, while changes of flow rates showed limited impacts. The highest H2 production rate was 168.01 ± 7.01 mL/L/d with a H2 yield of 5.14 ± 0.22 mmol/kg COD (3000 mg COD/L, 1.0 V), and the highest cathodic H2 recovery and energy efficiency were 74.24 ± 0.11% and 120.56 ± 17.45%, respectively. System configuration and operation can be further optimized to improve system performance. | |
| 02/01/2018 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.2.22 | Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) |
| Modification of a Pilot-Scale Continuous Flow Reactor for Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Wet Biomass | |
| Abstract A pilot-scale continuous flow reactor (CFR) was modified for hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) of algae slurry under subcritical conditions to investigate the feasibility of scaling up from batch to continuous processing. Modifications included a novel dual filter system that can remove solids at system pressure and temperature, and undergo in-situ cleaning. Commissioning was carried out to address potential particle settling and clogging problems, and to estimate reactor transport characteristics. CFR performance was evaluated by running 31.4 L algae slurry with solids loadings of 3-5 wt.% under 325-350 °C and 18 MPa for 7 hours. C and N elemental yields in HTL aqueous phase reached 39.0 wt.% and 61.8 wt.%, respectively. Future improvements to the CFR system will focus on higher solids loading and addition of in-line HTL liquid upgrading capabilities following the filtration system. • A high-temperature, high-pressure filtration system was designed to remove solids from HTL liquid/gaseous products at near reaction conditions to keep heavy oils in the liquid phase. • Uninterrupted reactor operation was achieved by cycling between the dual filter systems and performing in-situ filter cleaning. • Measured reactor residence time distributions were narrow and close to the calculated theoretical mean time. | |
| 01/01/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.2.23 | Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) |
| Prospects for energy recovery during hydrothermal and biological processing of waste biomass. | |
| Abstract Thermochemical and biological processes represent promising technologies for converting wet biomasses, such as animal manure, organic waste, or algae, to energy. To convert biomass to energy and bio-chemicals in an economical manner, internal energy recovery should be maximized to reduce the use of external heat and power. In this study, two conversion pathways that couple hydrothermal liquefaction with anaerobic digestion or catalytic hydrothermal gasification were compared. Each of these platforms is followed by two alternative processes for gas utilization: 1) combined heat and power; and 2) combustion in a boiler. Pinch analysis was applied to integrate thermal streams among unit processes and improve the overall system efficiency. A techno-economic analysis was conducted to compare the feasibility of the four modeled scenarios under different market conditions. Our results show that a systems approach designed to recover internal heat and power can reduce external energy demands and increase the overall process sustainability. | |
| 02/01/2017 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.2.24 | Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) |
| Recent advances in liquefaction technologies for production of liquid hydrocarbon fuels from biomass and carbonaceous wastes | |
| Abstract The liquefaction of biomass and carbonaceous wastes using hydro-pyrolysis, hydrothermal liquefaction or liquefaction using water and hydrocarbon solvents are promising thermochemical methods for producing renewable fuels and chemicals. New combinations of unit operations and possibly novel reactors will likely be required to economically convert biomass feedstock into partially upgraded bio-crudes. While some techno-economic assessments show that biofuels from fast pyrolysis may be competitive with petroleum fuels in future, conventional pyrolysis produces a poor quality bio-crude and is only suitable for dry, homogenous feedstock such as woody biomass, agricultural waste (corn stoves, wheat stalk, and rice husk). It is desirable to produce high-quality bio-crudes and to be able to process high-moisture feedstock such as algae, organic waste (food residues), bio-solids and bio-sludge into transportation fuels using the liquefaction approaches. Increased awareness of the environmental damage from burning fossil fuels is driving national and international reduction targets for on CO2 emissions. Liquefaction technologies aimed at producing alternatives to fossil-based transportation fuels/hydrocarbons are likely to receive continued support in the future and the most promising ones could be developed to full commercial scale. This review provides a summary of the current state of development of these technologies and also some of the challenges faced to develop commercially viable transportation fuels via liquefaction routes. This review compares liquefaction routes and provides a summary of techno-economic analyses where data is available and discusses the challenges and opportunities associated with commercial scale-up. | |
| 11/01/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.2.25 | Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) |
| Strategies to Valorize Hydrothermal Liquefaction-Derived Aqueous Phase into Fuels and Chemicals | |
| Valorization of the aqueous phase produced by hydrothermal liquefaction of terrestrial feedstocks is a potential strategy to decrease the minimum fuel selling price of biofuels. In this work, three different strategies were developed focused on upgrading the major molecules present in the aqueous phase, carboxylic acids, via 1) catalytic upgrading into chemicals via condensed phase ketonization reaction, 2) catalytic upgrading to H2 via direct steam reforming, and 3) catalytic upgrading to H2 via anaerobic digestion (to CH4) followed by steam reforming. Direct catalytic upgrading of the aqueous feed was unsuccessful as the catalyst deactivated, therefore, an aqueous phase clean up process based on activated carbon absorption followed by liquid-liquid extraction was developed to reduce color and inorganic contaminants while simultaneously concentrating desirable organic constituents. Stable conversion of the cleaned aqueous phase was successfully demonstrated using both condensed phase ketonization (for ≈1... | |
| 11/13/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.2.26 | Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) |
| Techno-economic feasibility and life cycle assessment of dairy effluent to renewable diesel via hydrothermal liquefaction. | |
| Abstract The economic feasibility and environmental impact is investigated for the conversion of agricultural waste, delactosed whey permeate, through yeast fermentation to a renewable diesel via hydrothermal liquefaction. Process feasibility was demonstrated at laboratory-scale with data leveraged to validate systems models used to perform industrial-scale economic and environmental impact analyses. Results show a minimum fuel selling price of $4.78 per gallon of renewable diesel, a net energy ratio of 0.81, and greenhouse gas emissions of 30.0 g-CO 2 -eq MJ −1 . High production costs and greenhouse gas emissions can be attributed to operational temperatures and durations of both fermentation and hydrothermal liquefaction. However, high lipid yields of the yeast counter these operational demands, resulting in a favorable net energy ratio. Results are presented on the optimization of the process based on economy of scale and a sensitivity analysis highlights improvements in conversion efficiency, yeast biomass productivity and hydrotreating efficiency can dramatically improve commercial feasibility. | |
| 11/01/2015 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.2.27 | Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) |
| Valorization of hydrothermal liquefaction aqueous phase: pathways towards commercial viability | |
| Abstract Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) is a thermochemical conversion technology that shows promising commercial potential for the production of biocrude oil from wet biomass. However, the inevitable production of the hydrothermal liquefaction aqueous phase (HTL-AP) acts as a double-edged sword: it is considered a waste stream that without additional treatment clouds the future scale-up prospects of HTL technology; on the other hand, it also offers potential as an untapped nutrient and energy resource that could be valorized. As more researchers turn to liquefaction as a means of producing renewable fuel, there is a growing need to better understand HTL-AP from a variety of vantage points. Specifically, the HTL-AP chemical composition, conversion pathways, energy valorization potential, and the interconnection of HTL-AP conversion with biofuel production technology are particularly worthy of investigation. This paper extensively reviews the impact of HTL conditions and the feedstock composition on the energy and elemental distribution of process outputs with specific emphasis on the HTL-AP. Moreover, this paper also compares and contrasts the current state of value-added products separation along with biological (biomass cultivation, anaerobic fermentation, and bioelectrochemical systems) and thermochemical (gasification and HTL) pathways to valorize HTL-AP. Furthermore, life cycle analysis (LCA) and techno-economic assessments (TEA) are performed to appraise the environmental sustainability and economic implications of these different valorization techniques. Finally, perspectives and challenges are presented and the integration approaches of HTL-AP valorization pathways with HTL and biorefining are explored. | |
| 03/01/2020 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.2.28 | Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) |
| Waste to bioenergy: a review on the recent conversion technologies | |
| Scientific studies have demonstrated that it is possible to generate a wide variety of bioenergy from biomass residues and waste, and however its cost is not competitive with petro-fuels and other renewable energy. On-going efforts are continued extensively to improve conversion technologies in order to reduce production costs. The present review focuses on the conversion technologies for transforming biomass residues and waste to biofuels, specifically their technological concepts, options and prospects for implementation are addressed. The emerging developments in the two primary conversion pathways, namely the thermochemical (i.e. gasification, liquefaction, and pyrolysis) and biochemical (i.e. anaerobic digestion, alcoholic fermentation and photobiological hydrogen production) conversion techniques, are evaluated. Additionally, transesterification, which appears to be the simplest and most economical route to produce biodiesel in large quantity, is discussed. Lastly, the strategies for direct conversion of biomass residues and waste to bioelectricity including the use of combustion and microbial fuel cells are reviewed. | |
| 12/01/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.2.29 | Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) |
| Systems and methods for converting biomass to biocrude via hydrothermal liquefaction | |
|
1. A system for converting biomass to biocrude comprising: a hydrothermal liquefaction system comprising a hydrothermal liquefaction reactor, the hydrothermal liquefaction reactor configured for receiving biomass feedstock and converting the biomass feedstock to biocrude, wherein the hydrothermal liquefaction system receives biogas and combusts the biogas to provide thermal energy to the hydrothermal liquefaction reactor. 2. The system of claim 1 , further comprising at least one anaerobic digester configured for digesting biowaste and producing the biogas. 3. The system of claim 2 , wherein the biomass feedstock received by the hydrothermal liquefaction reactor comprises the biowaste digested by the anaerobic digester, and the system further comprises a concentration mechanism configured for receiving the biosolids biowaste from the anaerobic digester and concentrating the biowaste prior to the biowaste being converted to biocrude by the hydrothermal liquefaction reactor. 4. The system of claim 3 , wherein the system is configured for being installed at least partially within a biosolids treatment facility. 5. The system of claim 2 , wherein the biowaste comprises municipal biosolid waste, grease waste, and/or food waste. 6. The system of claim 1 , wherein the biogas is harvested remotely from the system. 7. The system of claim 1 , wherein the biogas for combusting by the hydrothermal liquefaction system is a first portion of biogas, and the system further comprises a generator configured for receiving thermal energy from combustion of a second portion of biogas, the generator configured for generating electrical energy, wherein the generated electrical energy and any remaining thermal energy from the combustion of the second portion of biogas are provided to the hydrothermal liquefaction reactor for heating the biomass feedstock. 8. The system of claim 1 , wherein the biomass feedstock comprises biowaste. 9. The system of claim 8 , wherein the biowaste comprises municipal biosolid waste, grease waste, and/or food waste. 10. The system of claim 1 , wherein the biomass feedstock comprises algae and/or marine biomass. 11. The system of claim 1 , wherein the biomass feedstock comprises wood waste. 12. The system of claim 1 , wherein the biomass feedstock comprises cellulosic waste. 13. The system of claim 1 , further comprising a pump configured for continuously pumping the biomass feedstock through the hydrothermal liquefaction reactor. 14. The system of claim 13 , wherein the pump is configured for pumping the biomass feedstock at a pressure around 20 MPa. 15. The system of claim 1 , further comprising a quencher disposed adjacent an exit of the hydrothermal liquefaction reactor, the quencher configured for quickly cooling the biocrude. 16. The system of claim 1 , further comprising a heat exchanger downstream of the hydrothermal liquefaction reactor, the heat exchanger configured for harvesting the thermal energy from combustion of the biocrude, biogas, and/or biochar produced by the hydrothermal liquefaction reactor. 17. The system of claim 16 , further comprising a generator configured for generating electrical energy for operating at least one of one or more pumps and one or more electrical components, wherein the thermal energy from the heat exchanger is used for driving the generator. 18. A process of converting biomass feedstock to biocrude comprising: combusting biogas, by a hydrothermal liquefaction system, to produce thermal energy; pumping biomass feedstock through a hydrothermal liquefaction reactor of the hydrothermal liquefaction system; and heating, in the hydrothermal liquefaction reactor, the biomass feedstock using the thermal energy from the combustion of the biogas. 19. The process of claim 18 , wherein the biogas is produced by at least one anaerobic digester of a biosolids treatment facility. 20. The process of claim 18 , further comprising: collecting thermal energy from combustion of natural gas; and heating the biomass feedstock using the collected thermal energy from the combustion of natural gas in the hydrothermal liquefaction reactor. 21. A process of converting biomass to biocrude, comprising: feeding municipal sludge to at least one anaerobic digester, the municipal sludge comprising biowaste; collecting thermal energy from combustion of a first portion of biogas generated from partial digestion of the biowaste; providing the thermal energy from combustion of the first portion of biogas to a generator; providing a second portion of biogas generated from partial digestion of the biowaste to a hydrothermal liquefaction system for combusting, the hydrothermal liquefaction system comprising a hydrothermal liquefaction reactor; providing the thermal energy from combustion of the second portion of the biogas, waste heat generated by the generator, at least a portion of electrical energy generated by the generator, and the partially digested biowaste from the anaerobic digester to the hydrothermal liquefaction reactor; recirculating waste heat generated by the hydrothermal liquefaction system to the anaerobic digesters; and harvesting biocrude from the hydrothermal liquefaction system. 22. The process of claim 21 , further comprising concentrating the partially digested biowaste fed from the anaerobic digester prior to feeding the partially digested biowaste to the hydrothermal liquefaction reactor, and feeding an aqueous phase from the hydrothermal liquefaction reactor and washoff from the concentration of the partially digested biowaste to secondary and tertiary treatment streams of a biosolids treatment plant. 23. The process of claim 21 , further comprising harvesting waste thermal energy from the hydrothermal liquefaction system and providing the waste thermal energy to an electrical generator and/or the at least one anaerobic digester. 24. The system of claim 1 , wherein the biomass feedstock comprises animal waste. |
|
| 10/23/2017 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Patent | |
1.3 Sub- and Supercritical hydrothermal gasification
Different hydrothermal biomass gasification processes are under development. In contrast to biomass gasification processes without water, biomass with the natural water content (“green biomass”) can be converted completely and energetically efficiently to gases. Depending on the reaction conditions, methane or hydrogen is the burnable gas produced. Some processes use catalysts. In recent years, significant progress was achieved in the development of various hydrothermal biomass gasification processes.[\[Paper\]](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0896844608003501)
**Input:**
* Hydrothermal gasification has been a topic of great attention for the conversion of lignocellulosic feedstocks and biomass model compounds. Recently, a few notable studies on the hydrothermal gasification have shown some promising results for the valorization of biogenic waste materials such as chicken manure, cattle manure, horse manure, sewage sludge, food waste, waste cooking oil,as well as leachate from municipal solid wastes and landfills. Several authors have also explored the use of fossil fuels as feedstocks for supercritical water gasification (SCWG), a few of which include coal, bitumen, petroleum coke and asphaltene, diesel oil and organic solvents e.g. isooctane.[\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96336-2985535198)
* Lignocellulosic, waste water, organic waste, sludge, manure, biocrude, plastics, algae, industrial waste, black liquor. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96336-2623564767)
* This study investigates enhanced biogas production via co-Hydrothermalgasification (co-HTG) of wet Chlorella vulgaris biomass and hydrochar (HC).
**Products:** Syngas, biochar and tar.
* Along with H~2~, CO~2~, CO and CH~4~, the gas products obtained from SCWG also contains certain amount of light molecular weight hydrocarbon gases such as C~2~H~2~, C~2~H~4~ and C~2~H~6~ depending on the substrate gasified. Considering H~2~ as the chief product of interest, the presence of other gases in the product stream is found to be economically opposing. Syngas has many important applications such as electricity and power generation as well as in the production of liquid fuels and chemicals via several gas-to-liquid processes such as Fischer-Tropsch process or syngas fermentation. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96336-2985535198)
* The products from hydrothermal gasification include CO~2~, H~2~, CO and CH~4~, with small amounts of C~2~H~4~ and C~2~H~6~, some char/tar/coke[\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96336-2623564767)
**Process/pilots:**
* **Hydrothermal gasification is a process that involves a reaction temperature above 350 °C in the absence of oxidants and produces a flue gas rich in either H2 or CH4, depending on reaction conditions.** HTG is done in either batch or continuous mode. The batch process offers the advantage of carrying out experiments at different concentrations and catalysts, while the continuous system allows for studies of reaction kinetics. **Hydrothermal gasification has three main types: aqueous phase refining, catalytic gasification in a near-critical state, and supercritical water gasification.** Aqueous phase refining occurs at low concentrations at \~ 215–265 °C to produce H2 and CO2 in the presence of a heterogeneous catalyst. The process is not desired unless hydrogen is used in situ for the hydrogenation of biomass. Catalytic gasification of biomass in a near-critical state occurs at 350–400 °C and produces CH4 and CO2 in the presence of a heterogeneous catalyst wherein CO undergoes hydrogenation to CH4. This process was first performed in a batch reactor at Battelle Memorial Institute and later realized in a bench-scale continuous system. Supercritical water gasification (SCWG) uses water at a supercritical state in the range of 600–700 °C to generate mainly H2 and CO2 with/without a catalyst. SCWG is preferred for biomass with a moisture content above 30%. **Even biomass with a moisture content as high as 90% (w/w) can be gasified.** SCWG uses high energy to raise the temperature of water to 600 °C, and the energy content in the product can be easily recovered by passing it through a heat exchanger. Heat exchangers operate at high pressures, which makes heat recovery possible. Moreover, reactors at supercritical conditions operate at high pressure that do not require gas pressurization afterwards and thus the compressed medium allows gasification to occur with minimal heat loss. The further dissolution of reaction intermediates in the reaction medium minimizes coke and tar formation. **Hydrothermal gasification has significant advantages over traditional processes. The traditional method produces low-quality syngas with impurities such as char/tar that lead to clogging issues. This low-quality syngas needs to be purified, which increases costs.**[\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96336-2623564767)
* **Supercritical water gasification is a promising technology to convert coal/biomass/organic wastes to hydrogen cleanly and efficiently.** Extensive investigations on supercritical water gasification were conducted in China. State Key Laboratory of Multiphase Flow in Power Engineering (SKLMFPE) together with other universities/institutes established experimental device with the reactor type of quartz tube reaction system, tubular reactor and fluidized bed reactor. The fluidized bed reactor system solved the blocking problems to guarantee continuous and stable gasification. [ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96336-2053968199)
* Supercritical water gasification (SCWG) is a process that has been examined in the past years for its potential implementation in waste treatment technologies. SCWG can convert organic waste streams from industrial activities into energy. **A one of a kind vertical continuous apparatus was constructed at UCT Prague for testing this process.** Several experiments with tall soap and black liquor on the hydrothermal gasification apparatus were performed. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96336-2783804797)
* **Based on bench and pilot scale studies, supercritical water gasification of sewage sludge for hydrogen production is feasible in terms of technical and economic evaluation.** Given issues concerning corrosion, plugging and high operating cost, a combined supercritical water gasification and catalytic hydrothermal gasification concept is proposed as a practical strategy to directly harness hydrogen from sewage sludge in future applications.[ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96336-2020977193)
**Co-hydrothermal gasification:**
* Hydrothermal carbonization was applied to valorize struvite containing waste microalgae stream into solid bio-fuel with improved combustion properties. The effects of HC quality and mixing ratio are investigated on biogas yield, composition and carbon conversion ratio. The results show that the application of blending components promotes H2, CH4 formation and selectivity in hydrothermal gasification.The total co-HTGgasyieldis increased from 19.13 to 46.95mol kg..1 at 650.C and 300 bar by applying 5wt.% HC blending concentration and reduced level of volatile matter content (24.61 wt.%). The obtained high hydrogen, methane yields and carbon conversion ratio (19.49, 2.98 mol kg..1, 82.31%, respectively) indicate effective hydrothermal upgrading potentials in case of wet and waste biomass feedstocks.[ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96336-2998830622)
Suppliers
| 1.3.1 | Sub- and Supercritical hydrothermal gasification |
|---|---|
| A review on subcritical and supercritical water gasification of biogenic, polymeric and petroleum wastes to hydrogen-rich synthesis gas | |
| Abstract Lignocellulosic feedstocks such as forestry biomass and agricultural crop residues can be utilized to generate biofuels and biochemicals. In addition, a large amount of non-plant residues or biogenic wastes is also generated worldwide that has huge potentials but remains underutilized. Converting these organic waste materials through thermochemical and biochemical processes into biofuels is widely regarded as a remedial approach to address waste management and clean energy problems. One of such thermochemical biomass-to-gas technologies is hydrothermal gasification in the presence of subcritical or supercritical water, which utilizes the unique fluid properties of water to disintegrate effectively the organic wastes into hydrogen-rich syngas. This paper reviews the thermophysical chemistry of subcritical and supercritical water as well as their role in generating syngas from the hydrothermal decomposition of biogenic, polymeric and organic wastes such as municipal solid waste, animal manure, food waste, industrial effluents, sewage sludge, mixed plastics, waste tires and petrochemical wastes. The paper also describes different technologies used for syngas cleaning and conditioning together with gas-to-liquid technology such as Fischer-Tropsch synthesis to produce hydrocarbon fuels. The current progress, challenges and knowledge gaps in the research and development of hydrothermal gasification of biogenic wastes are also discussed. | |
| 03/01/2020 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.3.2 | Sub- and Supercritical hydrothermal gasification |
| A review on the current status of various hydrothermal technologies on biomass feedstock | |
| Hydrothermal processing, a thermochemical approach, is an excellent method of converting energy-rich biomass into useful products. This approach offers the advantage of handling biomass with relatively high moisture content by precluding an energy-intensive pretreatment step. Hydrothermal processing is of world-wide interest in view of depleting fossil-fuel reserves and increased environmental greenhouse gas emissions. There is potential to develop this novel technology at demonstration scale. This paper reviews the three hydrothermal technologies, namely hydrothermal liquefaction, gasification and carbonization, to provide insight into the likelihood of commercialization. The study discusses the role of different process parameters that have key impacts on the quality and yield of the desired products. This study also identifies the gaps in the literature including the need to establish a baseline to develop key process models and to perform a techno-economic assessment to get a better sense of the viability of the technology in future. | |
| 01/01/2018 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.3.3 | Sub- and Supercritical hydrothermal gasification |
| Assessment of black liquor gasification in supercritical water. | |
| Abstract Supercritical water gasification of black liquor (waste pulping chemicals) has been examined. The aim was to evaluate the feasibility of using this technique to convert such bio-based waste to value added fuel products, as well as recovery of pulping materials. Supercritical gasification may improve overall process efficiency by eliminating the energy intensive evaporation step necessary in conventional process and product gas obtained at high pressure may be ready for utilization without any compression requirement. Appropriate operating parameters, including pressure, temperature, feed concentration, and reaction time, which would yield the highest conversion and energy efficiency were determined. Reaction was performed in a quartz capillary heated in a fluidized bed reactor. Results indicated that pressure between 220 and 400 atm has insignificant influence on the gas products and extent of carbon conversion. Increasing temperature and residence time between 375–650 °C and 5–120 s resulted in greater gas production, overall carbon conversion, and energy efficiency. Maximum conversion to H 2 , CO, CH 4 , and C 2 H X was achieved at the highest temperature and longest residence time tested showing an overall carbon conversion of 84.8%, gas energy content of 9.4 MJ/m 3 and energy conversion ratio of 1.2. Though higher carbon conversion and energy conversion ratio were obtained with more dilute liquor, energy content was lower than for those with higher solid contents. Due to anticipated complex design and high initial investment cost of this operation, further studies on overall feasibility should be carried out in order to identify the optimum operating window for this novel process. | |
| 01/01/2009 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.3.4 | Sub- and Supercritical hydrothermal gasification |
| Catalytic Conversion of High‐Moisture Biomass to Synthetic Natural Gas in Supercritical Water | |
| Methane produced from waste biomass is a renewable and clean biofuel that can be distributed using the existing natural gas infrastructure. It can be used for heat and power generation and as a transportation fuel. High-moisture biomass is a relatively untapped resource with a significant energetic potential and attractive costs. However, new technologies are needed for converting high-moisture biomass efficiently into methane and recovering the nutrients for use as a fertilizer. Gasification of the biomass in a hydrothermal environment is an emerging technology that offers many advantages over gas-phase conversion processes or anaerobic digestion. Heterogeneous catalysis is the key to a successful hydrothermal gasification process for the synthesis of methane. Only a few metals, including Ru, Ni, Rh and Pt, are useful under these conditions. Pd and Co catalysts might also be suitable but conclusive data are lacking. Alloying is another approach that holds promise to yield active and stable catalysts. The choice of hydrothermally stable supports is limited to some insoluble oxides and carbon. Some of these oxides have not yet been tested as catalyst supports (e.g. Nb2O5, Ta2O5 and UO2) and might prove useful. The mechanism for the gasification of the organic compounds to CO and H2 is likely to follow a Mars–van-Krevelen redox cycle with two oxides of the catalytic metal involved. The strongest evidence for such a mechanism was found for RuO2, but specific in situ studies are needed for corroborating this hypothesis and determining the actual oxidation states involved in the mechanism. Deactivation in hydrothermal gasification follows the same modes as in gas-phase and liquid-phase catalysis. Coke deposition is not a primary cause of deactivation due to the high partial pressure of water and the high solubility of coke precursors in near- and supercritical water. Salts play a crucial role in catalyst deactivation. Sulfate was found to be a strong poison for Ru catalysts, but the actual poison might be sulfide, formed by reduction of the sulfate with hydrogen or organic compounds. Based on this knowledge, a continuous catalytic hydrothermal gasification process is under development at PSI featuring continuous on-line salt precipitation and removal before the catalytic reactor. Keywords: biomass; natural gas; methane; catalytic hydrothermal gasification; supercritical water; heterogeneous catalysis | |
| 07/15/2010 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.3.5 | Sub- and Supercritical hydrothermal gasification |
| Co-Hydrothermal gasification of Chlorella vulgaris and hydrochar: The effects of waste-to-solid biofuel production and blending concentration on biogas generation | |
| Abstract This studyinvestigates enhanced biogas production via co-Hydrothermalgasification (co-HTG) of wet Chlorella vulgaris biomass andhydrochar (HC). Hydrothermal carbonization was applied to valorize struvite containing waste microalgae stream into solid bio-fuel with improved combustion properties. The effects of HC quality and mixing ratio are investigated on biogas yield, composition and carbon conversion ratio. The results show that the applicationof blending components promotesH2,CH4 formation and selectivityin hydrothermalgasification.The total co-HTGgasyieldis increasedfrom 19.13to 46.95mol kg..1 at 650.Cand 300 barby applying5wt.%HC blending concentration and reducedlevel of volatile matter content (24.61 wt.%).The obtained highhydrogen, methane yields and carbon conversion ratio (19.49, 2.98 mol kg..1, 82.31%, respectively) indicate effective hydrothermal upgrading potentials in case of wet and waste biomass feedstocks. | |
| 01/01/2020 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.3.6 | Sub- and Supercritical hydrothermal gasification |
| Hydrogen Production by Supercritical Water Gasification of Biomass with Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Catalyst | |
| Biomass gasification in supercritical water is a clean and efficient way to convert biomass to hydrogen-rich gaseous products. Appropriate catalyst can lower the reaction temperature to guarantee the technological and economic feasibility. This paper selects Ca(OH)2, Na2CO3, K2CO3, NaOH, KOH, LiOH, and ZnCl2 as typical homogeneous catalysts and three kinds of Raney-Ni, dolomite, and olivine as typical heterogeneous catalysts. The catalyst effects are investigated in the process of biomass gasification in supercritical water with the temperature of 400°C, pressure of MPa, and residence time of 20 min. The experimental results show that Raney-Ni has the best hydrogen selectivity and hydrogen yield. The mixture of NaOH with Raney-Ni was investigated in order to research the synergistic effect of different catalysts. The experimental results show that Raney-Ni and NaOH have a synergistic effect in the biomass gasification in supercritical water. | |
| 01/01/2014 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.3.7 | Sub- and Supercritical hydrothermal gasification |
| Hydrothermal gasification of sewage sludge and model compounds for renewable hydrogen production: A review | |
| Sewage sludge is bio-solid with high moisture content generated from wastewater treatment plants. Due to the avoidance of energy-intensive dewatering, hydrothermal conversion of sewage sludge becomes a promising technology to simultaneously achieve energy recovery and solid waste management. In order to obtain an entire understanding of applicability of hydrothermal gasification for hydrogen rich gas production from sewage sludge, this review article discussed hydrothermal conversion and gasification processes in terms of fundamental principles, operating conditions, partial oxidative gasification, and detrimental effects of intermediates. Furthermore, since organic compounds in sewage sludge are mainly composed of carbohydrates, proteins, lipids, and lignin, this article comprehensively reviewed hydrogen production from these biomass model compounds and their hydrolysis products under sub- and supercritical water. Additionally, introduction of alkali salts and heterogeneous catalysts to enhance hydrogen yield under mild temperatures and pressures in hydrothermal gasification process was also discussed. Based on bench and pilot scale studies, supercritical water gasification of sewage sludge for hydrogen production is feasible in terms of technical and economic evaluation. Given issues concerning corrosion, plugging and high operating cost, a combined supercritical water gasification and catalytic hydrothermal gasification concept is proposed as a practical strategy to directly harness hydrogen from sewage sludge in future applications. | |
| 11/01/2014 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.3.8 | Sub- and Supercritical hydrothermal gasification |
| Microalgal growth and fatty acid productivity on recovered nutrients from hydrothermal gasification of Acutodesmus obliquus | |
| Abstract Microalgal biomass of the green algae Acutodesmus obliquus produced in photobioreactors was converted during hydrothermal gasification into biogas. The liquid residues from this process contain mainly inorganic elements which may substitute traditional nutrient sources. The conversion process produces two residual water fractions, an aqueous phase and a salt brine with a total recovery rate of the macronutrient nitrogen, 56.8% and 1.3% of phosphorus. Both types of residues were added in separate batch experiments to study the effects on growth of A. obliquus and Chlorella vulgaris over 9–10 days of cultivation. The biomass parameters and fatty acid productivity were assessed to elucidate the effects of the residues on the two algal species compared to a control culture medium. It was demonstrated that especially the salt brine can substitute fertilizers for algal cultivation. However not all the nutrients originally brought into the gasification process could be recovered, so the aqueous phase was replenished with nutrients. Biomass productivities of A. obliquus and C. vulgaris grown in the aqueous phase from the conversion process were similar to those in the control culture medium and reached up to 1.3 g L − 1 d − 1 and 0.5 g L − 1 d − 1 , respectively. Fatty acid productivity of A. obliquus in the aqueous phase was 312.9 mg L − 1 d − 1 , thus similar to the control. A much lower productivity of only 43.5 mg L − 1 d − 1 was determined for C. vulgaris with aqueous residue which accounted for only 52.6% of the control. The results indicate that the residual water from hydrothermal gasification can be partly applied as a sole nutrient source for large scale production of algal biomass and can also be a sustainable substitute for commercial fertilizers. | |
| 07/01/2015 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.3.9 | Sub- and Supercritical hydrothermal gasification |
| Review of heterogeneous catalysts for sub- and supercritical water gasification of biomass and wastes | |
| Abstract Nowadays, substantial efforts are devoted to decrease our dependence on fossil fuels. This change will heavily rely on development of new and improved catalytic processes. Over the past two decades, catalytic hydrogen production from wet biomass and organic compounds in sub- and supercritical water (SCW) has gained significant attention. In this process, catalysts are employed to enhance the gas formation rate at moderate temperatures. Catalysts can be also utilized to shift the product distribution toward a more desirable compound (e.g. hydrogen). The effectiveness of various types of heterogeneous catalysts, mainly containing nickel and ruthenium, have been demonstrated for hydrothermal gasification of organic compounds. Catalyst formulation along with operating conditions such as temperature and feed concentration can significantly affect the conversion and selectivity of the process. This paper reviews the major findings of hydrothermal gasification over the past two decades with the aid of heterogeneous catalysts in terms of activity, hydrogen selectivity and stability. Commercially available and laboratory-prepared catalysts including supported and skeletal metal catalysts, activated carbon, oxides, metal wires and other innovative catalysts are considered. Results of supercritical water gasification (SCWG) of various feedstocks reported in the literature are compared and possible mechanisms and rates of deactivation of heterogeneous catalysts are discussed. | |
| 08/01/2011 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.3.10 | Sub- and Supercritical hydrothermal gasification |
| Study on gasification mechanism of biomass waste in supercritical water based on product distribution | |
| Abstract Supercritical water gasification technology is widely applied to convert organic waste into valuable substances as a clean and efficient method. Biomass gasification in SCW is a complex process and complicated chemical reactions like decomposition and poly-condensation take place, thus, reaction mechanism of real biomass needs to be further investigated. In this paper, experimental study on cornstalk gasification in SCW was conducted at the temperature of 500–800 °C, reaction time of 1–15min and feedstock concentration of 1–9%. The effects of various operating parameters on evolution of gas, liquid and solid products were conducted. It was discovered that pore structure and carbon microspheres appeared successively on the surface of solid residue. Mechanism study showed that the biomass was first depolymerized into monomer and its derivatives, then cracked and poly-condensed into a nuclear to generate carbon microspheres as its concentration reached the critical concentration. As the reaction proceeds, reduction reaction, coke combustion and secondary reaction occurred, thus carbon microspheres decreased. The results indicated that higher reaction temperature, longer reaction time and lower feed concentration were conducive to improving reaction performance of biomass. Finally, it was discovered that carbon gasification efficiency reached 99% at the temperature of 700 °C, reaction time of 15 min and biomass concentration of 3%. | |
| 03/24/2020 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.3.11 | Sub- and Supercritical hydrothermal gasification |
| Supercritical water gasification of biomass: A state-of-the-art review of process parameters, reaction mechanisms and catalysis | |
| The global energy demand has laid emphasis on the exploration of alternate sources of energy. With the application of many thermochemical and biochemical technologies, waste biomass can be converted into green fuels. Gasification is one of the most effective thermochemical (biomass-to-gas) technologies that can transform organic substrates into combustible syngas. Supercritical water gasification is an iteration of conventional gasification that uses water as the reaction medium to efficiently decompose biomass to hydrogen-rich syngas. The yields and composition of products from supercritical water gasification largely depend on the process parameters such as temperature, pressure, residence time, and feed concentration, biomass particle size, reactor configurations as well as reaction pathways and catalysis. These factors also determine the gasification efficiency, carbon conversion and heating value of the gas products. This paper reviews different homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysts involved in supercritical water gasification of biomass. Several reaction mechanisms occurring during gasification of biomass in supercritical water have also been illustrated and discussed, and research gaps for future studies have been identified. Overall, this review is an update to the compiled literature and the aspects involved in supercritical water gasification of different biomass feedstocks. | |
| 01/01/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.3.12 | Sub- and Supercritical hydrothermal gasification |
| Supercritical water gasification of wastes from the paper industry | |
| Abstract Supercritical water gasification (SCWG) is a process that has been examined in the past years for its potential implementation in waste treatment technologies. SCWG can convert organic waste streams from industrial activities into energy. A one of a kind vertical continuous apparatus was constructed at UCT Prague for testing this process. Several experiments with tall soap and black liquor on the hydrothermal gasification apparatus were performed. In this paper, results that permit to compare the influence of different process conditions (residence time, catalyst addition). In addition, practical gasification experiences with real industry waste streams treated in the specific vertical reactor made from stainless steel are presented. All acquired data were obtained from experiments carried at temperature 500 °C and pressure 25 MPa. The reached carbon efficiency when using tall soap and black liquor were 11% and 24%, respectively. | |
| 01/01/2018 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 1.3.13 | Sub- and Supercritical hydrothermal gasification |
| Supercritical water gasification research and development in China | |
| Abstract Supercritical water gasification is a promising technology to convert coal/biomass/organic wastes to hydrogen cleanly and efficiently. Extensive investigations on supercritical water gasification were conducted in China. State Key Laboratory of Multiphase Flow in Power Engineering (SKLMFPE) together with other universities/institutes established experimental device with the reactor type of quartz tube reaction system, tubular reactor and fluidized bed reactor. The fluidized bed reactor system solved the blocking problems to guarantee continuous and stable gasification. Typically Hongliulin coal as a typical coal in China was completely gasified in supercritical water fluidized bed system and the hydrogen yield was 77.5 mol per kg of coal. A pilot scale demonstration plant for supercritical water gasification driven by solar concentration system was established with a handling capacity of 1 t/h and it proves the feasibility of the system scale up. A novel thermodynamics cycle power generation system based on coal gasification in supercritical water was proposed with the obvious advantages of high coal-electricity efficiency and zero pollutant emission. An Integrated Cooperative Innovation Center with the name of A New Type of High-efficient Coal Gasification Technology and its Large-scale Utilization was founded in order to vigorously enhance the industrialization of the technology. | |
| 01/01/2015 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
2. Thermal conversion
BackConversions done in a thermal environment, usually without water)
2.1 Pyrolysis
Pyrolysis is the thermal decomposition of materials at elevated temperatures in an inert atmosphere. It involves a change of chemical composition.[\[Wiki\]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyrolysis)
**Input:**
* Next to crops, lignocellulosic biomass and (dried) algae, various waste streams can also be used as the feedstock for pyrolysis, including industrial waste (*e.g.* tires, packaging, and recyclable waste), municipal solid waste (MSW), sewage sludge, agricultural waste (*e.g.* livestock manure, or agricultural residues), pre-treated non-hazardous waste fractions such as refuse-derived fuel (RDF), solid refuse fuels (SRF), and some hazardous waste (such as automotive shredder residue).[\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96339-2900718933)
* **It could be seen that higher water content led to a higher yield of condensable products and a lower amount of char.** At a pyrolysis temperature of 500 °C the CO-content of the product gas did increase significantly with increasing water content. Moreover, initial water content had no significant effect on the microscopic structure of wood chars. **However the quality of the liquid products is lower.** [\[Paper\]](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016236113000422#:\~:text=%E2%96%BA%20Higher%20water%20content%20led,smaller%20at%20high%20pyrolysis%20temperatures.)
* It can be concluded that the water in bio-oil mostly originates from the original moisture in feedstock. The high water content in bio-oil may cause a phase separation and lowers the heating value of the oil. The presence of water in bio-oil with higher amount also limits its utilization as a fuel, especially in combustion, as it reduces the combustion rates, delay the ignition and lower the adiabatic flame temperatures during combustion. Therefore it is an advantage to use a relatively dry feedstock in order to have a better quality of the bio-oil. [\[Paper\]](https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/757a/33d295c2fe781e34a6102be6ea13c0985f33.pdf)
**Products: bio-oil (50-70%), biochar (10-20%, (syn)gas (10-20%).**
**Process:**
* Pyrolysis is a promising technology for the production of marketable energy products from waste mixtures, as it decomposes heterogeneous material into homogenous fuel products. **This research assessed the ability of slow pyrolysis to convert three waste streams, composed of fibre residues contaminated with different plastic mixtures, into char and tarry phase products** at three different temperatures (300, 425 and 550 °C). Significant amounts of hydrocarbon plastics in the feed materials increased the calorific values of the char (up to 32.9 MJ/kg) and tarry phase (up to 42.8 MJ/kg) products, comparable to high volatile bituminous A coal and diesel respectively. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96339-2563570629)
* This paper presents a mobile autothermal pyrolysis system for locally converting biomass feedstock into bio-oil that can be transported easily. The system includes a compact internally interconnected fluidized bed (IIFB) reactor, a biomass pretreatment facility, and a product recovery unit. The results indicate that the biomass feedstock cost of mobile pyrolysis systems can be effectively reduced. Compared with the fixed biofuel production plant, the labor cost is higher for the mobile plant. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96339-2788065379)
* The purpose of this article is to demonstrate how the generated sludge from fermentation can be further converted into useful products such as hydrogen, methane and carbon monoxide, all produced in their maximum possible concentrations. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96339-2026844222)
**Reactors:**
* In general, fluidized bed reactors incur higher capital and operational costs but are regarded as a suitable technology for large-scale pyrolysis including catalytic pyrolysis. Entrained flow reactors are expected to be more economically efficient but deliver lower carbon efficiency than fluidized bed systems. Ablative reactors and auger reactors are considered to be suitable for small-scale operations and distributed systems. Other types of reactors in development include microwave-assisted reactors, and solar reactors. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96339-2900718933)
**Co-pyrolysis:**
* **Co-pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass and plastic is efficient to upgrade the quality of bio-oil because plastic facilitates deoxygenation.** However, catalysts are required to produce bio-oil that is suitable for potential use as transportation fuel. This review presents an overview of recent advances in catalytic co-pyrolysis of biomass and plastic from the perspective of chemistry, catalyst, and feedstock pretreatment. Additionally, this review introduces not only recent research results of acid catalysts for catalytic co-pyrolysis, but also recent approaches that utilize base catalysts. Future research directions are suggested for commercially feasible co-pyrolysis process. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96339-3023411190)
* Our results strongly suggest that co-pyrolysis of PETE and agricultural wastes may be favorable to enhance the properties of biochar. In addition to syn-gas and bio-oil from co-pyrolysis, biochar may be a valuable by-product for commercial use. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96339-2971593341)
**Emerging technologies:**
* There are a variety of emerging pyrolysis technologies which are under investigation. For instance, concentrated solar energy can be a strong source of heat for the endothermic pyrolysis reactions and can reduce the greenhouse gas footprint of the ultimate fuel. An alternative method for high heating rate required for fast pyrolysis is through electric current. internally connected fluidized beds (ICFB) in which a combustion bed is used for energy recovery from coke by-products.[\[Art. #ARTNUM\]\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96339-2900718933)
Suppliers
| 2.1.1 | Pyrolysis |
|---|---|
| Biomass Chars: Elaboration, Characterization and Applications | |
| This book contains the successful invited submissions [1–15] to a Special Issue of Energies onthe subject area of “Biomass Chars: Elaboration, Characterization, and Applications”. The invitededitors have decided to focus the Special Issue on the specific topic of biomass transformation and use.In fact, biomass can be converted to energy, biofuels, and bioproducts, via thermochemical conversionprocesses such as combustion, pyrolysis, and gasification. Combustion technology is most widelyapplied on an industrial scale. However, biomass gasification and pyrolysis processes are still in theresearch and development stage. The major products from these processes are syngas, bio-oil, andchar (called also biochar for agronomic applications). Among these products, biomass chars have beenreceiving increasing attention for different applications such as gasification, co-combustion, catalyst oradsorbent precursors, soil amendment, carbon fuel cells, and supercapacitors.This Special Issue provides an overview for biomass chars production methods (pyrolysis,hydrothermal carbonization, etc.), the characterization techniques (scanning electronic microscopy,X-ray fluorescence, nitrogen adsorption, Raman spectroscopy, nuclear magnetic resonancespectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, temperature programmed desorption, massspectrometry, etc.), their properties and their suitable recovery processes.Topics of interest for the call included, but were not limited to the production of biochar for: Biofuel production Soil amendment Carbon sequestration Heterogeneous catalysis Syngas production Pollutant adsorptionResponses to our call had the following statistics: Submissions (25); Publications (15); Rejections (10); Article types: research article (15).The authors’ geographical distribution (published papers) is: China (4) USA (2) Canada (2) | |
| 12/03/2017 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.1.2 | Pyrolysis |
| Combustion Behavior of Animal-Manure-Based Hydrochar and Pyrochar | |
| The sustainability of energy production can be increased by combusting waste-derived solid fuels, alone or as blends with coal. This paper investigated whether two thermochemical processes (hydrothermal carbonization and pyrolysis) can be used in sustainable manure management systems to convert surplus manure waste streams into renewable fuels. Hydrochars and pyrochars derived from swine manure and poultry litter at various process conditions were characterized. Their combustion behavior was studied by thermogravimetric analysis, individually and simulated as a blend with fossil coal. The hydrochars underwent two combustion stages, active and char combustion, while the pyrochars and four fossil coals showed only one stage. The substantial differences in characteristic combustion temperatures, kinetic parameters, and ash content between animal-manure-derived chars and coal suggest that fossil coals should not be replaced entirely with char, but used preferably as a blend. Simulation of blends with coal sho... | |
| 12/18/2018 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.1.3 | Pyrolysis |
| Copper(II)-mediated thermolysis of alginates: a model kinetic study on the influence of metal ions in the thermochemical processing of macroalgae | |
| Thermochemical processing methods such as pyrolysis are of growing interest as a means of converting biomass into fuels and commodity chemicals in a sustainable manner. Macroalgae, or seaweed, represent a novel class of feedstock for pyrolysis that, owing to the nature of the environments in which they grow coupled with their biochemistry, naturally possess high metal contents. Although the impact of metals upon the pyrolysis of terrestrial biomass is well documented, their influence on the thermochemical conversion of marine-derived feeds is largely unknown. Furthermore, these effects are inherently difficult to study, owing to the heterogeneous character of natural seaweed samples. The work described in this paper uses copper(II) alginate, together with alginic acid and sodium alginate as model compounds for exploring the effects of metals upon macroalgae thermolysis. A thermogravimetric analysis–Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic study revealed that, unusually, Cu2+ ions promote the onset of pyrolysis in the alginate polymer, with copper(II) alginate initiating rapid devolatilization at 143°C, 14°C lower than alginic acid and 61°C below the equivalent point for sodium alginate. Moreover, this effect was mirrored in a sample of wild Laminaria digitata that had been doped with Cu2+ ions prior to pyrolysis, thus validating the use of alginates as model compounds with which to study the thermolysis of macroalgae. These observations indicate the varying impact of different metal species on thermochemical behaviour of seaweeds and offer an insight into the pyrolysis of brown macroalgae used in phytoremediation of metal-containing waste streams. | |
| 12/21/2012 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.1.4 | Pyrolysis |
| Effect of autohydrolysis pretreatment on biomass structure and the resulting bio-oil from a pyrolysis process | |
| Abstract Pyrolysis is a promising method for converting biomass to biofuels. However, some of pyrolysis oil's physiochemical properties still limit its commercial applications. In this study, the autohydrolysis pretreatment at 175 ± 3 °C for 40 min was conducted to improve the resulting pine pyrolysis oil’s properties as a fuel. During autohydrolysis, deacetylation and decomposition of hemicellulose was observed by ion-exchange chromatography and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR). In addition, the cleavage of lignin ether bonds was clearly determined by 13 C cross-polarization/magic angle spinning (CP/MAS) nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). Phosphitylation followed by 31 P NMR analysis of the heavy oils gave detailed structural information of the hydroxyl groups; the results revealed that autohydrolysis pretreatment led to a reduction of carboxyl acids in the heavy oils generated at all three pyrolysis temperatures (400, 500, and 600 °C). The 31 P NMR analysis also revealed that autohydrolysis pretreatment led to a reduction of condensed phenolic hydroxyl groups in the heavy oils produced at 600 °C. 1 H- 13 C heteronuclear single-quantum correlation (HSQC) NMR analysis showed that at a pyrolysis temperature of 600 °C, the pretreated pine produced lower methoxy group constituents. Both 31 P and HSQC NMR results indicated that autohydrolysis pretreatment increased levoglucosan yields in the bio-oils. | |
| 10/01/2017 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.1.5 | Pyrolysis |
| Formation mechanism of levoglucosan and formaldehyde during cellulose pyrolysis | |
| Biomass pyrolysis is an efficient way to transform raw biomass or organic waste materials into useable energy, including liquid, solid, and gaseous materials. Levoglucosan (1,6-anhydro-β-d-glucopyranose) and formaldehyde are two important products in biomass pyrolysis. The formation mechanism of these two products was investigated using the density functional theory (DFT) method based on quantum mechanics. It was found that active anhydroglucose can be obtained from a cellulose homolytic reaction during high-temperature steam gasification of the biomass process. Anhydroglucose undergoes a hydrogen-donor reaction and forms an intermediate, which can transform into the products via three pathways, one (path 1) for the formation of levoglucosan and two (paths 2 and 3) for formaldehyde. A total of six elementary reactions are involved. At a pressure of 1 atm, levoglucosan can be formed at all of the temperatures (450–750 K) considered in this simulation, whereas formaldehyde can be formed only when the temper... | |
| 08/18/2011 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.1.6 | Pyrolysis |
| From waste biomass to chemicals and energy via microwave-assisted processes | |
| Lignocellulosic waste material serves as a considerable renewable feedstock that may be used to replace oil refineries with biorefineries. Indeed, all biomass components can be converted into platform chemicals, bioenergy and materials. However, thermo-chemical and conventional catalytic conversions suffer from a number of drawbacks. Enabling technologies, such as microwaves (MW), can reduce process times and energy consumption, leading to improvements in product quality and yields. The remarkable advantages of MW over conventional heating, which originate from its direct dielectric interaction with biomass, are documented in this comprehensive survey. Moreover, the use of alternative solvents that interact strongly with MW in biphasic systems can circumvent additional upgrading and separation steps. Finally, this review discusses some of the challenges that MW irradiation faces, including the poor dielectric properties of some substrates and issues related to its large-scale application in pyrolysis, hydrothermal conversion and catalytic routes to biofuels, materials and platform chemicals. Waste biomass may well be the benchmark feedstock for the development of a circular bioeconomic approach. | |
| 01/01/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.1.7 | Pyrolysis |
| In-Situ Upgrading of Biomass Pyrolysis Vapor | |
| Processes for thermal conversion of biomass are provided. The processes involve upgrading the pyrolysis vapor from a pyrolysis reactor. The steps include thermally converting a biomass feedstock in a pyrolysis reactor, recovering a pyrolysis vapor from the reactor, passing the pyrolysis vapor in contact with a cracking catalyst, a water-gas shift reaction catalyst, a hydrotreating catalyst, and an acid catalyst, and converting the resulting upgraded pyrolysis vapor into a liquid product. The resulting biooil liquid product is more refined, and the overall processes offer economic and energy efficiency. | |
| 08/21/2014 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.1.8 | Pyrolysis |
| Lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis mechanism: A state-of-the-art review | |
| Abstract The past decades have seen increasing interest in developing pyrolysis pathways to produce biofuels and bio-based chemicals from lignocellulosic biomass. Pyrolysis is a key stage in other thermochemical conversion processes, such as combustion and gasification. Understanding the reaction mechanisms of biomass pyrolysis will facilitate the process optimization and reactor design of commercial-scale biorefineries. However, the multiscale complexity of the biomass structures and reactions involved in pyrolysis make it challenging to elucidate the mechanism. This article provides a broad review of the state-of-art biomass pyrolysis research. Considering the complexity of the biomass structure, the pyrolysis characteristics of its three major individual components (cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin) are discussed in detail. Recently developed experimental technologies, such as Py-GC–MS/FID, TG-MS/TG-FTIR, in situ spectroscopy, 2D-PCIS, isotopic labeling method, in situ EPR and PIMS have been employed for biomass pyrolysis research, including online monitoring of the evolution of key intermediate products and the qualitative and quantitative measurement of the pyrolysis products. Based on experimental results, many macroscopic kinetic modeling methods with comprehensive mechanism schemes, such as the distributed activation energy model (DAEM), isoconversional method, detailed lumped kinetic model, kinetic Monte Carlo model, have been developed to simulate the mass loss behavior during biomass pyrolysis and to predict the resulting product distribution. Combined with molecular simulations of the elemental reaction routes, an in-depth understanding of the biomass pyrolysis mechanism may be obtained. Aiming to further improve the quality of pyrolysis products, the effects of various catalytic methods and feedstock pretreatment technologies on the pyrolysis behavior are also reviewed. At last, a brief conclusion for the challenge and perspectives of biomass pyrolysis is provided. | |
| 09/01/2017 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.1.9 | Pyrolysis |
| Loop bioenergy production and carbon sequestration of polymeric waste by integrating biochemical and thermochemical conversion processes: A conceptual framework and recent advances | |
| Abstract Large volumes of polymeric waste, including natural biomass residues and synthetic waste, motivate the development of a general, robust and flexible process for mining the energy and resources contained in these wastes. By analyzing the positive and negative aspects of current, conventional technologies for the recovery of energy from polymeric waste, an integrated concept of a hybrid technology combining biochemical (anaerobic digestion, gas fermentation, carbon chain elongation) and thermochemical conversion processes (pyrolysis, gasification, hydrothermal carbonization) was proposed. The hybrid technology aims at simultaneously enhancing the efficiency and stability of biochemical conversion, controlling the gaseous and aqueous pollution from thermochemical conversion, and sequestering carbon. This paper presents a detailed review of state-of-the-art research relating to the principles, technical feasibility and practices involved in each technical link between the two conversion processes. | |
| 10/01/2017 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.1.10 | Pyrolysis |
| Maximizing the concentrations of hydrogen, carbon monoxide and methane produced from the pyrolysis of a MixAlco process derived sludge | |
| Abstract The MixAlco process converts heterogeneous biomass feedstocks into gasoline, JP-8 and diesel via biochemical and chemical pathways, generating sludge in the effluent stream. The purpose of this article is to demonstrate how the generated sludge can be further converted into useful products such as hydrogen, methane and carbon monoxide, all produced in their maximum possible concentrations. Experiments were performed in a non-catalytic environment at atmospheric pressure conditions, studying synthesis gas and methane concentrations for temperatures in the range of 630/903–770/1043 °C/K and pretreated sludge feed rates in the range of 290–374 g/min. With an auger driven reactor system and the statistical response surface method, the highest possible synthesis gas composition was 43.9 ± 3.36 vol% H 2 /33.3 ± 3.29 vol% CO at 740/1013 °C/K. The methane concentration was 20.3 ± 2.99 vol%. The generated empirical models for both hydrogen and methane concentrations were significant but that for the carbon monoxide concentration behavior was not. As an input factor, temperature was significant but sludge feed rate was not. Mass and energy balances revealed process efficiency decreased with increase in temperature although the process could be self-sustaining even at the lowest process efficiency. | |
| 07/01/2013 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.1.11 | Pyrolysis |
| Mobile Autothermal Pyrolysis System for Local Biomass Conversion: Process Simulation and Techno-Economic Analysis | |
| This paper presents a mobile autothermal pyrolysis system for locally converting biomass feedstock into bio-oil that can be transported easily. The system includes a compact internally interconnected fluidized bed (IIFB) reactor, a biomass pretreatment facility, and a product recovery unit. On the basis of modified chemical kinetic models, the pyrolysis process of common forestry and agricultural residues in this mobile system has been simulated. The pyrolytic product distribution from simulation has good agreements with experimental results. Then, the techno-economic performance of the mobile pyrolysis system in China is evaluated and compared with other liquid biofuel production facilities, i.e., fixed biomass pyrolysis plants and Fischer–Tropsch liquids production via biomass gasification (BG-FT). The results indicate that the biomass feedstock cost of mobile pyrolysis systems can be effectively reduced. Compared with the fixed biofuel production plant, the labor cost is higher for the mobile plant. Th... | |
| 02/20/2018 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.1.12 | Pyrolysis |
| Pyrolysis of fibre residues with plastic contamination from a paper recycling mill: Energy recoveries | |
| Abstract Pyrolysis is a promising technology for the production of marketable energy products from waste mixtures, as it decomposes heterogeneous material into homogenous fuel products. This research assessed the ability of slow pyrolysis to convert three waste streams, composed of fibre residues contaminated with different plastic mixtures, into char and tarry phase products at three different temperatures (300, 425 and 550 °C). The products were characterised in terms of mass yield, higher heating value (HHV) and gross energy conversion (EC). Significant amounts of hydrocarbon plastics in the feed materials increased the calorific values of the char (up to 32.9 MJ/kg) and tarry phase (up to 42.8 MJ/kg) products, comparable to high volatile bituminous A coal and diesel respectively. For all three waste streams converted at 300 °C, the majority of the energy in the feedstock was recovered in the char product (>80%), while deoxygenation of fibre component resulted in char with increased calorific value (up to 31.6 MJ/kg) being produced. Pyrolysis at 425 °C for two of the waste streams containing significant amounts of plastic produced both a valuable char and tarry phase, which resulted in an EC greater than 74%. Full conversion of plastic at 550 °C increased the tarry phase yield but dramatically decreased the char HHV. The influence of temperature on product yield and HHV was discussed based on the pyrolysis mechanisms and in relation to the plastic composition of the waste streams. | |
| 02/01/2017 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.1.13 | Pyrolysis |
| Pyrolytic Fractionation: A Promising Thermochemical Technique for Processing Oleaginous (Algal) Biomass | |
| We report the development of a two-step pyrolytic fractionation approach that is especially applicable to processing oleaginous algae feed stocks. The first step is a low-temperature pyrolysis (T ∼ 300–320 °C) to produce bio-oils from degradation of protein and carbohydrate fractions. Solid residues left behind can subsequently be subjected to a second higher temperature pyrolysis (T ∼ 420–430 °C) to volatilize and/or degrade triglycerides to produce fatty acids, their derivatives, and long chain hydrocarbons. Thus, pyrolytic fractionation can be used to “fractionate” oleaginous biomass and separately recover triglyceride degradation products. Proof-of-concept micropyrolyzer and subsequent lab-scale fixed-bed experiments were performed using oleaginous Chlorella sp. and Scenedesmus sp. to demonstrate the pyrolytic fractionation technique and determine bio-oil yields. As expected, triglyceride-specific bio-oils were rich in hydrocarbons and free fatty acids, were nearly free of water, short-chain organic a... | |
| 01/02/2018 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.1.14 | Pyrolysis |
| Recent advances in catalytic co-pyrolysis of biomass and plastic waste for the production of petroleum-like hydrocarbons. | |
| Abstract The global economy is threatened by the depletion of fossil resources and fluctuations in fossil fuel prices, and thus it is necessary to exploit sustainable energy sources. Carbon-neutral fuels including bio-oil obtained from biomass pyrolysis can act as alternatives to fossil fuels. Co-pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass and plastic is efficient to upgrade the quality of bio-oil because plastic facilitates deoxygenation. However, catalysts are required to produce bio-oil that is suitable for potential use as transportation fuel. This review presents an overview of recent advances in catalytic co-pyrolysis of biomass and plastic from the perspective of chemistry, catalyst, and feedstock pretreatment. Additionally, this review introduces not only recent research results of acid catalysts for catalytic co-pyrolysis, but also recent approaches that utilize base catalysts. Future research directions are suggested for commercially feasible co-pyrolysis process. | |
| 05/04/2020 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.1.15 | Pyrolysis |
| Review of the direct thermochemical conversion of lignocellulosic biomass for liquid fuels | |
| Increased demand for liquid transportation fuels, environmental concerns and depletion of petroleum resources requires the development of efficient conversion technologies for production of second-generation biofuels from non-food resources. Thermochemical approaches hold great potential for conversion of lignocellulosic biomass into liquid fuels. Direct thermochemical pro- cesses convert biomass into liquid fuels in one step using heat and catalysts and have many advantages over indirect and biological processes, such as greater feedstock flexibility, integrated conversion of whole biomass, and lower operation costs. Several direct thermochemical processes are employed in the production of liquid biofuels depending on the nature of the feedstock proper- ties: such as fast pyrolysis/liquefaction of lignocellulosic biomass for bio-oil, including upgrading methods, such as catalytic cracking and hydrogenation. Owing to the substantial amount of liquid fuels consumed by vehicular transport, converting biomass into drop-in liquid fuels may reduce the dependence of the fuel market on petroleum- based fuel products. In this review, we also summarize recent progress in technologies for large-scale equipment for direct thermochemical conversion. We focus on the technical aspects critical to commercialization of the technologies for production of liquid fuels from biomass, including feedstock type, cracking catalysts, catalytic cracking mechanisms, catalytic reactors, and biofuel properties. We also discuss future prospects for direct thermochemical conversion in biorefineries for the pro- duction of high grade biofuels. | |
| 01/01/2015 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.1.16 | Pyrolysis |
| The bioliq process for producing synthetic transportation fuels | |
| Biofuels of the second generation can contribute significantly to the replacement of the currently used fossil energy carriers for transportation fuel production. The lignocellulosic biomass residues used do not compete with food and feed production, but have to be collected from wide-spread areas for industrial large-scale use. The two-stage gasification concept bioliq offers a solution to this problem. It aims at the conversion of low-grade residual biomass from agriculture and forestry into synthetic fuels and chemicals. Central element of the bioliq process development is the 2–5 MW pilot plant along the complete process chain: fast pyrolysis for pretreatment of biomass to obtain an energy dense, liquid intermediate fuel, high-pressure entrained flow gasification providing low methane synthesis gas free of tar, hot synthesis gas cleaning to separate acid gases, and contaminants as well as methanol/dimethyl ether and subsequent following gasoline synthesis. After construction and commissioning of the individual process steps with partners from industry, first production of synthetic fuel was successfully achieved in 2014. In addition to pilot plant operation for technology demonstration, a research and development network has been established providing the scientific basis for optimization and further development of the bioliq process as well as to explore new applications of the technologies and products involved. For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website. | |
| 05/01/2017 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.1.17 | Pyrolysis |
| The multi-scale challenges of biomass fast pyrolysis and bio-oil upgrading: Review of the state of art and future research directions | |
| Abstract Biomass fast pyrolysis is potentially one of the cheapest routes toward renewable liquid fuels. Its commercialization, however, poses a multi-scale challenge, which starts with the characterization of feedstock, products and reaction intermediates at molecular scales, and continues with understanding the complex reaction network taking place in different reactor configurations, and in the case of catalytic pyrolysis and upgrading on different catalysts. In addition, crude pyrolysis oil is not immediately usable in the current energy infrastructure, due to undesirable properties such as low energy content and corrosiveness as a result of its high oxygenate content. It, therefore, needs to be upgraded and fractionated to desired specifications. While various types of pyrolysis reactors and upgrading technologies are under development, knowledge transfer and closing the gap between theory and application requires model development. In-depth understanding of the reaction mechanisms and kinetics should be combined with the knowledge of multi-scale transport phenomena to enable design, optimization, and control of complex pyrolysis reactors. Finally, underpinning economic and environmental impacts of biofuel production requires expanding the system boundaries to include the overall process and supply chain. The present contribution aims at providing a comprehensive multi-scale review that discusses the state of the art of each of these aspects, as well as their multi-scale interactions. The study is mainly focused on fast pyrolysis, although reference to other types of pyrolysis technologies is made for the sake of comparison and knowledge transfer. | |
| 03/01/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.1.18 | Pyrolysis |
| Thermal Processes for Biomass to Energy Conversion | |
| Production of energy from biomassis an attractive alternative to conventional fossil fuels. Use of solid organic wastes to produce biofuel is seen as a promising route from the sustainability point of view. Pyrolysis is one of the possible thermochemical methods to convert solid biomasses to valuable liquid and gas products. In this study, the slow pyrolysis process of poultry litter was investigated using different experimental and analytical techniques. A fixed bed reactor was used for the simulation of the slow pyrolysis process up to a constant temperature (400-800°C) under nitrogen flow. Yields of the different product fractions were determined. Several analytic methods were used to characterise the products. On-line FTIR techniques were used to detect the most significant compounds in the evolved gas. GC-MS results allowed the identification of the most important categories of compounds in the liquid condensate. HCNS composition of the products was revealed by elemental analysis and the fate of nitrogen and sulphur, present in relevant amounts in the original substrate, was studied. The energy transfer from the original biomass substrate to the different product fractions was also investigated. However, the bio-oil obtained from pyrolysis can be used as biofuel only after an upgrading step. A suitable method for upgrading bio-oil is catalytic cracking of the pyrolysis products, which converts high molecular weight compounds of the bio-oil into lower-weight molecules. Therefore, in the following step of the present study in-situ catalytic pyrolysis of poultry litter was studied by zeolites (zsm-5) catalyst. In order to study the effect of influential factors (temperature and catalyst to biomass ratio) on the obtained products, experimental design techniques were used. Overall, the results achieved shed some light on the potential use of the slow pyrolysis process for sanitation and waste-to-energy valorization of poultry litter. | |
| 05/18/2016 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.1.19 | Pyrolysis |
| Upgrading biochar via co-pyrolyzation of agricultural biomass and polyethylene terephthalate wastes | |
| Spent polyethylene terephthalate (PETE) bottles were collected and co-pyrolyzed with rice straw (RS) to examine the characteristics and performance of biochar as a sorbent for various types of U.S. EPA priority pollutants, including 2,4-dinitrotoluene (DNT), 2,4-dichlorophenol (DCP), Pb, chromate (CrO42−), and selenate (SeO42−). During sorption of contaminants to PETE/RS-derived biochar, PETE residues from pyrolysis, pH, and pyrolysis temperature greatly affected the sorption process. Depending on the types of contaminants and experimental conditions, co-pyrolysis of PETE and RS may enhance the sorption of contaminants through different sorption mechanisms, including hydrophobicity, electrostatic force, ion exchange, surface complexation, and surface precipitation. Unlike other contaminants, selenate was reductively transformed by delocalized electrons from the graphitic structure in biochar. Our results strongly suggest that co-pyrolysis of PETE and agricultural wastes may be favorable to enhance the properties of biochar. In addition to syn-gas and bio-oil from co-pyrolysis, biochar may be a valuable by-product for commercial use. | |
| 09/03/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.1.20 | Pyrolysis |
| Upgrading pyrolysis bio-oil to biofuel over bifunctional Co-Zn/HZSM-5 catalyst in supercritical methanol | |
| Abstract The role of catalyst is essential in processes of upgrading biomass pyrolysis bio-oil into hydrocarbon biofuel. While the majority of heterogeneous catalytic processes are conducted in the presence of gas (nearly ideal) or liquid phase, a growing number of processes are utilizing supercritical fluids (SCFs) as reaction media. Although hydrodeoxygenation (HDO) is proven a promising process for pyrolysis bio-oil upgrading to hydrocarbon biofuel, catalyst efficiency remains a challenge. Integrating heterogeneous catalysts with SCFs in a bio-oil HDO process was investigated in this study. Bifunctional Co-Zn/HZSM-5 catalysts were firstly used to upgrade bio-oil to biofuel in supercritical methanol. The loading of Co and Zn did not change HZSM-5 crystalline structure. Physicochemical properties of biofuel produced by Co and/or Zn loaded HZSM-5 catalysts such as water content, total acid number, viscosity and higher heating value improved. Bimetallic Co-Zn/HZSM-5 catalysts showed enhanced reactions of decarboxylation and decarbonylation that resulted in higher yields of CO and CO 2 . Bimetallic Co-Zn/HZSM-5 catalysts were more effective for bio-oil HDO than monometallic Co/HZSM-5 or Zn/HZSM-5 catalyst , which was attributed to the synergistic effect of Co and Zn on HZSM-5 support. Bimetallic Co-Zn/HZSM-5 catalysts increased biofuel yields and hydrocarbons contents in biofuels in comparison with monometallic Co/HZSM-5 and Zn/HZSM-5 catalysts. 5%Co15%Zn/HZSM-5 catalyst generated the highest biofuel yield at 22.13 wt.%, and 15%Co5%Zn/HZSM-5 catalyst produced biofuel with the highest hydrocarbons content at 35.33%. Hydrogenation and esterification are two dominant reactions in bio-oil HDO over Co-Zn/HZSM-5 catalysts in supercritical methanol. The energy efficiency of biofuel product was 30.99–58.80% for Co-Zn/HZSM-5 catalysts. Co-Zn/HZSM-5 is a promising catalyst to produce biofuel with high quality in bio-oil HDO. | |
| 09/01/2017 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.1.21 | Pyrolysis |
| Waste to bioenergy: a review on the recent conversion technologies | |
| Scientific studies have demonstrated that it is possible to generate a wide variety of bioenergy from biomass residues and waste, and however its cost is not competitive with petro-fuels and other renewable energy. On-going efforts are continued extensively to improve conversion technologies in order to reduce production costs. The present review focuses on the conversion technologies for transforming biomass residues and waste to biofuels, specifically their technological concepts, options and prospects for implementation are addressed. The emerging developments in the two primary conversion pathways, namely the thermochemical (i.e. gasification, liquefaction, and pyrolysis) and biochemical (i.e. anaerobic digestion, alcoholic fermentation and photobiological hydrogen production) conversion techniques, are evaluated. Additionally, transesterification, which appears to be the simplest and most economical route to produce biodiesel in large quantity, is discussed. Lastly, the strategies for direct conversion of biomass residues and waste to bioelectricity including the use of combustion and microbial fuel cells are reviewed. | |
| 12/01/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.1.22 | Pyrolysis |
| Process for producing high quality bio-oil in high yield | |
|
1. A process for converting a solid biomass material comprising minerals to a high quality bio-oil in high yield, said process comprising: (a) contacting said solid biomass with a solvent so as to dissolve at least part of the minerals present in said solid biomass, wherein said solvent comprises a phosphoric acid; (b) at least partially removing said solvent from said solid biomass via a liquid/solid separation method to form a demineralized biomass; (c) subjecting said demineralized biomass to a pretreatment step, wherein said pretreatment step comprises improving the accessibility of said demineralized biomass by opening the texture of the particles of said demineralized biomass, wherein said improving comprises heating said demineralized biomass to a temperature in the range of from 90 to 300° C. in an oxygen-free atmosphere to form a pretreated solid biomass; and (d) subjecting at least a portion of said pretreated solid biomass to a pyrolysis step in a pyrolysis reactor and in the presence of a regenerated catalyst to produce a bio-oil having a Total Acid Number (TAN) of less than 30 and a used catalyst, wherein said bio-oil has a TAN of y and a yield of x, such that the ratio x/y is greater than 1.5; and (e) regenerating said used catalyst in a regenerator to produce a flue gas and said regenerated catalyst. 2. The process of claim 1 wherein said solid biomass comprises cellulose. 3. The process of claim 2 wherein said solid biomass is a lignocellulosic biomass material. 4. The process of claim 1 wherein said solvent comprises a chelant. 5. The process of claim 1 wherein said temperature is in the range of from 110 to 200° C. 6. The process of claim 1 wherein said temperature is in the range of from 200 to 300° C. 7. The process of claim 1 wherein said regenerated catalyst is water-insoluble. 8. The process of claim 1 wherein said regenerated catalyst comprises an acid. 9. The process of claim 1 wherein said regenerated catalyst comprises a zeolite. 10. The process of claim 9 wherein said regenerated catalyst comprises a Y-zeolite, a ZSM-5 zeolite, or a mixture thereof. 11. The process of claim 1 wherein said regenerated catalyst comprises alumina. 12. The process of claim 11 wherein said alumina comprises gamma-alumina. 13. The process of claim 1 wherein said regenerated catalyst comprises a solid base. 14. The process of claim 13 wherein said regenerated catalyst comprises hydrotalcite; a hydrotalcite-like material; a clay; a layered hydroxy salt; a metal oxide; a metal hydroxide; a mixed metal oxide; or a mixture thereof. 15. The process of claim 1 wherein said bio-oil has a TAN of less than 5. 16. The process of claim 1 wherein said ratio x/y is greater than 2. 17. The process of claim 1 wherein said ratio x/y is greater than 3. 18. The process of claim 1 wherein the pretreatment step is carried out in a mixer, a mill, a grinder, or a kneader. 19. The process of claim 1 wherein the pyrolysis reactor comprises a fluid bed reactor, a moving bed reactor, or a cyclone reactor. 20. The process of claim 1 wherein said pyrolysis step produces gases having a reducing potential, further comprising using said gases in said pyrolysis step to thereby reduce the oxygen content of said bio-oil. 21. The process of claim 1 further comprising recycling the excess heat from said pyrolysis step to said pretreatment step. 22. The process of claim 1 further comprising recycling the flue gas from said regenerator to said pretreatment step. 23. The process of claim 1 wherein said liquid/solid separation method comprises filtering. 24. The process of claim 1 wherein said contacting of step (a) occurs at a temperature in the range of 40 to 95° C. 25. The process of claim 1 further comprising separating said bio-oil into an aqueous phase and an organophilic phase in a skim tank. |
|
| 03/24/2010 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Patent | |
2.2 Fast/flash pyrolysis
Fast pyrolysis is a process in which organic materials are rapidly heated to 450 - 600 °C in the absence of air. Under these conditions, organic vapors, pyrolysis gases and charcoal are produced. The vapors are condensed to bio-oil. Typically, 60-75 wt. % of the feedstock is converted into oil.[\[Source\]](https://www.btgworld.com/en/rtd/technologies/fast-pyrolysis#:\~:text=Fast%20pyrolysis%20is%20a%20process,feedstock%20is%20converted%20into%20oil.)
In flash pyrolysis the heatin rates are even more rapid.
**Input:**
* However, biomass heterogeneity is known to impact the composition of pyrolytic product streams, as a complex mixture of aromatic compounds is recovered with the sugars, interfering with subsequent fermentation. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96416-2555251220)
* Usually dried to below 10% moisture before fast pyrolysis, and particle size <5mm.[\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96416-2900718933)
* Pretreatment is necessary for obtaining desirable pyrolysis products, and a variety of pretreatment methods prior to fast pyrolysis have been developed, including water leaching, dilute acid and alkali pretreatment, bio-oil washing, thermal pretreatment (including torrefaction and hydrothermal pretreatment), and combined pretreatment (such as two-step acid-demineralization and torrefaction). [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96416-2900718933)
* With biomass feedstocks of 48% carbon and 15% moisture, minimum fuel selling price (MFSP) increases from $0.97/L to $1.06/L when ash content increases from 1% to 7%, due to reduced hydrocarbon yields. With biomass feedstocks of 48% carbon and 3% ash content, MFSP increases from $1.03/L to $1.08/L when feedstock moisture increases from 15% to 45% as a consequence of increased energy demand for feedstock drying. [\[paper\]](https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/bbb.1860)
**Product:**
* Fast pyrolysis is an alternative thermal conversion technology for processing biomass. **It has recently been optimized to produce a stream rich in levoglucosan, a fermentable glucose precursor for biofuel production. Additional product streams might be of value to the petrochemical industry.** The present study investigates the feasibility of fast pyrolysis to produce fermentable pyrolytic glucose from two abundant lignocellulosic biomass sources in Ontario, switchgrass (potential energy crop) and corn cobs (by-product of corn industry). [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96416-2555251220)
* fast pyrolysis oil has a high heating value of around 17 MJ/kg, it is high in oxygen, moisture content, and viscosity, and contains corrosive and thermally unstable substances. Thus, it is upgraded using chemical or physical methods so that a final oil with an elevated H to C ratio[ ](https://www-sciencedirect-com.ezproxy.leidenuniv.nl:2443/science/article/pii/S036012851830025X?via%3Dihub#bib0084)and lower oxygenated compounds can be acheived.[\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96416-2900718933)
* characterization of biocrude in this study significantly suggested that additional unit operations for char and metal removal must be conducted to meet the fuel standard in terms of biocrude as bioenergy. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96416-2906857259)
**Process:**
* **Fast pyrolysis of biomass is praised as an efficient and feasible process to selectively convert lignocellulosic biomass into bio-fuels and bio-chemicals.** Pith of sugarcane bagasse could be an attractive lignocellulosic waste from depithing process from pulp and paper mill, which can utilize for production of biofuel and added value products. [ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96416-2771828318)
* UOP LLC proposed to demonstrate a fast pyrolysis based integrated biorefinery. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) has expertise in an important technology area of interest to UOP for use in their pyrolysis-based biorefinery. This CRADA project provides the supporting technology development and demonstration to allow incorporation of this technology into the biorefinery. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96416-2339007579)
* Fast pyrolysis is considered to be a promising pathway to biofuels since commercial fast pyrolysis plants are currently in operation and the process is a relatively simple and low cost. Fast pyrolysis can be deployed close to the source of feedstock to produce bio-crude for a centralised refinery. However, bio-oil from thermal pyrolysis is low quality and reactive and requires a large amount of hydrogen to be upgraded into drop-in fuels. Studies indicate that the carbon and energy efficiency of pyrolysis and hydrotreating is around 47–50% and the MFSP is in the range of 0.9 USD/LGE, or about double the current price of fossil fuels. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96416-2976637787)
**Commercial:**
* Central element of the bioliq process development is the 2–5 MW pilot plant along the complete process chain: fast pyrolysis for pretreatment of biomass to obtain an energy dense, liquid intermediate fuel, high-pressure entrained flow gasification providing low methane synthesis gas free of tar, hot synthesis gas cleaning to separate acid gases, and contaminants as well as methanol/dimethyl ether and subsequent following gasoline synthesis. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96416-2559614255)
* In the bioliq process, lignocellulosic biomass is first liquefied by fast pyrolysis in distributed regional plants to produce an energy-dense intermediate suitable for economic transport over long distances. Slurries of pyrolysis condensates and char, also referred to as biosyncrude, are transported to a large central gasification and synthesis plant. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96416-1978977279)
* several technologies for thermal fast pyrolysis are operating at commercial scale, while integrated process development efforts are just starting to focus on applying catalytic fast pyrolysis at pilot scale. Processes for catalytic fast pyrolysis, either via in-situ or ex-situ upgrading of the bio-oil vapours is an area currently receiving significant research and development interest. This processing route may enable the production of partially upgraded bio-crudes which are suitable for processing to final fuel products in centralized bio-refineries or for co-processing in petroleum refineries. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96416-2795456232)
**Additional highlights:**
* Co-pyrolysis of sawdust and waste polystyrene was found as a promising solution to improve bio-crude oil quality. With this technology, the industrial growth of bio-crude oil area is expected as well as waste plastic. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96416-2914102219)
* Biomass fast pyrolysis is potentially one of the cheapest routes toward renewable liquid fuels. Its commercialization, however, poses a multi-scale challenge, which starts with the characterization of feedstock, products and reaction intermediates at molecular scales, and continues with understanding the complex reaction network taking place in different reactor configurations, and in the case of catalytic pyrolysis and upgrading on different catalysts. In addition, crude pyrolysis oil is not immediately usable in the current energy infrastructure, due to undesirable properties such as low energy content and corrosiveness as a result of its high oxygenate content. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96416-2900718933)
* The heterogeneous structure of biomass causes the complex compositions of bio-oil, thereby posing huge challenges for the extraction of value-added chemicals from bio-oil and the catalytic upgrading of bio-oil in existing petroleum-refining infrastructures. In order to overcome these challenges, a new advanced biorefinery based on organosolv fractionation coupled with fast pyrolysis is first proposed. **The experimental results showed that biomass can be effectively divided into cellulose-rich fractions, organosolv lignins, and xylose by organosolv fractionation, thus improving the relative yields of platform chemicals (levoglucosan (LG) and phenols) in subsequent fast pyrolysis.** The relative LG yields from eucalyptus, pine, and bagasse increased from 4.8, 3.5, and 2.1 wt % to 42.1, 22.7, and 59.8 wt %, respectively.[ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96416-2625268160)
Suppliers
| 2.2.1 | Fast/flash pyrolysis |
|---|---|
| Advancing catalytic fast pyrolysis through integrated multiscale modeling and experimentation: Challenges, progress, and perspectives | |
| Catalytic fast pyrolysis (CFP) is a conversion process that integrates rapid thermochemical depolymerization of solid feedstocks with catalytic transformation to yield small molecules for fuel and chemical products. This process is well‐suited for the conversion of nonfossil feedstocks such as biomass and waste plastics, and thereby holds great potential for the production of renewable commodities. In spite of many technological developments in various aspects of CFP achieved over decades of research, this technology has yet to attain commercial success for the production of fuels and chemicals from renewable feedstocks. Effective CFP processes require careful coordination of chemical and physical phenomena that span very large length and time scales. A broad spectrum of scientific progress in both pyrolysis and catalytic upgrading has provided the foundation for successful deployment of CFP, although additional progress in process‐scale integration is yet required for commercial realization. Modeling and simulation tools provide an important framework wherein the CFP technologies by be better understood and evaluated from a holistic perspective. Here we provide a detailed description of the multiscale phenomena underlying CFP, describe challenges and associated technical progress, and suggest strategies for an integrated approach to advance this technology toward commercialization. This article is categorized under: Bioenergy > Systems and Infrastructure Bioenergy > Science and Materials | |
| 07/01/2018 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.2.2 | Fast/flash pyrolysis |
| Catalytic fast pyrolysis of biomass | |
| Utilization of biomass offers a potential to sustain the current petro-chemical economy for the production of chemicals and (transportation) fuels on basis of renewable resources. Crude bio-oil derived from fast pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass is a mixture of water (15-30 wt.%) and various oxygen containing organic compounds. The presence of oxygen in bio-oils (ca. 35–40 wt.%) is commonly believed to be the origin of problems caused by its high water content (15–30 %), corrosiveness (pH of 2–3), relatively low heating value compared to fossil fuels (ca. 17 MJ/kg), poor volatility, and high viscosity (35–1000 cP at 40 °C). However, not only the level of oxygen in the bio-oil is too high, but also the way it exists (functionality) is a part of the problem. Improving the quality of the bio-oils, whether or not in combination with a certain degree of oxygen removal, would include a selective transformation of certain oxygen functionalities such as acids and aldehydes into ‘desired’ or acceptable ones like alcohols, phenols, and ethers. Application of heterogeneous catalysis in fast pyrolysis (i.e. catalytic fast pyrolysis; CFP) may lead to a liquid product (i.e. catalytic fast pyrolysis oil, CFP-oil) with an improved quality compared to that of crude bio-oil. Here, the improvement in bio-oil quality refers to the production of either high yields of transportation fuel compounds (e.g. aromatics, olefins) and specialty chemicals (e.g. phenolics), or just a drop-in refinery feedstock to be blended with the feed streams of existing petroleum refineries. While the literature on catalytic fast pyrolysis of biomass -mainly focussed on catalyst screening- is rapidly expanding, there is an urgent need for the translation of laboratory results to viable process concepts and bench/pilot plant trials. Together with the development of efficient catalysts, the design and the intensification of the process with efficient heat integration are of significant importance in the catalytic conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to the targeted liquid product. The present thesis discusses the catalytic fast pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass in a process oriented way that may initiate a useful process technology development in the near future. The final goal is to come up with recommendations and suggestions on how to realize this technique at a commercial/industrial scale. That requires a better understanding of the precise effects of the essential process parameters (e.g. processing mode; in- or ex situ) and design elements (e.g. reactor type, catalyst type) on the one hand, and definitions and outcomes of possible obstacles (e.g. successive regeneration of the catalyst, effect of biomass ash) on the other. In this work, two types of continuously operated (catalytic) fast pyrolysis reactors were used, viz. an auger reactor and a mechanically stirred bed reactor. In all experiments performed in both setups, pine wood with a particle size range of 1 to 2 mm was pyrolyzed at a constant reactor temperature of 500 °C. In the auger reactor, first the effect of the operation mode on the product yields and compositions has been investigated while using a single type of heterogeneous ZSM-5 based acidic catalyst. Two operation modes were tested. In situ operation includes the mixing of biomass and catalyst inside a single reactor, while ex situ refers to catalytic treatment of the pyrolysis vapours in a secondary reactor. A second study was concerned with the screening of various heterogeneous catalysts (and their metal doped counterparts) in in situ operation. In all experiments, the presence of catalysts led to the production of additional water, coke and gases at the expense of the liquid organics and char. The overall performance of in situ catalysis in terms of oil quality was considerably better than that of ex situ catalysis; more aromatics and phenols were produced in the case of in situ operation. That may be caused by different vapour residence times and vapour-catalyst contact times. Among all eight catalysts tested, the acidic catalyst containing some redox active metal, the basic catalyst with a mixture of two metal oxides (calcined), and a metal oxide doped gamma-alumina catalyst (calcined) were found to be the best performing ones, based on both the deoxygenation requirements and the production of desirable compounds in high yields. In the mechanically stirred bed reactor, we studied i) the effect of a repeated catalyst regeneration (eight cycles in total), and ii) the effects of the pine wood ash on the yields and composition of the products. In all catalytic experiments, a single type of a ZSM-5 based catalyst was used in situ. Along the reaction/regeneration cycles, trends in pyrolysis product yields converging to that of non-catalytic levels were observed. This revealed that the activity, and thus the influence of the catalyst slowly declined, which was confirmed by a BET surface area reduction of 63 %. Ash concentrations as low as ca. 3 wt.% relative to the amount of pine wood fed, and ca. 0.002 wt.% relative to the amount of bed material, were found sufficient to affect the yield and composition of the CFP products unfavourably. Finally, the technical and operational barriers for the implementation of catalytic fast pyrolysis technology are discussed while focusing on the process modes and parameters, economical use of the primary and secondary products, and heat integration. Some process alternatives for an efficient CFP operation are suggested as well. Research has, until now, been focused mainly on screening and small-scale testing of various catalysts. One challenge in developing CFP of biomass is the design and large scale production of such catalysts to enable testing in continuously operated, bench and pilot scale installations. FCC type of catalysts are the only suitable ones commercially available. But they are developed especially for use in a riser reactor and short contact times (differing significantly from typical biomass devolatilization times). The main problem in CFP of biomass was found to be the presence of the biomass originated alkaline ash which eventually poisons any catalyst in case of direct contact. In a commercial process, a solution may be to separate the biomass fast pyrolysis from the catalytic treatment of the vapours (i.e. ex situ processing mode) where the physical contact between the biomass minerals and the catalyst is excluded. Even though this requires significant process adjustments, ex-situ processing allows the catalyst to be re-used in a much larger number of reaction/regeneration cycles than in case of in situ operation. | |
| 01/01/2012 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.2.3 | Fast/flash pyrolysis |
| Catalytic fast pyrolysis of sugarcane bagasse pith with HZSM-5 catalyst using tandem micro-reactor-GC-MS | |
| ABSTRACTFast pyrolysis of biomass is praised as an efficient and feasible process to selectively convert lignocellulosic biomass into bio-fuels and bio-chemicals. Pith of sugarcane bagasse could be an attractive lignocellulosic waste from depithing process from pulp and paper mill, which can utilize for production of biofuel and added value products. In this study, we employed a tandem micro-reactor coupled with gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy to investigate the products distribution from pith of sugarcane bagasse via catalytic fast pyrolysis. In the operating conditions, pyrolysis temperature and HZSM-5 catalyst had significant effect on products and distributions. An increase in the pyrolysis temperature from 400°C to 550°C led to an increase in the yield of phenolic compounds (6.3%, w/w%), followed decrease at higher temperature. The maximum carboxylic acids (10.6%) and furfural (3.5%) were obtained at lower temperature. At presence of HZSM-5 catalyst, the selectivity of aromatics such as benzene,... | |
| 01/02/2018 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.2.4 | Fast/flash pyrolysis |
| Characterization of fast pyrolysis bio-oil properties by near-infrared spectroscopic data | |
| Abstract Pyrolysis transforms bulky and heterogeneous lignocellulosic biomass into more easily-handled oils that can be upgraded into bio-based transportation fuels. Existing systems for monitoring pyrolysis processes and characterizing their products rely on slow and time-consuming wet chemical analyses. On-line near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy could potentially replace such analyses, providing real-time data and reducing costs. To test the usefulness of NIR methods in characterizing pyrolysis oils and processes, biomass from conifers, Salix, and reed canary grass was milled and pyrolyzed at 675, 750, and 775 °C. Two separate pyrolytic fractions (aerosol and condensed) were produced in each experiment, and NIR spectra were collected for each fraction. Multivariate modelling of the resulting data clearly showed that the samples’ NIR spectra could be used to accurately predict important properties of the pyrolysis oils such as their energy values, main organic element (C, H and O) contents, and water content. The spectra also contained predictive information on the samples’ origins, fraction, and temperature treatment, demonstrating the potential of on-line NIR techniques for monitoring pyrolytic production processes and characterizing important properties of pyrolytic oils from lignocellulosic biomass. | |
| 08/01/2018 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.2.5 | Fast/flash pyrolysis |
| Comparison of ethanol production from corn cobs and switchgrass following a pyrolysis-based biorefinery approach | |
| Background One of the main obstacles in lignocellulosic ethanol production is the necessity of pretreatment and fractionation of the biomass feedstocks to produce sufficiently pure fermentable carbohydrates. In addition, the by-products (hemicellulose and lignin fraction) are of low value, when compared to dried distillers grains (DDG), the main by-product of corn ethanol. Fast pyrolysis is an alternative thermal conversion technology for processing biomass. It has recently been optimized to produce a stream rich in levoglucosan, a fermentable glucose precursor for biofuel production. Additional product streams might be of value to the petrochemical industry. However, biomass heterogeneity is known to impact the composition of pyrolytic product streams, as a complex mixture of aromatic compounds is recovered with the sugars, interfering with subsequent fermentation. The present study investigates the feasibility of fast pyrolysis to produce fermentable pyrolytic glucose from two abundant lignocellulosic biomass sources in Ontario, switchgrass (potential energy crop) and corn cobs (by-product of corn industry). Results Demineralization of biomass removes catalytic centers and increases the levoglucosan yield during pyrolysis. The ash content of biomass was significantly decreased by 82–90% in corn cobs when demineralized with acetic or nitric acid, respectively. In switchgrass, a reduction of only 50% for both acids could be achieved. Conversely, levoglucosan production increased 9- and 14-fold in corn cobs when rinsed with acetic and nitric acid, respectively, and increased 11-fold in switchgrass regardless of the acid used. After pyrolysis, different configurations for upgrading the pyrolytic sugars were assessed and the presence of potentially inhibitory compounds was approximated at each step as double integral of the UV spectrum signal of an HPLC assay. The results showed that water extraction followed by acid hydrolysis and solvent extraction was the best upgrading strategy. Ethanol yields achieved based on initial cellulose fraction were 27.8% in switchgrass and 27.0% in corn cobs. Conclusions This study demonstrates that ethanol production from switchgrass and corn cobs is possible following a combined thermochemical and fermentative biorefinery approach, with ethanol yields comparable to results in conventional pretreatments and fermentation processes. The feedstock-independent fermentation ability can easily be assessed with a simple assay | |
| 12/01/2016 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.2.6 | Fast/flash pyrolysis |
| Improvement of bio-crude oil properties via co-pyrolysis of pine sawdust and waste polystyrene foam | |
| Abstract Conversion technology of solid biomass to liquid fuel, named bio-crude oil, has been researched widely for the production of renewable energy to replace fossil fuel oil. As the result of many admirable researches, fast pyrolysis technology for bio-crude oil production is close to commercialization. However, bio-crude oil has unsatisfactory properties compared to general petroleum oil, for instance, low heating value, high water content, and high viscosity. In this study, pine sawdust (SD) biomass was co-pyrolyzed with waste polystyrene foam (WPSF), which was expected to improve the bio-crude oil quality due to high heating value and non-oxygen composition of polystyrene. The co-pyrolysis experiment was conducted in a bubbling fluidized bed reactor under the following conditions: temperature of 500 °C which was chosen based on the results from thermogravimetric analysis of SD and WPSF, nitrogen flow rate of 20–25 L/min., and feeding rate of 200 g/hr. Various mixing ratios of SD/WPSF by weight percentage were tested as follows: 100/0, 95/5, 90/10, 85/15, 80/20, 75/25, 70/30, 60/40, 50/50, 25/75, 0/100. Experimental results showed that in case of only SD feeding the bio-crude oil yield and higher heating value (HHV) were 48.83 wt% and 17.81 MJ/kg respectively. By contrast, oil yield and HHV in case of 25% SD with 75% WPSF mixture were 63.31 wt% and 39.65 MJ/kg respectively. Additional analysis showed that water content, and acetic acid concentration of bio-crude oil from co-pyrolysis of SD/WPSF mixture were decreased almost proportionally with the increasing WPSF ratio. Furthermore, measured values of water content, and acetic acid concentration were lower than the calculated values by linear interpolation, which means that the synergistic effect between SD and WPSF was achieved during the co-pyrolysis. In conclusion, co-pyrolysis of SD and WPSF was found as a promising solution to improve bio-crude oil quality. With this technology, the industrial growth of bio-crude oil area is expected as well as waste plastic. | |
| 05/01/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.2.7 | Fast/flash pyrolysis |
| Pilot-Scale Biorefinery: Sustainable Transport Fuels from Biomass via Integrated Pyrolysis and Catalytic Hydroconversion - Wastewater Cleanup by Catalytic Hydrothermal Gasification | |
| DOE-EE Bioenergy Technologies Office has set forth several goals to increase the use of bioenergy and bioproducts derived from renewable resources. One of these goals is to facilitate the implementation of the biorefinery. The biorefinery will include the production of liquid fuels, power and, in some cases, products. The integrated biorefinery should stand-alone from an economic perspective with fuels and power driving the economy of scale while the economics/profitability of the facility will be dependent on existing market conditions. UOP LLC proposed to demonstrate a fast pyrolysis based integrated biorefinery. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) has expertise in an important technology area of interest to UOP for use in their pyrolysis-based biorefinery. This CRADA project provides the supporting technology development and demonstration to allow incorporation of this technology into the biorefinery. PNNL developed catalytic hydrothermal gasification (CHG) for use with aqueous streams within the pyrolysis biorefinery. These aqueous streams included the aqueous phase separated from the fast pyrolysis bio-oil and the aqueous byproduct streams formed in the hydroprocessing of the bio-oil to finished products. The purpose of this project was to demonstrate a technically and economically viable technology for converting renewable biomass feedstocks to sustainable and fungible transportation fuels. Tomore » demonstrate the technology, UOP constructed and operated a pilot-scale biorefinery that processed one dry ton per day of biomass using fast pyrolysis. Specific objectives of the project were to: The anticipated outcomes of the project were a validated process technology, a range of validated feedstocks, product property and Life Cycle data, and technical and operating data upon which to base the design of a full-scale biorefinery. The anticipated long-term outcomes from successful commercialization of the technology were: (1) the replacement of a significant fraction of petroleum based fuels with advanced biofuels, leading to increased energy security and decreased carbon footprint; and (2) establishment of a new biofuel industry segment, leading to the creation of U.S. engineering, manufacturing, construction, operations and agricultural jobs. PNNL development of CHG progressed at two levels. Initial tests were made in the laboratory in both mini-scale and bench-scale continuous flow reactor systems. Following positive results, the next level of evaluation was in the scaled-up engineering development system, which was operated at PNNL.« less | |
| 06/19/2015 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.2.8 | Fast/flash pyrolysis |
| Process development status of fast pyrolysis technologies for the manufacture of renewable transport fuels from biomass | |
| Abstract Fast pyrolysis is a promising thermochemical method of producing renewable fuels and chemicals from biomass and waste feedstocks. There is much interest in optimising the choice of feedstock pre-treatments, reaction conditions, reactor designs, and catalysts as well as product upgrading steps to improve the techno-economic feasibility of the process. This article summarizes the current state-of-art in thermal and catalytic fast pyrolysis and outlines the major considerations for process development. The status of process technologies and development efforts on thermal and catalytic fast pyrolysis are reviewed, with a focus on efforts producing bio-oil for use in manufacturing transport fuels or fuel blends as the final product. The leading thermal pyrolysis processes, which use circulating, bubbling, auger screw and rotating cone reactor technologies, are reviewed alongside recent research and development activities on catalytic fast pyrolysis. This review finds that several technologies for thermal fast pyrolysis are operating at commercial scale, while integrated process development efforts are just starting to focus on applying catalytic fast pyrolysis at pilot scale. Processes for catalytic fast pyrolysis, either via in-situ or ex-situ upgrading of the bio-oil vapours is an area currently receiving significant research and development interest. This processing route may enable the production of partially upgraded bio-crudes which are suitable for processing to final fuel products in centralized bio-refineries or for co-processing in petroleum refineries. However, there remains a lot of fundamental and laboratory work to be done to develop deeper understanding of the processes, so that the catalysts and reaction conditions can be optimized. New combinations of unit operations and possibly novel reactors will likely be required to economically convert biomass feedstocks into partially upgraded bio-crudes. Techno-economic assessment shows that bio-fuels from fast pyrolysis may be competitive with petroleum fuels in future, however there are currently only a handful of plants operating commercially. | |
| 07/01/2018 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.2.9 | Fast/flash pyrolysis |
| Production of bio-oil from fast pyrolysis of biomass using a pilot-scale circulating fluidized bed reactor and its characterization | |
| Abstract To circumvent the adverse impacts arising from an excessive use of fossil fuels, bioenergy and chemical production from a carbon neutral resource (biomass) has drawn considerable attention over the last two decades. Among various technical candidates, fast pyrolysis of biomass has been considered as one of the viable technical routes for converting a carbonaceous material (biomass) into biocrude (bio-oil). In these respects, three biomass samples ( i.e ., sawdust, empty fruit bunch, and giant Miscanthus) were chosen as a carbon substrate for the pyrolysis process in this study. A pilot-scale circulating fluidized bed reactor was employed for the pyrolysis work, and biocrude from the fast pyrolysis process at 500 °C were characterized because the maximum yield of biocrude (60 wt% of the original sample mass) was achieved at 500 °C. The physico-chemical properties of biocrude were measured by the international standard/protocol (ASTM D7544 and/or EN 16900 test method) to harness biocrude as bioenergy and an initial feedstock for diverse chemicals. All measurements in this study demonstrated that the heating value, moisture content, and ash contents in biocrude were highly contingent on the type of biomass. Moreover, characterization of biocrude in this study significantly suggested that additional unit operations for char and metal removal must be conducted to meet the fuel standard in terms of biocrude as bioenergy. | |
| 03/01/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.2.10 | Fast/flash pyrolysis |
| Recent advances in liquefaction technologies for production of liquid hydrocarbon fuels from biomass and carbonaceous wastes | |
| Abstract The liquefaction of biomass and carbonaceous wastes using hydro-pyrolysis, hydrothermal liquefaction or liquefaction using water and hydrocarbon solvents are promising thermochemical methods for producing renewable fuels and chemicals. New combinations of unit operations and possibly novel reactors will likely be required to economically convert biomass feedstock into partially upgraded bio-crudes. While some techno-economic assessments show that biofuels from fast pyrolysis may be competitive with petroleum fuels in future, conventional pyrolysis produces a poor quality bio-crude and is only suitable for dry, homogenous feedstock such as woody biomass, agricultural waste (corn stoves, wheat stalk, and rice husk). It is desirable to produce high-quality bio-crudes and to be able to process high-moisture feedstock such as algae, organic waste (food residues), bio-solids and bio-sludge into transportation fuels using the liquefaction approaches. Increased awareness of the environmental damage from burning fossil fuels is driving national and international reduction targets for on CO2 emissions. Liquefaction technologies aimed at producing alternatives to fossil-based transportation fuels/hydrocarbons are likely to receive continued support in the future and the most promising ones could be developed to full commercial scale. This review provides a summary of the current state of development of these technologies and also some of the challenges faced to develop commercially viable transportation fuels via liquefaction routes. This review compares liquefaction routes and provides a summary of techno-economic analyses where data is available and discusses the challenges and opportunities associated with commercial scale-up. | |
| 11/01/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.2.11 | Fast/flash pyrolysis |
| State of the art of the bioliq® process for synthetic biofuels production | |
| Synthetic fuels from biomass (also referred to as BTL, biomass to liquids) may contribute to the future motor fuel consumption to a considerable extent. To overcome the logistical hurdles connected with the industrial use of large quantities of biomass, the de-central-centralized bioliq® concept has been developed. It is based on a regional pretreatment of biomass for energy densification by fast pyrolysis. The intermediate referred to as biosyncrude allows for economic long-range transportation. Collected from a number of those plants, the biosyncrude is converted into synthesis gas, which is cleaned, conditioned, and further converted to fuels or chemicals in an industrial plant complex of reasonable size. Gasification is performed in a high-pressure entrained flow gasifier at pressures adjusted to those of the subsequently following chemical syntheses. For increased fuel flexibility and conversion of ash rich feed materials, the gasifier is equipped with a cooling screen operated in slagging mode. At Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), a pilot plant has been erected for process demonstration along the whole process chain. The two MWth fast pyrolysis plant is already in operation since 2009; the five MWth gasifier, the hot gas cleaning section, and a gasoline synthesis via dimethylether are to be finished in 2011. Commissioning of that plant complex will follow in 2012. The technology applied in the bioliq® process chain and on the state of construction of the pilot plant is presented. © 2012 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Environ Prog, 2012 | |
| 07/01/2012 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.2.12 | Fast/flash pyrolysis |
| The bioliq ® bioslurry gasification process for the production of biosynfuels, organic chemicals, and energy | |
| Biofuels may play a significant role in regard to carbon emission reduction in the transportation sector. Therefore, a thermochemical process for biomass conversion into synthetic chemicals and fuels is being developed at the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) by producing process energy to achieve a desirable high carbon dioxide reduction potential. In the bioliq process, lignocellulosic biomass is first liquefied by fast pyrolysis in distributed regional plants to produce an energy-dense intermediate suitable for economic transport over long distances. Slurries of pyrolysis condensates and char, also referred to as biosyncrude, are transported to a large central gasification and synthesis plant. The bioslurry is preheated and pumped into a pressurized entrained flow gasifier, atomized with technical oxygen, and converted at > 1,200°C to an almost tar-free, low-methane syngas. Syngas - a mixture of CO and H2 - is a well-known versatile intermediate for the selectively catalyzed production of various base chemicals or synthetic fuels. At KIT, a pilot plant has been constructed together with industrial partners to demonstrate the process chain in representative scale. The process data obtained will allow for process scale-up and reliable cost estimates. In addition, practical experience is gained. The paper describes the background, principal technical concepts, and actual development status of the bioliq process. It is considered to have the potential for worldwide application in large scale since any kind of dry biomass can be used as feedstock. Thus, a significant contribution to a sustainable future energy supply could be achieved. | |
| 01/01/2012 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.2.13 | Fast/flash pyrolysis |
| The bioliq process for producing synthetic transportation fuels | |
| Biofuels of the second generation can contribute significantly to the replacement of the currently used fossil energy carriers for transportation fuel production. The lignocellulosic biomass residues used do not compete with food and feed production, but have to be collected from wide-spread areas for industrial large-scale use. The two-stage gasification concept bioliq offers a solution to this problem. It aims at the conversion of low-grade residual biomass from agriculture and forestry into synthetic fuels and chemicals. Central element of the bioliq process development is the 2–5 MW pilot plant along the complete process chain: fast pyrolysis for pretreatment of biomass to obtain an energy dense, liquid intermediate fuel, high-pressure entrained flow gasification providing low methane synthesis gas free of tar, hot synthesis gas cleaning to separate acid gases, and contaminants as well as methanol/dimethyl ether and subsequent following gasoline synthesis. After construction and commissioning of the individual process steps with partners from industry, first production of synthetic fuel was successfully achieved in 2014. In addition to pilot plant operation for technology demonstration, a research and development network has been established providing the scientific basis for optimization and further development of the bioliq process as well as to explore new applications of the technologies and products involved. For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website. | |
| 05/01/2017 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.2.14 | Fast/flash pyrolysis |
| The catalyst/biomass integration concept for the direct thermo-catalytic conversion of biomass into either syngas or added-value molecules | |
| A new concept of integrated catalytic biomass thermochemical conversion based on the catalyst/biomass integration is proposed as a strategy to promote process intensification for either (i) the production of syngas from biomass gasification or (ii) the production of bio-oils with targeted composition from biomass flash pyrolysis. This concept is based on the smart and controlled integration of selected transition metal nanoparticles into the biomass feedstock during the pyrolysis step [1]. It relies on the postulate that heterogeneous catalysts, used to convert solid lignocellulosic biomass directly to either syngas or bio-oil, can be made substantially more efficient by improving the catalyst/biomass contact. Specifically, the achievement of such a close contact targets both (i) changes in the mechanisms of the first biomass decomposition stages, leading to high selectivity for specific products and (ii) a substantial improvement in catalyst efficiency for solid fuel conversion, allowing lower temperatures and/or shorter reaction times. This concept, illustrated in figure 1, consists of inserting the catalyst metal precursor into the lignocellulosic biomass feedstock during an impregnation stage with aqueous metal salt solutions, ensuring good precursor dispersion in the lignocellulosic matrix. The catalytic active phases, as metal-based nanoparticles, are then in-situ generated, during thermochemical conversion of the feedstock. As highlighted in figure 1, this concept involves different key reaction steps including i) insertion of catalyst precursor in the solid biomass, ii) catalytic pyrolysis of the as-pretreated biomass, iii) catalytic gasification of the nano-composite char residue and iv) recycling and reuse of the catalyst metal species maintained in the ashes. Each of these reaction steps requires a fundamental understanding in order to further develop new high-efficiency gasification and pyrolysis processes for producing both syngas and added-value molecules from biomass. On the basis of both the cumulated expertise and recent results associated to the application of this concept, this communication will focus on key results obtained using series of selected catalyst precursor for which in situ formation of metal nanoparticles during biomass pyrolysis was demonstrated. Fundamental issues regarding the mechanisms involved during biomass impregnation with metal precursors, formation and evolution of metal-based nanoparticles during pyrolysis [2-4], pyrolysis products selectivities and kinetic data associated to the metal/char nanocomposites gasification, will be addressed to depict the promises of this concept while underlining its associated challenges and prospects. (Texte integral) | |
| 01/01/2015 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.2.15 | Fast/flash pyrolysis |
| The multi-scale challenges of biomass fast pyrolysis and bio-oil upgrading: Review of the state of art and future research directions | |
| Abstract Biomass fast pyrolysis is potentially one of the cheapest routes toward renewable liquid fuels. Its commercialization, however, poses a multi-scale challenge, which starts with the characterization of feedstock, products and reaction intermediates at molecular scales, and continues with understanding the complex reaction network taking place in different reactor configurations, and in the case of catalytic pyrolysis and upgrading on different catalysts. In addition, crude pyrolysis oil is not immediately usable in the current energy infrastructure, due to undesirable properties such as low energy content and corrosiveness as a result of its high oxygenate content. It, therefore, needs to be upgraded and fractionated to desired specifications. While various types of pyrolysis reactors and upgrading technologies are under development, knowledge transfer and closing the gap between theory and application requires model development. In-depth understanding of the reaction mechanisms and kinetics should be combined with the knowledge of multi-scale transport phenomena to enable design, optimization, and control of complex pyrolysis reactors. Finally, underpinning economic and environmental impacts of biofuel production requires expanding the system boundaries to include the overall process and supply chain. The present contribution aims at providing a comprehensive multi-scale review that discusses the state of the art of each of these aspects, as well as their multi-scale interactions. The study is mainly focused on fast pyrolysis, although reference to other types of pyrolysis technologies is made for the sake of comparison and knowledge transfer. | |
| 03/01/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.2.16 | Fast/flash pyrolysis |
| Toward Fast Pyrolysis-Based Biorefinery: Selective Production of Platform Chemicals from Biomass by Organosolv Fractionation Coupled with Fast Pyrolysis | |
| The heterogeneous structure of biomass causes the complex compositions of bio-oil, thereby posing huge challenges for the extraction of value-added chemicals from bio-oil and the catalytic upgrading of bio-oil in existing petroleum-refining infrastructures. In order to overcome these challenges, a new advanced biorefinery based on organosolv fractionation coupled with fast pyrolysis is first proposed. The experimental results showed that biomass can be effectively divided into cellulose-rich fractions, organosolv lignins, and xylose by organosolv fractionation, thus improving the relative yields of platform chemicals (levoglucosan (LG) and phenols) in subsequent fast pyrolysis. The relative LG yields from eucalyptus, pine, and bagasse increased from 4.8, 3.5, and 2.1 wt % to 42.1, 22.7, and 59.8 wt %, respectively. These findings provide a simple and efficient integrated process to selective production of platform chemicals, which is different from the existing processes, e.g. catalytic fast pyrolysis and... | |
| 08/07/2017 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
2.3 Hydropyrolysis
In hydropyrolysis, the reducing H~2~ gas generates hydrogen radicals which react with volatiles released by the biomass, usually in the presence of a catalyst, removing oxygen which can be released in the form of water, CO, and CO~2~, and producing hydrocarbons.[\[Paper\]](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0920586116300025)
In hydropyrolysis, hydrogenation, a step commonly used to upgrade pyrolysis oil is done in situ, to generate liquid hydrocarbon fuels.
**Input:**
* The highest hydrocarbon selectivity of 49.14% and DE of 87.6% were obtained in catalytic hydropyrolysis of poplar sawdust. For rice husk, the hydropyrolysis process gained a similar DE (82.7%) to that of the catalytic HyPy (83.7%), because rice husk with high ash content (19.4 wt %) contains a large number of mineral elements that are likely to form a self-catalysis effect. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96404-2989562730)
**Product:**
* The current literature shows that catalytic fast hydropyrolysis produces **primarily aromatic hydrocarbons, but alkanes and naphthenes can also be produced under appropriate conditions** if a secondary unit is added for hydrotreating (ex-situ upgrading). **Compared to catalytic fast pyrolysis, the higher yields of hydrocarbons and much slower catalyst deactivation due to coking is promising.** Yields in the range of 80–95 gal/t can be obtained, and the process economics is equivalent to those of other biofuel processes, such as fast pyrolysis followed by hydrotreating/hydrocracking. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96404-2270848004)
**Process:**
* To increase the stability of pyrolysis bio-oil, pyrolysis can be carried out under a hydrogen environment called hydropyrolysis. In the early days, hydropyrolysis was performed without a catalyst, but the products of hydropyrolysis had similar disadvantages as those derived from conventional pyrolysis. After these studies, several direct routes for the production of gasoline and diesel range hydrocarbons or blending components were developed using catalytic hydropyrolysis, integrated hydropyrolysis and hydroconversion (integrated hydropylrolysis and hydroconversion (IH^2^®)) and a two-step biofuel process (H~2~Bioil).[\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96404-2976637787)
**Commercial:**
* The theoretical performance of the hydropyrolysis and hydrodeoxygenation pathway is attractive, however, the high carbon efficiencies (57–70%) and high energy efficiencies (76–82%) reported by Agrawal and Singh[ ](https://www-sciencedirect-com.ezproxy.leidenuniv.nl:2443/science/article/pii/S1364032119306082?via%3Dihub#bib35)have not yet been reported for the IH^2^® process, which is essentially a variant of the original H~2~Bioil concept. Results from the IH^2^® pilot plant and techno-economic modelling by Tan et al., indicate a carbon efficiency of \~44% and energy efficiency of \~58%, though Shell recently stated that energy efficiencies are up to 76%. These results are still very good in comparison to other biofuel routes. The MFSP calculated by Tan et al. of 0.4–0.5 USD/LGE (in 2007 dollars) looks very ambitious and we expect actual values to be significantly higher for the foreseeable future.[\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96404-2976637787)
* A techno-economic analysis (TEA) is performed to investigate the production of gasoline and diesel range hydrocarbon fuels by conversion of woody biomass via Gas Technology Institute (GTI)'s integrated hydropyrolysis plus hydroconversion (IH2) process. The processing capacity is 2000 dry metric tonnes (2205 dry US tons) of woody biomass per day. Major process areas include catalytic hydropyrolysis, catalytic hydroconversion, on-site hydrogen production, feedstock handling and storage, hydrocarbon absorber, sour water stripper, hydrogen sulfide scrubber, distillation tower, and all other operations support utilities. The TEA incorporates applicable commercial technologies, process modeling using Aspen HYSYS software, equipment cost estimation, and discounted cash flow analysis. The resulting minimum fuel selling price is $1.64 per gallon (or $1.68 per gallon of gasoline equivalent) in 2007 US dollars. The process yields 79 gallons of liquid fuels per dry US ton of woody biomass feedstock, for an annual fuel production rate of 61 million gallons at 96% on-stream time. The estimated total capital investment for an nth-plant is $264 million. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96404-1986549282)
**Co-pyrolysis:**
* Some tests were done using hydrogen (hydropyrolysis) instead of nitrogen (pyrolysis) with the aim of improving liquids quality due to the presence of hydrogen in the reaction medium. Different pathways were analysed: (I) co-pyrolysis; (II) co-hydropyrolysis; (III) co-pyrolysis followed by hydropyrolysis and (IV) hydropyrolysis of co-pyrolysis liquids. Co-pyrolysis followed by hydropyrolysis was not favourable for further solids conversion and led to a great increase of gases. Co-hydropyrolysis led to the highest conversion, as both gas and total liquid yields increased. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96404-2262717796)
Suppliers
| 2.3.1 | Hydropyrolysis |
|---|---|
| A METHOD FOR HYDROPYROLYZING AN OXYGENATED ORGANIC FEEDSTOCK | |
| This invention relates to a process for thermochemically transforming biomass or other oxygenated feedstocks into high quality liquid hydrocarbon fuels. In particular, a catalytic hydropyrolysis reactor, containing a deep bed of fluidized catalyst particles is utilized to accept particles of biomass or other oxygenated feedstocks that are significantly smaller than the particles of catalyst in the fluidized bed. The reactor features an insert or other structure disposed within the reactor vessel that inhibits slugging of the bed and thereby minimizes attrition of the catalyst. Within the bed, the biomass feedstock is converted into a vapor-phase product, containing hydrocarbon molecules and other process vapors, and an entrained solid char product, which is separated from the vapor stream after the vapor stream has been exhausted from the top of the reactor. When the product vapor stream is cooled to ambient temperatures, a significant proportion of the hydrocarbons in the product vapor stream can be recovered as a liquid stream of hydrophobic hydrocarbons, with properties consistent with those of gasoline, kerosene, and diesel fuel. Separate streams of gasoline, kerosene, and diesel fuel may also be obtained, either via selective condensation of each type of fuel, or via later distillation of the combined hydrocarbon liquid. | |
| 12/17/2018 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.3.2 | Hydropyrolysis |
| Bubbling bed catalytic hydropyrolysis process | |
| The invention relates to a bubbling bed catalytic hydropyrolysis process. This invention relates to a process for thermochemically transforming biomass or other oxygenated feedstocks into high quality liquid hydrocarbon fuels. In particular, a catalytic hydropyrolysis reactor, containing a deep bed of fluidized catalyst particles is utilized to accept particles of biomass or other oxygenated feedstocks that are significantly smaller than the particles of catalyst in the fluidized bed. The reactor features an insert or other structure disposed within the reactor vessel that inhibits slugging of the bed and thereby minimizes attrition of the catalyst. Within the bed, the biomass feedstock is converted into a vapor-phase product, containing hydrocarbon molecules and other process vapors, and an entrained solid char product, which is separated from the vapor stream after the vapor stream has been exhausted from the top of the reactor. When the product vapor stream is cooled to ambient temperatures, a significant proportion of the hydrocarbons in the product vapor stream can be recovered as a liquid stream of hydrophobic hydrocarbons, with properties consistent with those of gasoline, kerosene, and diesel fuel. Separate streams of gasoline, kerosene, and diesel fuel may also be obtained, either via selective condensation of each type of fuel, or via later distillation of the combined hydrocarbon liquid. | |
| 10/28/2015 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.3.3 | Hydropyrolysis |
| Bubbling bed catalytic hydropyrolysis process utilizing larger catalyst particles and smaller biomass particles featuring an anti-slugging reactor | |
| This invention relates to a process for thermochemically transforming biomass or other oxygenated feedstocks into high quality liquid hydrocarbon fuels. In particular, a catalytic hydropyrolysis reactor, containing a deep bed of fluidized catalyst particles is utilized to accept particles of biomass or other oxygenated feedstocks that are significantly smaller than the particles of catalyst in the fluidized bed. The reactor features an insert or other structure disposed within the reactor vessel that inhibits slugging of the bed and thereby minimizes attrition of the catalyst. Within the bed, the biomass feedstock is converted into a vapor-phase product, containing hydrocarbon molecules and other process vapors, and an entrained solid char product, which is separated from the vapor stream after the vapor stream has been exhausted from the top of the reactor. When the product vapor stream is cooled to ambient temperatures, a significant proportion of the hydrocarbons in the product vapor stream can be recovered as a liquid stream of hydrophobic hydrocarbons, with properties consistent with those of gasoline, kerosene, and diesel fuel. Separate streams of gasoline, kerosene, and diesel fuel may also be obtained, either via selective condensation of each type of fuel, or via later distillation of the combined hydrocarbon liquid. | |
| 09/22/2014 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.3.4 | Hydropyrolysis |
| Comparative study of fast pyrolysis, hydropyrolysis and catalytic hydropyrolysis of poplar sawdust and rice husk in a modified Py-GC/MS microreactor system: Insights into product distribution, quantum description and reaction mechanism | |
| Abstract Fast pyrolysis, hydropyrolysis and catalytic hydropyrolysis are three important methods to produce bio-oil from biomass and are of great interest to researchers. In this research, the comprehensive study of pyrolysis, hydropyrolysis and catalytic hydropyrolysis of poplar sawdust and rice husk was investigated in a modified laboratory Py-GC/MS microreactor system. Rh/ZrO2 (0.5 wt %) was prepared and applied in the catalytic hydropyrolysis process. An evaluation system including estimating method of product selectivity, the calculation method of O/C and H/C ratio, deoxygenation extent (DE) and hydrogen-loss extent (HLE), was established to fully measure the deoxygenation effect. The Rh/ZrO2-assisted catalytic hydropyrolysis showed a good deoxygenation effect as O/C ratios (0.10 for poplar sawdust, 0.11 for rice husk, respectively) are comparable to that of the reported upgraded bio-oil by hydrodeoxygenation (HDO). The highest hydrocarbon selectivity of 49.14% and DE of 87.6% were obtained in catalytic hydropyrolysis of poplar sawdust. For rice husk, the hydropyrolysis process gained a similar DE (82.7%) to that of the catalytic HyPy (83.7%), because rice husk with high ash content (19.4 wt %) contains a large number of mineral elements that are likely to form a self-catalysis effect. The reaction mechanism was further inferred according to product distribution and quantum calculation of oxygen-containing products, suggesting that Rh/ZrO2-assisted hydropyrolysis was accomplished by multistage reactions, involving initial pyrolysis of raw biomass and further deoxygenation of the pyrolysis intermediates. Moreover, this work can also provide a proven methodology and theoretical supports for future studies on catalytic hydropyrolysis of biomass. | |
| 11/01/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.3.5 | Hydropyrolysis |
| Direct Production of Gasoline and Diesel Fuels from Biomass via Integrated Hydropyrolysis and Hydroconversion Process—A Techno-economic Analysis | |
| A techno-economic analysis (TEA) is performed to investigate the production of gasoline and diesel range hydrocarbon fuels by conversion of woody biomass via Gas Technology Institute (GTI)'s integrated hydropyrolysis plus hydroconversion (IH2) process. The processing capacity is 2000 dry metric tonnes (2205 dry US tons) of woody biomass per day. Major process areas include catalytic hydropyrolysis, catalytic hydroconversion, on-site hydrogen production, feedstock handling and storage, hydrocarbon absorber, sour water stripper, hydrogen sulfide scrubber, distillation tower, and all other operations support utilities. The TEA incorporates applicable commercial technologies, process modeling using Aspen HYSYS software, equipment cost estimation, and discounted cash flow analysis. The resulting minimum fuel selling price is $1.64 per gallon (or $1.68 per gallon of gasoline equivalent) in 2007 US dollars. The process yields 79 gallons of liquid fuels per dry US ton of woody biomass feedstock, for an annual fuel production rate of 61 million gallons at 96% on-stream time. The estimated total capital investment for an nth-plant is $264 million. A sensitivity analysis captures uncertainties in costs and plant performance. Results from this TEA can serve as the baseline for future comparison and as a basis for comparing this process to other biomass-to-liquid fuel pathways. © 2013 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Environ Prog, 33: 609–617, 2014 | |
| 07/01/2014 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.3.6 | Hydropyrolysis |
| Production of liquid hydrocarbons from rice crop wastes mixtures by co-pyrolysis and co-hydropyrolysis | |
| Abstract The aim of this work was the valorisation of rice crop wastes mixtures by pyrolysis to produce liquids to be used as bio-fuels or as raw bio-materials. The effect of waste mixtures composition on liquids yield and composition was studied. Rice husk (RH) and straw (RS) were pyrolysed with polyethylene (PE), the main plastic used in rice production process. Polypropylene (PP) and polystyrene (PS) were also studied, due to their presence in great amounts in solid wastes. The rise of rice husk amount in PE blends led to a decrease in the conversion of co-pyrolysis (pyrolysis of blends of biomass rice and plastic wastes) and to a reduction of liquid yields. Thus, the blend with 20% (w/w) of rice wastes was selected for further studies. No great changes were observed in the results when husk was replaced by straw, which is advantageous for the pyrolysis process. However, the same was not observed for the type of plastic waste. PS decreased total conversion and the formation of gases and liquids and increased aromatic compounds content in liquids. Some tests were done using hydrogen (hydropyrolysis) instead of nitrogen (pyrolysis) with the aim of improving liquids quality due to the presence of hydrogen in the reaction medium. Different pathways were analysed: (I) co-pyrolysis; (II) co-hydropyrolysis; (III) co-pyrolysis followed by hydropyrolysis and (IV) hydropyrolysis of co-pyrolysis liquids. Co-pyrolysis followed by hydropyrolysis was not favourable for further solids conversion and led to a great increase of gases. Co-hydropyrolysis led to the highest conversion, as both gas and total liquid yields increased. | |
| 06/01/2016 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.3.7 | Hydropyrolysis |
| Recent advances in liquefaction technologies for production of liquid hydrocarbon fuels from biomass and carbonaceous wastes | |
| Abstract The liquefaction of biomass and carbonaceous wastes using hydro-pyrolysis, hydrothermal liquefaction or liquefaction using water and hydrocarbon solvents are promising thermochemical methods for producing renewable fuels and chemicals. New combinations of unit operations and possibly novel reactors will likely be required to economically convert biomass feedstock into partially upgraded bio-crudes. While some techno-economic assessments show that biofuels from fast pyrolysis may be competitive with petroleum fuels in future, conventional pyrolysis produces a poor quality bio-crude and is only suitable for dry, homogenous feedstock such as woody biomass, agricultural waste (corn stoves, wheat stalk, and rice husk). It is desirable to produce high-quality bio-crudes and to be able to process high-moisture feedstock such as algae, organic waste (food residues), bio-solids and bio-sludge into transportation fuels using the liquefaction approaches. Increased awareness of the environmental damage from burning fossil fuels is driving national and international reduction targets for on CO2 emissions. Liquefaction technologies aimed at producing alternatives to fossil-based transportation fuels/hydrocarbons are likely to receive continued support in the future and the most promising ones could be developed to full commercial scale. This review provides a summary of the current state of development of these technologies and also some of the challenges faced to develop commercially viable transportation fuels via liquefaction routes. This review compares liquefaction routes and provides a summary of techno-economic analyses where data is available and discusses the challenges and opportunities associated with commercial scale-up. | |
| 11/01/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.3.8 | Hydropyrolysis |
| Recent advances on fast hydropyrolysis of biomass | |
| Abstract Even though hydropyrolysis of biomass has been studied for many years, it was characterized by long residence times and low heating rates. On the other hand, fast hydropyrolysis, the rapid decomposition of an organic material under a hydrogen atmosphere, has been primarily reported only over the last five years. There is growing interest in the topic, and this brief article reviews fast hydropyrolysis of biomass, describing previous findings, current challenges, and research opportunities for the future. The current literature shows that catalytic fast hydropyrolysis produces primarily aromatic hydrocarbons, but alkanes and naphthenes can also be produced under appropriate conditions if a secondary unit is added for hydrotreating (ex-situ upgrading). Compared to catalytic fast pyrolysis, the higher yields of hydrocarbons and much slower catalyst deactivation due to coking promising. Yields in the range of 80–95 gal/t can be obtained, and the process economics is equivalent to those of other biofuel processes, such as fast pyrolysis followed by hydrotreating/hydrocracking. | |
| 07/01/2016 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.3.9 | Hydropyrolysis |
| BUBBLING BED CATALYTIC HYDROPYROLYSIS PROCESS UTILIZING LARGER CATALYST PARTICLES AND SMALLER BIOMASS PARTICLES FEATURING AN ANT | |
|
This invention relates to a process for thermochemically transforming biomass or other oxygenated feedstocks into high quality liquid hydrocarbon fuels. In particular, a catalytic hydropyrolysis reactor, containing a deep bed of fluidized catalyst particles is utilized to accept particles of biomass or other oxygenated feedstocks that are significantly smaller than the particles of catalyst in the fluidized bed. The reactor features an insert or other structure disposed within the reactor vessel that inhibits slugging of the bed and thereby minimizes attrition of the catalyst. Within the bed, the biomass feedstock is converted into a vapor-phase product, containing hydrocarbon molecules and other process vapors, and an entrained solid char product, which is separated from the vapor stream after the vapor stream has been exhausted from the top of the reactor. When the product vapor stream is cooled to ambient temperatures, a significant proportion of the hydrocarbons in the product vapor stream can be recovered as a liquid stream of hydrophobic hydrocarbons, with properties consistent with those of gasoline, kerosene, and diesel fuel. Separate streams of gasoline, kerosene, and diesel fuel may also be obtained, either via selective condensation of each type of fuel, or via later distillation of the combined hydrocarbon liquid.
A method for hydropyrolyzing an oxygenated organic feedstock, the method comprising: (a) introducing the oxygenated organic feedstock and a fluidizing gas comprising hydrogen into a fluidized bed hydropyrolysis reactor comprising a fluidized bed of solid particles, including catalyst, under hydropyrolysis conditions sufficient to generate product vapors from thermal decomposition and hydropyrolysis of the oxygenated organic feedstock; and (b) recovering from the product vapors a product stream containing substantially fully deoxygenated hydrocarbon species, wherein the product stream comprises less than about 4% oxygen by mass, while releasing enough exothermic heat from the deoxygenation reactions occurring during hydropyrolysis of the feedstock to supply process heat required by endothermic processes occurring during hydropyrolysis of the feedstock; wherein the fluidized bed of solid particles has a depth of greater than two reactor diameters and includes lateral inserts selected from the group consisting of obstructions, obstacles, constrictions, and combinations thereof, spaced at axial intervals from about one to about two reactor diameters in a manner such that slugging does not occur within the fluidized bed hydropyrolysis reactor. The method of claim 1, wherein an average particle size of the catalyst is greater than an average particle size of the oxygenated organic feedstock. The method of claim 1, wherein entrained solids exit the fluidized bed hydropyrolysis reactor, the method further comprising separating the entrained solids from a mixture of the fluidizing gas and the product vapors. The method of claim 1, wherein, in step (b), the product stream is recovered by condensation of the product vapors. The method of claim 1, wherein, in step (b), the product stream containing substantially fully deoxygenated hydrocarbon species is recovered following further hydrogenation of the product vapors using a hydroconversion catalyst, in an integrated hydropyrolysis and hydroconversion process. The method of claim 1, wherein the fully deoxygenated hydrocarbon species include hydrocarbons with atmospheric-pressure boiling points consistent with those of at least one of gasoline, kerosene, and diesel fuel. The method of claim 1, wherein the hydropyrolysis conditions include a hydrogen partial pressure from about 200 psig to about 600 psig. The method of claim 7, wherein the hydropyrolysis conditions further include a temperature from about 650°F to about 1100°F. The method of claim 1 wherein the hydropyrolysis conditions include a superficial velocity of the fluidizing gas, sufficient to maintain a bubbling fluidized bed. The method of claim 1 wherein the oxygenated organic feedstock comprises lignocellulosic biomass. The method of claim 1 wherein the feedstock comprises solid particles of an oxygenated polymer. The method of claim 1 wherein the oxygenated organic feedstock comprises a wholly or partially dewatered, high-lipid algae. The method of claim 1 wherein the oxygenated organic feedstock comprises waste organic material of animal origin. The method of claim 1 wherein the oxygenated organic feedstock comprises an oxygenated organic liquid, which undergoes hydropyrolysis in the fluidized bed hydropyrolysis reactor. The method of claim 1, wherein positions of the lateral inserts are varied, in a manner preventing a single, open axial passage extending within the fluidized bed for a distance of more than two reactor diameters. The method of claim 1, wherein slugging in the fluidized bed is prevented via the use of equipment for incorporating the lateral inserts centrally about the interior of the fluidized bed hydropyrolysis reactor. The method of claim 1 wherein upper surfaces of the lateral inserts are at least one of rounded, peaked, and sloped, in order to prevent the solid particles from coming to rest on the upper surfaces. The method of claim 1 wherein upper surfaces of the lateral inserts are porous to allow the passage of the product vapors, in order to prevent the solid materials from coming to rest on the upper surfaces. The method of claim 1 wherein upper surfaces of the lateral inserts comprise abrasion-resistant sintered glass ceramic material. The method of claim 1 wherein surfaces of the lateral inserts are catalytically active and facilitate hydropyrolysis. The method of claim 1, wherein the product stream is recovered in an amount of at least about 24% by mass of the oxygenated organic feedstock. A method for hydropyrolyzing an oxygenated organic feedstock, the method comprising: (a) introducing the oxygenated organic feedstock and a fluidizing gas comprising hydrogen into a fluidized bed hydropyrolysis reactor comprising a fluidized bed of solid particles, including catalyst, under hydropyrolysis conditions sufficient to generate product vapors from thermal decomposition and hydropyrolysis of the oxygenated organic feedstock; and (b) condensing from the product vapors a liquid product stream containing substantially fully deoxygenated hydrocarbon species, wherein the liquid product stream comprises less than about 4% oxygen by mass and is condensed as a separate phase from a primarily water-containing phase, also condensed from the product vapors, while releasing enough exothermic heat from the deoxygenation reactions occurring during hydropyrolysis of the feedstock to supply process heat required by endothermic processes occurring during hydropyrolysis of the feedstock; wherein the fluidized bed of solid particles has a depth of greater than two reactor diameters and includes lateral inserts selected from the group consisting of obstructions, obstacles, constrictions, and combinations thereof, spaced at axial intervals from about one to about two reactor diameters in a manner such that slugging does not occur within the fluidized bed hydropyrolysis reactor. The method of claim 22, wherein in step (b), the product stream containing substantially fully deoxygenated hydrocarbon species is condensed following further hydrogenation of the product vapors using a hydroconversion catalyst, in an integrated hydropyrolysis and hydroconversion process. The method of claim 22, wherein the primarily water-containing phase contains less than 5% by mass dissolved total organic carbon (TOC). The method of claim 22, wherein the liquid product stream is recovered in an amount of at least about 24% by mass of the oxygenated organic feedstock. |
|
| 03/23/2012 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Patent | |
| 2.3.10 | Hydropyrolysis |
| Catalyst for producing hydrocarbons | |
|
1. A process for converting biomass to products comprising: a. contacting the biomass with hydrogen in the presence of a fluidized bed of fresh hydropyrolysis catalyst in a reactor vessel under hydropyrolysis conditions; b. removing products and char from the reactor vessel; c. carrying out the contacting and removing steps for a period of time such that the fresh hydropyrolysis catalyst attrits in the fluidized bed to form small catalyst particles; and d. removing at least a portion of the small catalyst particles with the products and char, wherein the fresh hydropyrolysis catalyst comprises a support and an active metal component and wherein the fresh hydropyrolysis catalyst is an eggshell catalyst having the active metal component located in the outer portion of the support; and wherein the products leave the fluidized bed at an exit bed velocity, the char has a settling velocity that is less than the exit bed velocity, the fresh hydropyrolysis catalyst has a settling velocity that is greater than the exit bed velocity, and the small catalyst particles have a settling velocity that is less than the exit bed velocity. 2. A process as claimed in claim 1 wherein the settling velocity of the char is less than 90% of the exit bed velocity. 3. A process as claimed in claim 1 wherein the settling velocity of the char is less than 75% of the exit bed velocity. 4. A process as claimed in claim 1 wherein the settling velocity of the fresh hydropyrolysis catalyst is greater than 110% of the exit bed velocity. 5. A process as claimed in claim 1 wherein the settling velocity of the fresh hydropyrolysis catalyst is greater than 150% of the exit bed velocity. 6. A process as claimed in claim 1 wherein the settling velocity of the small catalyst particles is less than 90% of the exit bed velocity. 7. A process as claimed in claim 1 wherein the settling velocity of the small catalyst particles is less than 75% of the exit bed velocity. 8. A process as claimed in claim 1 further comprising separating the products to remove the carbon monoxide and light hydrocarbons from the remainder of the products. 9. A process as claimed in claim 8 further comprising passing the remainder of the products to a hydroconversion reactor wherein the remainder of the products are contacted with a hydroconversion catalyst under suitable hydroconversion conditions to produce a condensable liquid hydrocarbon product that has less than 1% oxygen. 10. A process as claimed in claim 1 wherein the small catalyst particles are separated out by a filter and the char is separated by a cyclone. 11. A process as claimed in claim 1 wherein the small catalyst particles are separated out by a filter and the char is separated by a virtual impactor. 12. A process as claimed in claim 1 wherein the small catalyst particles are separated out by a filter and the char is separated by an electrostatic precipitator. 13. A process as claimed in claim 1 wherein at least 60 wt % of the total active metal component in the fresh hydropyrolysis catalyst is located in the outer 50% of the volume of the support. 14. A process as claimed in claim 1 wherein at least 75 wt % of the total active metal component in the fresh hydropyrolysis catalyst is located in the outer 50% of the volume of the support. 15. A process as claimed in claim 1 wherein the active metal component is selected from nickel, cobalt, molybdenum and mixtures thereof. 16. A process as claimed in claim 1 wherein the active metal component is distributed in an outer shell region of the fresh hydropyrolysis catalyst having a penetration depth of 3 to 15% of the catalyst diameter and a remaining center of the catalyst such that the ratio of the average concentration in the outer shell region to the average concentration in the remaining center of the catalyst is in the range of from 1.3:1 to 6:1. 17. A process as claimed in claim 16 wherein the penetration depth of the outer shell region is the minimum depth from the surface of the catalyst at which the active metal concentration lies within plus or minus 10% of the active metal concentration at the geometric middle of the catalyst. 18. A process as claimed in claim 16 wherein the center of the catalyst has a diameter in the range of from 300 to 500 μm. 19. A process as claimed in claim 16 wherein up to 30% of the total active metal component in the catalyst by weight is in the outer shell region. |
|
| 03/06/2018 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Patent | |
| 2.3.11 | Hydropyrolysis |
| Co-processing for control of hydropyrolysis processes and products thereof | |
|
Hydropyrolysis processes are described, in which differing types of feedstocks, including at least one biorenewable feedstock, namely a biomass-containing feedstock, may be co-processed to allow enhancements in operating conditions and/or product properties, depending on changing customer requirements and/or overall market demands. According to specific embodiments, an aliphatic hydrocarbon precursor or an aromatic hydrocarbon precursor is co-processed with the biomass-containing feedstock to enhance an operating condition (e.g., a reactor temperature profile) of the hydropyrolysis process and/or a property (e.g., cetane number) of a liquid product (e.g., a diesel boiling range fraction) obtained from a substantially fully deoxygenated hydrocarbon liquid.
1. A process for producing liquid products comprising: a) hydropyrolyzing a biomass-containing feedstock, and a separate co-feed different from the biomass-containing feedstock, in a hydropyrolysis reactor vessel comprising a deoxygenating catalyst and operating at a hydrogen partial pressure from about 7 barg (102 psig) to about 55 barg (798 psig) to produce a hydropyrolysis reactor output comprising at least one non-condensable gas, a partially deoxygenated hydropyrolysis product and char; b) removing substantially all char particles from the hydropyrolysis reactor output to provide a purified hydropyrolysis reactor vapor stream having reduced char content; c) hydroconverting at least a portion of the purified hydropyrolysis reactor vapor stream in a hydroconversion reactor vessel comprising a hydroconversion catalyst to produce a hydroconversion reactor output; and d) recovering a substantially fully deoxygenated hydrocarbon liquid and a gaseous mixture from the hydroconversion reactor output; wherein the separate co-feed comprises an oxygenated plastic; and wherein oxygen present in the oxygenated plastic is at least partly removed in the hydropyrolysis reactor vessel and a structure of the oxygenated plastic, following oxygen removal, is used to generate aliphatic hydrocarbons or aromatic hydrocarbons in the substantially fully deoxygenated hydrocarbon liquid, wherein the oxygenated plastic comprises poly(methyl methacrylate) or polyamide, and a feed rate of the oxygenated plastic is adjusted in response to a measured or desired change in a yield or cetane number of a diesel boiling range fraction of the substantially fully deoxygenated hydrocarbon liquid, or wherein the oxygenated plastic comprises polycarbonate or polyethylene terephthalate, and a feed rate of the oxygenated plastic is adjusted in response to a measured or desired change in a yield or octane number of a gasoline boiling range fraction of the substantially fully deoxygenated hydrocarbon liquid. <br/>2. The process claim 1 , wherein the hydropyrolysis reactor vessel is a fluidized bed reactor and the hydroconversion reactor vessel is a fixed bed reactor. <br/>3. The process of claim 1 , wherein a poison of the hydroconversion catalyst is removed in the char particles prior to hydroconverting step (c). <br/>4. The process of claim 1 , wherein the hydrogen partial pressure is from about 13.8 barg (200 psig) to about 34.5 barg (500 psig). <br/>5. The process of claim 1 , wherein the deoxygenating catalyst comprises at least one Group VIII metal and at least one Group VI metal on a support comprising a refractory inorganic oxide. <br/>6. The process of claim 1 , wherein the oxygenated plastic is present in municipal solid waste (MSW). <br/>7. The process of claim 1 , wherein the biomass-containing feedstock comprises wood. <br/>8. The process of claim 1 , further comprising removing spent deoxygenating catalyst from a fluidized bed in the hydropyrolysis reactor vessel and replacing the spent deoxygenating catalyst with fresh deoxygenating catalyst. <br/>9. The process of claim 1 , further comprising steam reforming at least a portion of the gaseous mixture, producing reformed hydrogen. <br/>10. The process of claim 9 , further comprising recycling at least a portion of the reformed hydrogen to the hydropyrolysis reactor vessel. <br/>11. The process of claim 1 , wherein steps a) and c) are operated at conditions under which at least about 20% of oxygen in the feedstock is converted to CO and CO2 , following the hydropyrolyzing and hydroconverting steps. <br/>12. The process of claim 1 , wherein the hydropyrolyzing step is exothermic. <br/>13. The process of claim 1 , wherein the hydroconverting step is exothermic. <br/>14. The process of claim 1 , wherein the substantially fully deoxygenated hydrocarbon liquid has a total oxygen content of less than about 2% by weight. <br/>15. The process of claim 1 , wherein the diesel boiling range fraction of the substantially fully deoxygenated hydrocarbon liquid complies with diesel fuel specifications of a minimum cetane number of 41, a maximum water content of 0.05 wt-%, a maximum sulfur content of 15 ppm, and a maximum cold filter plugging point of 12° C. <br/>16. The process of claim 1 , wherein the gasoline boiling range fraction of the substantially fully deoxygenated hydrocarbon liquid complies with gasoline specifications of a minimum motor octane number of 82, a maximum water content of 0.05 wt-%, a maximum sulfur content of 50 ppm, and a maximum benzene content of 3.8 vol-%. <br/>17. The method of claim 1 , further comprising condensing an aqueous phase hydroconversion product from the hydroconversion reactor output. <br/>18. The method of claim 1 , wherein the diesel boiling range fraction and the gasoline boiling range fraction are obtained from distillation of the substantially fully deoxygenated hydrocarbon liquid. |
|
| 04/27/2015 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Patent | |
| 2.3.12 | Hydropyrolysis |
| HYDROPYROLYSIS OF BIOMASS-CONTAINING FEEDSTOCKS | |
|
Various techniques are disclosed for pretreating municipal solid waste (MSW) and other biomass-containing feedstocks that may be of a poorer quality and consequently more difficult, or even impossible, to convert to higher value liquid products ( _e_. _g_., transportation fuels) using conventional processes. Such conventional processes may otherwise be satisfactory for the conversion of the biomass portion of the feedstock alone. The pretreatment of biomass-containing feedstocks may generally include steps carried out prior to a hydropyrolysis step and optionally further steps, in order to change one or more characteristics of the feedstock, rendering it more easily upgradable.
A process for producing liquid products from a biomass-containing feedstock, the process comprising: hydropyrolyzing the biomass-containing feedstock in a hydropyrolysis reactor vessel containing hydrogen and a deoxygenating catalyst, producing a hydropyrolysis reactor output comprising at least one non-condensable gas, a partially deoxygenated hydropyrolysis product and char particles wherein the hydropyrolysis reactor vessel further comprises a sorbent having the capacity to adsorb corrosive species, poisons of the deoxygenating catalyst, or a combination thereof. The process of claim 1, further comprising: removing substantially all of the char particles from the hydropyrolysis reactor output to provide a purified hydropyrolysis reactor vapor stream having a reduced char content; hydroconverting at least a portion of the purified hydropyrolysis reactor vapor stream in a hydroconversion reactor vessel containing hydrogen and a hydroconversion catalyst, producing a hydroconversion reactor output; and recovering a substantially fully deoxygenated hydrocarbon liquid and a gaseous mixture from the hydroconversion reactor output, and the process further optionallycomprising the step of: steam reforming at least a portion of the gaseous mixture, producing reformed hydrogen. The process of claim 2, further comprising the step of: introducing at least a portion of the reformed hydrogen into the hydropyrolysis reactor vessel. The process of any one of claims 2 to 3, wherein at least 20% of oxygen (O) in the feedstock is converted to CO and CO2, following the hydropyrolyzing and hydroconverting steps. The process of any one of claims 2 to 4, wherein the hydropyrolyzing step and the hydroconverting step are both exothermic. The process of any one of claims 1 to 5, further comprising withdrawing a portion of the solid bed material from the hydropyrolysis reactor vessel and contacting the portion with a fluidizing hydrogen- containing gas stream to convert coke and carbon, accumulated on the solid bed material during the hydropyrolyzing step, to methane; and returning the portion of the solid bed material, having a reduced content of coke and carbon, to the hydropyrolysis reactor vessel. The process of any one of claims 1 to 6, wherein the hydropyrolyzing step is performed using a fluidized bed of the deoxygenating catalyst. The process of any one of claims 1 to 7, wherein the sorbent comprises a mineral having a basic anion, wherein preferably the basic anion is carbonate or hydroxide, and more preferably the sorbent comprises calcium carbonate. The process of any one of claims 1 to 8, wherein the biomass-containing feedstock comprises total chloride in an amount from 1000 ppm to 5000 ppm. A process for producing a higher value liquid product from an initial feedstock comprising the steps of: a) pretreating the initial feedstock to produce a pretreated feedstock, wherein the pretreated feedstock has at a least one improved characteristic over the initial feedstock, wherein the at least one improved characteristic is selected from the group consisting of a reduced non-biological material content, a reduced average particle size, a reduced average particle aerodynamic diameter, an increased average particle surface area to mass ratio, a more uniform particle size, a reduced corrosive species content, a reduced deoxygenating catalyst poison content, and a reduced hydroconversion catalyst poison content; and b) hydropyrolyzing the pretreated feedstock in a hydropyrolysis reactor vessel containing hydrogen and a deoxygenating catalyst, producing a hydropyrolysis reactor output comprising at least one non-condensable gas, a partially deoxygenated hydropyrolysis product, and char particles, wherein the hydropyrolysis reactor vessel further comprises a sorbent having the capacity to adsorb corrosive species, poisons of the deoxygenating catalyst, or a combination thereof; wherein pretreating in step a) comprises (i) devolatilization and/or hydropyrolysis of said initial feedstock in a pre-reactor (ii) centrifuging or contacting said initial feedstock with a separating gas or liquid, (iii) contacting said initial feedstock with a solid sorbent, (iv) leaching said initial feedstock by contact with an aqueous solution, (v) physically sorting said initial feedstock, or (vi) _in situ_ remediation to break, or prevent the formation of, particle agglomerates of said initial feedstock. The process of claim 10, further comprising: c) removing substantially all of the char particles from the hydropyrolysis reactor output to provide a purified hydropyrolysis reactor vapor stream having a reduced char content; d) hydroconverting the purified hydropyrolysis reactor vapor stream in a hydroconversion reactor vessel in the presence of a hydroconversion catalyst, producing a hydroconversion reactor output; and e) recovering a substantially fully deoxygenated hydrocarbon liquid and a gaseous mixture from the hydroconversion reactor output, wherein the hydroconversion reactor output of step d) and the gaseous mixture of step e) include one or more contaminant gases generated from the hydrogenation of heteroatom-containing compounds in the initial feedstock, the one or more contaminant gases selected from the group consisting of HCl, H2S, and NH3, the process further comprising: f) removing at least a portion of the one or more contaminant gases from the hydroconversion reactor output of step d) or the gaseous mixture of step e). The process of claim 10 or claim 11, wherein the sorbent comprises a mineral having a basic anion, wherein preferably the basis anion is carbonate or hydroxide, and more preferably the sorbent comprises calcium carbonate. The process of any one of claims 10 to 12, wherein the biomass-containing feedstock comprises total chloride in an amount from 1000 ppm to 5000 ppm. A process for producing a higher value liquid product from a pretreated feedstock, comprising hydropyrolyzing the pretreated feedstock in a hydropyrolysis reactor vessel containing hydrogen and a deoxygenating catalyst, producing a hydropyrolysis reactor output comprising at least one non-condensable gas, a partially deoxygenated hydropyrolysis product, and char particles, wherein the hydropyrolysis reactor vessel further comprises a sorbent having the capacity to adsorb corrosive species, poisons of the deoxygenating catalyst, or a combination thereof; and wherein the pretreated feedstock has at a least one improved characteristic over the initial feedstock, wherein the at least one improved characteristic is selected from the group consisting of a reduced non-biological material content, a reduced average particle size, a reduced average particle aerodynamic diameter, an increased average particle surface area to mass ratio, a more uniform particle size, a reduced deoxygenating catalyst poison content, and a reduced hydroconversion catalyst poison content. The process of claim 14, wherein the pretreated feedstock is obtained by pretreating an initial feedstock to produce the pretreated feedstock, wherein pretreating comprises (i) devolatilization and/or hydropyrolysis of said initial feedstock in a pre-reactor, wherein the pre-reactor is a separate vessel from the hydropyrolysis reactor vessel (ii) centrifuging or contacting said initial feedstock with a separating gas or liquid, (iii) contacting said initial feedstock with a solid sorbent, (iv) leaching said initial feedstock by contact with an aqueous solution, (v) physically sorting said initial feedstock, or (vi) _in situ_ remediation to break, or prevent the formation of, particle agglomerates of said initial feedstock and |
|
| 06/29/2015 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Patent | |
| 2.3.13 | Hydropyrolysis |
| Refractory mixed-metal oxides and spinel compositions for thermo-catalytic conversion of biomass | |
|
1. A process for catalytic thermolysis of cellulosic biomass, the process comprising heating the cellulosic biomass to a conversion temperature in presence of a catalyst system, wherein the catalyst system comprises a mixed metal oxide represented by the formula (X1O).(X2O)a.(X3Y b O4) wherein X1, X2 and X3 are alkaline earth elements selected from the group consisting of Mg, Ca, Be, Ba , and mixture thereof, and Y is a metal selected from the group consisting of Al, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cr, Ga, B, La, P, Ti, Zn and mixture thereof, wherein a is 0 or 1 and b is 0 1or 2. 2. The process of claim 1 wherein the heating step is performed in presence of hydrogen. 3. The process of claim 1 wherein the heating step is performed in presence of steam. 4. The process of claim 1 wherein the thermolysis is performed in presence of recycled gaseous products. 5. The process of claim 1 wherein X1, X2 and X3 represent the same element. 6. The process of claim 1 wherein X1 is a different element than X2 and X3. 7. The process of claim 1 wherein the catalyst system comprises mixed metal oxides represented by the formula CaO.MgO.(MgAl2O4). 8. The process of claim 1 wherein the alkaline earth elements X1, X2 and X3 are selected from the group consisting of Ca and Mg and the metal element Y is Al. 9. The process of claim 1, wherein the catalyst system comprises spinels. 10. The process of claim 9 wherein the spinels have an alkaline earth element to a metal element molar ratio between 1:1 and 10:1. 11. The process of claim 9 wherein the spinels have a X-ray diffraction peaks at a 2- θ angle ranging between 35 ° to 68°. 12. The process of claim 1 wherein the catalyst system comprises transition aluminum. 13. The process of claim 1 wherein the catalyst system acts as a catalyst and as a heat carrier. 14. The process of claim 1 further comprising adding a heat carrier to the cellulosic biomass. 15. The process of claim 1 wherein the cellulosic biomass is contacted with the catalyst system in a pretreatment step. 16. The process of claim 15 wherein the pretreatment step comprises forming a biomass-catalysts system mixture and treating the mixture by thermal treatment, hydro-thermal treatment, torrefaction, mechanical treatment, swelling, steam explosion, precipitation, or combinations of any two or more of the foregoing. 17. The process of claim 16 wherein the step of treating the mixture is performed at an elevated temperature. 18. The process of claim 16 wherein the step of treating the mixture is performed at an elevated pressure. 19. The process of claim 16 wherein the mechanical treatment comprises milling, grinding, kneading or combinations of any two or more of the foregoing. 20. The process of claim 19 wherein the mechanical treatment is performed at an elevated temperature. 21. The process of claim 19 wherein the mechanical treatment is performed at an elevated pressure. 22. A process for catalytic hydropyrolysis of cellulosic biomass, the process comprising heating the cellulosic biomass to a conversion temperature in the presence of hydrogen, and in the presence of a catalyst system wherein the catalyst system comprises a mixed metal oxide represented by the formula (X1O).(X2O)a.(X3Yb O4) wherein X1, X2 and X3 are alkaline earth elements selected from the group consisting of Mg, Ca, Be, Ba , and mixture thereof, and Y is a metal selected from the group consisting of Al, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cr, Ga, B, La, P, Ti, Zn and mixture thereof, wherein a is 0 or 1 and b is 0, 1 or 2. 23. The process of claim 22 wherein the heating step is performed in the presence of an inert atmosphere. 24. The process of claim 23 wherein the heating step is performed in the presence of nitrogen. 25. The process of claim 22 wherein the heating step is performed in the presence of recycled gaseous products. 26. The process of claim 23 wherein the heating step is performed in the presence of carbon monoxide or carbon dioxide. |
|
| 03/10/2011 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Patent | |
2.4 Gasification
Gasification is a process that converts organic- or fossil fuel-based carbonaceous materials into carbon monoxide, hydrogen and carbon dioxide. This is achieved by reacting the material at high temperatures (>700 °C), without combustion, with a controlled amount of oxygen and/or steam.[\[wiki\]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gasification#:\~:text=Gasification%20is%20a%20process%20that,of%20oxygen%20and%2For%20steam.)
Perhaps most importantly, a number of studies on the issue of thermal waste to energy processes including those done by the US Department of Energy , the US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) , and Alameda Power & Telecom have concluded that **conventional, air fed gasification systems provided the most cost-effective and clean form of waste to energy systems.**[\[Paper\]](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280080635_A_Comparative_Assessment_of_Commercial_Technologies_for_Conversion_of_Solid_Waste_to_Energy)
**Input:**
* Gasification process is affected by a number of variables both chemically and physically such as **biomass type, size, shape, porosity, bulk density, ash content**, etc.Among these, moisture content is one of the most important factor affecting gasification, especially in downdraft gasifiers. Arjharn et al.,reported that the 100-kW fixed bed downdraft **gasification was difficult to operate continuously if the biomass feedstockscontain moisture content higher than 20%(w.b.).** [\[Paper\]](http://www.orientjchem.org/vol33no4/the-potential-of-high-moisture-biomass-for-energy-production-using-plasma-assisted-gasification/)
**Product: Syngas (composition of H2, CO, CO2, CH4) depends very strongly on process parameters: reactor, temperature, gasifying agent, feedstock.**
**Process:**
* The gasification technique comprises chemical reaction in an environment which is oxygen-deficient. This process involves biomass heating at extreme temperatures (500–1400 °C), from atmospheric pressures up to 33 bar and with low/absent oxygen content to yield combustible gas mixtures. Gasification process transforms carbonaceous constituents into syngas comprising hydrogen, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, methane, higher hydrocarbons, and nitrogen with the presence of a gasification agent and catalyst. By utilizing this syngas, various types of energy/energy carriers are supplied for examples biofuel, hydrogen gas, biomethane gas, heat, power and chemicals. **It is reported that gasification process is the most efficient technique in the production of hydrogen gas from biomass. Gas composition produced from gasification process varies according to type of gasifier, gasification agent, catalyst type and size of particle.** [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96410-2947495040)
* **Gasification can be done with air, oxygen or steam**, each gasifying agent has their own advantages and disadvantages. There are four types of typical gasifiers utilized for biowaste gasification: **fixed bed, fluidized bed, entrained flow, and plasma gasifiers**. Each type of gasifier has different ranges of acceptable reaction conditions, feedstock characteristics, and ash contents, see [\[Figure 1, ](#image-4397)[2, ](#image-4399)[3\]](#image-4400). **Gasification temperature is one of the most important parameters that impact the product gas quality and process efficiency.** This is because most gasification reactions are endothermic. The incorporation of catalysts leads to an improved gas yield, CCE, GE, and H~2~ content. Further, catalysts are known to be effective at eliminating recalcitrant gasification by-products, such as tar and char.
* Steam is a promising gasification agent that produces a high content of H2 and a high HHV syngas compared with air and oxygen. Although air is readily available, nitrogen dilutes the HHV of the produced gas and leads to difficulty in gas separation. Oxygen is an expensive alternative that produces a medium heating value gas; however, it also leads to difficulty in gas separation.
* The biomass chemical composition, reactor configuration, gasification temperature, and catalyst all work in harmony to selectively isolate H~2~, deconstruct recalcitrant compounds, and produce a high energetic and gasification efficiency. Appropriate conditions and configurations should be chosen based on the biowaste feedstock and the composition and quality of the desired gaseous products.
* Large-scale commercial implementation of biowaste gasification is currently limited to MSW and agricultural residues. The economics of biowaste gasification are highly dependent on the gate fee, electricity generation capacity, and the efficiency of the gasifier.
* Gasification demonstrates net environmental and social benefits in a variety of environmental and social impact categories. However, **the disposal of coke and heavy metals in the solid residue needs to be addressed to mitigate pollution to aquatic ecosystems and the air.**
* The main problems facing the commercial outlook of biowaste gasification include the large amount of tar in the resulting gas, the difficulty in separating individual gaseous compounds, and the deactivation of gasification catalysts due to nitrogen- and sulfur-containing compounds. Solving these three specific issues is crucial for the future of large-scale biowaste conversion.[\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96410-2775722755)
* **Co-pyrogasification of plastics and biomass mixtures, as opposed to separately converting these waste streams, offers several advantages including an improvement in syngas quality and composition (H2/CO ratio) in relation to the desired application, and an easier reactor feeding of plastics.** Furthermore, many studies have shown that co-pyrogasification promotes the conversion of waste to gas rather than char and tar. However, in order to achieve the desired product distribution or syngas composition, operating parameters such as the reactor temperature, equivalence ratio (air or oxygen), steam/fuel ratio and catalyst, have to be optimized. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96410-2793895765)
* **Based on recent studies, the gasification of biomass, gas conditioning, government policies and utilization of fuel gas for heat and power generation applications have been identified as the greatest challenges.** Despite the availability of different gasifier reactors, a highly efficient reactor design is yet to be developed for successful operation and commercialization. Thus, an advanced gasification system with efficient gas conditioning technology can significantly overcome many of the barriers.[ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96410-2620180631)
**Commercial/pilot:**
* Central element of the bioliq process development is the 2–5 MW pilot plant along the complete process chain: fast pyrolysis for pretreatment of biomass to obtain an energy dense, liquid intermediate fuel, **high-pressure entrained flow gasification providing low methane synthesis gas free of tar**, hot synthesis gas cleaning to separate acid gases, and contaminants as well as methanol/dimethyl ether and subsequent following gasoline synthesis. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96410-2559614255)
* Mono-gasification of plastics and its co-gasification with biomass were performed in DFB pilot plant, using olivine as heterogeneous catalyst and heat transfer agent. It was found that co-gasification led to successful thermochemical conversion of plastics as opposed to mono-gasification. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96410-2065979483)
Suppliers
| 2.4.1 | Gasification |
|---|---|
| Co-gasification of biomass and plastics: Pyrolysis kinetics studies, experiments on 100 kW dual fluidized bed pilot plant and development of thermodynamic equilibrium model and balances | |
| Abstract Thermo-gravimetric analysis (TGA) of volatilization reaction kinetics for 50 wt.% mixtures of plastics (PE) and biomass (wood pellets) as well as for 100 wt.% plastics was conducted to predict decomposition times at 850 °C and 900 °C using iso-conversional model method. For mixtures, agreement with residence time of dual fluidized bed (DFB) reactor, treated as continuous stirred-tank reactor (CSTR), was obtained at large conversions. Mono-gasification of plastics and its co-gasification with biomass were performed in DFB pilot plant, using olivine as heterogeneous catalyst and heat transfer agent. It was found that co-gasification led to successful thermochemical conversion of plastics as opposed to mono-gasification. Unknown flow rates were determined applying nonlinear regression to energy and mass balances acknowledging combustion fuel, air, steam, feedstock, but also exiting char, tar, steam and other components in DFB gasification unit. Water–gas shift equilibrium and methanol synthesis requirements were incorporated into gasification model, based on measurements. | |
| 06/01/2014 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.4.2 | Gasification |
| Co-pyrogasification of Plastics and Biomass, a Review | |
| Over the past few decades, the sharp rise in post-consumer plastic and biomass waste has resulted in an ever growing challenge to treat such waste sustainably. Co-pyrogasification of plastics and biomass mixtures, as opposed to separately converting these waste streams, offers several advantages including an improvement in syngas quality and composition (H2/CO ratio) in relation to the desired application, and an easier reactor feeding of plastics. Furthermore, many studies have shown that co-pyrogasification promotes the conversion of waste to gas rather than char and tar. However, in order to achieve the desired product distribution or syngas composition, operating parameters such as the reactor temperature, equivalence ratio (air or oxygen), steam/fuel ratio and catalyst, have to be optimized. Thus, this paper aims to review literature studies on the co-pyrogasification of plastics and biomass by considering various aspects including the process principle, reactors, influence of feedstock characteristics and operating parameters on the products, as well as the synergies observed during the thermoconversion of plastics and biomass mixtures with some reference to coal mixtures when necessary. | |
| 02/01/2018 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.4.3 | Gasification |
| Gasification of biowaste: A critical review and outlooks | |
| Abstract Gasification is a promising technology for reducing the volume of biowaste feedstock. Further, with the incorporation of steam this thermochemical treatment technology also concomitantly produces H 2 , a high value energy. This paper aims to summarize the status of biowaste gasification technology and detail the benefits and limitations of different gasification processes, especially for biowaste. First, we compare steam with other gasification agents (oxygen and air) to understand the specific effects of gasification agents on the resulting gas quality and quantity. Second, influencing process factors (reactor configurations, temperature, steam to biomass ratio, and catalyst incorporation) are evaluated in terms of their impact on the resulting H 2 /CO ratio, gas heating value, gas yield, tar yield, and energy recovery. Third, commercial biowaste gasification applications are detailed and the economics and societal impacts are elucidated. Finally, the current challenges facing the field of gasification and the future outlooks of this technology for reducing biowaste are presented. | |
| 03/01/2018 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.4.4 | Gasification |
| Global challenges in the sustainable development of biomass gasification: An overview | |
| Biomass has proven to be an effective energy carrier capable of fulfilling the growing demand of clean and everlasting energy source for the sustainable development of society. Among different biomass conversion routes, biomass gasification is one of the most promising thermochemical routes for conversion of biomass into gaseous fuel for both heat and power generation applications besides biofuel production through fermentation. But, we are unable to present these gaseous fuels directly for domestic and commercial uses, which indicates the existence of various barriers including the lack of research in this area. In this article, various barriers to the technology, such as challenges with biomass supply chain management, biomass pretreatment, generic shortcomings, gas conditioning and conversion technology have been highlighted. Based on recent studies, the gasification of biomass, gas conditioning, government policies and utilization of fuel gas for heat and power generation applications have been identified as the greatest challenges. Despite the availability of different gasifier reactors, a highly efficient reactor design is yet to be developed for successful operation and commercialization. Thus, an advanced gasification system with efficient gas conditioning technology can significantly overcome many of the barriers. | |
| 12/01/2017 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.4.5 | Gasification |
| Hybridization of sugar-carboxylate-syngas platforms for the production of bio-alcohols from lignocellulosic biomass (LCB) – A state-of-the-art review and recommendations | |
| Abstract Lignocellulosic biomass (LCB), the most abundant renewable feedstock for bioenergy generation, is commonly converted to second generation bioalcohols, the main drop-in fuels for petroleum gasoline, through three technologies based on sugar, carboxylic acid and syngas platforms. The hybridization of either any two or three platforms altogether is a novel concept aimed at improvement of yield and quality (high heating value) of bioalcohols. This article reviews the present status of the integration techniques of hybrid platforms with an overall assessment of their advancement with respect to their individual counterpart as well as the challenges involved. It has been indicated that to extract the maximum benefit of hybridization, research studies should be spurred in the fields of kinetic analysis of all thermochemical and biochemical processes, microbial interaction, optimization of process parameters (pH, temperature), performance analysis of engine for the utilization of mixed product bioalcohols, sustainability analysis through the development of mathematical models for lab-scale operations and process simulation models for large scale units along with life cycle assessment. Moreover, pyrolysis of LCB has been identified as a unique central process for the supply of all intermediate compounds, namely, sugar, carboxylic acid and syngas during the hybrid networking of three platform technologies. In this context, the scheme of CONVER-B, a joint research project under the INNO-INDIGO partnership program, aiming at sustainable integration of the platforms to produce bio-alcohols from LCBs leaving zero effluent simultaneously with carbon sequestration potential has been introduced and discussed. | |
| 11/01/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.4.6 | Gasification |
| Loop bioenergy production and carbon sequestration of polymeric waste by integrating biochemical and thermochemical conversion processes: A conceptual framework and recent advances | |
| Abstract Large volumes of polymeric waste, including natural biomass residues and synthetic waste, motivate the development of a general, robust and flexible process for mining the energy and resources contained in these wastes. By analyzing the positive and negative aspects of current, conventional technologies for the recovery of energy from polymeric waste, an integrated concept of a hybrid technology combining biochemical (anaerobic digestion, gas fermentation, carbon chain elongation) and thermochemical conversion processes (pyrolysis, gasification, hydrothermal carbonization) was proposed. The hybrid technology aims at simultaneously enhancing the efficiency and stability of biochemical conversion, controlling the gaseous and aqueous pollution from thermochemical conversion, and sequestering carbon. This paper presents a detailed review of state-of-the-art research relating to the principles, technical feasibility and practices involved in each technical link between the two conversion processes. | |
| 10/01/2017 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.4.7 | Gasification |
| State of the art of the bioliq® process for synthetic biofuels production | |
| Synthetic fuels from biomass (also referred to as BTL, biomass to liquids) may contribute to the future motor fuel consumption to a considerable extent. To overcome the logistical hurdles connected with the industrial use of large quantities of biomass, the de-central-centralized bioliq® concept has been developed. It is based on a regional pretreatment of biomass for energy densification by fast pyrolysis. The intermediate referred to as biosyncrude allows for economic long-range transportation. Collected from a number of those plants, the biosyncrude is converted into synthesis gas, which is cleaned, conditioned, and further converted to fuels or chemicals in an industrial plant complex of reasonable size. Gasification is performed in a high-pressure entrained flow gasifier at pressures adjusted to those of the subsequently following chemical syntheses. For increased fuel flexibility and conversion of ash rich feed materials, the gasifier is equipped with a cooling screen operated in slagging mode. At Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), a pilot plant has been erected for process demonstration along the whole process chain. The two MWth fast pyrolysis plant is already in operation since 2009; the five MWth gasifier, the hot gas cleaning section, and a gasoline synthesis via dimethylether are to be finished in 2011. Commissioning of that plant complex will follow in 2012. The technology applied in the bioliq® process chain and on the state of construction of the pilot plant is presented. © 2012 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Environ Prog, 2012 | |
| 07/01/2012 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.4.8 | Gasification |
| Techno-economic analysis of a trigeneration system based on biomass gasification | |
| Abstract Biomass is one of the renewable energy sources (RES) with highest potential to contribute to the world's energy needs and can thereby play a key role in the path towards smart energy systems. Smart energy systems aim to integrate all energy sectors to increase the penetration of RES in the energy supply. Biomass gasification is a key technology to fulfil the goal of sustainable RES systems. Its main product (syngas) can be used as fuel, in various conversion technologies, to produce different products, including electricity, heat, cooling, biofuels and chemicals, which makes this technology an important tool for the energy system flexibility. Initially, the present manuscript reviews the relevant studies on the use of biomass gasification in trigeneration and polygeneration systems. Subsequently, it presents a case study that assesses the potential of the use of biomass gasification in an existing Portuguese trigeneration natural gas-fired plant located in Lisboa. The literature review revealed that most of the studies analysed are based on modelling data and not on experimental and/or pilot installations data. These studies show the environmental and energy added value of this type of system but stress the system's complexity and high investment costs. As for the case study, all scenarios considered show a negative net present value; nevertheless, the decrease of the biomass cost or the increase of the natural gas cost can turn financially feasible some scenarios. | |
| 04/01/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.4.9 | Gasification |
| The bioliq process for producing synthetic transportation fuels | |
| Biofuels of the second generation can contribute significantly to the replacement of the currently used fossil energy carriers for transportation fuel production. The lignocellulosic biomass residues used do not compete with food and feed production, but have to be collected from wide-spread areas for industrial large-scale use. The two-stage gasification concept bioliq offers a solution to this problem. It aims at the conversion of low-grade residual biomass from agriculture and forestry into synthetic fuels and chemicals. Central element of the bioliq process development is the 2–5 MW pilot plant along the complete process chain: fast pyrolysis for pretreatment of biomass to obtain an energy dense, liquid intermediate fuel, high-pressure entrained flow gasification providing low methane synthesis gas free of tar, hot synthesis gas cleaning to separate acid gases, and contaminants as well as methanol/dimethyl ether and subsequent following gasoline synthesis. After construction and commissioning of the individual process steps with partners from industry, first production of synthetic fuel was successfully achieved in 2014. In addition to pilot plant operation for technology demonstration, a research and development network has been established providing the scientific basis for optimization and further development of the bioliq process as well as to explore new applications of the technologies and products involved. For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website. | |
| 05/01/2017 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.4.10 | Gasification |
| Waste to bioenergy: a review on the recent conversion technologies | |
| Scientific studies have demonstrated that it is possible to generate a wide variety of bioenergy from biomass residues and waste, and however its cost is not competitive with petro-fuels and other renewable energy. On-going efforts are continued extensively to improve conversion technologies in order to reduce production costs. The present review focuses on the conversion technologies for transforming biomass residues and waste to biofuels, specifically their technological concepts, options and prospects for implementation are addressed. The emerging developments in the two primary conversion pathways, namely the thermochemical (i.e. gasification, liquefaction, and pyrolysis) and biochemical (i.e. anaerobic digestion, alcoholic fermentation and photobiological hydrogen production) conversion techniques, are evaluated. Additionally, transesterification, which appears to be the simplest and most economical route to produce biodiesel in large quantity, is discussed. Lastly, the strategies for direct conversion of biomass residues and waste to bioelectricity including the use of combustion and microbial fuel cells are reviewed. | |
| 12/01/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 2.4.11 | Gasification |
| System and method for production of ultra-pure hydrogen from biomass | |
|
1. An ultra-pure hydrogen synthesis system which comprises: a gasifier; an oils and tars filtration system; a steam generator; a water gas shift reactor containing a catalyst, comprising oxides of copper, zinc and aluminum, that facilitates one or more chemical reactions between carbon monoxide and water in a temperature range of approximately 200° C. to approximately 250° C.; a heat-exchange two-phase water condenser and separator; a liquid-based, bubbling scrubber wherein a liquid contained within the scrubber includes a methanol suspension of copper (I) chloride particles; a hydrogen separator; one or more fluid conduits, wherein the one or more fluid conduits connect to and establish fluid communication between each of the gasifier, the oils and tars filtration system, the steam generator, the water gas shift reactor, the scrubber, and the hydrogen separator. 2. The ultra-pure hydrogen synthesis system of claim 1 , wherein the gasifier is a down draft gasifier. 3. The ultra-pure hydrogen synthesis system of claim 1 , wherein the catalyst of the water gas shift reactor comprises 32%-33% CuO, 34%-53% ZnO, and 15%-33% Al2 O3 and is configured to minimize thermal sintering and occurrence of side reactions when operating at the temperature range of approximately 200° C. to approximately 250° C. 4. The ultra-pure hydrogen synthesis system of claim 1 , further comprising a hydrogen fuel cell. 5. The ultra-pure hydrogen synthesis system of claim 1 , wherein the hydrogen separator is an electrochemical separator. 6. The ultra-pure hydrogen synthesis system of claim 1 , wherein the hydrogen separator is a swing absorption system. 7. The ultra-pure hydrogen synthesis system of claim 5 , wherein the hydrogen separator is a proton exchange membrane based hydrogen purification system. 8. The ultra-pure hydrogen synthesis system of claim 1 , wherein the-oils and tars filtration system is an activated carbon filter. 9. A method of producing ultra-pure hydrogen from biomass, comprising the steps of: feeding a biomass feedstock into a gasifier and using the gasifier to perform gasification and pyrolysis of the biomass feedstock, which converts the biomass feedstock into a syngas product that includes molecules of nitrogen, carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, and hydrogen; outputting the syngas product from the gasifier into an oils and tars filtration system; filtering any oils and tars from the syngas product using the oils and tars filtration system; outputting the filtered syngas product from the oils and tars filtration system; producing water vapor using a steam generator; mixing the filtered syngas product with the water vapor produced by the steam generator to create a syngas-water vapor mixture; feeding the syngas-water vapor mixture into a water gas shift reactor and using the water gas shift reactor to modify the syngas product to create a modified syngas product by increasing an amount of hydrogen gas and decreasing an amount of carbon monoxide, wherein the water gas shift reactor contains a catalyst comprising 32%-33% CuO, 34%-53% ZnO, and 15%-33% Al2 O3 , wherein the catalyst is configured to facilitate a chemical reaction between the carbon monoxide and water vapor and is also configured to minimize thermal sintering and occurrence of side reactions by operating at a temperature range of approximately 200° C. to approximately 250° C. to convert the syngas-water vapor mixture into a gas mixture that includes molecules of hydrogen and other byproduct gases including nitrogen, carbon dioxide, dihydrogen monoxide, and trace amounts of carbon monoxide; outputting the modified syngas product from the water gas shift reactor; feeding the modified syngas product through a fluid conduit and into a heat-exchange two-phase water separator, wherein the heat-exchange two-phase water separator is configured to: condense water vapor from the modified syngas product into liquid water; transmit the liquid water into the steam generator; and transmit the modified syngas product through the fluid conduit and into a liquid-based bubbling scrubber wherein a liquid contained within the scrubber includes a methanol suspension of copper (I) chloride particles and the scrubber is configured to create a scrubbed gas by removing remaining trace amounts of carbon monoxide from the gas mixture; outputting the scrubbed gas from the scrubber; feeding the scrubbed gas into a hydrogen separator and using the hydrogen separator to isolate hydrogen gas molecules from remaining byproduct gases and create ultra-pure hydrogen gas; and outputting the ultra-pure hydrogen gas from the hydrogen separator. 10. The method of producing ultra-pure hydrogen from biomass of claim 9 , wherein the gasifier is a down draft gasifier. 11. The method of producing ultra-pure hydrogen from biomass of claim 9 , wherein the ultra-pure hydrogen is output from the hydrogen separator into a hydrogen fuel cell. 12. The method of producing ultra-pure hydrogen from biomass of claim 9 wherein the hydrogen separator is an electrochemical separator. 13. The method of producing ultra-pure hydrogen from biomass of claim 9 , wherein the hydrogen separator is a swing absorption system. 14. The method of producing ultra-pure hydrogen from biomass of claim 9 , wherein the oils and tars filtration system is an activated carbon filter. 15. The method of producing ultra-pure hydrogen from biomass of claim 9 , wherein a ratio of water vapor to syngas is a 5:1 ratio. |
|
| 04/30/2016 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Patent | |
3. (An)aerobic digestive technologies
BackTechnologies and advances in anaerobic digestion
3.1 Autogenerative high pressure digestion
Conventional anaerobic digestion is a widely applied technology to produce biogas from organic wastes and residues. The biogas calorific value depends on the CH4 content which generally ranges between 55 and 65%. Biogas upgrading to so-called ‘green gas’, with natural gas quality, generally proceeds with add-on technologies, applicable only for biogas flows >100 m3/h. **In the concept of autogenerative high pressure digestion (AHPD), methanogenic biomass builds up pressure inside the reactor. Since CO2 has a higher solubility than CH4, it will proportion more to the liquid phase at higher pressures. Therefore, AHPD biogas is characterised by a high CH4 content, reaching equilibrium values between 90 and 95% at a pressure of 3–90 bar.**
**Highlights:**
* In addition, also H2S and NH3 are theoretically more soluble in the bulk liquid than CO2. Moreover, the water content of the already compressed biogas is calculated to have a dew point <−10 °C. Ideally, high-quality biogas can be directly used for electricity and heat generation, or injected in a local natural gas distribution net. [ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96631-2002182342)
* The two-stage autogenerative high-pressure digestion technique is a novel and promising approach for the production of gaseous fuels or upgraded biogas. This new technique is described in the patent DE 10 2011 015415 A1 and integrates biogas production, its upgrading and pressure boosting in one process. Anaerobic digestion under elevated pressure conditions leads to decreasing pH-values in the digestate due to the augmented formation of carboxylic acid. Model calculations carried out to evaluate the two-stage design showed that the pH-value in the pressurized anaerobic filter has a major influence on the methane content of the biogas produced. Within this study, the influence of the nitrogen content as one of the most important buffering substances on the performance of the system has been tested. **The results show that higher NH4 contents lead to higher pH-values in the digester and as a consequence to higher methane contents. **[\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96631-2022204724)
* However, accumulation of CO2 and fatty acids after anaerobic digestion of glucose resulted in pH 3–5, which is incompatible with the commonly applied high-rate methanogenic processes. Therefore, we studied the use of wollastonite, olivine and anorthosite, to scavenge CO2 during batch AHPD of glucose. Depending on the glucose to mineral ratio the pH increased to 6.0–7.5. Experiments with wollastonite showed that Ca2+-leaching was caused by volatile fatty acid (VFA) production during glucose digestion. **At 1, 3 and 9 bar, the CH4 content reached 74%, 86% and 88%, respectively, indicating CO2 scavenging.** [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96631-2026980254)
* Autogenerative high pressure digestion (AHPD) is a novel configuration of anaerobic digestion, in which micro-organisms produce autogenerated biogas pressures up to 90 bar with >90% CH4-content in a single step reactor. However, at 90 bar of total pressure Henry’s law also predicts dissolution of 81% of produced CH4. Therefore, in the present research we studied whether CO2 can be selectively retained in solution at moderately high pressures up to 20 bar, aiming to produce high-calorific biogas with >90% methane. Experiments were performed in an 8 L closed fed-batch pressure digester fed with acetate as the substrate. Experimental results confirmed CH4 distribution over gas and liquid phase according to Henry’s law, but the CO2-content of the biogas was only 1–2%, at pH 7, that is, much lower than expected. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96631-2007106398)
* The effects of the operating conditions on the biogas quality, and the substrate utilisation rates were evaluated using 3 AHPD reactors (0.6 L); feeding a concentration of acetate and VFA (1–10 g COD/L) corresponding to an expected pressure increase of 1–20 bar. The biogas composition improved with pressure up to 4.5 bar (>93% CH4), and stabilized at 10 and 20 bar. Both, acetotrophic and hydrogenotrophic methanogenic activity was observed. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-96631-1977114676)
* Previous work already showed that working pressures up to 90 bar and >95% CH4-content of the biogas are feasible. This work explores the future potential of AHPD by discussing constraints on the requirement of Acid Neutralizing Capacity (ANC), and the role of mineral addition. Although not the main focus of this work, insights on kinetics and population dynamics are used to support the findings. The fact that a continuous AHPD 1.5 m3 reactor is currently in operation brings the technology very close to practice. [\[Paper\]](https://repository.tudelft.nl/islandora/object/uuid%3A0bbd0066-681f-43f6-bdfd-fdaab5dd77c6)
**Pilot:**
* The height of the high pressure reactor in the pilot plant (4,5 meters) is almost half of the intended reactors in the final installations, so no significant issues are expected when scaling up. In the final installation the reactors will be switched modularly and ranked in boxes of 16 (figure 2). Based on extensive research, ENGIE Services has concluded that ‘the system has proved itself and is ready for up-scaling’. They also have concluded that a fully fletched sewage sludge- and kitchen waste system at a sewage plant of 300.000 population equivalents has a return on investment time of 7 years. The AHPD process is fully automated and runs 24/7 on remote control. To build the AHPD-installations, a consortium of several companies has been set up in which all required expertise is packaged. [\[Bareau Position paper\]](https://bareau.nl/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/AHPD-Position-Paper-English.pdf)
**High pressure digestion:**
* To ensure an efficient use of biogas produced by anaerobic digestion, in some cases it would be advisable to upgrade the biogenic gases and inject them into the transnational gas grids. To investigate biogas production under high-pressure conditions up to 100 bar, new pressure batch methane reactors were developed for preliminary lab-scale experiments with a mixture of grass and maize silage hydrolysate. During this investigation, the effects of different initial pressures (1, 50 and 100 bar) on pressure increase, gas production and the specific methane yield using nitrogen as inert gas were determined. Based on the experimental findings increasing initial pressures alter neither significantly, further pressure increases nor pressure increase rates. All supplied organic acids were degraded and no measurable inhibition of the microorganisms was observed. The results show that methane reactors can be operated at operating pressures up to 100 bar without any negative effects on methane production.[\[Paper\]](https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09593330.2016.1192691?scroll=top&needAccess=true&journalCode=tent20)
Suppliers
| 3.1.1 | Autogenerative high pressure digestion |
|---|---|
| Autogenerative high pressure digestion: anaerobic digestion and biogas upgrading in a single step reactor system | |
| Conventional anaerobic digestion is a widely applied technology to produce biogas from organic wastes and residues. The biogas calorific value depends on the CH4 content which generally ranges between 55 and 65%. Biogas upgrading to so-called ‘green gas’, with natural gas quality, generally proceeds with add-on technologies, applicable only for biogas flows >100 m3/h. In the concept of autogenerative high pressure digestion (AHPD), methanogenic biomass builds up pressure inside the reactor. Since CO2 has a higher solubility than CH4, it will proportion more to the liquid phase at higher pressures. Therefore, AHPD biogas is characterised by a high CH4 content, reaching equilibrium values between 90 and 95% at a pressure of 3–90 bar. In addition, also H2S and NH3 are theoretically more soluble in the bulk liquid than CO2. Moreover, the water content of the already compressed biogas is calculated to have a dew point <−10 °C. Ideally, high-quality biogas can be directly used for electricity and heat generation, or injected in a local natural gas distribution net. In the present study, using sodium acetate as substrate and anaerobic granular sludge as inoculum, batch-fed reactors showed a pressure increase up to 90 bars, the maximum allowable value for our used reactors. However, the specific methanogenic activity (SMA) of the sludge decreased on average by 30% compared to digestion at ambient pressure (1 bar). Other results show no effect of pressure exposure on the SMA assessed under atmospheric conditions. These first results show that the proposed AHPD process is a highly promising technology for anaerobic digestion and biogas upgrading in a single step reactor system. | |
| 08/01/2011 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 3.1.2 | Autogenerative high pressure digestion |
| Effect of substrate and cation requirement on anaerobic volatile fatty acid conversion rates at elevated biogas pressure. | |
| This work studied the anaerobic conversion of neutralized volatile fatty acids (VFA) into biogas under Autogenerative High Pressure Digestion (AHPD) conditions. The effects of the operating conditions on the biogas quality, and the substrate utilisation rates were evaluated using 3 AHPD reactors (0.6 L); feeding a concentration of acetate and VFA (1–10 g COD/L) corresponding to an expected pressure increase of 1–20 bar. The biogas composition improved with pressure up to 4.5 bar (>93% CH4), and stabilized at 10 and 20 bar. Both, acetotrophic and hydrogenotrophic methanogenic activity was observed. Substrate utilisation rates of 0.2, 0.1 and 0.1 g CODCH4/g VSS/d for acetate, propionate and butyrate were found to decrease by up to 50% with increasing final pressure. Most likely increased Na+-requirement to achieve CO2 sequestration at higher pressure rather than end-product inhibition was responsible. | |
| 12/01/2013 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 3.1.3 | Autogenerative high pressure digestion |
| High-Calorific Biogas Production by Selective CO2 Retention at Autogenerated Biogas Pressures up to 20 Bar | |
| Autogenerative high pressure digestion (AHPD) is a novel configuration of anaerobic digestion, in which micro-organisms produce autogenerated biogas pressures up to 90 bar with >90% CH4-content in a single step reactor.(1) The less than 10% CO2-content was postulated to be resulting from proportionally more CO2 dissolution relative to CH4 at increasing pressure. However, at 90 bar of total pressure Henry’s law also predicts dissolution of 81% of produced CH4. Therefore, in the present research we studied whether CO2 can be selectively retained in solution at moderately high pressures up to 20 bar, aiming to produce high-calorific biogas with >90% methane. Experiments were performed in an 8 L closed fed-batch pressure digester fed with acetate as the substrate. Experimental results confirmed CH4 distribution over gas and liquid phase according to Henry’s law, but the CO2-content of the biogas was only 1–2%, at pH 7, that is, much lower than expected. By varying the ratio between acid neutralizing capacity ... | |
| 02/07/2012 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 3.1.4 | Autogenerative high pressure digestion |
| Influence of different substrates on the performance of a two-stage high pressure anaerobic digestion system | |
| Abstract The two-stage autogenerative high-pressure digestion technique is a novel and promising approach for the production of gaseous fuels or upgraded biogas. This new technique is described in the patent DE 10 2011 015415 A1 and integrates biogas production, its upgrading and pressure boosting in one process. Anaerobic digestion under elevated pressure conditions leads to decreasing pH-values in the digestate due to the augmented formation of carboxylic acid. Model calculations carried out to evaluate the two-stage design showed that the pH-value in the pressurized anaerobic filter has a major influence on the methane content of the biogas produced. Within this study, the influence of the nitrogen content as one of the most important buffering substances on the performance of the system has been tested. The results show that higher NH 4 contents lead to higher pH-values in the digester and as a consequence to higher methane contents. | |
| 02/01/2015 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 3.1.5 | Autogenerative high pressure digestion |
| Piezo-tolerant natural gas-producing microbes under accumulating pCO2 | |
| Background It is known that a part of natural gas is produced by biogenic degradation of organic matter, but the microbial pathways resulting in the formation of pressurized gas fields remain unknown. Autogeneration of biogas pressure of up to 20 bar has been shown to improve the quality of biogas to the level of biogenic natural gas as the fraction of CO2 decreased. Still, the pCO2 is higher compared to atmospheric digestion and this may affect the process in several ways. In this work, we investigated the effect of elevated pCO2 of up to 0.5 MPa on Gibbs free energy, microbial community composition and substrate utilization kinetics in autogenerative high-pressure digestion. | |
| 12/01/2016 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 3.1.6 | Autogenerative high pressure digestion |
| Silicate minerals for CO2 scavenging from biogas in Autogenerative High Pressure Digestion. | |
| Autogenerative High Pressure Digestion (AHPD) is a novel concept that integrates gas upgrading with anaerobic digestion by selective dissolution of CO2 at elevated biogas pressure. However, accumulation of CO2 and fatty acids after anaerobic digestion of glucose resulted in pH 3–5, which is incompatible with the commonly applied high-rate methanogenic processes. Therefore, we studied the use of wollastonite, olivine and anorthosite, with measured composition of CaSi1.05O3.4, Mg2Fe0.2Ni0.01Si1.2O5.3 and Na0.7Ca1K0.1Mg0.1Fe0.15Al3.1Si4O24, respectively, to scavenge CO2 during batch AHPD of glucose. Depending on the glucose to mineral ratio the pH increased to 6.0–7.5. Experiments with wollastonite showed that Ca2+-leaching was caused by volatile fatty acid (VFA) production during glucose digestion. At 1, 3 and 9 bar, the CH4 content reached 74%, 86% and 88%, respectively, indicating CO2 scavenging. Fixation of produced CO2 by CaCO3 precipitation in the sludge was confirmed by Fourier Transferred-InfraRed, Combined Field emission Scanning Electron Microscopy-Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy and Thermogravimetric Analysis-Mass Spectroscopy. | |
| 07/01/2013 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 3.1.7 | Autogenerative high pressure digestion |
| Starch hydrolysis in autogenerative high pressure digestion: Gelatinisation and saccharification as rate limiting steps | |
| Abstract Autogenerative high pressure digestion (AHPD) provides an integrated biogas upgrading technology, capable of producing biogas with a CH 4 content exceeding 95% at pressures up to 90 bar. Hydrolysis is generally regarded as the rate-limiting step in the anaerobic digestion of complex organic matter, governing the volatile fatty acid (VFA) production rate for subsequent conversion to methane. Starch hydrolysis rates in AHPD systems were studied and the potential risk for VFA accumulation was assessed. Under the anticipated practical moderate pressure conditions at 30 °C, experimental CH 4 -content of the biogas improved from 49 to 73 ± 2% at atmospheric and elevated pressure, respectively. Furthermore, no significant effect of pressure on the hydrolysis was found. Like under atmospheric pressure, gelatinisation was the rate-limiting step for particulate starch (0.05 d −1 ) and saccharification for gelatinised starch (0.1 d −1 ). Because no effect was observed on starch, an effect on the hydrolysis rate of more complex organic matter like (ligno-)cellulose is also not anticipated. | |
| 12/01/2014 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
4. Fractionation
BackValorisation brought about by fractionation processes
4.1 Acidolysis/hydrolysis
A chemical reaction involving the decomposition of a molecule, with the addition of the elements of an acid to the molecule; the reaction is comparable to hydrolysis or alcoholysis, in which water or alcohol, respectively, is used in place of the acid.[\[Source\]](https://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/acidolysis#:\~:text=acidolysis,in%20place%20of%20the%20acid.)
The main advantage of the acid hydrolysis is that acids can penetrate lignin without any preliminary pretreatment of biomass, thus breaking down the cellulose and hemicellulose polymers to form individual sugar molecules. Several types of acids, concentrated or diluted, can be used, such as sulphurous, sulphuric, hydrocloric, hydrofluoric, phosphoric, nitric and formic acid. [\[Paper\]](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303209676_Hydrolysis_of_lignocellulosic_biomass_Current_status_of_processes_and_technologies_and_future_perspectives)
**Acidolysis/Solvolysis:**
* Raw residual wood biomass, containing cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin, was liquefied at low temperature by ultrasound-assisted solvolysis and acidolysis by glycerol, diethylene glycol and p -toluenesulfonic acid. Liquefied biomass was consequently upgraded by hydrotreatment utilizing heterogeneous catalysis over NiMo/Al 2 O 3 bifunctional catalyst. Effects of temperature (200−350 °C), heating rate (2.5–10.0 K min −1 ), hydrogen/nitrogen pressure (2−8 MPa), mixing (250−1000 min −1 ), hydrogen donor solvent (tetralin) and catalyst contents on deoxygenation were established. The presence of hydrocracking reactions was confirmed by a decrease in product viscosity, and the upgrade for energetic or fuel applications by measurements of calorific value.[ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-97022-1970778330)
* Here we report on a mild lignin-first acidolysis process (140 degrees C, 40 min) that uses the benign solvent dimethyl carbonate (DMC) and ethylene glycol (EG) as stabilization agent/solvent in order to **produce high yield of aromatic monophenols directly from softwood lignocellulose** (pine, spruce, cedar, and Douglas fir) with a depolymerization efficiency of 77-98%. At optimized conditions (140 degrees C, 40 min, 400 wt% EG and 2 wt% H2SO4 to pinewood) up to 9 wt% of aromatic monophenol was produced reaching a degree of delignification in pinewood of 77%.[ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-97022-3008488012)
* This paper integrates acidolysis and in situ hydrogenation of biomass to produce bio-oil featuring a high yield and also a high effective hydrogen/carbon molar ratio (H/Ceff). A catalytic amount of trifluoromethanesulfonic acid (HOTf) is found to be very effective to cleave glycosidic bonds in carbohydrates and β-O-4 bonds in lignin, resulting in the formation of various carbohydrate/lignin-derived radicals. The in situ hydrogenation in the presence of Ru/C and H2 stabilizes the resulting radicals and, thus, prevents their repolymerization. **This HOTf–Ru/C system is applicable to a wide range of feedstocks. Typically, the yield of bio-oil (dichloromethane extract) from pine wood at 160 °C can be as high as 43.2 wt % with a H/Ceff of 1.24, which is high enough to be co-processed in the existing refineries.**[ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-97022-2545564081)
* Hydrolysis of biomass waste (such as fish waste, chicken waste, hair and feather) to produce amino acids was studied in sub-critical water, with reaction temperatures from 180 to 320 °C and reaction pressures from 3 to 30 MPa.[\[Paper\]](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0960852407006621)
* In this study, a new sustainable three-step process for the production of hydrogen has been proposed. **In the first step, a crude formic acid (CF) solution, which included typical reaction byproducts, in particular, acetic acid, levulinic acid, saccharides, 5-hydroxymethylfurfural, furfural, and lignin, was obtained through the combined hydrolysis/oxidation of the biomass, in the presence of diluted sulfuric acid/hydrogen peroxide, as homogeneous catalysts.** In the second one, the distilled formic acid (DF) solution was obtained by distillation of the CF solution, for example, by isolating liquid byproducts, or the lignin-free CF (LCF) solution was recovered by CF filtration for the elimination of only solid lignin particles. In the final step, hydrogen was produced from the DF or LCF solutions through formic acid dehydrogenation over Pd supported on amine-functionalized mesoporous silica catalysts, in the presence of sodium formate, as an additive. The clean hydrogen, which is produced from biomass passing through formic acid, could be applied as an energy source of fuel cells.[\[Paper\]](https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.9b04273)
**Ionic liquids:**
* Significant attention has been historically given to agriculturally derived feedstocks; however, a diverse range of wastes, including municipal solid wastes (MSW), also have the potential to serve as feedstocks for the production of advanced biofuels and have not been extensively studied. In addition, ionic liquid (IL) pretreatment with certain ILs is receiving great interest as a potential process that enables fractionation of a wide range of feedstocks. **Acid catalysts have been used previously to hydrolyze polysaccharides into fermentable sugars following IL pretreatment**, which could potentially provide a means of liberating fermentable sugars from lignocellulose without the use of costly enzymes. However, successful optimization and scale-up of the one-pot acid-assisted IL deconstruction for further commercialization involve challenges such as reactor compatibility, mixing at high solid loading, sugar recovery, and IL recycling, which have not been effectively resolved during the development stages at bench scale. Here, we present the successful scale-up demonstration of the **acid-assisted IL deconstruction on feedstock blends of municipal solid wastes and agricultural residues (corn stover) by 30-fold, relative to the bench scale (6 vs 0.2 L), at 10% solid loading.** By integrating IL pretreatment and acid hydrolysis with subsequent centrifugation and extraction, the sugar and lignin products can be further recovered efficiently. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-97022-2569391245)
* This scale-up development at Advanced Biofuels/Bioproducts Process Demonstration Unit (ABPDU) will leverage the opportunity and synergistic efforts toward developing a cost-effective IL-based deconstruction technology by drastically eliminating enzyme, reducing water usage, and simplifying the downstream sugar/lignin recovery and IL recycling. Results indicate that MSW blends are viable and valuable resource to consider when assessing biomass availability and affordability for lignocellulosic biorefineries. **This scale-up evaluation demonstrates that the acid-assisted IL deconstruction technology can be effectively scaled up to larger operations and the current study established the baseline of scaling parameters for this process.**[ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-97022-2569391245)
* We report a high-yielding chemical process for the hydrolysis of biomass into monosaccharides. Adding water gradually to a chloride ionic liquid-containing catalytic acid leads to a nearly 90% yield of glucose from cellulose and 70–80% yield of sugars from untreated corn stover. [\[Paper\]](https://www.pnas.org/content/107/10/4516)
**Microwave acidolysis:**
* In this paper, three types of lignocellulosic biomass (softwood, hardwood and herbaceous biomass) were processed by **microwave-assisted acidolysis to produce high quality lignin.** The lignin from the softwood was isolated largely intact in the solid residue after acidolysis. For example, a 10 min microwave-assisted acidolysis treatment produced lignin with a purity of 93% and in a yield of 82%, which is superior to other conventional separation methods reported. To assess the suitability of this methodology as part of a biorefinery system, the aqueous phase, produced after acidolysis of the softwood, was characterised and assessed for its suitability for fermentation. The broth contained some mono- and di-saccharides but mainly contained organic acids, oligosaccharides and furans. **This preliminary work demonstrates new protocols of microwave-assisted acidolysis and therefore offers an effective approach to produce high purity lignin and fermentable chemicals, which is a key step towards developing a zero-waste lignocellulosic biorefinery.**[\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-97022-2601982806)
Suppliers
| 4.1.1 | Acidolysis/hydrolysis |
|---|---|
| Bioleaching approach for extraction of metal values from secondary solid wastes: A critical review | |
| Abstract Bioleaching (microbial leaching), being an economical and environmental friendly process, is investigated extensively for metal extraction from secondary solid wastes, viz., electronic wastes, spent catalyst, sludge, slag and fly ash Bioleaching using acidophiles (bacteria and archaea) is routed either by thiosulfate or polysulfide pathways through generation of ferric (Fe III) and sulphuric acid. Other microbes such as the fungi carryout bioleaching by acidolysis/complexolysis (generation of organic acids), redoxolysis and bioaccumulation method. The cyanogenic microbes in particular possess the ability to extract metal(s) by producing hydrogen cyanide. The bioleaching process is achieved by one-step, two-step and spent medium-step in batch mode or by continuous mode reported to be promising on quantitative extraction of various metals (Ni, Co, Mo, V, Fe, Zn, Cu, Cr, Cd, W, Pb and Mn). Enhanced metal extraction can be accomplished by implementing pretreatment methods like, adding a catalyst, prior adaptation of microbes, bioleaching followed by bioleaching or chemical leaching, ultrasound, and also by optimising the process parameters. Additionally, the use of small size waste particles, low pH, low solid concentration and higher operating temperature could also enhance metal leaching to considerable extent. The review compiles extensive studies on treatment of secondary solid wastes employing chemolithotrophs (acidophiles) and organotrophs (fungi and cynogens) for metal extraction. The mechanism of bioleaching, candidate microbes, metal extraction efficiency, operational strategies and process improvement are extensively reviewed, discussed and reported. | |
| 11/01/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 4.1.2 | Acidolysis/hydrolysis |
| Blending municipal solid waste with corn stover for sugar production using ionic liquid process | |
| Abstract Municipal solid waste (MSW) represents an attractive cellulosic resource for sustainable fuel production. However, its heterogeneity is the major barrier to efficient conversion to biofuels. MSW paper mix was generated and blended with corn stover (CS). It has been shown that both of them can be efficiently pretreated in certain ionic liquids (ILs) with high yields of fermentable sugars. After pretreatment in 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate ([C 2 C 1 Im][OAc]), over 80% glucose has been released with enzymatic saccharification. We have also applied an enzyme-free process by adding mineral acid and water directly into the IL/biomass slurry to induce hydrolysis. With the acidolysis process in 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride ([C 2 C 1 Im]Cl), up to 80% glucose and 90% xylose are released. There is a correlation between the viscosity profile and hydrolysis efficiency; low viscosity of the hydrolysate generally corresponds to high sugar yields. Overall, the results indicate the feasibility of incorporating MSW as a robust blending agent for biorefineries. | |
| 06/01/2015 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 4.1.3 | Acidolysis/hydrolysis |
| Efficient Method of Lignin Isolation Using Microwave-Assisted Acidolysis and Characterization of the Residual Lignin | |
| Microwave heating is characterized by high efficiency and selectivity in biomass treatment. Due to the high thermal stability and low polarity of lignin, isolation of lignin by high-temperature microwave treatment is a promising subject for investigation. In this paper, microwave treatment is applied to polysaccharide liquefaction and lignin isolation from softwood at 160–210 °C for 10 min with dilute sulfuric acid. Mass balance/element analysis/FTIR/TG/solid-state 13C NMR/Py-GC/MS are applied to investigate the processed residues (residual lignin). At 190 °C processing temperature, the residual lignin is a material rich in aromatics. High lignin purity (93 wt %) and yield (82 wt %) could be achieved by a simple protocol, which usually takes days or even weeks using conventional milled wood lignin protocols. The Py-GC/MS is applied to check the structure of lignin by a newly developed approach. The liquid phase after isolation is analyzed by GC-MS and liquid carbon NMR. Most chemicals in processed liquid ... | |
| 05/01/2017 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 4.1.4 | Acidolysis/hydrolysis |
| Fast microwave-assisted acidolysis, a new biorefinery approach for a zero-waste utilisation of lignocellulosic biomass to produce high quality lignin and fermentable saccharides | |
| Generally biorefineries convert lignocellulosic biomass into a range of biofuels and further value added chemicals. However, conventional biorefinery processes focus mainly on the cellulose and hemicellulose fractions and therefore produce only low quality lignin, which is commonly burnt to provide process heat. To make full use of the biomass, more attention needs to be focussed on novel separation techniques, where the lignin can be isolated in a high quality suitable for further valorisation into aromatic chemicals and fuel components. In this paper, three types of lignocellulosic biomass (softwood, hardwood and herbaceous biomass) were processed by microwave-assisted acidolysis, to produce high quality lignin. The lignin from the softwood was isolated largely intact in the solid residue after acidolysis. For example, a 10 min treatment, microwave-assisted acidolysis produced a lignin with a purity of 93% and yield of 82%, superior to other conventional separation methods reported. Furthermore, the py-GC/MS analysis proved that the isolated lignin retained the original structure as native lignin in the feedstock without severe chemical modification. This is a large advantage, and the purified lignin is suitable for further chemical processing. To assess the suitability of this methodology as part of a biorefinery system, the aqueous phase, produced after acidolysis of the softwood, was characterised and assessed for its suitability for fermentation. The broth contained some mono- and disaccharides but mainly organic acids, oligosaccharides and furans. While this is unsuitable for S. cerevisiae and other common ethanol producing yeasts, two oleaginous yeasts with known inhibitor tolerances were selected; Cryptococcus curvatus and Metschnikowia pulcherrima. Both yeasts could grow on the broth, demonstrating suitable catabolism of the oligosaccharides and inhibitors over 7 days. In addition, both yeasts were shown to be able to produce an oil with a similar composition to palm oil. This preliminary work demonstrates new protocols of microwave-assisted acidolysis and therefore offers an effective approach to produce high purity lignin and fermentable chemicals, a key step towards a zero-waste lignocellulosic biorefinery. | |
| 01/01/2017 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 4.1.5 | Acidolysis/hydrolysis |
| Hydrotreatment of solvolytically liquefied lignocellulosic biomass over NiMo/Al2O3 catalyst: Reaction mechanism, hydrodeoxygenation kinetics and mass transfer model based on FTIR | |
| Abstract Raw residual wood biomass, containing cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin, was liquefied at low temperature by ultrasound-assisted solvolysis and acidolysis by glycerol, diethylene glycol and p -toluenesulfonic acid. Liquefied biomass was consequently upgraded by hydrotreatment utilizing heterogeneous catalysis over NiMo/Al 2 O 3 bifunctional catalyst. Effects of temperature (200−350 °C), heating rate (2.5–10.0 K min −1 ), hydrogen/nitrogen pressure (2−8 MPa), mixing (250−1000 min −1 ), hydrogen donor solvent (tetralin) and catalyst contents on deoxygenation were established. Reactions of liquefaction products, such as levulinic acid, were quantified based on their functional groups by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, whereas catalyst was examined by scanning electron microscopy, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) and X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD). Chemical kinetics of hydrodeoxygenation (HDO), decarbonylation and decarboxylation were determined by originally developed lumped model, based on reaction mechanisms and pathways, while the external mass transfer resistance proved to be negligible under the applied hydrodynamic conditions. The presence of hydrocracking reactions was confirmed by a decrease in product viscosity, and the upgrade for energetic or fuel applications by measurements of calorific value. | |
| 04/01/2014 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 4.1.6 | Acidolysis/hydrolysis |
| Lignin‐first fractionation of softwood lignocellulose using a mild dimethyl carbonate and ethylene glycol organosolv process | |
| Here we report on a mild lignin-first acidolysis process (140 degrees C, 40 min) that uses the benign solvent dimethyl carbonate (DMC) and ethylene glycol (EG) as stabilization agent/solvent in order to produce high yield of aromatic monophenols directly from softwood lignocellulose (pine, spruce, cedar, and Douglas fir) with a depolymerization efficiency of 77-98%. At optimized conditions (140 degrees C, 40 min, 400 wt% EG and 2 wt% H2SO4 to pinewood) up to 9 wt% of aromatic monophenol was produced reaching a degree of delignification in pinewood of 77%. Cellulose was also preserved as evidenced by a 85% glucose yield after enzymatic digestion. An in-depth analysis of the depolymerization oil was conducted using GC-MS, HPLC, 2D-NMR and SEC providing structural insights into lignin derived dimers and oligomers and the composition of sugars and derived molecules. Mass balance evaluation was provided. | |
| 02/26/2020 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 4.1.7 | Acidolysis/hydrolysis |
| Lignocellulosic ethanol production without enzymes – Technoeconomic analysis of ionic liquid pretreatment followed by acidolysis | |
| Abstract Deconstruction of polysaccharides into fermentable sugars remains the key challenge in the production of inexpensive lignocellulosic biofuels. Typically, costly enzymatic saccharification of the pretreated biomass is used to depolymerize its cellulosic content into fermentable monomers. In this work, we examined the production of lignocellulosic recovery, a process that does not require the use of enzymes to produce fermentable sugars. In the base case, the minimum ethanol selling price (MESP) was $8.05/gal, but with improved performance of the hydrolysis, extraction, and sugar recovery, the MESP can be lowered to $4.00/gal. Additionally, two scenarios involving lignin recovery were considered. Although the results based on current assumptions indicate that this process is expensive compared to more established technologies, improvements in the hydrolysis yield, the sugar extraction efficiency, and the sugar recovery were shown to result in more competitive processes. | |
| 04/01/2014 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 4.1.8 | Acidolysis/hydrolysis |
| Production of High-Yield Bio-oil with a High Effective Hydrogen/Carbon Molar Ratio through Acidolysis and In Situ Hydrogenation | |
| This paper integrates acidolysis and in situ hydrogenation of biomass to produce bio-oil featuring a high yield and also a high effective hydrogen/carbon molar ratio (H/Ceff). A catalytic amount of trifluoromethanesulfonic acid (HOTf) is found to be very effective to cleave glycosidic bonds in carbohydrates and β-O-4 bonds in lignin, resulting in the formation of various carbohydrate/lignin-derived radicals. The in situ hydrogenation in the presence of Ru/C and H2 stabilizes the resulting radicals and, thus, prevents their repolymerization. This HOTf–Ru/C system is applicable to a wide range of feedstocks. Typically, the yield of bio-oil (dichloromethane extract) from pine wood at 160 °C can be as high as 43.2 wt % with a H/Ceff of 1.24, which is high enough to be co-processed in the existing refineries. | |
| 11/17/2016 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 4.1.9 | Acidolysis/hydrolysis |
| Scale-up and process integration of sugar production by acidolysis of municipal solid waste/corn stover blends in ionic liquids | |
| Lignocellulosic biorefineries have tonnage and throughput requirements that must be met year round and there is no single feedstock available in any given region that is capable of meeting the price and availability demands of the biorefineries scheduled for deployment. Significant attention has been historically given to agriculturally derived feedstocks; however, a diverse range of wastes, including municipal solid wastes (MSW), also have the potential to serve as feedstocks for the production of advanced biofuels and have not been extensively studied. In addition, ionic liquid (IL) pretreatment with certain ILs is receiving great interest as a potential process that enables fractionation of a wide range of feedstocks. Acid catalysts have been used previously to hydrolyze polysaccharides into fermentable sugars following IL pretreatment, which could potentially provide a means of liberating fermentable sugars from lignocellulose without the use of costly enzymes. However, successful optimization and scale-up of the one-pot acid-assisted IL deconstruction for further commercialization involve challenges such as reactor compatibility, mixing at high solid loading, sugar recovery, and IL recycling, which have not been effectively resolved during the development stages at bench scale. Here, we present the successful scale-up demonstration of the acid-assisted IL deconstruction on feedstock blends of municipal solid wastes and agricultural residues (corn stover) by 30-fold, relative to the bench scale (6 vs 0.2 L), at 10% solid loading. By integrating IL pretreatment and acid hydrolysis with subsequent centrifugation and extraction, the sugar and lignin products can be further recovered efficiently. This scale-up development at Advanced Biofuels/Bioproducts Process Demonstration Unit (ABPDU) will leverage the opportunity and synergistic efforts toward developing a cost-effective IL-based deconstruction technology by drastically eliminating enzyme, reducing water usage, and simplifying the downstream sugar/lignin recovery and IL recycling. Results indicate that MSW blends are viable and valuable resource to consider when assessing biomass availability and affordability for lignocellulosic biorefineries. This scale-up evaluation demonstrates that the acid-assisted IL deconstruction technology can be effectively scaled up to larger operations and the current study established the baseline of scaling parameters for this process. | |
| 12/01/2017 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 4.1.10 | Acidolysis/hydrolysis |
| Low Temperature and Efficient Fractionation of Lignocellulosic Biomass Using Recyclable Organic Solid Acids | |
|
Methods of fractionating lignocellulosic biomass using hydrotropic solid organic acids are provided. Also provided are methods of forming lignin particles, furans, sugars, and/or lignocellulosic micro- and nanofibrils from the liquid and solid fractions produced by fractionation process. The fractionation can be carried out at low temperatures with short reaction times.
**1**. A method for treating lignocellulosic biomass, the method comprising: dispersing a lignocellulosic biomass in an aqueous solution comprising a hydrotropic solid organic acid, wherein the concentration of the hydrotropic solid organic acid in the solution is higher than its minimal hydrotrope concentration; maintaining the solution at a temperature and for a time sufficient to dissolve at least 10 wt. % of the lignin in the lignocellulosic biomass; and separating the solution and the dispersed lignocellulosic biomass into a spent acid solution comprising dissolved lignin and a water- insoluble cellulose-rich solids fraction comprising water-insoluble lignocellulosic solid residues. <br/>**2**. The method of claim 1 , wherein the temperature is no greater than 100° C. and the time is no greater than 300 minutes. <br/>**3**. The method of claim 1 , wherein the lignocellulosic biomass comprises wood chips, milled wood, commercial technical lignin, or a combination thereof. <br/>**4**. The method of claim 1 , wherein the lignocellulosic biomass is a hardwood and at least 10 wt. % of the lignin in the hardwood is dissolved. <br/>**5**. The method of claim 1 , wherein the lignocellulosic biomass is softwood and at least 10 wt. % of the lignin in the softwood is dissolved. <br/>**6**. The method of claim 1 , wherein the lignocellulosic biomass is commercial technical lignin and the amount of the technical lignin dissolved is at least 2 g/100 g solution. <br/>**7**. The method of claim 1 , further comprising fibrillating the lignocellulosic biomass prior to dispersing the lignocellulosic biomass in the aqueous solution comprising the hydrotropic solid organic acid. <br/>**8**. The method of claim 1 , further comprising precipitating lignin nanoparticles from the spent acid solution. <br/>**9**. The method of claim 1 , further comprising converting sugars dissolved in the spent acid solution into furans and separating the furans from the spent acid solution. <br/>**10**. The method of claim 1 , further comprising mechanically fibrillating the lignocellulosic solid residues to form lignocellulosic microfibrils, lignocellulosic nanofibrils, or a combination thereof. <br/>**11**. The method of claim 10 , wherein the water-insoluble cellulose-rich solids fraction comprises lignocellulosic solid residues and lignocellulosic nanocrystals. <br/>**12**. The method of claim 10 , further comprising separating the lignocellulosic solid residues from the lignocellulosic nanocrystals. <br/>**13**. The method of claim 1 , further comprising converting the water- insoluble lignocellulosic solid residues into sugars via hydrolysis using enzymes or chemicals. <br/>**14**. The method of claim 1 , further comprising recycling the hydrotropic solid organic acid in the spent acid solution back into the aqueous solution comprising the dispersed lignocellulosic biomass. |
|
| 03/18/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Patent | |
4.2 Biphasic systems
Solutions can separate into distinct layers, which can be used for fractionation and reaction purposes. Usually these systems are organic/aqueous, but other biphasic systems have been developed.
For product removal: [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-97054-3005459370)
**Aqueous/organic:**
* Lignocellulosic biomass, such as corn stover, pulp and paper mill waste, and switchgrass, is a readily available feedstock for the production of monomeric sugars and platform chemicals that can then be transformed into valuable organic molecules. However, efficiently fractionating lignocellulosic biomass is difficult due to the recalcitrance of lignin at mild reaction conditions and the reactive sugars/platform chemicals at more severe conditions. **Biphasic systems present a possible solution to creating an economically viable biomass upgrading process since sugars prefer the aqueous phase while the lignin and furans partition to the organic phase.** [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-97054-2890619490)
* **The fractionation of lignocellulose in its three main components, hemicellulose, lignin and cellulose pulp can be achieved in a biphasic system comprising water and bio-based 2-methyltetrahydrofuran (2-MeTHF) as solvents and oxalic acid as catalyst at mild temperatures (up to 140 °C). This so-called OrganoCat concept relies on selective hemicellulose depolymerization to form an aqueous stream of the corresponding carbohydrates, whereas solid cellulose pulp remains suspended and the disentangled lignin is to a large extent extracted in situ with the organic phase.** Economic analysis of the process reveals that the improved biomass loading significantly reduces capital and energy costs in the solvent recycle, indicating the importance of process integration for potential implementation. The procedure was successfully scaled-up from the screening on bench scale to 3 L reactor. The feedstock flexibility was assessed for biomasses containing moderate-to-high hemicellulose content.[ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-97054-1991412117)
* **In this work, corn stalk was treated in a methyl isobutyl ketone (MIBK)/water biphasic system to produce furfural and treated-corn stalk residues.** The results showed that Al(NO3)3·9H2O owned the best property to convert hemicelluloses into furfural in the MIBK/water system. Under the optimal conditions (0.1 M Al(NO3)3·9H2O, 160 °C and 60 min), the furfural yield could reach 52.0%, while only 2.3% hemicelluloses remained in the treated-corn stalk residues. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-97054-3006418174)
* Herein, we proposed a one-pot method for lignocellulosic biomass (poplar) fractionation by acidic water/phenol pretreatment at mild temperature (120 °C). **By this approach, three phases were obtained: water phase containing hemicellulose-derived sugars, phenol phase containing lignin, and cellulose-enriched solid phase.** Up to 90% of original lignin was removed with over 96% original cellulose retained in the solid under the optimized conditions (3.5% acid based on biomass weight, 40% phenol content in water/phenol system, 120 °C, and 1 h). Additionally, 77% of original xylan was recovered from the water phase in the form of xylose, while negligible amounts of byproducts (e.g., furfural) formed due to the mild conditions. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-97054-3002768024)
* Levulinic acid is a platform chemical obtained from acid-catalyzed hydrothermal conversion of cellulose-rich biomass. The low amounts of solid biomass which can be handled in the reactor limit the levulinic acid concentration in the aqueous stream, making the economic viability of the aqueous phase process unsuitable for large scale applications. Now a novel approach to biphasic process has been proposed, where a mineral oil has been used as non-solvent for levulinic acid, thus concentrating it in the water phase, reducing the water volume to be processed downstream but at the same time maintaining enough liquid phase to sustain the slurry processability. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-97054-2803552213)
* 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) is considered as a platform chemical derived from C6 sugars, which can be transformed into various important biochemicals and biofuels. The preparation of HMF in an efficient and green way is of great significance for its large scale production. Attapulgite modified by phosphoric acid (ATP-P) has been used to transform saccharides (fructose, glucose, inulin and starch) into HMF in a 2-butanol-water biphasic system with satisfactory results, in which HMF yields of 96.3% and 50.4% were obtained from fructose and starch, respectively. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-97054-2989762761)
* Within the last decade, interest in using biphasic systems for producing furans from biomass has grown significantly. Biphasic systems continuously extract furans into the organic phase, which prevents degradation reactions and potentially allows for easier separations of the products. Several heterogeneous catalyst types, including zeolites, ion exchange resins, niobium-based, and others, have been used with various organic solvents to increase furan yields from sugar dehydration reactions. In this minireview, we summarized the use of heterogeneous catalysts in biphasic systems for furfural and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural production from the past five years, highlighting trends in chemical and physical properties that effect catalytic activity. Additionally, the selection of an organic solvent for a biphasic system is extremely important and we review and discuss properties of the most commonly used organic solvents. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-97054-2888644556)
**Clean Fractionation (NREL):**
* The National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) developed a method first patented in the late 1990's named “Clean Fractionation” that was further explored more recently. The Clean Fractionation process sought to provide a more energy efficient process that also produces valuable co-products from biomass. The method uses a monophasic solvent that consists of methyl isobutyl ketone (MIBK), water, and ethanol or acetone along with a homogeneous catalyst (typically sulfuric acid) to remove the hemicellulose and lignin fractions while, ideally, leaving the cellulose unreacted. After reaction, the cellulose and other solids that form during reaction are filtered and a modifier (in the case of the ethanol process, water and NaCl), is added to the permeate in order to create a biphasic system. The hemicellulose is recovered in the aqueous layer and lignin partitions to the organic layer. By modifying the Clean Fractionation method and exploring different solvents and phase modifiers, several trends emerged. It can be generalized that more severe reaction conditions favor higher sugar monomer and lignin recovery, but further dehydration and condensation reactions may occur. Lower severity reaction conditions favor cellulose recovery, but significant amounts of hemicellulose and lignin could remain in the cellulose and inhibit the ability of enzymes to produce glucose. Other factors such as the renewability, toxicity, and recyclability of the solvent must be considered and ethyl acetate, n-propanol, and GVL may be better alternatives to MIBK in this regard. [ \[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-97054-2890619490)
**Water/CO2:**
* Sustainably producing concentrated solutions of monosaccharides from biomass is a key challenge facing the conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to biofuels or bioproducts. Most pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis processes are run at low-solid concentration (<10 wt%) and use chemical catalysts, while most high-solids enzymatic hydrolysis experiments are performed with air-dried pretreated materials. **Using optimally two-temperature stage CO2–H2O pretreated biomass substrates (210 °C 16 min, 160 °C, 60 min for mixed hardwood and 210 °C, 1 min, 160 °C, 60 min), high-solids enzymatic hydrolysis reactions were performed in a novel high-solids reaction system.** With this system, twelve “rotating drum” reactors were run simultaneously in a controlled environment. Without additional chemical catalysts or any drying, two-temperature stage CO2–H2O pretreatment coupled with high-solids enzymatic hydrolysis produced monosaccharide solutions of 185 g L−1 for mixed hardwood and 149 g L−1 for switchgrass. These results suggest that CO2–H2O pretreatment is an attractive alternative to chemically catalyzed processes such as dilute acid pretreatment. [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-97054-2126641263)
* A high pressure (200 bar) CO2-H2O process was developed for pretreating lignocellulosic biomass at **high-solid contents**, while minimizing chemical inputs. Operating temperatures ranged from 150 to 250°C, and residence times from 20 s to 60 min. At these conditions a biphasic mixture of an H2O-rich liquid (hydrothermal) phase and a CO2-rich supercritical phase coexist. Following pretreatment, samples were then enzymatically hydrolyzed. Total yields, defined as the fraction of the theoretical maximum, were determined for glucose, hemicellulose sugars, and two degradation products: furfural and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural. **Pretreatment at 170°C for 60 min gave glucose yields of 77%, 73%, and 68% for 20 and 40 (wt.%) solids mixed hardwood and mixed perennial grasses, respectively. Pretreatment at 160°C for 60 min gave glucan to glucose yields of 81% for switchgrass and 85% for corn stover.** [\[Art. #ARTNUM\]](#article-97054-2130190477)
Suppliers
| 4.2.1 | Biphasic systems |
|---|---|
| A novel approach to biphasic strategy for intensification of the hydrothermal process to give levulinic acid: Use of an organic non-solvent | |
| Abstract Levulinic acid is a platform chemical obtained from acid-catalyzed hydrothermal conversion of cellulose-rich biomass. The low amounts of solid biomass which can be handled in the reactor limit the levulinic acid concentration in the aqueous stream, making the economic viability of the aqueous phase process unsuitable for large scale applications. Now a novel approach to biphasic process has been proposed, where a mineral oil has been used as non-solvent for levulinic acid, thus concentrating it in the water phase, reducing the water volume to be processed downstream but at the same time maintaining enough liquid phase to sustain the slurry processability. The work has studied: i) the optimization of the biphasic hydrolysis of corn grain to levulinic acid; ii) the characterization of the recovered oil; iii) the evaluation of the energetic properties of the recovered hydrochar for its exploitation, thus smartly closing the biorefinery cycle. | |
| 09/01/2018 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 4.2.2 | Biphasic systems |
| An Insight into the Valorization of Hemicellulose Fraction of Biomass into Furfural: Catalytic Conversion and Product Separation | |
| The global impetus to produce alternatives for the petroleum-based fuels and value-added chemicals in order to reduce greenhouse gases is currently emphasizing stringent need on the industries to diversify and valorize byproducts. This further aims at the valorization of agroindustrial by-product into furfural. A thorough investigation of research advances particularly, the pretreatment of biomass, a pertinent reaction mechanism in furfural production, separation of furfural and the various used catalysts were explored in the current review. The biomass, which contains fiber, lignin, pentosans, and pith, can be converted into furfural by the application of suitable chemical, biochemical and microbial methods. Dilute acid, alkali and hydrothermal pretreatment methods for hemicellulose separation from the biomass matrix were discussed in detail. Studies on the development of an effective and stable catalyst to overcome the limitation of the existing commercial processes were also reviewed. The strategies including the steam stripping, nitrogen stripping, supercritical carbon dioxide extraction, mono- and biphasic solvent extractions were investigated in this study, as a way forward towards the removal of furfural from the reaction medium, thereby assisting in the avoidance of the product degradation. | |
| 02/04/2020 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 4.2.3 | Biphasic systems |
| An integrated biorefinery process to comprehensively utilize corn stalk in a MIBK/water/Al(NO3)3·9H2O biphasic system: Chemical and morphological changes | |
| Abstract Developing an effective and efficient biorefinery process is crucial for the utilization of biomass. In this work, corn stalk was treated in a methyl isobutyl ketone (MIBK)/water biphasic system to produce furfural and treated-corn stalk residues. The results showed that Al(NO3)3·9H2O owned the best property to convert hemicelluloses into furfural in the MIBK/water system. Under the optimal conditions (0.1 M Al(NO3)3·9H2O, 160 °C and 60 min), the furfural yield could reach 52.0%, while only 2.3% hemicelluloses remained in the treated-corn stalk residues. The cellulose largely remained in the residues, and the glucose yield had an apparent increment by the subsequent enzymatic hydrolysis process (85.5%). Additionally, lignin was the main component of the residues obtained after enzymatic hydrolysis process, which has been degraded to some extent. Moreover, in the morphological aspect, the cell walls swelled evidently and the vascular bundles were broken down. The result of confocal Raman microscopy indicated that there was a severe cleavage of ether and ester linkages between hydroxycinnamic acids and hemicelluloses or lignin, and lignin largely remained during the treatment. In short, the MIBK/water/Al(NO3)3·9H2O treatment process provided an efficient integrated utilization of corn stalk to produce furfural and fermentable glucose for the bioethanol production, and the feasible biorefinery process is beneficial for the environment protection and sustainable development. | |
| 05/01/2020 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 4.2.4 | Biphasic systems |
| Conversion of Sugars and Biomass to Furans Using Heterogeneous Catalysts in Biphasic Solvent Systems | |
| Within the last decade, interest in using biphasic systems for producing furans from biomass has grown significantly. Biphasic systems continuously extract furans into the organic phase, which prevents degradation reactions and potentially allows for easier separations of the products. Several heterogeneous catalyst types, including zeolites, ion exchange resins, niobium-based, and others, have been used with various organic solvents to increase furan yields from sugar dehydration reactions. In this minireview, we summarized the use of heterogeneous catalysts in biphasic systems for furfural and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural production from the past five years, highlighting trends in chemical and physical properties that effect catalytic activity. Additionally, the selection of an organic solvent for a biphasic system is extremely important and we review and discuss properties of the most commonly used organic solvents. | |
| 11/07/2018 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 4.2.5 | Biphasic systems |
| Effective conversion of saccharides into hydroxymethylfurfural catalyzed by a natural clay, attapulgite | |
| Abstract 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) is considered as a platform chemical derived from C6 sugars, which can be transformed into various important biochemicals and biofuels. The preparation of HMF in an efficient and green way is of great significance for its large scale production. Attapulgite modified by phosphoric acid (ATP-P) has been used to transform saccharides (fructose, glucose, inulin and starch) into HMF in a 2-butanol-water biphasic system with satisfactory results, in which HMF yields of 96.3% and 50.4% were obtained from fructose and starch, respectively. The amount of Bronsted acid sites of ATP notably increase after modification by phosphoric acid, which endows ATP with a proper B/L ratio (Bronsted acid sites to Lewis acid sites) for HMF production. This B/L ratio is necessary because the production of HMF from saccharides is a multistep mechanism that involves isomerization catalyzed by Lewis acid sites and dehydration by Bronsted acid sites. Moreover, the catalyst provides good stability because the catalytic activity remained nearly unchanged after it was used 4 times. This work provides a green and economic alternative for biomass conversion using natural clays as catalysts. | |
| 11/01/2019 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 4.2.6 | Biphasic systems |
| Fractionation of lignocellulosic biomass using the OrganoCat process | |
| The fractionation of lignocellulose in its three main components, hemicellulose, lignin and cellulose pulp can be achieved in a biphasic system comprising water and bio-based 2-methyltetrahydrofuran (2-MeTHF) as solvents and oxalic acid as catalyst at mild temperatures (up to 140 °C). This so-called OrganoCat concept relies on selective hemicellulose depolymerization to form an aqueous stream of the corresponding carbohydrates, whereas solid cellulose pulp remains suspended and the disentangled lignin is to a large extent extracted in situ with the organic phase. In the present paper, it is demonstrated that biomass loadings of 100 g L−1 can be efficiently fractionated within 3 h whereby the mild conditions assure that no significant amounts of by-products (e.g. furans) are formed. Removing the solid pulp by filtration allows to re-use the water and organic phase without product separation in repetitive batch mode. In this way, (at least) 400 g L−1 biomass can be processed in 4 cycles, leading to greatly improved biomass-to-catalyst and biomass-to-solvent ratios. Economic analysis of the process reveals that the improved biomass loading significantly reduces capital and energy costs in the solvent recycle, indicating the importance of process integration for potential implementation. The procedure was successfully scaled-up from the screening on bench scale to 3 L reactor. The feedstock flexibility was assessed for biomasses containing moderate-to-high hemicellulose content. | |
| 01/01/2015 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 4.2.7 | Biphasic systems |
| High-solids biphasic CO2-H2O pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. | |
| A high pressure (200 bar) CO2-H2O process was developed for pretreating lignocellulosic biomass at high-solid contents, while minimizing chemical inputs. Hardwood was pretreated at 20 and 40 (wt.%) solids. Switchgrass, corn stover, big bluestem, and mixed perennial grasses (a co-culture of big bluestem and switchgrass) were pretreated at 40 (wt.%) solids. Operating temperatures ranged from 150 to 250°C, and residence times from 20 s to 60 min. At these conditions a biphasic mixture of an H2-Orich liquid (hydrothermal) phase and a CO2-rich supercritical phase coexist. Following pretreatment, samples were then enzymatically hydrolyzed. Total yields, defined as the fraction of the theoretical maximum, were determined for glucose, hemicellulose sugars, and two degradation products: furfural and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural. Response surfaces of yield as a function of temperature and residence time were compared for different moisture contents and biomass species. Pretreatment at 170°C for 60 min gave glucose yields of 77%, 73%, and 68% for 20 and 40 (wt.%) solids mixed hardwood and mixed perennial grasses, respectively. Pretreatment at 160°C for 60 min gave glucan to glucose yields of 81% for switchgrass and 85% for corn stover. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. | |
| 10/15/2010 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 4.2.8 | Biphasic systems |
| Liquid phase conversion of lignocellulosic biomass using biphasic systems | |
| Abstract Lignocellulosic biomass, such as corn stover, pulp and paper mill waste, and switchgrass, is a readily available feedstock for the production of monomeric sugars and platform chemicals that can then be transformed into valuable organic molecules. However, efficiently fractionating lignocellulosic biomass is difficult due to the recalcitrance of lignin at mild reaction conditions and the reactive sugars/platform chemicals at more severe conditions. Biphasic systems present a possible solution to creating an economically viable biomass upgrading process since sugars prefer the aqueous phase while the lignin and furans partition to the organic phase. This review focuses on recent work to fractionate biomass using biphasic reactions as well as monophasic reactions that use biphasic systems to separate products. The use of different biphasic media, heterogeneous and homogeneous catalysts, and reaction conditions are reviewed and trends in isolating the fractions found in biomass are discussed. | |
| 11/01/2018 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 4.2.9 | Biphasic systems |
| Mild One-Pot Lignocellulose Fractionation Based on Acid-Catalyzed Biphasic Water/Phenol System to Enhance Components’ Processability | |
| Effective fractionation and utilization of the three main components (cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin) in lignocellulosic biomass give a significant opportunity for commercial operation of a lignocellulosic biorefinery. Herein, we proposed a one-pot method for lignocellulosic biomass (poplar) fractionation by acidic water/phenol pretreatment at mild temperature (120 °C). By this approach, three phases were obtained: water phase containing hemicellulose-derived sugars, phenol phase containing lignin, and cellulose-enriched solid phase. Up to 90% of original lignin was removed with over 96% original cellulose retained in the solid under the optimized conditions (3.5% acid based on biomass weight, 40% phenol content in water/phenol system, 120 °C, and 1 h). Additionally, 77% of original xylan was recovered from the water phase in the form of xylose, while negligible amounts of byproducts (e.g., furfural) formed due to the mild conditions. The pretreated substrate was enzymatically hydrolyzed to glucose,... | |
| 02/24/2020 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 4.2.10 | Biphasic systems |
| Producing concentrated solutions of monosaccharides using biphasic CO2–H2O mixtures | |
| Sustainably producing concentrated solutions of monosaccharides from biomass is a key challenge facing the conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to biofuels or bioproducts. Most pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis processes are run at low-solid concentration (<10 wt%) and use chemical catalysts, while most high-solids enzymatic hydrolysis experiments are performed with air-dried pretreated materials. Using optimally two-temperature stage CO2–H2O pretreated biomass substrates (210 °C 16 min, 160 °C, 60 min for mixed hardwood and 210 °C, 1 min, 160 °C, 60 min), high-solids enzymatic hydrolysis reactions were performed in a novel high-solids reaction system. With this system, twelve “rotating drum” reactors were run simultaneously in a controlled environment. Without additional chemical catalysts or any drying, two-temperature stage CO2–H2O pretreatment coupled with high-solids enzymatic hydrolysis produced monosaccharide solutions of 185 g L−1 for mixed hardwood and 149 g L−1 for switchgrass. Apart from results obtained with dilute acid pretreated corn stover, these are the most concentrated solutions obtained from biomass pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis without substrate drying. The corresponding glucan to glucose yields were above 80% for both types of biomass. Notably, these high yields were obtained because, similar to dilute acid pretreatment but unlike un-catalyzed pretreatment, our approach produced biomass that did not show decreasing yields with increasing enzymatic hydrolysis solid contents. These results suggest that CO2–H2O pretreatment is an attractive alternative to chemically catalyzed processes such as dilute acid pretreatment. | |
| 01/01/2012 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
| 4.2.11 | Biphasic systems |
| Techno-economic analysis of an integrated biorefinery strategy based on one-pot biomass fractionation and furfural production | |
| Abstract This study evaluates the techno-economic feasibility of an integrated biorefinery for the co-production of furfural, lignin, and ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass (i.e., switchgrass as a model feedstock). The proposed biorefinery is based on a novel one-pot biomass fractionation and furfural production, which is integrated into ethanol production. The one-pot reaction system uses a biphasic solvent comprising aqueous choline chloride (ChCl) and methyl isobutyl ketone (MIBK). Aqueous ChCl is the reaction medium for simultaneous pretreatment and hemicellulose conversion, while MIBK is the organic phase for in situ furfural extraction. Aspen Plus simulation indicates that 49% of total carbon in the feedstock is converted to the target products (i.e., 17.9% to furfural, 16.0% to lignin, and 15.1% to ethanol). The base case has a minimum furfural selling price (MFSP) of 625 $/t, which is about 37% lower than furfural market price. Sensitivity analysis shows that the technical parameters (e.g., reaction temperature, solid loading) have a larger effect on MFSP than the economic parameters (e.g., material cost, installation cost). The techno-economic analysis results suggest that the proposed system is cost-competitive and has low economic risk. | |
| 07/01/2020 00:00:00 | |
| Link to Article | |
Next Steps
Sorry, this functionality is not available in the HTML export of the project.
Do you want access to this functionality? Please sign in to the original project webpage by using this link.